Response of Elodea canadensis Michx. and Myriophyllum spicatum L. to shade, cutting and competition in experimental culture
Elodea canadensis Michx. and Myriophyllum spicatum L. are widespread nuisance aquatic plant species. Their ecology is regarded as similar. Both species have been previously classified in terms of established-phase survival strategy as "competitive disturbance-tolerant" species. Experimenta...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrobiologia 1996-12, Vol.340 (1-3), p.219-224 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 224 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-3 |
| container_start_page | 219 |
| container_title | Hydrobiologia |
| container_volume | 340 |
| creator | ABERNETHY, V. J SABBATINI, M. R MURPHY, K. J |
| description | Elodea canadensis Michx. and Myriophyllum spicatum L. are widespread nuisance aquatic plant species. Their ecology is regarded as similar. Both species have been previously classified in terms of established-phase survival strategy as "competitive disturbance-tolerant" species. Experimental data are presented to show that although this broad categorization of strategy is probably correct for the two species, it is possible to demonstrate significant differences in terms of response to disturbance and competition. Less difference was discernible in their comparative response to stress. The drawbacks of applying broad descriptive terminology when dealing with two species of similar strategy are addressed. The results help explain reports of variable success in attempting to manage these two species using disturbance-based weed control measures, and suggest that Elodea is even less susceptible to such measures than Myriophyllum. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/bf00012758 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15886504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15886504</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-2fdc22663261deeb32f1d29b725d3674d610b2fea12e5c4d6fcea590555abf5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKc3_oJciBdiZz6WtrvUsamwIYhelzR94yJpUpsUNvzzRqdevR8853A4CJ1TMqGEFDe1JoRQVojyAI2oKHgmKC0O0Sh9y6ykojxGJyG8J6qYMTJCn88QOu8CYK_xwvoGJFbSyQZcMAGvjdpsJ1i6Bq93vfHdZmft0OLQGSVjWlYTHD0OmyS4xmqI0bi3H1z5toNoovEOG4dh20FvWnBR2sTZOPRwio60tAHOfucYvS4XL_OHbPV0_zi_XWWKCxEzphvFWJ5zltMGoOZM04bN6oKJhufFtMkpqZkGSRkIlU6tQIoZEULIWgvJx-hy79v1_mOAEKvWBAXWSgd-CFVqpcwFmSbwag-q3ofQg666lFn2u4qS6rvf6m7512-CL35dZVDS6l46ZcK_IoXNuZjyLyNQe9U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15886504</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response of Elodea canadensis Michx. and Myriophyllum spicatum L. to shade, cutting and competition in experimental culture</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>ABERNETHY, V. J ; SABBATINI, M. R ; MURPHY, K. J</creator><creatorcontrib>ABERNETHY, V. J ; SABBATINI, M. R ; MURPHY, K. J</creatorcontrib><description>Elodea canadensis Michx. and Myriophyllum spicatum L. are widespread nuisance aquatic plant species. Their ecology is regarded as similar. Both species have been previously classified in terms of established-phase survival strategy as "competitive disturbance-tolerant" species. Experimental data are presented to show that although this broad categorization of strategy is probably correct for the two species, it is possible to demonstrate significant differences in terms of response to disturbance and competition. Less difference was discernible in their comparative response to stress. The drawbacks of applying broad descriptive terminology when dealing with two species of similar strategy are addressed. The results help explain reports of variable success in attempting to manage these two species using disturbance-based weed control measures, and suggest that Elodea is even less susceptible to such measures than Myriophyllum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/bf00012758</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HYDRB8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Elodea canadensis ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities, botany, ecology, damages, economic importance ; Myriophyllum spicatum ; Parasitic plants. Weeds ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 1996-12, Vol.340 (1-3), p.219-224</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-2fdc22663261deeb32f1d29b725d3674d610b2fea12e5c4d6fcea590555abf5a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-2fdc22663261deeb32f1d29b725d3674d610b2fea12e5c4d6fcea590555abf5a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2616354$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ABERNETHY, V. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SABBATINI, M. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURPHY, K. J</creatorcontrib><title>Response of Elodea canadensis Michx. and Myriophyllum spicatum L. to shade, cutting and competition in experimental culture</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><description>Elodea canadensis Michx. and Myriophyllum spicatum L. are widespread nuisance aquatic plant species. Their ecology is regarded as similar. Both species have been previously classified in terms of established-phase survival strategy as "competitive disturbance-tolerant" species. Experimental data are presented to show that although this broad categorization of strategy is probably correct for the two species, it is possible to demonstrate significant differences in terms of response to disturbance and competition. Less difference was discernible in their comparative response to stress. The drawbacks of applying broad descriptive terminology when dealing with two species of similar strategy are addressed. The results help explain reports of variable success in attempting to manage these two species using disturbance-based weed control measures, and suggest that Elodea is even less susceptible to such measures than Myriophyllum.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Elodea canadensis</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities, botany, ecology, damages, economic importance</subject><subject>Myriophyllum spicatum</subject><subject>Parasitic plants. Weeds</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKc3_oJciBdiZz6WtrvUsamwIYhelzR94yJpUpsUNvzzRqdevR8853A4CJ1TMqGEFDe1JoRQVojyAI2oKHgmKC0O0Sh9y6ykojxGJyG8J6qYMTJCn88QOu8CYK_xwvoGJFbSyQZcMAGvjdpsJ1i6Bq93vfHdZmft0OLQGSVjWlYTHD0OmyS4xmqI0bi3H1z5toNoovEOG4dh20FvWnBR2sTZOPRwio60tAHOfucYvS4XL_OHbPV0_zi_XWWKCxEzphvFWJ5zltMGoOZM04bN6oKJhufFtMkpqZkGSRkIlU6tQIoZEULIWgvJx-hy79v1_mOAEKvWBAXWSgd-CFVqpcwFmSbwag-q3ofQg666lFn2u4qS6rvf6m7512-CL35dZVDS6l46ZcK_IoXNuZjyLyNQe9U</recordid><startdate>19961201</startdate><enddate>19961201</enddate><creator>ABERNETHY, V. J</creator><creator>SABBATINI, M. R</creator><creator>MURPHY, K. J</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961201</creationdate><title>Response of Elodea canadensis Michx. and Myriophyllum spicatum L. to shade, cutting and competition in experimental culture</title><author>ABERNETHY, V. J ; SABBATINI, M. R ; MURPHY, K. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-2fdc22663261deeb32f1d29b725d3674d610b2fea12e5c4d6fcea590555abf5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Elodea canadensis</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities, botany, ecology, damages, economic importance</topic><topic>Myriophyllum spicatum</topic><topic>Parasitic plants. Weeds</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ABERNETHY, V. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SABBATINI, M. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURPHY, K. J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ABERNETHY, V. J</au><au>SABBATINI, M. R</au><au>MURPHY, K. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response of Elodea canadensis Michx. and Myriophyllum spicatum L. to shade, cutting and competition in experimental culture</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><date>1996-12-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>340</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>219</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>219-224</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><coden>HYDRB8</coden><abstract>Elodea canadensis Michx. and Myriophyllum spicatum L. are widespread nuisance aquatic plant species. Their ecology is regarded as similar. Both species have been previously classified in terms of established-phase survival strategy as "competitive disturbance-tolerant" species. Experimental data are presented to show that although this broad categorization of strategy is probably correct for the two species, it is possible to demonstrate significant differences in terms of response to disturbance and competition. Less difference was discernible in their comparative response to stress. The drawbacks of applying broad descriptive terminology when dealing with two species of similar strategy are addressed. The results help explain reports of variable success in attempting to manage these two species using disturbance-based weed control measures, and suggest that Elodea is even less susceptible to such measures than Myriophyllum.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/bf00012758</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0018-8158 |
| ispartof | Hydrobiologia, 1996-12, Vol.340 (1-3), p.219-224 |
| issn | 0018-8158 1573-5117 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15886504 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Elodea canadensis Freshwater Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Generalities, botany, ecology, damages, economic importance Myriophyllum spicatum Parasitic plants. Weeds Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection Weeds |
| title | Response of Elodea canadensis Michx. and Myriophyllum spicatum L. to shade, cutting and competition in experimental culture |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T19%3A16%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20of%20Elodea%20canadensis%20Michx.%20and%20Myriophyllum%20spicatum%20L.%20to%20shade,%20cutting%20and%20competition%20in%20experimental%20culture&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=ABERNETHY,%20V.%20J&rft.date=1996-12-01&rft.volume=340&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=219-224&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft.coden=HYDRB8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/bf00012758&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15886504%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15886504&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |