Nontarget effects of a test application of diflubenzuron to the forest canopy on stream macroinvertebrates
Forest application of diflubenzuron (DFB) is commonly used in mid‐Atlantic states for control of gypsy moths in hardwood forests. To assess effects of the pesticide on nontarget organisms, DFB (Dimilin) was applied by helicopter on May 16, 1992, to two watersheds in the Fernow Experimental Forest ne...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental toxicology and chemistry 1996-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1344-1351 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1351 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1344 |
container_title | Environmental toxicology and chemistry |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Hurd, Martin K. Perry, Sue A. Perry, William B. |
description | Forest application of diflubenzuron (DFB) is commonly used in mid‐Atlantic states for control of gypsy moths in hardwood forests. To assess effects of the pesticide on nontarget organisms, DFB (Dimilin) was applied by helicopter on May 16, 1992, to two watersheds in the Fernow Experimental Forest near Parsons, West Virginia. To determine if aquatic macroinvertebrates were affected by the aerial spray, we monitored streams in two reference and two treatment watersheds before and after treatment with DFB using a multilevel artificial substrate sampler. The before‐after‐control‐impact‐pairs (BACIP) analysis was used to test for differences in aquatic macroinvertebrate densities between treated and reference watersheds. Densities of some taxa in DFB‐treated watersheds either showed population depressions or did not increase in density after drought conditions as compared with those taxa in streams in reference watersheds, whereas other taxa increased in treated watersheds. Taxa that had reduced mean densities in treatment watersheds (α = 0.05) included the stoneflies, Leuctra sp. and Isoperla sp., the mayfly, Paraleptophlebia sp., and the crane fly, Hexatoma sp. Shredders, the dominant functional feeding group, also had reduced mean densities in treatment watersheds. Densities of Oligochaeta and Turbellaria increased in streams in treated watersheds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/etc.5620150813 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15865462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>13640251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4473-e564ba0d064ea63a4f4211f5307050618498d7e5ff8babe5fce076f7aad180243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1vEzEQxVcIJELLlbMPiNsGf3v3iCpoK1VFlUo4WrPOGFw268V2oOlfX0epijjlNNLT772Z0Wuad4wuGaX8Ixa3VJpTpmjHxItmwZTibadZ97JZUCNoa7juXjdvcr6jlOm-7xfN3XWcCqQfWAh6j65kEj0BUjAXAvM8BgclxGmvroMftwNOD9tUhRJJ-YnEx7RHHUxx3pGq55IQNmQDLsUw_cFUcEhQ806bVx7GjG-f5knz7cvn27OL9urr-eXZp6vWSWlEi0rLAeiaaomgBUgvOWNeCWqoovUb2Xdrg8r7boChTofUaG8A1qyjXIqT5sMhd07x97YeZzchOxxHmDBus2Wq00pqfhyUUmim9HFQaEm5YhVcHsD6e84JvZ1T2EDaWUbtviRbS7L_SqqG90_JkB2MPsHkQn52Cc4FU_tL-wP2N4y4OxJqK_nfivbgDbng_bMX0i-rjTDKfr8-tyvD-OrmdmVvxCMpH7LF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13640251</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nontarget effects of a test application of diflubenzuron to the forest canopy on stream macroinvertebrates</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Hurd, Martin K. ; Perry, Sue A. ; Perry, William B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hurd, Martin K. ; Perry, Sue A. ; Perry, William B.</creatorcontrib><description>Forest application of diflubenzuron (DFB) is commonly used in mid‐Atlantic states for control of gypsy moths in hardwood forests. To assess effects of the pesticide on nontarget organisms, DFB (Dimilin) was applied by helicopter on May 16, 1992, to two watersheds in the Fernow Experimental Forest near Parsons, West Virginia. To determine if aquatic macroinvertebrates were affected by the aerial spray, we monitored streams in two reference and two treatment watersheds before and after treatment with DFB using a multilevel artificial substrate sampler. The before‐after‐control‐impact‐pairs (BACIP) analysis was used to test for differences in aquatic macroinvertebrate densities between treated and reference watersheds. Densities of some taxa in DFB‐treated watersheds either showed population depressions or did not increase in density after drought conditions as compared with those taxa in streams in reference watersheds, whereas other taxa increased in treated watersheds. Taxa that had reduced mean densities in treatment watersheds (α = 0.05) included the stoneflies, Leuctra sp. and Isoperla sp., the mayfly, Paraleptophlebia sp., and the crane fly, Hexatoma sp. Shredders, the dominant functional feeding group, also had reduced mean densities in treatment watersheds. Densities of Oligochaeta and Turbellaria increased in streams in treated watersheds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-7268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620150813</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ETOCDK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diflubenzuron ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on protozoa and invertebrates ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Leptophlebiidae ; Leuctridae ; Nontarget effects ; Perlodidae ; Stream invertebrates ; Tipulidae</subject><ispartof>Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 1996-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1344-1351</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1996 SETAC</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4473-e564ba0d064ea63a4f4211f5307050618498d7e5ff8babe5fce076f7aad180243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4473-e564ba0d064ea63a4f4211f5307050618498d7e5ff8babe5fce076f7aad180243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fetc.5620150813$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fetc.5620150813$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3223152$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hurd, Martin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Sue A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, William B.</creatorcontrib><title>Nontarget effects of a test application of diflubenzuron to the forest canopy on stream macroinvertebrates</title><title>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</title><addtitle>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</addtitle><description>Forest application of diflubenzuron (DFB) is commonly used in mid‐Atlantic states for control of gypsy moths in hardwood forests. To assess effects of the pesticide on nontarget organisms, DFB (Dimilin) was applied by helicopter on May 16, 1992, to two watersheds in the Fernow Experimental Forest near Parsons, West Virginia. To determine if aquatic macroinvertebrates were affected by the aerial spray, we monitored streams in two reference and two treatment watersheds before and after treatment with DFB using a multilevel artificial substrate sampler. The before‐after‐control‐impact‐pairs (BACIP) analysis was used to test for differences in aquatic macroinvertebrate densities between treated and reference watersheds. Densities of some taxa in DFB‐treated watersheds either showed population depressions or did not increase in density after drought conditions as compared with those taxa in streams in reference watersheds, whereas other taxa increased in treated watersheds. Taxa that had reduced mean densities in treatment watersheds (α = 0.05) included the stoneflies, Leuctra sp. and Isoperla sp., the mayfly, Paraleptophlebia sp., and the crane fly, Hexatoma sp. Shredders, the dominant functional feeding group, also had reduced mean densities in treatment watersheds. Densities of Oligochaeta and Turbellaria increased in streams in treated watersheds.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diflubenzuron</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on protozoa and invertebrates</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Leptophlebiidae</subject><subject>Leuctridae</subject><subject>Nontarget effects</subject><subject>Perlodidae</subject><subject>Stream invertebrates</subject><subject>Tipulidae</subject><issn>0730-7268</issn><issn>1552-8618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1vEzEQxVcIJELLlbMPiNsGf3v3iCpoK1VFlUo4WrPOGFw268V2oOlfX0epijjlNNLT772Z0Wuad4wuGaX8Ixa3VJpTpmjHxItmwZTibadZ97JZUCNoa7juXjdvcr6jlOm-7xfN3XWcCqQfWAh6j65kEj0BUjAXAvM8BgclxGmvroMftwNOD9tUhRJJ-YnEx7RHHUxx3pGq55IQNmQDLsUw_cFUcEhQ806bVx7GjG-f5knz7cvn27OL9urr-eXZp6vWSWlEi0rLAeiaaomgBUgvOWNeCWqoovUb2Xdrg8r7boChTofUaG8A1qyjXIqT5sMhd07x97YeZzchOxxHmDBus2Wq00pqfhyUUmim9HFQaEm5YhVcHsD6e84JvZ1T2EDaWUbtviRbS7L_SqqG90_JkB2MPsHkQn52Cc4FU_tL-wP2N4y4OxJqK_nfivbgDbng_bMX0i-rjTDKfr8-tyvD-OrmdmVvxCMpH7LF</recordid><startdate>199608</startdate><enddate>199608</enddate><creator>Hurd, Martin K.</creator><creator>Perry, Sue A.</creator><creator>Perry, William B.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>SETAC</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199608</creationdate><title>Nontarget effects of a test application of diflubenzuron to the forest canopy on stream macroinvertebrates</title><author>Hurd, Martin K. ; Perry, Sue A. ; Perry, William B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4473-e564ba0d064ea63a4f4211f5307050618498d7e5ff8babe5fce076f7aad180243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diflubenzuron</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on protozoa and invertebrates</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Leptophlebiidae</topic><topic>Leuctridae</topic><topic>Nontarget effects</topic><topic>Perlodidae</topic><topic>Stream invertebrates</topic><topic>Tipulidae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hurd, Martin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Sue A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, William B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hurd, Martin K.</au><au>Perry, Sue A.</au><au>Perry, William B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nontarget effects of a test application of diflubenzuron to the forest canopy on stream macroinvertebrates</atitle><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</addtitle><date>1996-08</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1344</spage><epage>1351</epage><pages>1344-1351</pages><issn>0730-7268</issn><eissn>1552-8618</eissn><coden>ETOCDK</coden><abstract>Forest application of diflubenzuron (DFB) is commonly used in mid‐Atlantic states for control of gypsy moths in hardwood forests. To assess effects of the pesticide on nontarget organisms, DFB (Dimilin) was applied by helicopter on May 16, 1992, to two watersheds in the Fernow Experimental Forest near Parsons, West Virginia. To determine if aquatic macroinvertebrates were affected by the aerial spray, we monitored streams in two reference and two treatment watersheds before and after treatment with DFB using a multilevel artificial substrate sampler. The before‐after‐control‐impact‐pairs (BACIP) analysis was used to test for differences in aquatic macroinvertebrate densities between treated and reference watersheds. Densities of some taxa in DFB‐treated watersheds either showed population depressions or did not increase in density after drought conditions as compared with those taxa in streams in reference watersheds, whereas other taxa increased in treated watersheds. Taxa that had reduced mean densities in treatment watersheds (α = 0.05) included the stoneflies, Leuctra sp. and Isoperla sp., the mayfly, Paraleptophlebia sp., and the crane fly, Hexatoma sp. Shredders, the dominant functional feeding group, also had reduced mean densities in treatment watersheds. Densities of Oligochaeta and Turbellaria increased in streams in treated watersheds.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/etc.5620150813</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0730-7268 |
ispartof | Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 1996-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1344-1351 |
issn | 0730-7268 1552-8618 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15865462 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Diflubenzuron Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on protozoa and invertebrates Freshwater Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Leptophlebiidae Leuctridae Nontarget effects Perlodidae Stream invertebrates Tipulidae |
title | Nontarget effects of a test application of diflubenzuron to the forest canopy on stream macroinvertebrates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T18%3A30%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nontarget%20effects%20of%20a%20test%20application%20of%20diflubenzuron%20to%20the%20forest%20canopy%20on%20stream%20macroinvertebrates&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20toxicology%20and%20chemistry&rft.au=Hurd,%20Martin%20K.&rft.date=1996-08&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1344&rft.epage=1351&rft.pages=1344-1351&rft.issn=0730-7268&rft.eissn=1552-8618&rft.coden=ETOCDK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/etc.5620150813&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E13640251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13640251&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |