A comparison of eelgrass, sea lettuce macroalgae, and marsh creeks as habitats for epibenthic fishes and decapods
Densities of epibenthic fishes and decapod crustaceans (excluding xanthids and pagurids) were quantified with daytime throw trap sampling in shallow water habitats of New Jersey estuaries. We compared eelgrass ( Zostera marina), sea lettuce macroalgae ( Ulva lactuca), unvegetated sand/mud substrates...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Estuarine, coastal and shelf science coastal and shelf science, 1991, Vol.33 (5), p.501-519 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 519 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 501 |
container_title | Estuarine, coastal and shelf science |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Sogard, Susan M. Able, Kenneth W. |
description | Densities of epibenthic fishes and decapod crustaceans (excluding xanthids and pagurids) were quantified with daytime throw trap sampling in shallow water habitats of New Jersey estuaries. We compared eelgrass (
Zostera marina), sea lettuce macroalgae (
Ulva lactuca), unvegetated sand/mud substrates adjacent to these vegetation types, and saltmarsh creeks. The highest total density of fishes occurred in marsh creeks, due primarily to high abundances of
Menidia menidia. The highest total decapod density was also in a marsh creek, but only slightly surpassed the density in
Zostera. Results of
apriori comparisons tests for individual species demonstrated that vegetation (either
Zostera or
Ulva) was superior in quality (based on fish and decapod densities) to adjacent unvegetated substrates. Sites with
Zostera as the dominant vegetation had higher densities of most fish species than sites with
Ulva as the dominant vegetation, but only one decapod,
Hippolyte pleuracanthus, was more abundant at eelgrass sites.
Ulva lactuca, therefore, was an important habitat in areas lacking
Zostera marina; for the decapods the two vegetation types were comparable in habitat quality, but for fishes
Ulva did not provide an equivalent substitute for
Zostera. Marsh creeks supported very high densities, but only for a few species that were also common in other habitats. Comparison of recruitment patterns suggested many species do not begin exploiting these estuarine habitats until relatively late in the summer, perhaps as result of peak spawning in mid-summer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0272-7714(91)90087-R |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16045515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>027277149190087R</els_id><sourcerecordid>16045515</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-1b4543a4ccccbf848ce0bd3e693358a8fabfaa594cbdbb3e875a418ef55d39e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LHDEUxUNpodut38CHPIgoODXZJPPnRRBpbUEQpH0ON5kbNzo7GXNnC357s674aF5Cwjnn3vNj7FCKH1LI-lysmlXVNFKfdPK0E6JtqrtPbCFFV1dCSPOZLd4lX9k3oofyK41aLdjTJfdpM0GOlEaeAkcc7jMQnXFC4APO89Yj34DPCYZ7wDMOY1_emdbcZ8RH4kB8DS7OMBMPKXOcosNxXkfPQ6Q10qulRw9T6uk7-xJgIDx4u5fs36-ff69-Vze313-uLm8qr2o9V9JpoxVoX44LrW49CtcrrDulTAttABcATKe9651T2DYGtGwxGNOrDhu1ZMf73Cmnpy3SbDeRPA4DjJi2ZGUttDGFwpLpvbBUJMoY7JRjKfhspbA7vnYHz-7g2U7aV772rtiO3vKBPAwhw-gjvXtN2VJIVWQXexmWrv8jZks-4uixjxn9bPsUP57zApHtkL4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16045515</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of eelgrass, sea lettuce macroalgae, and marsh creeks as habitats for epibenthic fishes and decapods</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Sogard, Susan M. ; Able, Kenneth W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sogard, Susan M. ; Able, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><description>Densities of epibenthic fishes and decapod crustaceans (excluding xanthids and pagurids) were quantified with daytime throw trap sampling in shallow water habitats of New Jersey estuaries. We compared eelgrass (
Zostera marina), sea lettuce macroalgae (
Ulva lactuca), unvegetated sand/mud substrates adjacent to these vegetation types, and saltmarsh creeks. The highest total density of fishes occurred in marsh creeks, due primarily to high abundances of
Menidia menidia. The highest total decapod density was also in a marsh creek, but only slightly surpassed the density in
Zostera. Results of
apriori comparisons tests for individual species demonstrated that vegetation (either
Zostera or
Ulva) was superior in quality (based on fish and decapod densities) to adjacent unvegetated substrates. Sites with
Zostera as the dominant vegetation had higher densities of most fish species than sites with
Ulva as the dominant vegetation, but only one decapod,
Hippolyte pleuracanthus, was more abundant at eelgrass sites.
Ulva lactuca, therefore, was an important habitat in areas lacking
Zostera marina; for the decapods the two vegetation types were comparable in habitat quality, but for fishes
Ulva did not provide an equivalent substitute for
Zostera. Marsh creeks supported very high densities, but only for a few species that were also common in other habitats. Comparison of recruitment patterns suggested many species do not begin exploiting these estuarine habitats until relatively late in the summer, perhaps as result of peak spawning in mid-summer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-7714</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0272-7714(91)90087-R</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECSSD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brackish ; Decapoda ; estuaries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat quality ; Marine ; New Jersey ; recruitment ; Ulva lactuca ; Zostera marina</subject><ispartof>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science, 1991, Vol.33 (5), p.501-519</ispartof><rights>1991</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-1b4543a4ccccbf848ce0bd3e693358a8fabfaa594cbdbb3e875a418ef55d39e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-1b4543a4ccccbf848ce0bd3e693358a8fabfaa594cbdbb3e875a418ef55d39e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(91)90087-R$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5358013$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sogard, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Able, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of eelgrass, sea lettuce macroalgae, and marsh creeks as habitats for epibenthic fishes and decapods</title><title>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</title><description>Densities of epibenthic fishes and decapod crustaceans (excluding xanthids and pagurids) were quantified with daytime throw trap sampling in shallow water habitats of New Jersey estuaries. We compared eelgrass (
Zostera marina), sea lettuce macroalgae (
Ulva lactuca), unvegetated sand/mud substrates adjacent to these vegetation types, and saltmarsh creeks. The highest total density of fishes occurred in marsh creeks, due primarily to high abundances of
Menidia menidia. The highest total decapod density was also in a marsh creek, but only slightly surpassed the density in
Zostera. Results of
apriori comparisons tests for individual species demonstrated that vegetation (either
Zostera or
Ulva) was superior in quality (based on fish and decapod densities) to adjacent unvegetated substrates. Sites with
Zostera as the dominant vegetation had higher densities of most fish species than sites with
Ulva as the dominant vegetation, but only one decapod,
Hippolyte pleuracanthus, was more abundant at eelgrass sites.
Ulva lactuca, therefore, was an important habitat in areas lacking
Zostera marina; for the decapods the two vegetation types were comparable in habitat quality, but for fishes
Ulva did not provide an equivalent substitute for
Zostera. Marsh creeks supported very high densities, but only for a few species that were also common in other habitats. Comparison of recruitment patterns suggested many species do not begin exploiting these estuarine habitats until relatively late in the summer, perhaps as result of peak spawning in mid-summer.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Decapoda</subject><subject>estuaries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat quality</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>New Jersey</subject><subject>recruitment</subject><subject>Ulva lactuca</subject><subject>Zostera marina</subject><issn>0272-7714</issn><issn>1096-0015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF9LHDEUxUNpodut38CHPIgoODXZJPPnRRBpbUEQpH0ON5kbNzo7GXNnC357s674aF5Cwjnn3vNj7FCKH1LI-lysmlXVNFKfdPK0E6JtqrtPbCFFV1dCSPOZLd4lX9k3oofyK41aLdjTJfdpM0GOlEaeAkcc7jMQnXFC4APO89Yj34DPCYZ7wDMOY1_emdbcZ8RH4kB8DS7OMBMPKXOcosNxXkfPQ6Q10qulRw9T6uk7-xJgIDx4u5fs36-ff69-Vze313-uLm8qr2o9V9JpoxVoX44LrW49CtcrrDulTAttABcATKe9651T2DYGtGwxGNOrDhu1ZMf73Cmnpy3SbDeRPA4DjJi2ZGUttDGFwpLpvbBUJMoY7JRjKfhspbA7vnYHz-7g2U7aV772rtiO3vKBPAwhw-gjvXtN2VJIVWQXexmWrv8jZks-4uixjxn9bPsUP57zApHtkL4</recordid><startdate>1991</startdate><enddate>1991</enddate><creator>Sogard, Susan M.</creator><creator>Able, Kenneth W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1991</creationdate><title>A comparison of eelgrass, sea lettuce macroalgae, and marsh creeks as habitats for epibenthic fishes and decapods</title><author>Sogard, Susan M. ; Able, Kenneth W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-1b4543a4ccccbf848ce0bd3e693358a8fabfaa594cbdbb3e875a418ef55d39e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Decapoda</topic><topic>estuaries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat quality</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>New Jersey</topic><topic>recruitment</topic><topic>Ulva lactuca</topic><topic>Zostera marina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sogard, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Able, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sogard, Susan M.</au><au>Able, Kenneth W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of eelgrass, sea lettuce macroalgae, and marsh creeks as habitats for epibenthic fishes and decapods</atitle><jtitle>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</jtitle><date>1991</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>501</spage><epage>519</epage><pages>501-519</pages><issn>0272-7714</issn><eissn>1096-0015</eissn><coden>ECSSD3</coden><abstract>Densities of epibenthic fishes and decapod crustaceans (excluding xanthids and pagurids) were quantified with daytime throw trap sampling in shallow water habitats of New Jersey estuaries. We compared eelgrass (
Zostera marina), sea lettuce macroalgae (
Ulva lactuca), unvegetated sand/mud substrates adjacent to these vegetation types, and saltmarsh creeks. The highest total density of fishes occurred in marsh creeks, due primarily to high abundances of
Menidia menidia. The highest total decapod density was also in a marsh creek, but only slightly surpassed the density in
Zostera. Results of
apriori comparisons tests for individual species demonstrated that vegetation (either
Zostera or
Ulva) was superior in quality (based on fish and decapod densities) to adjacent unvegetated substrates. Sites with
Zostera as the dominant vegetation had higher densities of most fish species than sites with
Ulva as the dominant vegetation, but only one decapod,
Hippolyte pleuracanthus, was more abundant at eelgrass sites.
Ulva lactuca, therefore, was an important habitat in areas lacking
Zostera marina; for the decapods the two vegetation types were comparable in habitat quality, but for fishes
Ulva did not provide an equivalent substitute for
Zostera. Marsh creeks supported very high densities, but only for a few species that were also common in other habitats. Comparison of recruitment patterns suggested many species do not begin exploiting these estuarine habitats until relatively late in the summer, perhaps as result of peak spawning in mid-summer.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0272-7714(91)90087-R</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-7714 |
ispartof | Estuarine, coastal and shelf science, 1991, Vol.33 (5), p.501-519 |
issn | 0272-7714 1096-0015 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16045515 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Brackish Decapoda estuaries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Habitat quality Marine New Jersey recruitment Ulva lactuca Zostera marina |
title | A comparison of eelgrass, sea lettuce macroalgae, and marsh creeks as habitats for epibenthic fishes and decapods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T17%3A51%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20eelgrass,%20sea%20lettuce%20macroalgae,%20and%20marsh%20creeks%20as%20habitats%20for%20epibenthic%20fishes%20and%20decapods&rft.jtitle=Estuarine,%20coastal%20and%20shelf%20science&rft.au=Sogard,%20Susan%20M.&rft.date=1991&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=501&rft.epage=519&rft.pages=501-519&rft.issn=0272-7714&rft.eissn=1096-0015&rft.coden=ECSSD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0272-7714(91)90087-R&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16045515%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16045515&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=027277149190087R&rfr_iscdi=true |