Prostate stent is an option for selected patients who are unsuitable for transurethral resection of the prostate
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) is the gold standard for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urine retention. Some patients are unfit for surgery due to much co-morbidity and need alternative treatment. Intraprostatic stents are one example of minimally invasiv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Danish medical journal 2014-10, Vol.61 (10), p.A4937-A4937 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A4937 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | A4937 |
container_title | Danish medical journal |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine Dahl, Claus Azawi, Nessn Htum |
description | Transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) is the gold standard for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urine retention. Some patients are unfit for surgery due to much co-morbidity and need alternative treatment. Intraprostatic stents are one example of minimally invasive treatment for LUTS. We present our results for 27 consecutive intraprostatic stents.
A retrospective chart review of all patients who had received an intraprostatic stent between January 2012 and December 2013 by the same surgeon at the Department of Urology, Roskilde Hospital, Denmark.
A total of 27 consecutive intraprostatic stents placed in 25 patients were reported. In all, 14 stents were still functioning at the end of follow-up after a mean 432.5 days. Four patients had died of reasons unrelated to the stent with a functioning stent in situ after an average of 102 days. A total of nine stents (33%) were removed in seven patients after a mean 165 days due to migration in two cases, infection in two cases, incontinence in two cases and retention in three cases. Residual urine was significantly reduced after placement of the stents. 72% of the patients avoided surgery or an indwelling catheter.
An intraprostatic stent can be an important option in highly selected patients with considerable co-morbidity who are unsuitable for TUR-P.
not relevant.
not relevant. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1609102216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1609102216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p281t-d384724fcb3a36cdbe62230694e185e48920bcc0f500f61cb6656ef4b296116d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE9LxDAQxYMg7rLuV5AcvRSSSTq2R1n8Bwt60HNJ0gmttE1NUsRvb9V1Lg-G33sP3hnbAuiykLWsN2yf0rtYDwErKS7YBkqoFILesvklhpRNJp4yTZn3iZuJhzn3YeI-RJ5oIJep5bPJ_Uok_tkFbiLxZUpLn40d6BfM0ayPSLmLZuCR0mr7CQme5474fOq5ZOfeDIn2J92xt_u718NjcXx-eDrcHosZKpmLVlX6BrR3VhmFrrWEAEpgrUlWJemqBmGdE74UwqN0FrFE8tpCjVJiq3bs-i93Lf5YKOVm7JOjYTAThSU1EkUtBYDEFb06oYsdqW3m2I8mfjX_K6lvn8Nk3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1609102216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prostate stent is an option for selected patients who are unsuitable for transurethral resection of the prostate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine ; Dahl, Claus ; Azawi, Nessn Htum</creator><creatorcontrib>Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine ; Dahl, Claus ; Azawi, Nessn Htum</creatorcontrib><description>Transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) is the gold standard for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urine retention. Some patients are unfit for surgery due to much co-morbidity and need alternative treatment. Intraprostatic stents are one example of minimally invasive treatment for LUTS. We present our results for 27 consecutive intraprostatic stents.
A retrospective chart review of all patients who had received an intraprostatic stent between January 2012 and December 2013 by the same surgeon at the Department of Urology, Roskilde Hospital, Denmark.
A total of 27 consecutive intraprostatic stents placed in 25 patients were reported. In all, 14 stents were still functioning at the end of follow-up after a mean 432.5 days. Four patients had died of reasons unrelated to the stent with a functioning stent in situ after an average of 102 days. A total of nine stents (33%) were removed in seven patients after a mean 165 days due to migration in two cases, infection in two cases, incontinence in two cases and retention in three cases. Residual urine was significantly reduced after placement of the stents. 72% of the patients avoided surgery or an indwelling catheter.
An intraprostatic stent can be an important option in highly selected patients with considerable co-morbidity who are unsuitable for TUR-P.
not relevant.
not relevant.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2245-1919</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25283624</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Selection ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications ; Prostatic Neoplasms - complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Retention - etiology ; Urinary Retention - therapy</subject><ispartof>Danish medical journal, 2014-10, Vol.61 (10), p.A4937-A4937</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25283624$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahl, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azawi, Nessn Htum</creatorcontrib><title>Prostate stent is an option for selected patients who are unsuitable for transurethral resection of the prostate</title><title>Danish medical journal</title><addtitle>Dan Med J</addtitle><description>Transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) is the gold standard for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urine retention. Some patients are unfit for surgery due to much co-morbidity and need alternative treatment. Intraprostatic stents are one example of minimally invasive treatment for LUTS. We present our results for 27 consecutive intraprostatic stents.
A retrospective chart review of all patients who had received an intraprostatic stent between January 2012 and December 2013 by the same surgeon at the Department of Urology, Roskilde Hospital, Denmark.
A total of 27 consecutive intraprostatic stents placed in 25 patients were reported. In all, 14 stents were still functioning at the end of follow-up after a mean 432.5 days. Four patients had died of reasons unrelated to the stent with a functioning stent in situ after an average of 102 days. A total of nine stents (33%) were removed in seven patients after a mean 165 days due to migration in two cases, infection in two cases, incontinence in two cases and retention in three cases. Residual urine was significantly reduced after placement of the stents. 72% of the patients avoided surgery or an indwelling catheter.
An intraprostatic stent can be an important option in highly selected patients with considerable co-morbidity who are unsuitable for TUR-P.
not relevant.
not relevant.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary Retention - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Retention - therapy</subject><issn>2245-1919</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kE9LxDAQxYMg7rLuV5AcvRSSSTq2R1n8Bwt60HNJ0gmttE1NUsRvb9V1Lg-G33sP3hnbAuiykLWsN2yf0rtYDwErKS7YBkqoFILesvklhpRNJp4yTZn3iZuJhzn3YeI-RJ5oIJep5bPJ_Uok_tkFbiLxZUpLn40d6BfM0ayPSLmLZuCR0mr7CQme5474fOq5ZOfeDIn2J92xt_u718NjcXx-eDrcHosZKpmLVlX6BrR3VhmFrrWEAEpgrUlWJemqBmGdE74UwqN0FrFE8tpCjVJiq3bs-i93Lf5YKOVm7JOjYTAThSU1EkUtBYDEFb06oYsdqW3m2I8mfjX_K6lvn8Nk3A</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine</creator><creator>Dahl, Claus</creator><creator>Azawi, Nessn Htum</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Prostate stent is an option for selected patients who are unsuitable for transurethral resection of the prostate</title><author>Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine ; Dahl, Claus ; Azawi, Nessn Htum</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p281t-d384724fcb3a36cdbe62230694e185e48920bcc0f500f61cb6656ef4b296116d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary Retention - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Retention - therapy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahl, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azawi, Nessn Htum</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Danish medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skydsgaard Schou-Jensen, Katrine</au><au>Dahl, Claus</au><au>Azawi, Nessn Htum</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prostate stent is an option for selected patients who are unsuitable for transurethral resection of the prostate</atitle><jtitle>Danish medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Dan Med J</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>A4937</spage><epage>A4937</epage><pages>A4937-A4937</pages><eissn>2245-1919</eissn><abstract>Transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) is the gold standard for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urine retention. Some patients are unfit for surgery due to much co-morbidity and need alternative treatment. Intraprostatic stents are one example of minimally invasive treatment for LUTS. We present our results for 27 consecutive intraprostatic stents.
A retrospective chart review of all patients who had received an intraprostatic stent between January 2012 and December 2013 by the same surgeon at the Department of Urology, Roskilde Hospital, Denmark.
A total of 27 consecutive intraprostatic stents placed in 25 patients were reported. In all, 14 stents were still functioning at the end of follow-up after a mean 432.5 days. Four patients had died of reasons unrelated to the stent with a functioning stent in situ after an average of 102 days. A total of nine stents (33%) were removed in seven patients after a mean 165 days due to migration in two cases, infection in two cases, incontinence in two cases and retention in three cases. Residual urine was significantly reduced after placement of the stents. 72% of the patients avoided surgery or an indwelling catheter.
An intraprostatic stent can be an important option in highly selected patients with considerable co-morbidity who are unsuitable for TUR-P.
not relevant.
not relevant.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pmid>25283624</pmid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2245-1919 |
ispartof | Danish medical journal, 2014-10, Vol.61 (10), p.A4937-A4937 |
issn | 2245-1919 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1609102216 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Middle Aged Patient Selection Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications Prostatic Neoplasms - complications Retrospective Studies Stents Treatment Outcome Urinary Retention - etiology Urinary Retention - therapy |
title | Prostate stent is an option for selected patients who are unsuitable for transurethral resection of the prostate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T22%3A04%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prostate%20stent%20is%20an%20option%20for%20selected%20patients%20who%20are%20unsuitable%20for%20transurethral%20resection%20of%20the%20prostate&rft.jtitle=Danish%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Skydsgaard%20Schou-Jensen,%20Katrine&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=A4937&rft.epage=A4937&rft.pages=A4937-A4937&rft.eissn=2245-1919&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1609102216%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1609102216&rft_id=info:pmid/25283624&rfr_iscdi=true |