Evidence for Unapparent Brucella canis Infections among Adults with Occupational Exposure to Dogs
Human serological assays designed to detect brucellosis will miss infections caused by Brucella canis, and low levels of periodic bacteremia limit diagnosis by blood culture. Recent B. canis outbreaks in dogs and concomitant illnesses in caretakers suggest that unapparent human infections may be occ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zoonoses and public health 2014-11, Vol.61 (7), p.509-518 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 518 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 509 |
container_title | Zoonoses and public health |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Krueger, W. S Lucero, N. E Brower, A Heil, G. L Gray, G. C |
description | Human serological assays designed to detect brucellosis will miss infections caused by Brucella canis, and low levels of periodic bacteremia limit diagnosis by blood culture. Recent B. canis outbreaks in dogs and concomitant illnesses in caretakers suggest that unapparent human infections may be occurring. With more than a quarter of a million persons in occupations involving dogs, and nearly 80 million dog owners in the United States, this pathogen is an under‐recognized human health threat. To investigate occupational exposure to B. canis, we adapted a commercial canine serological assay and present the first controlled seroepidemiological study of human B. canis infections in recent years. 306 adults with occupational exposure to dogs and 101 non‐matched, non‐canine‐exposed subjects were enrolled. Antibodies were detected using the canine D‐Tec® CB rapid slide agglutination test (RSAT) kit with a secondary 2‐mercaptoethanol (ME)‐RSAT. Results were validated on a blinded subset of sera with an additional RSAT and indirect enzyme‐linked immunoassay at the National Administration of Laboratories and Health Institutes (ANLIS) in Argentina. Seroprevalence ranged from 10.8% (RSAT) to 3.6% (ME‐RSAT) among canine‐exposed subjects. Kennel employees were more likely to test RSAT seropositive compared with other canine exposures (OR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3–5.8); however, low seroprevalence limited meaningful occupational risk factor analyses. Two seropositive participants reported experiencing symptoms consistent with brucellosis and having exposure to B. canis‐infected dogs; however, temporality of symptom onset with reported exposure could not be determined. D‐Tec® CB results had substantial agreement with ANLIS assays (Cohen's kappa = 0.60–0.68). These data add to a growing body of literature suggesting that people occupationally exposed to dogs may be at risk of unapparent B. canis infection. It seems prudent to consider B. canis as an occupational public health concern and encourage the development of serological assays to detect human B. canis infections. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/zph.12102 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1609098033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3452199481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4152-121c7b8d4ca6c282bc3c9c4e3ee31502dcfe18c52f271e416222fe7e1a8ae6183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10Mtu1DAUBuAIgegFFrwAWGIDi7Q-duzYy9IObcVAETBCYmN5nJNp2kwc7KQXnh63mXaBhDe25M-_jv8sewV0D9La_9Of7wEDyp5k26Akzxkv1dPNGbTQW9lOjBeUCqFp-TzbYkUpADRsZ3Z21VTYOSS1D2TR2b63AbuBfAijw7a1xNmuieS0q9ENje8isWvfrchBNbZDJNfNcE7OnBt7e3drWzK76X0cA5LBkyO_ii-yZ7VtI77c7LvZ4uPsx-FJPj87Pj08mOeuAMHyNL8rl6oqnJWOKbZ03GlXIEfkICirXI2gnGA1KwELkIyxGksEqyxKUHw3ezfl9sH_HjEOZt3E-y906MdoQFJNtaKcJ_r2H3rhx5CGT0ooSaXQSiT1flIu-BgD1qYPzdqGWwPU3PVuUu_mvvdkX28Sx-Uaq0f5UHQC-xO4blq8_X-S-fX15CEyn140ccCbxxc2XBpZ8lKYn1-OjZ5_OuKf-Tcjk38z-dp6Y1ehiWbxndHUHaVKCyj4X73YpFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1586065985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence for Unapparent Brucella canis Infections among Adults with Occupational Exposure to Dogs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Krueger, W. S ; Lucero, N. E ; Brower, A ; Heil, G. L ; Gray, G. C</creator><creatorcontrib>Krueger, W. S ; Lucero, N. E ; Brower, A ; Heil, G. L ; Gray, G. C</creatorcontrib><description>Human serological assays designed to detect brucellosis will miss infections caused by Brucella canis, and low levels of periodic bacteremia limit diagnosis by blood culture. Recent B. canis outbreaks in dogs and concomitant illnesses in caretakers suggest that unapparent human infections may be occurring. With more than a quarter of a million persons in occupations involving dogs, and nearly 80 million dog owners in the United States, this pathogen is an under‐recognized human health threat. To investigate occupational exposure to B. canis, we adapted a commercial canine serological assay and present the first controlled seroepidemiological study of human B. canis infections in recent years. 306 adults with occupational exposure to dogs and 101 non‐matched, non‐canine‐exposed subjects were enrolled. Antibodies were detected using the canine D‐Tec® CB rapid slide agglutination test (RSAT) kit with a secondary 2‐mercaptoethanol (ME)‐RSAT. Results were validated on a blinded subset of sera with an additional RSAT and indirect enzyme‐linked immunoassay at the National Administration of Laboratories and Health Institutes (ANLIS) in Argentina. Seroprevalence ranged from 10.8% (RSAT) to 3.6% (ME‐RSAT) among canine‐exposed subjects. Kennel employees were more likely to test RSAT seropositive compared with other canine exposures (OR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3–5.8); however, low seroprevalence limited meaningful occupational risk factor analyses. Two seropositive participants reported experiencing symptoms consistent with brucellosis and having exposure to B. canis‐infected dogs; however, temporality of symptom onset with reported exposure could not be determined. D‐Tec® CB results had substantial agreement with ANLIS assays (Cohen's kappa = 0.60–0.68). These data add to a growing body of literature suggesting that people occupationally exposed to dogs may be at risk of unapparent B. canis infection. It seems prudent to consider B. canis as an occupational public health concern and encourage the development of serological assays to detect human B. canis infections.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-1959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/zph.12102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24751191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Blackwell Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; adults ; Aged ; agglutination tests ; Animals ; antibodies ; Antibodies, Bacterial - blood ; bacteremia ; Bacterial infections ; blood ; Brucella canis - isolation & purification ; Brucella melitensis biovar Canis ; Brucellosis ; Brucellosis - blood ; Brucellosis - epidemiology ; Case-Control Studies ; communicable diseases ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Dog Diseases - epidemiology ; Dog Diseases - microbiology ; Dogs ; emerging ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Female ; Florida - epidemiology ; human diseases ; human health ; human resources ; Humans ; immunoassays ; Iowa - epidemiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; occupational exposure ; Occupational Exposure - adverse effects ; occupations ; pathogens ; people ; public health ; Reproducibility of Results ; risk ; Risk Factors ; Seroepidemiologic Studies ; serological surveys ; seroprevalence ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult ; Zoonoses ; Zoonoses - blood ; Zoonoses - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Zoonoses and public health, 2014-11, Vol.61 (7), p.509-518</ispartof><rights>2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4152-121c7b8d4ca6c282bc3c9c4e3ee31502dcfe18c52f271e416222fe7e1a8ae6183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4152-121c7b8d4ca6c282bc3c9c4e3ee31502dcfe18c52f271e416222fe7e1a8ae6183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fzph.12102$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fzph.12102$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24751191$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krueger, W. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucero, N. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brower, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heil, G. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, G. C</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence for Unapparent Brucella canis Infections among Adults with Occupational Exposure to Dogs</title><title>Zoonoses and public health</title><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><description>Human serological assays designed to detect brucellosis will miss infections caused by Brucella canis, and low levels of periodic bacteremia limit diagnosis by blood culture. Recent B. canis outbreaks in dogs and concomitant illnesses in caretakers suggest that unapparent human infections may be occurring. With more than a quarter of a million persons in occupations involving dogs, and nearly 80 million dog owners in the United States, this pathogen is an under‐recognized human health threat. To investigate occupational exposure to B. canis, we adapted a commercial canine serological assay and present the first controlled seroepidemiological study of human B. canis infections in recent years. 306 adults with occupational exposure to dogs and 101 non‐matched, non‐canine‐exposed subjects were enrolled. Antibodies were detected using the canine D‐Tec® CB rapid slide agglutination test (RSAT) kit with a secondary 2‐mercaptoethanol (ME)‐RSAT. Results were validated on a blinded subset of sera with an additional RSAT and indirect enzyme‐linked immunoassay at the National Administration of Laboratories and Health Institutes (ANLIS) in Argentina. Seroprevalence ranged from 10.8% (RSAT) to 3.6% (ME‐RSAT) among canine‐exposed subjects. Kennel employees were more likely to test RSAT seropositive compared with other canine exposures (OR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3–5.8); however, low seroprevalence limited meaningful occupational risk factor analyses. Two seropositive participants reported experiencing symptoms consistent with brucellosis and having exposure to B. canis‐infected dogs; however, temporality of symptom onset with reported exposure could not be determined. D‐Tec® CB results had substantial agreement with ANLIS assays (Cohen's kappa = 0.60–0.68). These data add to a growing body of literature suggesting that people occupationally exposed to dogs may be at risk of unapparent B. canis infection. It seems prudent to consider B. canis as an occupational public health concern and encourage the development of serological assays to detect human B. canis infections.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>agglutination tests</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>antibodies</subject><subject>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</subject><subject>bacteremia</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>blood</subject><subject>Brucella canis - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Brucella melitensis biovar Canis</subject><subject>Brucellosis</subject><subject>Brucellosis - blood</subject><subject>Brucellosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>communicable diseases</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>emerging</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Florida - epidemiology</subject><subject>human diseases</subject><subject>human health</subject><subject>human resources</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>immunoassays</subject><subject>Iowa - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>occupational exposure</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>occupations</subject><subject>pathogens</subject><subject>people</subject><subject>public health</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Seroepidemiologic Studies</subject><subject>serological surveys</subject><subject>seroprevalence</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><subject>Zoonoses - blood</subject><subject>Zoonoses - epidemiology</subject><issn>1863-1959</issn><issn>1863-2378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10Mtu1DAUBuAIgegFFrwAWGIDi7Q-duzYy9IObcVAETBCYmN5nJNp2kwc7KQXnh63mXaBhDe25M-_jv8sewV0D9La_9Of7wEDyp5k26Akzxkv1dPNGbTQW9lOjBeUCqFp-TzbYkUpADRsZ3Z21VTYOSS1D2TR2b63AbuBfAijw7a1xNmuieS0q9ENje8isWvfrchBNbZDJNfNcE7OnBt7e3drWzK76X0cA5LBkyO_ii-yZ7VtI77c7LvZ4uPsx-FJPj87Pj08mOeuAMHyNL8rl6oqnJWOKbZ03GlXIEfkICirXI2gnGA1KwELkIyxGksEqyxKUHw3ezfl9sH_HjEOZt3E-y906MdoQFJNtaKcJ_r2H3rhx5CGT0ooSaXQSiT1flIu-BgD1qYPzdqGWwPU3PVuUu_mvvdkX28Sx-Uaq0f5UHQC-xO4blq8_X-S-fX15CEyn140ccCbxxc2XBpZ8lKYn1-OjZ5_OuKf-Tcjk38z-dp6Y1ehiWbxndHUHaVKCyj4X73YpFQ</recordid><startdate>201411</startdate><enddate>201411</enddate><creator>Krueger, W. S</creator><creator>Lucero, N. E</creator><creator>Brower, A</creator><creator>Heil, G. L</creator><creator>Gray, G. C</creator><general>Blackwell Verlag</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201411</creationdate><title>Evidence for Unapparent Brucella canis Infections among Adults with Occupational Exposure to Dogs</title><author>Krueger, W. S ; Lucero, N. E ; Brower, A ; Heil, G. L ; Gray, G. C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4152-121c7b8d4ca6c282bc3c9c4e3ee31502dcfe18c52f271e416222fe7e1a8ae6183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>agglutination tests</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>antibodies</topic><topic>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</topic><topic>bacteremia</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>blood</topic><topic>Brucella canis - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Brucella melitensis biovar Canis</topic><topic>Brucellosis</topic><topic>Brucellosis - blood</topic><topic>Brucellosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>communicable diseases</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>emerging</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Florida - epidemiology</topic><topic>human diseases</topic><topic>human health</topic><topic>human resources</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>immunoassays</topic><topic>Iowa - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>occupational exposure</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>occupations</topic><topic>pathogens</topic><topic>people</topic><topic>public health</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Seroepidemiologic Studies</topic><topic>serological surveys</topic><topic>seroprevalence</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><topic>Zoonoses - blood</topic><topic>Zoonoses - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krueger, W. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucero, N. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brower, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heil, G. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, G. C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krueger, W. S</au><au>Lucero, N. E</au><au>Brower, A</au><au>Heil, G. L</au><au>Gray, G. C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence for Unapparent Brucella canis Infections among Adults with Occupational Exposure to Dogs</atitle><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><date>2014-11</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>509-518</pages><issn>1863-1959</issn><eissn>1863-2378</eissn><abstract>Human serological assays designed to detect brucellosis will miss infections caused by Brucella canis, and low levels of periodic bacteremia limit diagnosis by blood culture. Recent B. canis outbreaks in dogs and concomitant illnesses in caretakers suggest that unapparent human infections may be occurring. With more than a quarter of a million persons in occupations involving dogs, and nearly 80 million dog owners in the United States, this pathogen is an under‐recognized human health threat. To investigate occupational exposure to B. canis, we adapted a commercial canine serological assay and present the first controlled seroepidemiological study of human B. canis infections in recent years. 306 adults with occupational exposure to dogs and 101 non‐matched, non‐canine‐exposed subjects were enrolled. Antibodies were detected using the canine D‐Tec® CB rapid slide agglutination test (RSAT) kit with a secondary 2‐mercaptoethanol (ME)‐RSAT. Results were validated on a blinded subset of sera with an additional RSAT and indirect enzyme‐linked immunoassay at the National Administration of Laboratories and Health Institutes (ANLIS) in Argentina. Seroprevalence ranged from 10.8% (RSAT) to 3.6% (ME‐RSAT) among canine‐exposed subjects. Kennel employees were more likely to test RSAT seropositive compared with other canine exposures (OR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3–5.8); however, low seroprevalence limited meaningful occupational risk factor analyses. Two seropositive participants reported experiencing symptoms consistent with brucellosis and having exposure to B. canis‐infected dogs; however, temporality of symptom onset with reported exposure could not be determined. D‐Tec® CB results had substantial agreement with ANLIS assays (Cohen's kappa = 0.60–0.68). These data add to a growing body of literature suggesting that people occupationally exposed to dogs may be at risk of unapparent B. canis infection. It seems prudent to consider B. canis as an occupational public health concern and encourage the development of serological assays to detect human B. canis infections.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Blackwell Verlag</pub><pmid>24751191</pmid><doi>10.1111/zph.12102</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1863-1959 |
ispartof | Zoonoses and public health, 2014-11, Vol.61 (7), p.509-518 |
issn | 1863-1959 1863-2378 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1609098033 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult adults Aged agglutination tests Animals antibodies Antibodies, Bacterial - blood bacteremia Bacterial infections blood Brucella canis - isolation & purification Brucella melitensis biovar Canis Brucellosis Brucellosis - blood Brucellosis - epidemiology Case-Control Studies communicable diseases Cross-Sectional Studies Dog Diseases - epidemiology Dog Diseases - microbiology Dogs emerging Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Female Florida - epidemiology human diseases human health human resources Humans immunoassays Iowa - epidemiology Male Middle Aged occupational exposure Occupational Exposure - adverse effects occupations pathogens people public health Reproducibility of Results risk Risk Factors Seroepidemiologic Studies serological surveys seroprevalence Surveys and Questionnaires Young Adult Zoonoses Zoonoses - blood Zoonoses - epidemiology |
title | Evidence for Unapparent Brucella canis Infections among Adults with Occupational Exposure to Dogs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A28%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20for%20Unapparent%20Brucella%20canis%20Infections%20among%20Adults%20with%20Occupational%20Exposure%20to%20Dogs&rft.jtitle=Zoonoses%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Krueger,%20W.%20S&rft.date=2014-11&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=509-518&rft.issn=1863-1959&rft.eissn=1863-2378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/zph.12102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3452199481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1586065985&rft_id=info:pmid/24751191&rfr_iscdi=true |