Constraints on Double Brooding in a Neotropical Migrant, the Hooded Warbler

We examined the constraints on double brooding in Hooded Warblers (Wilsonia citrina) to explain why 56% of females with successful first nests did not attempt second broods. Double brooded females fledged on average 1.9 more young than single brooded females. Double brooded females nested significan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.) Calif.), 1996-11, Vol.98 (4), p.736-744
Hauptverfasser: OGDEN, L. J. E, STUTCHBURY, B. J. M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 744
container_issue 4
container_start_page 736
container_title The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)
container_volume 98
creator OGDEN, L. J. E
STUTCHBURY, B. J. M
description We examined the constraints on double brooding in Hooded Warblers (Wilsonia citrina) to explain why 56% of females with successful first nests did not attempt second broods. Double brooded females fledged on average 1.9 more young than single brooded females. Double brooded females nested significantly earlier than single brooded females, but many females with early nests did not double brood. There were no significant differences among single and double brooded females in age, experience, body condition, or reproductive output at their first nest. Female breeding strategy did not depend on male age or male feeding effort at the first nest. Double brooded individuals were usually feeding fledglings while undergoing their pre-basic molt, and the main cost of being double brooded was a three week delay in molt compared with single brooded birds. This delay in molt could impose a high energetic cost due to the overlap of molt and fledgling care, and a time cost in terms of delaying migration and the acquisition of a winter territory.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1369855
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15972333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1369855</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1369855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-48f3ae143249b8a1be30a77c6a70c6c7fc55dcaafcb755bed1d3470456b126563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUQIMoWKv4C0FEN47mOZlZan1UrLpRXIZMJlNTxqQmmYV_b0qLgmA2l8C5h8sB4BCjc0KRuMC0rCvOt8AI17QqOCb1NhghhFHBGSG7YC_GBcp_wsgIPEy8iyko61KE3sFrPzS9gVfB-9a6ObQOKvhkfAp-abXq4aOdB-XSGUzvBk4zZVr4pkJeCvtgp1N9NAebOQavtzcvk2kxe767n1zOCk0FSwWrOqoMZpSwuqkUbgxFSghdKoF0qUWnOW-1Up1uBOeNaXFLmUCMlw0mJS_pGJysvcvgPwcTk_ywUZu-V874IUrMa0FofmNw9Adc-CG4fJskOLsqRle20zWkg48xmE4ug_1Q4UtiJFdF5aZoJo83OhVzii530Db-4ISTior6F1vE5MO_tm9OR35H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211268436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Constraints on Double Brooding in a Neotropical Migrant, the Hooded Warbler</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals</source><source>SORA - Searchable Ornithological Research Archive</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>OGDEN, L. J. E ; STUTCHBURY, B. J. M</creator><creatorcontrib>OGDEN, L. J. E ; STUTCHBURY, B. J. M</creatorcontrib><description>We examined the constraints on double brooding in Hooded Warblers (Wilsonia citrina) to explain why 56% of females with successful first nests did not attempt second broods. Double brooded females fledged on average 1.9 more young than single brooded females. Double brooded females nested significantly earlier than single brooded females, but many females with early nests did not double brood. There were no significant differences among single and double brooded females in age, experience, body condition, or reproductive output at their first nest. Female breeding strategy did not depend on male age or male feeding effort at the first nest. Double brooded individuals were usually feeding fledglings while undergoing their pre-basic molt, and the main cost of being double brooded was a three week delay in molt compared with single brooded birds. This delay in molt could impose a high energetic cost due to the overlap of molt and fledgling care, and a time cost in terms of delaying migration and the acquisition of a winter territory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-5422</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2732-4621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1369855</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CNDRAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Santa Clara, CA: Cooper Ornithological Society</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal reproduction ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Autoecology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; Breeding ; Breeding seasons ; Female animals ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Male animals ; Mating behavior ; Molting ; Ornithology ; Single status ; Vertebrata ; Warblers ; Wilsonia citrina</subject><ispartof>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 1996-11, Vol.98 (4), p.736-744</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 The Cooper Ornithological Society</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Cooper Ornithological Society Nov 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-48f3ae143249b8a1be30a77c6a70c6c7fc55dcaafcb755bed1d3470456b126563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-48f3ae143249b8a1be30a77c6a70c6c7fc55dcaafcb755bed1d3470456b126563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1369855$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1369855$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27929,27930,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2528379$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>OGDEN, L. J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STUTCHBURY, B. J. M</creatorcontrib><title>Constraints on Double Brooding in a Neotropical Migrant, the Hooded Warbler</title><title>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</title><description>We examined the constraints on double brooding in Hooded Warblers (Wilsonia citrina) to explain why 56% of females with successful first nests did not attempt second broods. Double brooded females fledged on average 1.9 more young than single brooded females. Double brooded females nested significantly earlier than single brooded females, but many females with early nests did not double brood. There were no significant differences among single and double brooded females in age, experience, body condition, or reproductive output at their first nest. Female breeding strategy did not depend on male age or male feeding effort at the first nest. Double brooded individuals were usually feeding fledglings while undergoing their pre-basic molt, and the main cost of being double brooded was a three week delay in molt compared with single brooded birds. This delay in molt could impose a high energetic cost due to the overlap of molt and fledgling care, and a time cost in terms of delaying migration and the acquisition of a winter territory.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding seasons</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Molting</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><subject>Single status</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Warblers</subject><subject>Wilsonia citrina</subject><issn>0010-5422</issn><issn>1938-5129</issn><issn>2732-4621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUQIMoWKv4C0FEN47mOZlZan1UrLpRXIZMJlNTxqQmmYV_b0qLgmA2l8C5h8sB4BCjc0KRuMC0rCvOt8AI17QqOCb1NhghhFHBGSG7YC_GBcp_wsgIPEy8iyko61KE3sFrPzS9gVfB-9a6ObQOKvhkfAp-abXq4aOdB-XSGUzvBk4zZVr4pkJeCvtgp1N9NAebOQavtzcvk2kxe767n1zOCk0FSwWrOqoMZpSwuqkUbgxFSghdKoF0qUWnOW-1Up1uBOeNaXFLmUCMlw0mJS_pGJysvcvgPwcTk_ywUZu-V874IUrMa0FofmNw9Adc-CG4fJskOLsqRle20zWkg48xmE4ug_1Q4UtiJFdF5aZoJo83OhVzii530Db-4ISTior6F1vE5MO_tm9OR35H</recordid><startdate>19961101</startdate><enddate>19961101</enddate><creator>OGDEN, L. J. E</creator><creator>STUTCHBURY, B. J. M</creator><general>Cooper Ornithological Society</general><general>Cooper Ornithological Club</general><general>American Ornithological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961101</creationdate><title>Constraints on Double Brooding in a Neotropical Migrant, the Hooded Warbler</title><author>OGDEN, L. J. E ; STUTCHBURY, B. J. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-48f3ae143249b8a1be30a77c6a70c6c7fc55dcaafcb755bed1d3470456b126563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding seasons</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Molting</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><topic>Single status</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Warblers</topic><topic>Wilsonia citrina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>OGDEN, L. J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STUTCHBURY, B. J. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>OGDEN, L. J. E</au><au>STUTCHBURY, B. J. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Constraints on Double Brooding in a Neotropical Migrant, the Hooded Warbler</atitle><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle><date>1996-11-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>736</spage><epage>744</epage><pages>736-744</pages><issn>0010-5422</issn><eissn>1938-5129</eissn><eissn>2732-4621</eissn><coden>CNDRAB</coden><abstract>We examined the constraints on double brooding in Hooded Warblers (Wilsonia citrina) to explain why 56% of females with successful first nests did not attempt second broods. Double brooded females fledged on average 1.9 more young than single brooded females. Double brooded females nested significantly earlier than single brooded females, but many females with early nests did not double brood. There were no significant differences among single and double brooded females in age, experience, body condition, or reproductive output at their first nest. Female breeding strategy did not depend on male age or male feeding effort at the first nest. Double brooded individuals were usually feeding fledglings while undergoing their pre-basic molt, and the main cost of being double brooded was a three week delay in molt compared with single brooded birds. This delay in molt could impose a high energetic cost due to the overlap of molt and fledgling care, and a time cost in terms of delaying migration and the acquisition of a winter territory.</abstract><cop>Santa Clara, CA</cop><pub>Cooper Ornithological Society</pub><doi>10.2307/1369855</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-5422
ispartof The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 1996-11, Vol.98 (4), p.736-744
issn 0010-5422
1938-5129
2732-4621
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15972333
source Oxford University Press Journals; SORA - Searchable Ornithological Research Archive; JSTOR
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal reproduction
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Autoecology
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Bird nesting
Birds
Breeding
Breeding seasons
Female animals
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Male animals
Mating behavior
Molting
Ornithology
Single status
Vertebrata
Warblers
Wilsonia citrina
title Constraints on Double Brooding in a Neotropical Migrant, the Hooded Warbler
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T22%3A40%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Constraints%20on%20Double%20Brooding%20in%20a%20Neotropical%20Migrant,%20the%20Hooded%20Warbler&rft.jtitle=The%20Condor%20(Los%20Angeles,%20Calif.)&rft.au=OGDEN,%20L.%20J.%20E&rft.date=1996-11-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=736&rft.epage=744&rft.pages=736-744&rft.issn=0010-5422&rft.eissn=1938-5129&rft.coden=CNDRAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1369855&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1369855%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211268436&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1369855&rfr_iscdi=true