Predicting Cake Filtration Using Specific Filtration Flow Rate

The filterability parameters obtained from laboratory testing of cake filtration are discussed. A high-quality filterability parameter for predicting full-scale equipment operation should only exhibit a small change in parameter value with changing test conditions. An important factor is the test pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water environment research 1996-11, Vol.68 (7), p.1151-1155
Hauptverfasser: Sorensen, Peter B., Agerbaek, Mikkel L., Sørensen, Birgitte L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1155
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1151
container_title Water environment research
container_volume 68
creator Sorensen, Peter B.
Agerbaek, Mikkel L.
Sørensen, Birgitte L.
description The filterability parameters obtained from laboratory testing of cake filtration are discussed. A high-quality filterability parameter for predicting full-scale equipment operation should only exhibit a small change in parameter value with changing test conditions. An important factor is the test pressure applied, so, the discussion is based on the relationship between the filterability parameter and the test pressure. The traditionally used specific resistance to filtration (SRF) is shown to be highly dependent on the applied pressure when the compressibility of the investigated material is high. Therefore, in this case SRF looses its property as a material constant and a new parameter denoted the specific filtrate flow rate (SFF) is suggested as a possible alternative to SRF. A test coefficient (T) is derived to quantify the constancy of SRF and SFF in relation to changing test pressure. Data obtained from the literature are discussed in relation to SRF and SFF, and it is found that SFF is constant and thus the best alternative in case of biological wastewater solids and highly compressible inorganic slurries. However, for non- or slightly compressible solids SRF is more constant than SFF, and therefore, still the relevant filtration parameter. In the range of moderate compressibility neither SRF or SFF can be claimed constant.
doi_str_mv 10.2175/106143096X128568
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15931884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25044824</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25044824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-b15c83ab699f08c4653347f5ddbe1231875807f53ddedb6ad82bc702b735a70d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LwzAYh4MoOKd3L0IR8VbNm48mvQgyNhUGynToLaRpKpldO5OOsf_ejA0ZXjzl4_f8Hl5ehM4B3xAQ_BZwBoziPPsAInkmD1APOGep4BQO4z3GaczpMToJYYYxEIJZD929eFs607nmMxnoL5uMXN153bm2SaZh8_u6sMZVzuwno7pdJRPd2VN0VOk62LPd2UfT0fBt8JiOnx-eBvfj1DBKIC2AG0l1keV5haVhGaeUiYqXZWGBUJCCSxzftCxtWWS6lKQwApNCUK4FLmkfXW-9C99-L23o1NwFY-taN7ZdBgU8jxbJInj5B5y1S9_E2RSBDHPIcxEhvIWMb0PwtlIL7-barxVgtdmm-rvNWLnaeXUwuq68bowLvz3CMeQSR4xvsZWr7fpfrXofTgA4xN7FtjcLXev3tYxJwugPNRmKsw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216051997</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting Cake Filtration Using Specific Filtration Flow Rate</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Sorensen, Peter B. ; Agerbaek, Mikkel L. ; Sørensen, Birgitte L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sorensen, Peter B. ; Agerbaek, Mikkel L. ; Sørensen, Birgitte L.</creatorcontrib><description>The filterability parameters obtained from laboratory testing of cake filtration are discussed. A high-quality filterability parameter for predicting full-scale equipment operation should only exhibit a small change in parameter value with changing test conditions. An important factor is the test pressure applied, so, the discussion is based on the relationship between the filterability parameter and the test pressure. The traditionally used specific resistance to filtration (SRF) is shown to be highly dependent on the applied pressure when the compressibility of the investigated material is high. Therefore, in this case SRF looses its property as a material constant and a new parameter denoted the specific filtrate flow rate (SFF) is suggested as a possible alternative to SRF. A test coefficient (T) is derived to quantify the constancy of SRF and SFF in relation to changing test pressure. Data obtained from the literature are discussed in relation to SRF and SFF, and it is found that SFF is constant and thus the best alternative in case of biological wastewater solids and highly compressible inorganic slurries. However, for non- or slightly compressible solids SRF is more constant than SFF, and therefore, still the relevant filtration parameter. In the range of moderate compressibility neither SRF or SFF can be claimed constant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-4303</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-7531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2175/106143096X128568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Federation</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Chemical engineering ; COMPRESSIBILITY ; Exact sciences and technology ; FILTER CAKE ; Filtration ; FLOW RATE ; Flow rates ; Flow velocity ; Hydrodynamics ; Liquid-liquid and fluid-solid mechanical separations ; Liquids ; Pressure reduction ; Research Papers ; Solids ; SPECIFIC RESISTANCE ; Tillers ; Viscosity ; Wastewater</subject><ispartof>Water environment research, 1996-11, Vol.68 (7), p.1151-1155</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 The Water Environment Federation (WEF)</rights><rights>1996 Water Environment Federation</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Water Environment Federation Nov/Dec 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-b15c83ab699f08c4653347f5ddbe1231875807f53ddedb6ad82bc702b735a70d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25044824$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25044824$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,27907,27908,58000,58233</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2501980$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sorensen, Peter B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agerbaek, Mikkel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Birgitte L.</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting Cake Filtration Using Specific Filtration Flow Rate</title><title>Water environment research</title><description>The filterability parameters obtained from laboratory testing of cake filtration are discussed. A high-quality filterability parameter for predicting full-scale equipment operation should only exhibit a small change in parameter value with changing test conditions. An important factor is the test pressure applied, so, the discussion is based on the relationship between the filterability parameter and the test pressure. The traditionally used specific resistance to filtration (SRF) is shown to be highly dependent on the applied pressure when the compressibility of the investigated material is high. Therefore, in this case SRF looses its property as a material constant and a new parameter denoted the specific filtrate flow rate (SFF) is suggested as a possible alternative to SRF. A test coefficient (T) is derived to quantify the constancy of SRF and SFF in relation to changing test pressure. Data obtained from the literature are discussed in relation to SRF and SFF, and it is found that SFF is constant and thus the best alternative in case of biological wastewater solids and highly compressible inorganic slurries. However, for non- or slightly compressible solids SRF is more constant than SFF, and therefore, still the relevant filtration parameter. In the range of moderate compressibility neither SRF or SFF can be claimed constant.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>COMPRESSIBILITY</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>FILTER CAKE</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>FLOW RATE</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Liquid-liquid and fluid-solid mechanical separations</subject><subject>Liquids</subject><subject>Pressure reduction</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>Solids</subject><subject>SPECIFIC RESISTANCE</subject><subject>Tillers</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><issn>1061-4303</issn><issn>1554-7531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1LwzAYh4MoOKd3L0IR8VbNm48mvQgyNhUGynToLaRpKpldO5OOsf_ejA0ZXjzl4_f8Hl5ehM4B3xAQ_BZwBoziPPsAInkmD1APOGep4BQO4z3GaczpMToJYYYxEIJZD929eFs607nmMxnoL5uMXN153bm2SaZh8_u6sMZVzuwno7pdJRPd2VN0VOk62LPd2UfT0fBt8JiOnx-eBvfj1DBKIC2AG0l1keV5haVhGaeUiYqXZWGBUJCCSxzftCxtWWS6lKQwApNCUK4FLmkfXW-9C99-L23o1NwFY-taN7ZdBgU8jxbJInj5B5y1S9_E2RSBDHPIcxEhvIWMb0PwtlIL7-barxVgtdmm-rvNWLnaeXUwuq68bowLvz3CMeQSR4xvsZWr7fpfrXofTgA4xN7FtjcLXev3tYxJwugPNRmKsw</recordid><startdate>199611</startdate><enddate>199611</enddate><creator>Sorensen, Peter B.</creator><creator>Agerbaek, Mikkel L.</creator><creator>Sørensen, Birgitte L.</creator><general>Water Environment Federation</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199611</creationdate><title>Predicting Cake Filtration Using Specific Filtration Flow Rate</title><author>Sorensen, Peter B. ; Agerbaek, Mikkel L. ; Sørensen, Birgitte L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-b15c83ab699f08c4653347f5ddbe1231875807f53ddedb6ad82bc702b735a70d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>COMPRESSIBILITY</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>FILTER CAKE</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>FLOW RATE</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Liquid-liquid and fluid-solid mechanical separations</topic><topic>Liquids</topic><topic>Pressure reduction</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>Solids</topic><topic>SPECIFIC RESISTANCE</topic><topic>Tillers</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sorensen, Peter B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agerbaek, Mikkel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Birgitte L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sorensen, Peter B.</au><au>Agerbaek, Mikkel L.</au><au>Sørensen, Birgitte L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting Cake Filtration Using Specific Filtration Flow Rate</atitle><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle><date>1996-11</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1151</spage><epage>1155</epage><pages>1151-1155</pages><issn>1061-4303</issn><eissn>1554-7531</eissn><abstract>The filterability parameters obtained from laboratory testing of cake filtration are discussed. A high-quality filterability parameter for predicting full-scale equipment operation should only exhibit a small change in parameter value with changing test conditions. An important factor is the test pressure applied, so, the discussion is based on the relationship between the filterability parameter and the test pressure. The traditionally used specific resistance to filtration (SRF) is shown to be highly dependent on the applied pressure when the compressibility of the investigated material is high. Therefore, in this case SRF looses its property as a material constant and a new parameter denoted the specific filtrate flow rate (SFF) is suggested as a possible alternative to SRF. A test coefficient (T) is derived to quantify the constancy of SRF and SFF in relation to changing test pressure. Data obtained from the literature are discussed in relation to SRF and SFF, and it is found that SFF is constant and thus the best alternative in case of biological wastewater solids and highly compressible inorganic slurries. However, for non- or slightly compressible solids SRF is more constant than SFF, and therefore, still the relevant filtration parameter. In the range of moderate compressibility neither SRF or SFF can be claimed constant.</abstract><cop>Alexandria, VA</cop><pub>Water Environment Federation</pub><doi>10.2175/106143096X128568</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1061-4303
ispartof Water environment research, 1996-11, Vol.68 (7), p.1151-1155
issn 1061-4303
1554-7531
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15931884
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Applied sciences
Chemical engineering
COMPRESSIBILITY
Exact sciences and technology
FILTER CAKE
Filtration
FLOW RATE
Flow rates
Flow velocity
Hydrodynamics
Liquid-liquid and fluid-solid mechanical separations
Liquids
Pressure reduction
Research Papers
Solids
SPECIFIC RESISTANCE
Tillers
Viscosity
Wastewater
title Predicting Cake Filtration Using Specific Filtration Flow Rate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T00%3A09%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20Cake%20Filtration%20Using%20Specific%20Filtration%20Flow%20Rate&rft.jtitle=Water%20environment%20research&rft.au=Sorensen,%20Peter%20B.&rft.date=1996-11&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1151&rft.epage=1155&rft.pages=1151-1155&rft.issn=1061-4303&rft.eissn=1554-7531&rft_id=info:doi/10.2175/106143096X128568&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25044824%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216051997&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25044824&rfr_iscdi=true