Evidence for Unapparent Brucella canis Infections among Adults with Occupational Exposure to Dogs

Human serological assays designed to detect brucellosis will miss infections caused by Brucella canis, and low levels of periodic bacteremia limit diagnosis by blood culture. Recent B. canis outbreaks in dogs and concomitant illnesses in caretakers suggest that unapparent human infections may be occ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zoonoses and public health 2014-11, Vol.61 (7), p.509-518
Hauptverfasser: Krueger, W. S, Lucero, N. E, Brower, A, Heil, G. L, Gray, G. C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 518
container_issue 7
container_start_page 509
container_title Zoonoses and public health
container_volume 61
creator Krueger, W. S
Lucero, N. E
Brower, A
Heil, G. L
Gray, G. C
description Human serological assays designed to detect brucellosis will miss infections caused by Brucella canis, and low levels of periodic bacteremia limit diagnosis by blood culture. Recent B. canis outbreaks in dogs and concomitant illnesses in caretakers suggest that unapparent human infections may be occurring. With more than a quarter of a million persons in occupations involving dogs, and nearly 80 million dog owners in the United States, this pathogen is an under‐recognized human health threat. To investigate occupational exposure to B. canis, we adapted a commercial canine serological assay and present the first controlled seroepidemiological study of human B. canis infections in recent years. 306 adults with occupational exposure to dogs and 101 non‐matched, non‐canine‐exposed subjects were enrolled. Antibodies were detected using the canine D‐Tec® CB rapid slide agglutination test (RSAT) kit with a secondary 2‐mercaptoethanol (ME)‐RSAT. Results were validated on a blinded subset of sera with an additional RSAT and indirect enzyme‐linked immunoassay at the National Administration of Laboratories and Health Institutes (ANLIS) in Argentina. Seroprevalence ranged from 10.8% (RSAT) to 3.6% (ME‐RSAT) among canine‐exposed subjects. Kennel employees were more likely to test RSAT seropositive compared with other canine exposures (OR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3–5.8); however, low seroprevalence limited meaningful occupational risk factor analyses. Two seropositive participants reported experiencing symptoms consistent with brucellosis and having exposure to B. canis‐infected dogs; however, temporality of symptom onset with reported exposure could not be determined. D‐Tec® CB results had substantial agreement with ANLIS assays (Cohen's kappa = 0.60–0.68). These data add to a growing body of literature suggesting that people occupationally exposed to dogs may be at risk of unapparent B. canis infection. It seems prudent to consider B. canis as an occupational public health concern and encourage the development of serological assays to detect human B. canis infections.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/zph.12102
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1609098033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3452199481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4152-121c7b8d4ca6c282bc3c9c4e3ee31502dcfe18c52f271e416222fe7e1a8ae6183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10Mtu1DAUBuAIgegFFrwAWGIDi7Q-duzYy9IObcVAETBCYmN5nJNp2kwc7KQXnh63mXaBhDe25M-_jv8sewV0D9La_9Of7wEDyp5k26Akzxkv1dPNGbTQW9lOjBeUCqFp-TzbYkUpADRsZ3Z21VTYOSS1D2TR2b63AbuBfAijw7a1xNmuieS0q9ENje8isWvfrchBNbZDJNfNcE7OnBt7e3drWzK76X0cA5LBkyO_ii-yZ7VtI77c7LvZ4uPsx-FJPj87Pj08mOeuAMHyNL8rl6oqnJWOKbZ03GlXIEfkICirXI2gnGA1KwELkIyxGksEqyxKUHw3ezfl9sH_HjEOZt3E-y906MdoQFJNtaKcJ_r2H3rhx5CGT0ooSaXQSiT1flIu-BgD1qYPzdqGWwPU3PVuUu_mvvdkX28Sx-Uaq0f5UHQC-xO4blq8_X-S-fX15CEyn140ccCbxxc2XBpZ8lKYn1-OjZ5_OuKf-Tcjk38z-dp6Y1ehiWbxndHUHaVKCyj4X73YpFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1586065985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence for Unapparent Brucella canis Infections among Adults with Occupational Exposure to Dogs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Krueger, W. S ; Lucero, N. E ; Brower, A ; Heil, G. L ; Gray, G. C</creator><creatorcontrib>Krueger, W. S ; Lucero, N. E ; Brower, A ; Heil, G. L ; Gray, G. C</creatorcontrib><description>Human serological assays designed to detect brucellosis will miss infections caused by Brucella canis, and low levels of periodic bacteremia limit diagnosis by blood culture. Recent B. canis outbreaks in dogs and concomitant illnesses in caretakers suggest that unapparent human infections may be occurring. With more than a quarter of a million persons in occupations involving dogs, and nearly 80 million dog owners in the United States, this pathogen is an under‐recognized human health threat. To investigate occupational exposure to B. canis, we adapted a commercial canine serological assay and present the first controlled seroepidemiological study of human B. canis infections in recent years. 306 adults with occupational exposure to dogs and 101 non‐matched, non‐canine‐exposed subjects were enrolled. Antibodies were detected using the canine D‐Tec® CB rapid slide agglutination test (RSAT) kit with a secondary 2‐mercaptoethanol (ME)‐RSAT. Results were validated on a blinded subset of sera with an additional RSAT and indirect enzyme‐linked immunoassay at the National Administration of Laboratories and Health Institutes (ANLIS) in Argentina. Seroprevalence ranged from 10.8% (RSAT) to 3.6% (ME‐RSAT) among canine‐exposed subjects. Kennel employees were more likely to test RSAT seropositive compared with other canine exposures (OR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3–5.8); however, low seroprevalence limited meaningful occupational risk factor analyses. Two seropositive participants reported experiencing symptoms consistent with brucellosis and having exposure to B. canis‐infected dogs; however, temporality of symptom onset with reported exposure could not be determined. D‐Tec® CB results had substantial agreement with ANLIS assays (Cohen's kappa = 0.60–0.68). These data add to a growing body of literature suggesting that people occupationally exposed to dogs may be at risk of unapparent B. canis infection. It seems prudent to consider B. canis as an occupational public health concern and encourage the development of serological assays to detect human B. canis infections.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-1959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/zph.12102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24751191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Blackwell Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; adults ; Aged ; agglutination tests ; Animals ; antibodies ; Antibodies, Bacterial - blood ; bacteremia ; Bacterial infections ; blood ; Brucella canis - isolation &amp; purification ; Brucella melitensis biovar Canis ; Brucellosis ; Brucellosis - blood ; Brucellosis - epidemiology ; Case-Control Studies ; communicable diseases ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Dog Diseases - epidemiology ; Dog Diseases - microbiology ; Dogs ; emerging ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Female ; Florida - epidemiology ; human diseases ; human health ; human resources ; Humans ; immunoassays ; Iowa - epidemiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; occupational exposure ; Occupational Exposure - adverse effects ; occupations ; pathogens ; people ; public health ; Reproducibility of Results ; risk ; Risk Factors ; Seroepidemiologic Studies ; serological surveys ; seroprevalence ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult ; Zoonoses ; Zoonoses - blood ; Zoonoses - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Zoonoses and public health, 2014-11, Vol.61 (7), p.509-518</ispartof><rights>2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4152-121c7b8d4ca6c282bc3c9c4e3ee31502dcfe18c52f271e416222fe7e1a8ae6183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4152-121c7b8d4ca6c282bc3c9c4e3ee31502dcfe18c52f271e416222fe7e1a8ae6183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fzph.12102$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fzph.12102$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24751191$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krueger, W. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucero, N. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brower, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heil, G. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, G. C</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence for Unapparent Brucella canis Infections among Adults with Occupational Exposure to Dogs</title><title>Zoonoses and public health</title><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><description>Human serological assays designed to detect brucellosis will miss infections caused by Brucella canis, and low levels of periodic bacteremia limit diagnosis by blood culture. Recent B. canis outbreaks in dogs and concomitant illnesses in caretakers suggest that unapparent human infections may be occurring. With more than a quarter of a million persons in occupations involving dogs, and nearly 80 million dog owners in the United States, this pathogen is an under‐recognized human health threat. To investigate occupational exposure to B. canis, we adapted a commercial canine serological assay and present the first controlled seroepidemiological study of human B. canis infections in recent years. 306 adults with occupational exposure to dogs and 101 non‐matched, non‐canine‐exposed subjects were enrolled. Antibodies were detected using the canine D‐Tec® CB rapid slide agglutination test (RSAT) kit with a secondary 2‐mercaptoethanol (ME)‐RSAT. Results were validated on a blinded subset of sera with an additional RSAT and indirect enzyme‐linked immunoassay at the National Administration of Laboratories and Health Institutes (ANLIS) in Argentina. Seroprevalence ranged from 10.8% (RSAT) to 3.6% (ME‐RSAT) among canine‐exposed subjects. Kennel employees were more likely to test RSAT seropositive compared with other canine exposures (OR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3–5.8); however, low seroprevalence limited meaningful occupational risk factor analyses. Two seropositive participants reported experiencing symptoms consistent with brucellosis and having exposure to B. canis‐infected dogs; however, temporality of symptom onset with reported exposure could not be determined. D‐Tec® CB results had substantial agreement with ANLIS assays (Cohen's kappa = 0.60–0.68). These data add to a growing body of literature suggesting that people occupationally exposed to dogs may be at risk of unapparent B. canis infection. It seems prudent to consider B. canis as an occupational public health concern and encourage the development of serological assays to detect human B. canis infections.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>agglutination tests</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>antibodies</subject><subject>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</subject><subject>bacteremia</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>blood</subject><subject>Brucella canis - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Brucella melitensis biovar Canis</subject><subject>Brucellosis</subject><subject>Brucellosis - blood</subject><subject>Brucellosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>communicable diseases</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>emerging</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Florida - epidemiology</subject><subject>human diseases</subject><subject>human health</subject><subject>human resources</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>immunoassays</subject><subject>Iowa - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>occupational exposure</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>occupations</subject><subject>pathogens</subject><subject>people</subject><subject>public health</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Seroepidemiologic Studies</subject><subject>serological surveys</subject><subject>seroprevalence</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><subject>Zoonoses - blood</subject><subject>Zoonoses - epidemiology</subject><issn>1863-1959</issn><issn>1863-2378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10Mtu1DAUBuAIgegFFrwAWGIDi7Q-duzYy9IObcVAETBCYmN5nJNp2kwc7KQXnh63mXaBhDe25M-_jv8sewV0D9La_9Of7wEDyp5k26Akzxkv1dPNGbTQW9lOjBeUCqFp-TzbYkUpADRsZ3Z21VTYOSS1D2TR2b63AbuBfAijw7a1xNmuieS0q9ENje8isWvfrchBNbZDJNfNcE7OnBt7e3drWzK76X0cA5LBkyO_ii-yZ7VtI77c7LvZ4uPsx-FJPj87Pj08mOeuAMHyNL8rl6oqnJWOKbZ03GlXIEfkICirXI2gnGA1KwELkIyxGksEqyxKUHw3ezfl9sH_HjEOZt3E-y906MdoQFJNtaKcJ_r2H3rhx5CGT0ooSaXQSiT1flIu-BgD1qYPzdqGWwPU3PVuUu_mvvdkX28Sx-Uaq0f5UHQC-xO4blq8_X-S-fX15CEyn140ccCbxxc2XBpZ8lKYn1-OjZ5_OuKf-Tcjk38z-dp6Y1ehiWbxndHUHaVKCyj4X73YpFQ</recordid><startdate>201411</startdate><enddate>201411</enddate><creator>Krueger, W. S</creator><creator>Lucero, N. E</creator><creator>Brower, A</creator><creator>Heil, G. L</creator><creator>Gray, G. C</creator><general>Blackwell Verlag</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201411</creationdate><title>Evidence for Unapparent Brucella canis Infections among Adults with Occupational Exposure to Dogs</title><author>Krueger, W. S ; Lucero, N. E ; Brower, A ; Heil, G. L ; Gray, G. C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4152-121c7b8d4ca6c282bc3c9c4e3ee31502dcfe18c52f271e416222fe7e1a8ae6183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>agglutination tests</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>antibodies</topic><topic>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</topic><topic>bacteremia</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>blood</topic><topic>Brucella canis - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Brucella melitensis biovar Canis</topic><topic>Brucellosis</topic><topic>Brucellosis - blood</topic><topic>Brucellosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>communicable diseases</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>emerging</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Florida - epidemiology</topic><topic>human diseases</topic><topic>human health</topic><topic>human resources</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>immunoassays</topic><topic>Iowa - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>occupational exposure</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>occupations</topic><topic>pathogens</topic><topic>people</topic><topic>public health</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Seroepidemiologic Studies</topic><topic>serological surveys</topic><topic>seroprevalence</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><topic>Zoonoses - blood</topic><topic>Zoonoses - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krueger, W. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucero, N. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brower, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heil, G. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, G. C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krueger, W. S</au><au>Lucero, N. E</au><au>Brower, A</au><au>Heil, G. L</au><au>Gray, G. C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence for Unapparent Brucella canis Infections among Adults with Occupational Exposure to Dogs</atitle><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><date>2014-11</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>509-518</pages><issn>1863-1959</issn><eissn>1863-2378</eissn><abstract>Human serological assays designed to detect brucellosis will miss infections caused by Brucella canis, and low levels of periodic bacteremia limit diagnosis by blood culture. Recent B. canis outbreaks in dogs and concomitant illnesses in caretakers suggest that unapparent human infections may be occurring. With more than a quarter of a million persons in occupations involving dogs, and nearly 80 million dog owners in the United States, this pathogen is an under‐recognized human health threat. To investigate occupational exposure to B. canis, we adapted a commercial canine serological assay and present the first controlled seroepidemiological study of human B. canis infections in recent years. 306 adults with occupational exposure to dogs and 101 non‐matched, non‐canine‐exposed subjects were enrolled. Antibodies were detected using the canine D‐Tec® CB rapid slide agglutination test (RSAT) kit with a secondary 2‐mercaptoethanol (ME)‐RSAT. Results were validated on a blinded subset of sera with an additional RSAT and indirect enzyme‐linked immunoassay at the National Administration of Laboratories and Health Institutes (ANLIS) in Argentina. Seroprevalence ranged from 10.8% (RSAT) to 3.6% (ME‐RSAT) among canine‐exposed subjects. Kennel employees were more likely to test RSAT seropositive compared with other canine exposures (OR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3–5.8); however, low seroprevalence limited meaningful occupational risk factor analyses. Two seropositive participants reported experiencing symptoms consistent with brucellosis and having exposure to B. canis‐infected dogs; however, temporality of symptom onset with reported exposure could not be determined. D‐Tec® CB results had substantial agreement with ANLIS assays (Cohen's kappa = 0.60–0.68). These data add to a growing body of literature suggesting that people occupationally exposed to dogs may be at risk of unapparent B. canis infection. It seems prudent to consider B. canis as an occupational public health concern and encourage the development of serological assays to detect human B. canis infections.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Blackwell Verlag</pub><pmid>24751191</pmid><doi>10.1111/zph.12102</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1863-1959
ispartof Zoonoses and public health, 2014-11, Vol.61 (7), p.509-518
issn 1863-1959
1863-2378
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1609098033
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
adults
Aged
agglutination tests
Animals
antibodies
Antibodies, Bacterial - blood
bacteremia
Bacterial infections
blood
Brucella canis - isolation & purification
Brucella melitensis biovar Canis
Brucellosis
Brucellosis - blood
Brucellosis - epidemiology
Case-Control Studies
communicable diseases
Cross-Sectional Studies
Dog Diseases - epidemiology
Dog Diseases - microbiology
Dogs
emerging
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Female
Florida - epidemiology
human diseases
human health
human resources
Humans
immunoassays
Iowa - epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
occupational exposure
Occupational Exposure - adverse effects
occupations
pathogens
people
public health
Reproducibility of Results
risk
Risk Factors
Seroepidemiologic Studies
serological surveys
seroprevalence
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
Zoonoses
Zoonoses - blood
Zoonoses - epidemiology
title Evidence for Unapparent Brucella canis Infections among Adults with Occupational Exposure to Dogs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A28%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20for%20Unapparent%20Brucella%20canis%20Infections%20among%20Adults%20with%20Occupational%20Exposure%20to%20Dogs&rft.jtitle=Zoonoses%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Krueger,%20W.%20S&rft.date=2014-11&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=509-518&rft.issn=1863-1959&rft.eissn=1863-2378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/zph.12102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3452199481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1586065985&rft_id=info:pmid/24751191&rfr_iscdi=true