Insecticide effects on small mammals: influence of vegetation structure and diet
We tested whether differences in the diets of nontarget organisms or in vegetation structure could result in adverse ecological effects not predicted by the Quotient Method, a laboratory-based risk assessment methodology used by the Environmental Protection Agency to evaluate pesticides for registra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological applications 1997-02, Vol.7 (1), p.143-157 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 157 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 143 |
container_title | Ecological applications |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Schauber, Eric M. Edge, W. Daniel Wolff, Jerry O. |
description | We tested whether differences in the diets of nontarget organisms or in vegetation structure could result in adverse ecological effects not predicted by the Quotient Method, a laboratory-based risk assessment methodology used by the Environmental Protection Agency to evaluate pesticides for registration and use. We established populations of herbivorous gray-tailed voles (Microtus canicaudus) and omnivorous deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) in 24 0.2-ha enclosures planted with alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and monitored the populations by live trapping. Alfalfa in twelve enclosures was mowed on 22 June to reduce vegetation height, and 3 wk later, we applied azinphos-methyl at 0, 0.88, and 3.61 kg/ha. We compared predictions of risk with observed effects on the small mammals. Treatment with azinphos-methyl at 3.61 kg/ha reduced population density and growth survival, recruitment, and body growth of voles in both mowed and unmowed enclosures. Survival of female voles exposed to 3.61 kg/ha was lower in mowed than in unmowed enclosures, and the 0.88 kg/ha treatment affected body growth of male voles only in mowed enclosures. Vole densities in 3.61 kg/ha enclosures remained depressed for $\geq 6$ wk after spraying. Azinphos-methyl did not detectably affect reproductive activity of female voles. Precipitation after spraying may have increased exposure of the mammals to azinphosmethyl, resulting in greater effects on voles than reported in a previous, similar experiment. Deer mouse densities in mowed enclosures receiving 3.61 kg/ha decreased 47% within 5 d after spraying. No other adverse insecticide effects on deer mice were significant, but confidence intervals for such effects were wide. Analysis of deer mouse feces indicated that consumption of anthropods just after spraying was greater in insecticide-treated enclosures than in controls. In general, the Quotient Method adequately predicted effects on the small mammals, but its performance may be affected by vegetation structure and precipitation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0143:IEOSMI]2.0.CO;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15939151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2269413</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2269413</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4443-4605837ff99a694bdd86a8de7f962887781f2543b6006272c536e0d5893a0a633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkE1rFTEUhgdRsFb_gmQhoou5niSTr7oql2t7oXIrtSuRQzqTlJT5aJMZpf--CaPg2mzeA3nPA-epqk8UNlQbyCloDUrSD9QY9RFA_QDa8JP97nD1df-TbWCzPXxmz6ojariphdDseZ7_br2sXqV0B_kxxo6qy_2YXDuHNnSOOO_znMg0kjTYvieDHXKmExJG3y9ubB2ZPPnlbt1s51Bqc1zaeYmO2LEjXXDz6-qFzyvuzZ88rq6_7L5vz-uLw9l-e3pRt03T8LqRIDRX3htjpWluuk5LqzunvJFMa6U09Uw0_EYCSKZYK7h00AltuAUrOT-u3q_c-zg9LC7NOITUur63o5uWhFTk66mguXi2Fts4pRSdx_sYBhsfkQIWo1jcYHGDxShmo1iM4moUGQJuD8gy6dtK-h169_i_GNydXpaCovkzM9-tzLs0T_FfJuMZwFiWQ0vt7VrzdkJ7G0PC66tCATDSaM2fAKxtl6o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15939151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insecticide effects on small mammals: influence of vegetation structure and diet</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>JSTOR Complete Journals</source><creator>Schauber, Eric M. ; Edge, W. Daniel ; Wolff, Jerry O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schauber, Eric M. ; Edge, W. Daniel ; Wolff, Jerry O. ; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR</creatorcontrib><description>We tested whether differences in the diets of nontarget organisms or in vegetation structure could result in adverse ecological effects not predicted by the Quotient Method, a laboratory-based risk assessment methodology used by the Environmental Protection Agency to evaluate pesticides for registration and use. We established populations of herbivorous gray-tailed voles (Microtus canicaudus) and omnivorous deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) in 24 0.2-ha enclosures planted with alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and monitored the populations by live trapping. Alfalfa in twelve enclosures was mowed on 22 June to reduce vegetation height, and 3 wk later, we applied azinphos-methyl at 0, 0.88, and 3.61 kg/ha. We compared predictions of risk with observed effects on the small mammals. Treatment with azinphos-methyl at 3.61 kg/ha reduced population density and growth survival, recruitment, and body growth of voles in both mowed and unmowed enclosures. Survival of female voles exposed to 3.61 kg/ha was lower in mowed than in unmowed enclosures, and the 0.88 kg/ha treatment affected body growth of male voles only in mowed enclosures. Vole densities in 3.61 kg/ha enclosures remained depressed for $\geq 6$ wk after spraying. Azinphos-methyl did not detectably affect reproductive activity of female voles. Precipitation after spraying may have increased exposure of the mammals to azinphosmethyl, resulting in greater effects on voles than reported in a previous, similar experiment. Deer mouse densities in mowed enclosures receiving 3.61 kg/ha decreased 47% within 5 d after spraying. No other adverse insecticide effects on deer mice were significant, but confidence intervals for such effects were wide. Analysis of deer mouse feces indicated that consumption of anthropods just after spraying was greater in insecticide-treated enclosures than in controls. In general, the Quotient Method adequately predicted effects on the small mammals, but its performance may be affected by vegetation structure and precipitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0143:IEOSMI]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Alfalfa ; Animal traps ; Arthropods ; azinfos metil ; azinphos methyl ; Deer ; diet ; efectos secundarios ; effet secondaire ; field validation ; Insecticides ; Mammals ; Mice ; Microtus canicaudus ; Mowing ; Oregon ; Peromyscus maniculatus ; Population growth rate ; Quotient Method ; side effects ; small mammals ; vegetation structure ; Voles</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 1997-02, Vol.7 (1), p.143-157</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1997 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1997 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4443-4605837ff99a694bdd86a8de7f962887781f2543b6006272c536e0d5893a0a633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4443-4605837ff99a694bdd86a8de7f962887781f2543b6006272c536e0d5893a0a633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2269413$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2269413$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schauber, Eric M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edge, W. Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Jerry O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR</creatorcontrib><title>Insecticide effects on small mammals: influence of vegetation structure and diet</title><title>Ecological applications</title><description>We tested whether differences in the diets of nontarget organisms or in vegetation structure could result in adverse ecological effects not predicted by the Quotient Method, a laboratory-based risk assessment methodology used by the Environmental Protection Agency to evaluate pesticides for registration and use. We established populations of herbivorous gray-tailed voles (Microtus canicaudus) and omnivorous deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) in 24 0.2-ha enclosures planted with alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and monitored the populations by live trapping. Alfalfa in twelve enclosures was mowed on 22 June to reduce vegetation height, and 3 wk later, we applied azinphos-methyl at 0, 0.88, and 3.61 kg/ha. We compared predictions of risk with observed effects on the small mammals. Treatment with azinphos-methyl at 3.61 kg/ha reduced population density and growth survival, recruitment, and body growth of voles in both mowed and unmowed enclosures. Survival of female voles exposed to 3.61 kg/ha was lower in mowed than in unmowed enclosures, and the 0.88 kg/ha treatment affected body growth of male voles only in mowed enclosures. Vole densities in 3.61 kg/ha enclosures remained depressed for $\geq 6$ wk after spraying. Azinphos-methyl did not detectably affect reproductive activity of female voles. Precipitation after spraying may have increased exposure of the mammals to azinphosmethyl, resulting in greater effects on voles than reported in a previous, similar experiment. Deer mouse densities in mowed enclosures receiving 3.61 kg/ha decreased 47% within 5 d after spraying. No other adverse insecticide effects on deer mice were significant, but confidence intervals for such effects were wide. Analysis of deer mouse feces indicated that consumption of anthropods just after spraying was greater in insecticide-treated enclosures than in controls. In general, the Quotient Method adequately predicted effects on the small mammals, but its performance may be affected by vegetation structure and precipitation.</description><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>Animal traps</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>azinfos metil</subject><subject>azinphos methyl</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>diet</subject><subject>efectos secundarios</subject><subject>effet secondaire</subject><subject>field validation</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Microtus canicaudus</subject><subject>Mowing</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Peromyscus maniculatus</subject><subject>Population growth rate</subject><subject>Quotient Method</subject><subject>side effects</subject><subject>small mammals</subject><subject>vegetation structure</subject><subject>Voles</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkE1rFTEUhgdRsFb_gmQhoou5niSTr7oql2t7oXIrtSuRQzqTlJT5aJMZpf--CaPg2mzeA3nPA-epqk8UNlQbyCloDUrSD9QY9RFA_QDa8JP97nD1df-TbWCzPXxmz6ojariphdDseZ7_br2sXqV0B_kxxo6qy_2YXDuHNnSOOO_znMg0kjTYvieDHXKmExJG3y9ubB2ZPPnlbt1s51Bqc1zaeYmO2LEjXXDz6-qFzyvuzZ88rq6_7L5vz-uLw9l-e3pRt03T8LqRIDRX3htjpWluuk5LqzunvJFMa6U09Uw0_EYCSKZYK7h00AltuAUrOT-u3q_c-zg9LC7NOITUur63o5uWhFTk66mguXi2Fts4pRSdx_sYBhsfkQIWo1jcYHGDxShmo1iM4moUGQJuD8gy6dtK-h169_i_GNydXpaCovkzM9-tzLs0T_FfJuMZwFiWQ0vt7VrzdkJ7G0PC66tCATDSaM2fAKxtl6o</recordid><startdate>199702</startdate><enddate>199702</enddate><creator>Schauber, Eric M.</creator><creator>Edge, W. Daniel</creator><creator>Wolff, Jerry O.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199702</creationdate><title>Insecticide effects on small mammals: influence of vegetation structure and diet</title><author>Schauber, Eric M. ; Edge, W. Daniel ; Wolff, Jerry O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4443-4605837ff99a694bdd86a8de7f962887781f2543b6006272c536e0d5893a0a633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>Animal traps</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>azinfos metil</topic><topic>azinphos methyl</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>diet</topic><topic>efectos secundarios</topic><topic>effet secondaire</topic><topic>field validation</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Microtus canicaudus</topic><topic>Mowing</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Peromyscus maniculatus</topic><topic>Population growth rate</topic><topic>Quotient Method</topic><topic>side effects</topic><topic>small mammals</topic><topic>vegetation structure</topic><topic>Voles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schauber, Eric M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edge, W. Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Jerry O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schauber, Eric M.</au><au>Edge, W. Daniel</au><au>Wolff, Jerry O.</au><aucorp>Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insecticide effects on small mammals: influence of vegetation structure and diet</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><date>1997-02</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>143</spage><epage>157</epage><pages>143-157</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>We tested whether differences in the diets of nontarget organisms or in vegetation structure could result in adverse ecological effects not predicted by the Quotient Method, a laboratory-based risk assessment methodology used by the Environmental Protection Agency to evaluate pesticides for registration and use. We established populations of herbivorous gray-tailed voles (Microtus canicaudus) and omnivorous deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) in 24 0.2-ha enclosures planted with alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and monitored the populations by live trapping. Alfalfa in twelve enclosures was mowed on 22 June to reduce vegetation height, and 3 wk later, we applied azinphos-methyl at 0, 0.88, and 3.61 kg/ha. We compared predictions of risk with observed effects on the small mammals. Treatment with azinphos-methyl at 3.61 kg/ha reduced population density and growth survival, recruitment, and body growth of voles in both mowed and unmowed enclosures. Survival of female voles exposed to 3.61 kg/ha was lower in mowed than in unmowed enclosures, and the 0.88 kg/ha treatment affected body growth of male voles only in mowed enclosures. Vole densities in 3.61 kg/ha enclosures remained depressed for $\geq 6$ wk after spraying. Azinphos-methyl did not detectably affect reproductive activity of female voles. Precipitation after spraying may have increased exposure of the mammals to azinphosmethyl, resulting in greater effects on voles than reported in a previous, similar experiment. Deer mouse densities in mowed enclosures receiving 3.61 kg/ha decreased 47% within 5 d after spraying. No other adverse insecticide effects on deer mice were significant, but confidence intervals for such effects were wide. Analysis of deer mouse feces indicated that consumption of anthropods just after spraying was greater in insecticide-treated enclosures than in controls. In general, the Quotient Method adequately predicted effects on the small mammals, but its performance may be affected by vegetation structure and precipitation.</abstract><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0143:IEOSMI]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1051-0761 |
ispartof | Ecological applications, 1997-02, Vol.7 (1), p.143-157 |
issn | 1051-0761 1939-5582 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15939151 |
source | Wiley Journals; JSTOR Complete Journals |
subjects | Alfalfa Animal traps Arthropods azinfos metil azinphos methyl Deer diet efectos secundarios effet secondaire field validation Insecticides Mammals Mice Microtus canicaudus Mowing Oregon Peromyscus maniculatus Population growth rate Quotient Method side effects small mammals vegetation structure Voles |
title | Insecticide effects on small mammals: influence of vegetation structure and diet |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T00%3A55%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insecticide%20effects%20on%20small%20mammals:%20influence%20of%20vegetation%20structure%20and%20diet&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Schauber,%20Eric%20M.&rft.aucorp=Oregon%20State%20University,%20Corvallis,%20OR&rft.date=1997-02&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=157&rft.pages=143-157&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007%5B0143:IEOSMI%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2269413%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15939151&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2269413&rfr_iscdi=true |