Constraints on Double Brooding in a Neotropical Migrant, the Hooded Warbler
We examined the constraints on double brooding in Hooded Warblers (Wilsonia citrina) to explain why 56% of females with successful first nests did not attempt second broods. Double brooded females fledged on average 1.9 more young than single brooded females. Double brooded females nested significan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.) Calif.), 1996-11, Vol.98 (4), p.736-744 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 744 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 736 |
container_title | The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.) |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | OGDEN, L. J. E STUTCHBURY, B. J. M |
description | We examined the constraints on double brooding in Hooded Warblers (Wilsonia citrina) to explain why 56% of females with successful first nests did not attempt second broods. Double brooded females fledged on average 1.9 more young than single brooded females. Double brooded females nested significantly earlier than single brooded females, but many females with early nests did not double brood. There were no significant differences among single and double brooded females in age, experience, body condition, or reproductive output at their first nest. Female breeding strategy did not depend on male age or male feeding effort at the first nest. Double brooded individuals were usually feeding fledglings while undergoing their pre-basic molt, and the main cost of being double brooded was a three week delay in molt compared with single brooded birds. This delay in molt could impose a high energetic cost due to the overlap of molt and fledgling care, and a time cost in terms of delaying migration and the acquisition of a winter territory. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1369855 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15972333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1369855</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1369855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-48f3ae143249b8a1be30a77c6a70c6c7fc55dcaafcb755bed1d3470456b126563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUQIMoWKv4C0FEN47mOZlZan1UrLpRXIZMJlNTxqQmmYV_b0qLgmA2l8C5h8sB4BCjc0KRuMC0rCvOt8AI17QqOCb1NhghhFHBGSG7YC_GBcp_wsgIPEy8iyko61KE3sFrPzS9gVfB-9a6ObQOKvhkfAp-abXq4aOdB-XSGUzvBk4zZVr4pkJeCvtgp1N9NAebOQavtzcvk2kxe767n1zOCk0FSwWrOqoMZpSwuqkUbgxFSghdKoF0qUWnOW-1Up1uBOeNaXFLmUCMlw0mJS_pGJysvcvgPwcTk_ywUZu-V874IUrMa0FofmNw9Adc-CG4fJskOLsqRle20zWkg48xmE4ug_1Q4UtiJFdF5aZoJo83OhVzii530Db-4ISTior6F1vE5MO_tm9OR35H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211268436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Constraints on Double Brooding in a Neotropical Migrant, the Hooded Warbler</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals</source><source>SORA - Searchable Ornithological Research Archive</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>OGDEN, L. J. E ; STUTCHBURY, B. J. M</creator><creatorcontrib>OGDEN, L. J. E ; STUTCHBURY, B. J. M</creatorcontrib><description>We examined the constraints on double brooding in Hooded Warblers (Wilsonia citrina) to explain why 56% of females with successful first nests did not attempt second broods. Double brooded females fledged on average 1.9 more young than single brooded females. Double brooded females nested significantly earlier than single brooded females, but many females with early nests did not double brood. There were no significant differences among single and double brooded females in age, experience, body condition, or reproductive output at their first nest. Female breeding strategy did not depend on male age or male feeding effort at the first nest. Double brooded individuals were usually feeding fledglings while undergoing their pre-basic molt, and the main cost of being double brooded was a three week delay in molt compared with single brooded birds. This delay in molt could impose a high energetic cost due to the overlap of molt and fledgling care, and a time cost in terms of delaying migration and the acquisition of a winter territory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-5422</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2732-4621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1369855</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CNDRAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Santa Clara, CA: Cooper Ornithological Society</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal reproduction ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Autoecology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; Breeding ; Breeding seasons ; Female animals ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Male animals ; Mating behavior ; Molting ; Ornithology ; Single status ; Vertebrata ; Warblers ; Wilsonia citrina</subject><ispartof>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 1996-11, Vol.98 (4), p.736-744</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 The Cooper Ornithological Society</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Cooper Ornithological Society Nov 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-48f3ae143249b8a1be30a77c6a70c6c7fc55dcaafcb755bed1d3470456b126563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-48f3ae143249b8a1be30a77c6a70c6c7fc55dcaafcb755bed1d3470456b126563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1369855$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1369855$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27929,27930,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2528379$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>OGDEN, L. J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STUTCHBURY, B. J. M</creatorcontrib><title>Constraints on Double Brooding in a Neotropical Migrant, the Hooded Warbler</title><title>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</title><description>We examined the constraints on double brooding in Hooded Warblers (Wilsonia citrina) to explain why 56% of females with successful first nests did not attempt second broods. Double brooded females fledged on average 1.9 more young than single brooded females. Double brooded females nested significantly earlier than single brooded females, but many females with early nests did not double brood. There were no significant differences among single and double brooded females in age, experience, body condition, or reproductive output at their first nest. Female breeding strategy did not depend on male age or male feeding effort at the first nest. Double brooded individuals were usually feeding fledglings while undergoing their pre-basic molt, and the main cost of being double brooded was a three week delay in molt compared with single brooded birds. This delay in molt could impose a high energetic cost due to the overlap of molt and fledgling care, and a time cost in terms of delaying migration and the acquisition of a winter territory.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding seasons</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Molting</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><subject>Single status</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Warblers</subject><subject>Wilsonia citrina</subject><issn>0010-5422</issn><issn>1938-5129</issn><issn>2732-4621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUQIMoWKv4C0FEN47mOZlZan1UrLpRXIZMJlNTxqQmmYV_b0qLgmA2l8C5h8sB4BCjc0KRuMC0rCvOt8AI17QqOCb1NhghhFHBGSG7YC_GBcp_wsgIPEy8iyko61KE3sFrPzS9gVfB-9a6ObQOKvhkfAp-abXq4aOdB-XSGUzvBk4zZVr4pkJeCvtgp1N9NAebOQavtzcvk2kxe767n1zOCk0FSwWrOqoMZpSwuqkUbgxFSghdKoF0qUWnOW-1Up1uBOeNaXFLmUCMlw0mJS_pGJysvcvgPwcTk_ywUZu-V874IUrMa0FofmNw9Adc-CG4fJskOLsqRle20zWkg48xmE4ug_1Q4UtiJFdF5aZoJo83OhVzii530Db-4ISTior6F1vE5MO_tm9OR35H</recordid><startdate>19961101</startdate><enddate>19961101</enddate><creator>OGDEN, L. J. E</creator><creator>STUTCHBURY, B. J. M</creator><general>Cooper Ornithological Society</general><general>Cooper Ornithological Club</general><general>American Ornithological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961101</creationdate><title>Constraints on Double Brooding in a Neotropical Migrant, the Hooded Warbler</title><author>OGDEN, L. J. E ; STUTCHBURY, B. J. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-48f3ae143249b8a1be30a77c6a70c6c7fc55dcaafcb755bed1d3470456b126563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding seasons</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Molting</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><topic>Single status</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Warblers</topic><topic>Wilsonia citrina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>OGDEN, L. J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STUTCHBURY, B. J. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>OGDEN, L. J. E</au><au>STUTCHBURY, B. J. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Constraints on Double Brooding in a Neotropical Migrant, the Hooded Warbler</atitle><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle><date>1996-11-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>736</spage><epage>744</epage><pages>736-744</pages><issn>0010-5422</issn><eissn>1938-5129</eissn><eissn>2732-4621</eissn><coden>CNDRAB</coden><abstract>We examined the constraints on double brooding in Hooded Warblers (Wilsonia citrina) to explain why 56% of females with successful first nests did not attempt second broods. Double brooded females fledged on average 1.9 more young than single brooded females. Double brooded females nested significantly earlier than single brooded females, but many females with early nests did not double brood. There were no significant differences among single and double brooded females in age, experience, body condition, or reproductive output at their first nest. Female breeding strategy did not depend on male age or male feeding effort at the first nest. Double brooded individuals were usually feeding fledglings while undergoing their pre-basic molt, and the main cost of being double brooded was a three week delay in molt compared with single brooded birds. This delay in molt could impose a high energetic cost due to the overlap of molt and fledgling care, and a time cost in terms of delaying migration and the acquisition of a winter territory.</abstract><cop>Santa Clara, CA</cop><pub>Cooper Ornithological Society</pub><doi>10.2307/1369855</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-5422 |
ispartof | The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 1996-11, Vol.98 (4), p.736-744 |
issn | 0010-5422 1938-5129 2732-4621 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15972333 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals; SORA - Searchable Ornithological Research Archive; JSTOR |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal reproduction Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Autoecology Aves Biological and medical sciences Bird nesting Birds Breeding Breeding seasons Female animals Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Male animals Mating behavior Molting Ornithology Single status Vertebrata Warblers Wilsonia citrina |
title | Constraints on Double Brooding in a Neotropical Migrant, the Hooded Warbler |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T22%3A40%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Constraints%20on%20Double%20Brooding%20in%20a%20Neotropical%20Migrant,%20the%20Hooded%20Warbler&rft.jtitle=The%20Condor%20(Los%20Angeles,%20Calif.)&rft.au=OGDEN,%20L.%20J.%20E&rft.date=1996-11-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=736&rft.epage=744&rft.pages=736-744&rft.issn=0010-5422&rft.eissn=1938-5129&rft.coden=CNDRAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1369855&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1369855%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211268436&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1369855&rfr_iscdi=true |