A comparison of eelgrass, sea lettuce macroalgae, and marsh creeks as habitats for epibenthic fishes and decapods

Densities of epibenthic fishes and decapod crustaceans (excluding xanthids and pagurids) were quantified with daytime throw trap sampling in shallow water habitats of New Jersey estuaries. We compared eelgrass ( Zostera marina), sea lettuce macroalgae ( Ulva lactuca), unvegetated sand/mud substrates...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Estuarine, coastal and shelf science coastal and shelf science, 1991, Vol.33 (5), p.501-519
Hauptverfasser: Sogard, Susan M., Able, Kenneth W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 519
container_issue 5
container_start_page 501
container_title Estuarine, coastal and shelf science
container_volume 33
creator Sogard, Susan M.
Able, Kenneth W.
description Densities of epibenthic fishes and decapod crustaceans (excluding xanthids and pagurids) were quantified with daytime throw trap sampling in shallow water habitats of New Jersey estuaries. We compared eelgrass ( Zostera marina), sea lettuce macroalgae ( Ulva lactuca), unvegetated sand/mud substrates adjacent to these vegetation types, and saltmarsh creeks. The highest total density of fishes occurred in marsh creeks, due primarily to high abundances of Menidia menidia. The highest total decapod density was also in a marsh creek, but only slightly surpassed the density in Zostera. Results of apriori comparisons tests for individual species demonstrated that vegetation (either Zostera or Ulva) was superior in quality (based on fish and decapod densities) to adjacent unvegetated substrates. Sites with Zostera as the dominant vegetation had higher densities of most fish species than sites with Ulva as the dominant vegetation, but only one decapod, Hippolyte pleuracanthus, was more abundant at eelgrass sites. Ulva lactuca, therefore, was an important habitat in areas lacking Zostera marina; for the decapods the two vegetation types were comparable in habitat quality, but for fishes Ulva did not provide an equivalent substitute for Zostera. Marsh creeks supported very high densities, but only for a few species that were also common in other habitats. Comparison of recruitment patterns suggested many species do not begin exploiting these estuarine habitats until relatively late in the summer, perhaps as result of peak spawning in mid-summer.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0272-7714(91)90087-R
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16045515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>027277149190087R</els_id><sourcerecordid>16045515</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-1b4543a4ccccbf848ce0bd3e693358a8fabfaa594cbdbb3e875a418ef55d39e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LHDEUxUNpodut38CHPIgoODXZJPPnRRBpbUEQpH0ON5kbNzo7GXNnC357s674aF5Cwjnn3vNj7FCKH1LI-lysmlXVNFKfdPK0E6JtqrtPbCFFV1dCSPOZLd4lX9k3oofyK41aLdjTJfdpM0GOlEaeAkcc7jMQnXFC4APO89Yj34DPCYZ7wDMOY1_emdbcZ8RH4kB8DS7OMBMPKXOcosNxXkfPQ6Q10qulRw9T6uk7-xJgIDx4u5fs36-ff69-Vze313-uLm8qr2o9V9JpoxVoX44LrW49CtcrrDulTAttABcATKe9651T2DYGtGwxGNOrDhu1ZMf73Cmnpy3SbDeRPA4DjJi2ZGUttDGFwpLpvbBUJMoY7JRjKfhspbA7vnYHz-7g2U7aV772rtiO3vKBPAwhw-gjvXtN2VJIVWQXexmWrv8jZks-4uixjxn9bPsUP57zApHtkL4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16045515</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of eelgrass, sea lettuce macroalgae, and marsh creeks as habitats for epibenthic fishes and decapods</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Sogard, Susan M. ; Able, Kenneth W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sogard, Susan M. ; Able, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><description>Densities of epibenthic fishes and decapod crustaceans (excluding xanthids and pagurids) were quantified with daytime throw trap sampling in shallow water habitats of New Jersey estuaries. We compared eelgrass ( Zostera marina), sea lettuce macroalgae ( Ulva lactuca), unvegetated sand/mud substrates adjacent to these vegetation types, and saltmarsh creeks. The highest total density of fishes occurred in marsh creeks, due primarily to high abundances of Menidia menidia. The highest total decapod density was also in a marsh creek, but only slightly surpassed the density in Zostera. Results of apriori comparisons tests for individual species demonstrated that vegetation (either Zostera or Ulva) was superior in quality (based on fish and decapod densities) to adjacent unvegetated substrates. Sites with Zostera as the dominant vegetation had higher densities of most fish species than sites with Ulva as the dominant vegetation, but only one decapod, Hippolyte pleuracanthus, was more abundant at eelgrass sites. Ulva lactuca, therefore, was an important habitat in areas lacking Zostera marina; for the decapods the two vegetation types were comparable in habitat quality, but for fishes Ulva did not provide an equivalent substitute for Zostera. Marsh creeks supported very high densities, but only for a few species that were also common in other habitats. Comparison of recruitment patterns suggested many species do not begin exploiting these estuarine habitats until relatively late in the summer, perhaps as result of peak spawning in mid-summer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-7714</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0272-7714(91)90087-R</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECSSD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brackish ; Decapoda ; estuaries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat quality ; Marine ; New Jersey ; recruitment ; Ulva lactuca ; Zostera marina</subject><ispartof>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science, 1991, Vol.33 (5), p.501-519</ispartof><rights>1991</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-1b4543a4ccccbf848ce0bd3e693358a8fabfaa594cbdbb3e875a418ef55d39e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-1b4543a4ccccbf848ce0bd3e693358a8fabfaa594cbdbb3e875a418ef55d39e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(91)90087-R$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5358013$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sogard, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Able, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of eelgrass, sea lettuce macroalgae, and marsh creeks as habitats for epibenthic fishes and decapods</title><title>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</title><description>Densities of epibenthic fishes and decapod crustaceans (excluding xanthids and pagurids) were quantified with daytime throw trap sampling in shallow water habitats of New Jersey estuaries. We compared eelgrass ( Zostera marina), sea lettuce macroalgae ( Ulva lactuca), unvegetated sand/mud substrates adjacent to these vegetation types, and saltmarsh creeks. The highest total density of fishes occurred in marsh creeks, due primarily to high abundances of Menidia menidia. The highest total decapod density was also in a marsh creek, but only slightly surpassed the density in Zostera. Results of apriori comparisons tests for individual species demonstrated that vegetation (either Zostera or Ulva) was superior in quality (based on fish and decapod densities) to adjacent unvegetated substrates. Sites with Zostera as the dominant vegetation had higher densities of most fish species than sites with Ulva as the dominant vegetation, but only one decapod, Hippolyte pleuracanthus, was more abundant at eelgrass sites. Ulva lactuca, therefore, was an important habitat in areas lacking Zostera marina; for the decapods the two vegetation types were comparable in habitat quality, but for fishes Ulva did not provide an equivalent substitute for Zostera. Marsh creeks supported very high densities, but only for a few species that were also common in other habitats. Comparison of recruitment patterns suggested many species do not begin exploiting these estuarine habitats until relatively late in the summer, perhaps as result of peak spawning in mid-summer.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Decapoda</subject><subject>estuaries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat quality</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>New Jersey</subject><subject>recruitment</subject><subject>Ulva lactuca</subject><subject>Zostera marina</subject><issn>0272-7714</issn><issn>1096-0015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF9LHDEUxUNpodut38CHPIgoODXZJPPnRRBpbUEQpH0ON5kbNzo7GXNnC357s674aF5Cwjnn3vNj7FCKH1LI-lysmlXVNFKfdPK0E6JtqrtPbCFFV1dCSPOZLd4lX9k3oofyK41aLdjTJfdpM0GOlEaeAkcc7jMQnXFC4APO89Yj34DPCYZ7wDMOY1_emdbcZ8RH4kB8DS7OMBMPKXOcosNxXkfPQ6Q10qulRw9T6uk7-xJgIDx4u5fs36-ff69-Vze313-uLm8qr2o9V9JpoxVoX44LrW49CtcrrDulTAttABcATKe9651T2DYGtGwxGNOrDhu1ZMf73Cmnpy3SbDeRPA4DjJi2ZGUttDGFwpLpvbBUJMoY7JRjKfhspbA7vnYHz-7g2U7aV772rtiO3vKBPAwhw-gjvXtN2VJIVWQXexmWrv8jZks-4uixjxn9bPsUP57zApHtkL4</recordid><startdate>1991</startdate><enddate>1991</enddate><creator>Sogard, Susan M.</creator><creator>Able, Kenneth W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1991</creationdate><title>A comparison of eelgrass, sea lettuce macroalgae, and marsh creeks as habitats for epibenthic fishes and decapods</title><author>Sogard, Susan M. ; Able, Kenneth W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-1b4543a4ccccbf848ce0bd3e693358a8fabfaa594cbdbb3e875a418ef55d39e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Decapoda</topic><topic>estuaries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat quality</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>New Jersey</topic><topic>recruitment</topic><topic>Ulva lactuca</topic><topic>Zostera marina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sogard, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Able, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sogard, Susan M.</au><au>Able, Kenneth W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of eelgrass, sea lettuce macroalgae, and marsh creeks as habitats for epibenthic fishes and decapods</atitle><jtitle>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</jtitle><date>1991</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>501</spage><epage>519</epage><pages>501-519</pages><issn>0272-7714</issn><eissn>1096-0015</eissn><coden>ECSSD3</coden><abstract>Densities of epibenthic fishes and decapod crustaceans (excluding xanthids and pagurids) were quantified with daytime throw trap sampling in shallow water habitats of New Jersey estuaries. We compared eelgrass ( Zostera marina), sea lettuce macroalgae ( Ulva lactuca), unvegetated sand/mud substrates adjacent to these vegetation types, and saltmarsh creeks. The highest total density of fishes occurred in marsh creeks, due primarily to high abundances of Menidia menidia. The highest total decapod density was also in a marsh creek, but only slightly surpassed the density in Zostera. Results of apriori comparisons tests for individual species demonstrated that vegetation (either Zostera or Ulva) was superior in quality (based on fish and decapod densities) to adjacent unvegetated substrates. Sites with Zostera as the dominant vegetation had higher densities of most fish species than sites with Ulva as the dominant vegetation, but only one decapod, Hippolyte pleuracanthus, was more abundant at eelgrass sites. Ulva lactuca, therefore, was an important habitat in areas lacking Zostera marina; for the decapods the two vegetation types were comparable in habitat quality, but for fishes Ulva did not provide an equivalent substitute for Zostera. Marsh creeks supported very high densities, but only for a few species that were also common in other habitats. Comparison of recruitment patterns suggested many species do not begin exploiting these estuarine habitats until relatively late in the summer, perhaps as result of peak spawning in mid-summer.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0272-7714(91)90087-R</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-7714
ispartof Estuarine, coastal and shelf science, 1991, Vol.33 (5), p.501-519
issn 0272-7714
1096-0015
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16045515
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Brackish
Decapoda
estuaries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Habitat quality
Marine
New Jersey
recruitment
Ulva lactuca
Zostera marina
title A comparison of eelgrass, sea lettuce macroalgae, and marsh creeks as habitats for epibenthic fishes and decapods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T17%3A51%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20eelgrass,%20sea%20lettuce%20macroalgae,%20and%20marsh%20creeks%20as%20habitats%20for%20epibenthic%20fishes%20and%20decapods&rft.jtitle=Estuarine,%20coastal%20and%20shelf%20science&rft.au=Sogard,%20Susan%20M.&rft.date=1991&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=501&rft.epage=519&rft.pages=501-519&rft.issn=0272-7714&rft.eissn=1096-0015&rft.coden=ECSSD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0272-7714(91)90087-R&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16045515%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16045515&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=027277149190087R&rfr_iscdi=true