Insecticide effects on small mammals: influence of vegetation structure and diet

We tested whether differences in the diets of nontarget organisms or in vegetation structure could result in adverse ecological effects not predicted by the Quotient Method, a laboratory-based risk assessment methodology used by the Environmental Protection Agency to evaluate pesticides for registra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological applications 1997-02, Vol.7 (1), p.143-157
Hauptverfasser: Schauber, Eric M., Edge, W. Daniel, Wolff, Jerry O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 157
container_issue 1
container_start_page 143
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 7
creator Schauber, Eric M.
Edge, W. Daniel
Wolff, Jerry O.
description We tested whether differences in the diets of nontarget organisms or in vegetation structure could result in adverse ecological effects not predicted by the Quotient Method, a laboratory-based risk assessment methodology used by the Environmental Protection Agency to evaluate pesticides for registration and use. We established populations of herbivorous gray-tailed voles (Microtus canicaudus) and omnivorous deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) in 24 0.2-ha enclosures planted with alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and monitored the populations by live trapping. Alfalfa in twelve enclosures was mowed on 22 June to reduce vegetation height, and 3 wk later, we applied azinphos-methyl at 0, 0.88, and 3.61 kg/ha. We compared predictions of risk with observed effects on the small mammals. Treatment with azinphos-methyl at 3.61 kg/ha reduced population density and growth survival, recruitment, and body growth of voles in both mowed and unmowed enclosures. Survival of female voles exposed to 3.61 kg/ha was lower in mowed than in unmowed enclosures, and the 0.88 kg/ha treatment affected body growth of male voles only in mowed enclosures. Vole densities in 3.61 kg/ha enclosures remained depressed for $\geq 6$ wk after spraying. Azinphos-methyl did not detectably affect reproductive activity of female voles. Precipitation after spraying may have increased exposure of the mammals to azinphosmethyl, resulting in greater effects on voles than reported in a previous, similar experiment. Deer mouse densities in mowed enclosures receiving 3.61 kg/ha decreased 47% within 5 d after spraying. No other adverse insecticide effects on deer mice were significant, but confidence intervals for such effects were wide. Analysis of deer mouse feces indicated that consumption of anthropods just after spraying was greater in insecticide-treated enclosures than in controls. In general, the Quotient Method adequately predicted effects on the small mammals, but its performance may be affected by vegetation structure and precipitation.
doi_str_mv 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0143:IEOSMI]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15939151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2269413</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2269413</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4443-4605837ff99a694bdd86a8de7f962887781f2543b6006272c536e0d5893a0a633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkE1rFTEUhgdRsFb_gmQhoou5niSTr7oql2t7oXIrtSuRQzqTlJT5aJMZpf--CaPg2mzeA3nPA-epqk8UNlQbyCloDUrSD9QY9RFA_QDa8JP97nD1df-TbWCzPXxmz6ojariphdDseZ7_br2sXqV0B_kxxo6qy_2YXDuHNnSOOO_znMg0kjTYvieDHXKmExJG3y9ubB2ZPPnlbt1s51Bqc1zaeYmO2LEjXXDz6-qFzyvuzZ88rq6_7L5vz-uLw9l-e3pRt03T8LqRIDRX3htjpWluuk5LqzunvJFMa6U09Uw0_EYCSKZYK7h00AltuAUrOT-u3q_c-zg9LC7NOITUur63o5uWhFTk66mguXi2Fts4pRSdx_sYBhsfkQIWo1jcYHGDxShmo1iM4moUGQJuD8gy6dtK-h169_i_GNydXpaCovkzM9-tzLs0T_FfJuMZwFiWQ0vt7VrzdkJ7G0PC66tCATDSaM2fAKxtl6o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15939151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insecticide effects on small mammals: influence of vegetation structure and diet</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>JSTOR Complete Journals</source><creator>Schauber, Eric M. ; Edge, W. Daniel ; Wolff, Jerry O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schauber, Eric M. ; Edge, W. Daniel ; Wolff, Jerry O. ; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR</creatorcontrib><description>We tested whether differences in the diets of nontarget organisms or in vegetation structure could result in adverse ecological effects not predicted by the Quotient Method, a laboratory-based risk assessment methodology used by the Environmental Protection Agency to evaluate pesticides for registration and use. We established populations of herbivorous gray-tailed voles (Microtus canicaudus) and omnivorous deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) in 24 0.2-ha enclosures planted with alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and monitored the populations by live trapping. Alfalfa in twelve enclosures was mowed on 22 June to reduce vegetation height, and 3 wk later, we applied azinphos-methyl at 0, 0.88, and 3.61 kg/ha. We compared predictions of risk with observed effects on the small mammals. Treatment with azinphos-methyl at 3.61 kg/ha reduced population density and growth survival, recruitment, and body growth of voles in both mowed and unmowed enclosures. Survival of female voles exposed to 3.61 kg/ha was lower in mowed than in unmowed enclosures, and the 0.88 kg/ha treatment affected body growth of male voles only in mowed enclosures. Vole densities in 3.61 kg/ha enclosures remained depressed for $\geq 6$ wk after spraying. Azinphos-methyl did not detectably affect reproductive activity of female voles. Precipitation after spraying may have increased exposure of the mammals to azinphosmethyl, resulting in greater effects on voles than reported in a previous, similar experiment. Deer mouse densities in mowed enclosures receiving 3.61 kg/ha decreased 47% within 5 d after spraying. No other adverse insecticide effects on deer mice were significant, but confidence intervals for such effects were wide. Analysis of deer mouse feces indicated that consumption of anthropods just after spraying was greater in insecticide-treated enclosures than in controls. In general, the Quotient Method adequately predicted effects on the small mammals, but its performance may be affected by vegetation structure and precipitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0143:IEOSMI]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Alfalfa ; Animal traps ; Arthropods ; azinfos metil ; azinphos methyl ; Deer ; diet ; efectos secundarios ; effet secondaire ; field validation ; Insecticides ; Mammals ; Mice ; Microtus canicaudus ; Mowing ; Oregon ; Peromyscus maniculatus ; Population growth rate ; Quotient Method ; side effects ; small mammals ; vegetation structure ; Voles</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 1997-02, Vol.7 (1), p.143-157</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1997 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1997 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4443-4605837ff99a694bdd86a8de7f962887781f2543b6006272c536e0d5893a0a633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4443-4605837ff99a694bdd86a8de7f962887781f2543b6006272c536e0d5893a0a633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2269413$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2269413$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schauber, Eric M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edge, W. Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Jerry O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR</creatorcontrib><title>Insecticide effects on small mammals: influence of vegetation structure and diet</title><title>Ecological applications</title><description>We tested whether differences in the diets of nontarget organisms or in vegetation structure could result in adverse ecological effects not predicted by the Quotient Method, a laboratory-based risk assessment methodology used by the Environmental Protection Agency to evaluate pesticides for registration and use. We established populations of herbivorous gray-tailed voles (Microtus canicaudus) and omnivorous deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) in 24 0.2-ha enclosures planted with alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and monitored the populations by live trapping. Alfalfa in twelve enclosures was mowed on 22 June to reduce vegetation height, and 3 wk later, we applied azinphos-methyl at 0, 0.88, and 3.61 kg/ha. We compared predictions of risk with observed effects on the small mammals. Treatment with azinphos-methyl at 3.61 kg/ha reduced population density and growth survival, recruitment, and body growth of voles in both mowed and unmowed enclosures. Survival of female voles exposed to 3.61 kg/ha was lower in mowed than in unmowed enclosures, and the 0.88 kg/ha treatment affected body growth of male voles only in mowed enclosures. Vole densities in 3.61 kg/ha enclosures remained depressed for $\geq 6$ wk after spraying. Azinphos-methyl did not detectably affect reproductive activity of female voles. Precipitation after spraying may have increased exposure of the mammals to azinphosmethyl, resulting in greater effects on voles than reported in a previous, similar experiment. Deer mouse densities in mowed enclosures receiving 3.61 kg/ha decreased 47% within 5 d after spraying. No other adverse insecticide effects on deer mice were significant, but confidence intervals for such effects were wide. Analysis of deer mouse feces indicated that consumption of anthropods just after spraying was greater in insecticide-treated enclosures than in controls. In general, the Quotient Method adequately predicted effects on the small mammals, but its performance may be affected by vegetation structure and precipitation.</description><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>Animal traps</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>azinfos metil</subject><subject>azinphos methyl</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>diet</subject><subject>efectos secundarios</subject><subject>effet secondaire</subject><subject>field validation</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Microtus canicaudus</subject><subject>Mowing</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Peromyscus maniculatus</subject><subject>Population growth rate</subject><subject>Quotient Method</subject><subject>side effects</subject><subject>small mammals</subject><subject>vegetation structure</subject><subject>Voles</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkE1rFTEUhgdRsFb_gmQhoou5niSTr7oql2t7oXIrtSuRQzqTlJT5aJMZpf--CaPg2mzeA3nPA-epqk8UNlQbyCloDUrSD9QY9RFA_QDa8JP97nD1df-TbWCzPXxmz6ojariphdDseZ7_br2sXqV0B_kxxo6qy_2YXDuHNnSOOO_znMg0kjTYvieDHXKmExJG3y9ubB2ZPPnlbt1s51Bqc1zaeYmO2LEjXXDz6-qFzyvuzZ88rq6_7L5vz-uLw9l-e3pRt03T8LqRIDRX3htjpWluuk5LqzunvJFMa6U09Uw0_EYCSKZYK7h00AltuAUrOT-u3q_c-zg9LC7NOITUur63o5uWhFTk66mguXi2Fts4pRSdx_sYBhsfkQIWo1jcYHGDxShmo1iM4moUGQJuD8gy6dtK-h169_i_GNydXpaCovkzM9-tzLs0T_FfJuMZwFiWQ0vt7VrzdkJ7G0PC66tCATDSaM2fAKxtl6o</recordid><startdate>199702</startdate><enddate>199702</enddate><creator>Schauber, Eric M.</creator><creator>Edge, W. Daniel</creator><creator>Wolff, Jerry O.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199702</creationdate><title>Insecticide effects on small mammals: influence of vegetation structure and diet</title><author>Schauber, Eric M. ; Edge, W. Daniel ; Wolff, Jerry O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4443-4605837ff99a694bdd86a8de7f962887781f2543b6006272c536e0d5893a0a633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>Animal traps</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>azinfos metil</topic><topic>azinphos methyl</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>diet</topic><topic>efectos secundarios</topic><topic>effet secondaire</topic><topic>field validation</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Microtus canicaudus</topic><topic>Mowing</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Peromyscus maniculatus</topic><topic>Population growth rate</topic><topic>Quotient Method</topic><topic>side effects</topic><topic>small mammals</topic><topic>vegetation structure</topic><topic>Voles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schauber, Eric M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edge, W. Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Jerry O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schauber, Eric M.</au><au>Edge, W. Daniel</au><au>Wolff, Jerry O.</au><aucorp>Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insecticide effects on small mammals: influence of vegetation structure and diet</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><date>1997-02</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>143</spage><epage>157</epage><pages>143-157</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>We tested whether differences in the diets of nontarget organisms or in vegetation structure could result in adverse ecological effects not predicted by the Quotient Method, a laboratory-based risk assessment methodology used by the Environmental Protection Agency to evaluate pesticides for registration and use. We established populations of herbivorous gray-tailed voles (Microtus canicaudus) and omnivorous deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) in 24 0.2-ha enclosures planted with alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and monitored the populations by live trapping. Alfalfa in twelve enclosures was mowed on 22 June to reduce vegetation height, and 3 wk later, we applied azinphos-methyl at 0, 0.88, and 3.61 kg/ha. We compared predictions of risk with observed effects on the small mammals. Treatment with azinphos-methyl at 3.61 kg/ha reduced population density and growth survival, recruitment, and body growth of voles in both mowed and unmowed enclosures. Survival of female voles exposed to 3.61 kg/ha was lower in mowed than in unmowed enclosures, and the 0.88 kg/ha treatment affected body growth of male voles only in mowed enclosures. Vole densities in 3.61 kg/ha enclosures remained depressed for $\geq 6$ wk after spraying. Azinphos-methyl did not detectably affect reproductive activity of female voles. Precipitation after spraying may have increased exposure of the mammals to azinphosmethyl, resulting in greater effects on voles than reported in a previous, similar experiment. Deer mouse densities in mowed enclosures receiving 3.61 kg/ha decreased 47% within 5 d after spraying. No other adverse insecticide effects on deer mice were significant, but confidence intervals for such effects were wide. Analysis of deer mouse feces indicated that consumption of anthropods just after spraying was greater in insecticide-treated enclosures than in controls. In general, the Quotient Method adequately predicted effects on the small mammals, but its performance may be affected by vegetation structure and precipitation.</abstract><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0143:IEOSMI]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 1997-02, Vol.7 (1), p.143-157
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15939151
source Wiley Journals; JSTOR Complete Journals
subjects Alfalfa
Animal traps
Arthropods
azinfos metil
azinphos methyl
Deer
diet
efectos secundarios
effet secondaire
field validation
Insecticides
Mammals
Mice
Microtus canicaudus
Mowing
Oregon
Peromyscus maniculatus
Population growth rate
Quotient Method
side effects
small mammals
vegetation structure
Voles
title Insecticide effects on small mammals: influence of vegetation structure and diet
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T00%3A55%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insecticide%20effects%20on%20small%20mammals:%20influence%20of%20vegetation%20structure%20and%20diet&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Schauber,%20Eric%20M.&rft.aucorp=Oregon%20State%20University,%20Corvallis,%20OR&rft.date=1997-02&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=157&rft.pages=143-157&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007%5B0143:IEOSMI%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2269413%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15939151&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2269413&rfr_iscdi=true