Testing the individual odour theory of canine olfaction

Experiments were performed with three dogs, Canis familiaris, trained in human scent discrimination (American Kennel Club utility obedience test), to evaluate whether the dogs could distinguish the scent of their handler from the scent of other humans, irrespective of the body part from which the sc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal behaviour 1991, Vol.42 (1), p.63-69
Hauptverfasser: Brisbin, I. Lehr, Austad, Steven N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 69
container_issue 1
container_start_page 63
container_title Animal behaviour
container_volume 42
creator Brisbin, I. Lehr
Austad, Steven N.
description Experiments were performed with three dogs, Canis familiaris, trained in human scent discrimination (American Kennel Club utility obedience test), to evaluate whether the dogs could distinguish the scent of their handler from the scent of other humans, irrespective of the body part from which the scent had been collected. The dogs were successful at distinguishing scent obtained from the hand of their handler from that from the hands of strangers, but could not similarly distinguish their handler's scent when it was obtained from the crook of his arm. These results suggest either that there is no such thing as an individual human odour or that dogs trained with standard methods do not spontaneously identify individual odour components of scents taken from different parts of the body. The results also call into question the practice of using dogs to identify individuals from scented objects in law enforcement, unless the dogs used can be shown to be capable of performing discriminations of the type unsuccessfully attempted by the animals in the present study.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80606-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16047147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003347205806062</els_id><sourcerecordid>5763331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-6d56d6ea1ce91799d256e241708cb645762cb7c4a8da697e063c376300851e483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LHDEUhoNUcKv-BHEotNiL0ZNMvuZKitQqCF7oXodscmabZUxsMiv475txpYXe9CokPOfNex5CTiicU6Dy4gEAurbjip2B-KpBgmzZHllQ6EWrmWYfyOIPckA-lrKpVylALIh6xDKFuG6mn9iE6MNL8Fs7NsmnbZ4fU35t0tA4G0PEJo2DdVNI8YjsD3YsePx-HpLl9ffHq5v27v7H7dW3u9Zx2k-t9EJ6iZY67Knqe8-ERMapAu1WkgslmVspx632VvYKQXauU7ID0IIi190h-bLLfc7p17Z2NU-hOBxHGzFti6ESuKJcVfDTP-CmbhBrN8NY_Yixfk4TO8jlVErGwTzn8GTzq6FgZpfmzaWZRRkQ5s2lYXXu83u4Lc6OQ7bRhfJ3uNegNfDKne64wSZj17kyywcGtAOqOACdG1zuCKzSXgJmU1zA6NCHjG4yPoX_dPkNkvqO5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224572298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing the individual odour theory of canine olfaction</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Brisbin, I. Lehr ; Austad, Steven N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brisbin, I. Lehr ; Austad, Steven N.</creatorcontrib><description>Experiments were performed with three dogs, Canis familiaris, trained in human scent discrimination (American Kennel Club utility obedience test), to evaluate whether the dogs could distinguish the scent of their handler from the scent of other humans, irrespective of the body part from which the scent had been collected. The dogs were successful at distinguishing scent obtained from the hand of their handler from that from the hands of strangers, but could not similarly distinguish their handler's scent when it was obtained from the crook of his arm. These results suggest either that there is no such thing as an individual human odour or that dogs trained with standard methods do not spontaneously identify individual odour components of scents taken from different parts of the body. The results also call into question the practice of using dogs to identify individuals from scented objects in law enforcement, unless the dogs used can be shown to be capable of performing discriminations of the type unsuccessfully attempted by the animals in the present study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80606-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANBEA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kent: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal ethology ; Animal memory ; Biological and medical sciences ; body parts ; Canis familiaris ; Dogs ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Mammalia ; odors ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Smell ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Animal behaviour, 1991, Vol.42 (1), p.63-69</ispartof><rights>1991 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd. Jul 1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-6d56d6ea1ce91799d256e241708cb645762cb7c4a8da697e063c376300851e483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-6d56d6ea1ce91799d256e241708cb645762cb7c4a8da697e063c376300851e483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347205806062$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19808804$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brisbin, I. Lehr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austad, Steven N.</creatorcontrib><title>Testing the individual odour theory of canine olfaction</title><title>Animal behaviour</title><description>Experiments were performed with three dogs, Canis familiaris, trained in human scent discrimination (American Kennel Club utility obedience test), to evaluate whether the dogs could distinguish the scent of their handler from the scent of other humans, irrespective of the body part from which the scent had been collected. The dogs were successful at distinguishing scent obtained from the hand of their handler from that from the hands of strangers, but could not similarly distinguish their handler's scent when it was obtained from the crook of his arm. These results suggest either that there is no such thing as an individual human odour or that dogs trained with standard methods do not spontaneously identify individual odour components of scents taken from different parts of the body. The results also call into question the practice of using dogs to identify individuals from scented objects in law enforcement, unless the dogs used can be shown to be capable of performing discriminations of the type unsuccessfully attempted by the animals in the present study.</description><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Animal memory</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>body parts</subject><subject>Canis familiaris</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>odors</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Smell</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0003-3472</issn><issn>1095-8282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LHDEUhoNUcKv-BHEotNiL0ZNMvuZKitQqCF7oXodscmabZUxsMiv475txpYXe9CokPOfNex5CTiicU6Dy4gEAurbjip2B-KpBgmzZHllQ6EWrmWYfyOIPckA-lrKpVylALIh6xDKFuG6mn9iE6MNL8Fs7NsmnbZ4fU35t0tA4G0PEJo2DdVNI8YjsD3YsePx-HpLl9ffHq5v27v7H7dW3u9Zx2k-t9EJ6iZY67Knqe8-ERMapAu1WkgslmVspx632VvYKQXauU7ID0IIi190h-bLLfc7p17Z2NU-hOBxHGzFti6ESuKJcVfDTP-CmbhBrN8NY_Yixfk4TO8jlVErGwTzn8GTzq6FgZpfmzaWZRRkQ5s2lYXXu83u4Lc6OQ7bRhfJ3uNegNfDKne64wSZj17kyywcGtAOqOACdG1zuCKzSXgJmU1zA6NCHjG4yPoX_dPkNkvqO5Q</recordid><startdate>1991</startdate><enddate>1991</enddate><creator>Brisbin, I. Lehr</creator><creator>Austad, Steven N.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1991</creationdate><title>Testing the individual odour theory of canine olfaction</title><author>Brisbin, I. Lehr ; Austad, Steven N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-6d56d6ea1ce91799d256e241708cb645762cb7c4a8da697e063c376300851e483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Animal memory</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>body parts</topic><topic>Canis familiaris</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>odors</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Smell</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brisbin, I. Lehr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austad, Steven N.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brisbin, I. Lehr</au><au>Austad, Steven N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing the individual odour theory of canine olfaction</atitle><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle><date>1991</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>63-69</pages><issn>0003-3472</issn><eissn>1095-8282</eissn><coden>ANBEA8</coden><abstract>Experiments were performed with three dogs, Canis familiaris, trained in human scent discrimination (American Kennel Club utility obedience test), to evaluate whether the dogs could distinguish the scent of their handler from the scent of other humans, irrespective of the body part from which the scent had been collected. The dogs were successful at distinguishing scent obtained from the hand of their handler from that from the hands of strangers, but could not similarly distinguish their handler's scent when it was obtained from the crook of his arm. These results suggest either that there is no such thing as an individual human odour or that dogs trained with standard methods do not spontaneously identify individual odour components of scents taken from different parts of the body. The results also call into question the practice of using dogs to identify individuals from scented objects in law enforcement, unless the dogs used can be shown to be capable of performing discriminations of the type unsuccessfully attempted by the animals in the present study.</abstract><cop>Kent</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80606-2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3472
ispartof Animal behaviour, 1991, Vol.42 (1), p.63-69
issn 0003-3472
1095-8282
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16047147
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animal ethology
Animal memory
Biological and medical sciences
body parts
Canis familiaris
Dogs
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Mammalia
odors
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Smell
Vertebrata
title Testing the individual odour theory of canine olfaction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T07%3A08%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20the%20individual%20odour%20theory%20of%20canine%20olfaction&rft.jtitle=Animal%20behaviour&rft.au=Brisbin,%20I.%20Lehr&rft.date=1991&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=63-69&rft.issn=0003-3472&rft.eissn=1095-8282&rft.coden=ANBEA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80606-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E5763331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224572298&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0003347205806062&rfr_iscdi=true