Prostate stent is an option for selected patients who are unsuitable for transurethral resection of the prostate

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) is the gold standard for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urine retention. Some patients are unfit for surgery due to much co-morbidity and need alternative treatment. Intraprostatic stents are one example of minimally invasiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Danish medical journal 2014-10, Vol.61 (10), p.A4937-A4937
Hauptverfasser: Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine, Dahl, Claus, Azawi, Nessn Htum
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A4937
container_issue 10
container_start_page A4937
container_title Danish medical journal
container_volume 61
creator Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine
Dahl, Claus
Azawi, Nessn Htum
description Transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) is the gold standard for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urine retention. Some patients are unfit for surgery due to much co-morbidity and need alternative treatment. Intraprostatic stents are one example of minimally invasive treatment for LUTS. We present our results for 27 consecutive intraprostatic stents. A retrospective chart review of all patients who had received an intraprostatic stent between January 2012 and December 2013 by the same surgeon at the Department of Urology, Roskilde Hospital, Denmark. A total of 27 consecutive intraprostatic stents placed in 25 patients were reported. In all, 14 stents were still functioning at the end of follow-up after a mean 432.5 days. Four patients had died of reasons unrelated to the stent with a functioning stent in situ after an average of 102 days. A total of nine stents (33%) were removed in seven patients after a mean 165 days due to migration in two cases, infection in two cases, incontinence in two cases and retention in three cases. Residual urine was significantly reduced after placement of the stents. 72% of the patients avoided surgery or an indwelling catheter. An intraprostatic stent can be an important option in highly selected patients with considerable co-morbidity who are unsuitable for TUR-P. not relevant. not relevant.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1609102216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1609102216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p281t-d384724fcb3a36cdbe62230694e185e48920bcc0f500f61cb6656ef4b296116d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE9LxDAQxYMg7rLuV5AcvRSSSTq2R1n8Bwt60HNJ0gmttE1NUsRvb9V1Lg-G33sP3hnbAuiykLWsN2yf0rtYDwErKS7YBkqoFILesvklhpRNJp4yTZn3iZuJhzn3YeI-RJ5oIJep5bPJ_Uok_tkFbiLxZUpLn40d6BfM0ayPSLmLZuCR0mr7CQme5474fOq5ZOfeDIn2J92xt_u718NjcXx-eDrcHosZKpmLVlX6BrR3VhmFrrWEAEpgrUlWJemqBmGdE74UwqN0FrFE8tpCjVJiq3bs-i93Lf5YKOVm7JOjYTAThSU1EkUtBYDEFb06oYsdqW3m2I8mfjX_K6lvn8Nk3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1609102216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prostate stent is an option for selected patients who are unsuitable for transurethral resection of the prostate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine ; Dahl, Claus ; Azawi, Nessn Htum</creator><creatorcontrib>Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine ; Dahl, Claus ; Azawi, Nessn Htum</creatorcontrib><description>Transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) is the gold standard for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urine retention. Some patients are unfit for surgery due to much co-morbidity and need alternative treatment. Intraprostatic stents are one example of minimally invasive treatment for LUTS. We present our results for 27 consecutive intraprostatic stents. A retrospective chart review of all patients who had received an intraprostatic stent between January 2012 and December 2013 by the same surgeon at the Department of Urology, Roskilde Hospital, Denmark. A total of 27 consecutive intraprostatic stents placed in 25 patients were reported. In all, 14 stents were still functioning at the end of follow-up after a mean 432.5 days. Four patients had died of reasons unrelated to the stent with a functioning stent in situ after an average of 102 days. A total of nine stents (33%) were removed in seven patients after a mean 165 days due to migration in two cases, infection in two cases, incontinence in two cases and retention in three cases. Residual urine was significantly reduced after placement of the stents. 72% of the patients avoided surgery or an indwelling catheter. An intraprostatic stent can be an important option in highly selected patients with considerable co-morbidity who are unsuitable for TUR-P. not relevant. not relevant.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2245-1919</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25283624</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Selection ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications ; Prostatic Neoplasms - complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Retention - etiology ; Urinary Retention - therapy</subject><ispartof>Danish medical journal, 2014-10, Vol.61 (10), p.A4937-A4937</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25283624$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahl, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azawi, Nessn Htum</creatorcontrib><title>Prostate stent is an option for selected patients who are unsuitable for transurethral resection of the prostate</title><title>Danish medical journal</title><addtitle>Dan Med J</addtitle><description>Transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) is the gold standard for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urine retention. Some patients are unfit for surgery due to much co-morbidity and need alternative treatment. Intraprostatic stents are one example of minimally invasive treatment for LUTS. We present our results for 27 consecutive intraprostatic stents. A retrospective chart review of all patients who had received an intraprostatic stent between January 2012 and December 2013 by the same surgeon at the Department of Urology, Roskilde Hospital, Denmark. A total of 27 consecutive intraprostatic stents placed in 25 patients were reported. In all, 14 stents were still functioning at the end of follow-up after a mean 432.5 days. Four patients had died of reasons unrelated to the stent with a functioning stent in situ after an average of 102 days. A total of nine stents (33%) were removed in seven patients after a mean 165 days due to migration in two cases, infection in two cases, incontinence in two cases and retention in three cases. Residual urine was significantly reduced after placement of the stents. 72% of the patients avoided surgery or an indwelling catheter. An intraprostatic stent can be an important option in highly selected patients with considerable co-morbidity who are unsuitable for TUR-P. not relevant. not relevant.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary Retention - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Retention - therapy</subject><issn>2245-1919</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kE9LxDAQxYMg7rLuV5AcvRSSSTq2R1n8Bwt60HNJ0gmttE1NUsRvb9V1Lg-G33sP3hnbAuiykLWsN2yf0rtYDwErKS7YBkqoFILesvklhpRNJp4yTZn3iZuJhzn3YeI-RJ5oIJep5bPJ_Uok_tkFbiLxZUpLn40d6BfM0ayPSLmLZuCR0mr7CQme5474fOq5ZOfeDIn2J92xt_u718NjcXx-eDrcHosZKpmLVlX6BrR3VhmFrrWEAEpgrUlWJemqBmGdE74UwqN0FrFE8tpCjVJiq3bs-i93Lf5YKOVm7JOjYTAThSU1EkUtBYDEFb06oYsdqW3m2I8mfjX_K6lvn8Nk3A</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine</creator><creator>Dahl, Claus</creator><creator>Azawi, Nessn Htum</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Prostate stent is an option for selected patients who are unsuitable for transurethral resection of the prostate</title><author>Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine ; Dahl, Claus ; Azawi, Nessn Htum</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p281t-d384724fcb3a36cdbe62230694e185e48920bcc0f500f61cb6656ef4b296116d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary Retention - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Retention - therapy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahl, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azawi, Nessn Htum</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Danish medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine</au><au>Dahl, Claus</au><au>Azawi, Nessn Htum</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prostate stent is an option for selected patients who are unsuitable for transurethral resection of the prostate</atitle><jtitle>Danish medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Dan Med J</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>A4937</spage><epage>A4937</epage><pages>A4937-A4937</pages><eissn>2245-1919</eissn><abstract>Transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) is the gold standard for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urine retention. Some patients are unfit for surgery due to much co-morbidity and need alternative treatment. Intraprostatic stents are one example of minimally invasive treatment for LUTS. We present our results for 27 consecutive intraprostatic stents. A retrospective chart review of all patients who had received an intraprostatic stent between January 2012 and December 2013 by the same surgeon at the Department of Urology, Roskilde Hospital, Denmark. A total of 27 consecutive intraprostatic stents placed in 25 patients were reported. In all, 14 stents were still functioning at the end of follow-up after a mean 432.5 days. Four patients had died of reasons unrelated to the stent with a functioning stent in situ after an average of 102 days. A total of nine stents (33%) were removed in seven patients after a mean 165 days due to migration in two cases, infection in two cases, incontinence in two cases and retention in three cases. Residual urine was significantly reduced after placement of the stents. 72% of the patients avoided surgery or an indwelling catheter. An intraprostatic stent can be an important option in highly selected patients with considerable co-morbidity who are unsuitable for TUR-P. not relevant. not relevant.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pmid>25283624</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2245-1919
ispartof Danish medical journal, 2014-10, Vol.61 (10), p.A4937-A4937
issn 2245-1919
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1609102216
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Selection
Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications
Prostatic Neoplasms - complications
Retrospective Studies
Stents
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Retention - etiology
Urinary Retention - therapy
title Prostate stent is an option for selected patients who are unsuitable for transurethral resection of the prostate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T22%3A04%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prostate%20stent%20is%20an%20option%20for%20selected%20patients%20who%20are%20unsuitable%20for%20transurethral%20resection%20of%20the%20prostate&rft.jtitle=Danish%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Skydsgaard%20Schou-Jensen,%20Katrine&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=A4937&rft.epage=A4937&rft.pages=A4937-A4937&rft.eissn=2245-1919&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1609102216%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1609102216&rft_id=info:pmid/25283624&rfr_iscdi=true