Assessing the potential for environmental monitoring using ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) with riverside and Scottish data
Ground beetle survey data were used to produce three habitat classifications; a national and a local riverside classification generated by hand searching and a Scottish classification from a pitfall trap survey. The classifications provided a clear picture of the habitats of the assemblages sampled,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annales zoologici fennici 1996-01, Vol.33 (1), p.157-163 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 163 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 157 |
container_title | Annales zoologici fennici |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Eyre, Michael D. Lott, Derek A. Garside, Adam |
description | Ground beetle survey data were used to produce three habitat classifications; a national and a local riverside classification generated by hand searching and a Scottish classification from a pitfall trap survey. The classifications provided a clear picture of the habitats of the assemblages sampled, even when the data were from a number of sources, and were especially good with data from standardised sampling. Species rarity scores were derived from distribution records from either national or local surveys. These were used to generate site rarity values by summing species scores and dividing by the number of species. These were used as a measure of site quality and provided a mechanism for ranking sites within habitat groups. This methodology worked at the local, regional and national scales and it appears that there is great potential for the use of ground beetle data from structured, standardised surveys in assessing environmental quality. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15861128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23735415</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23735415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j206t-5cbbcdecbf33776e1c2e523e68a7ee87724b91207cea2e5fce52fee8d07c846b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0tLxDAUhYMoOI7-BCEr0UUhj6bpuBuKLxhwoYK7kqS30wxtU5N0xK2_3Oi4unC-7xy4R2hB5UpmLBfkGC0IITzLhXg_RWch7AhhopBkgb7XIUAIdtzi2AGeXIQxWtXj1nkM4956Nw4pSsngRhud_1Xnv8LWu3lssAaIPQR8Xbke3BTBq1tcKa-0bRTc4E8bO-ztHnywDWCVKi_GxWhDhxsV1Tk6aVUf4OL_LtHb_d1r9Zhtnh-eqvUm2zFSxEwYrU0DRrecS1kANQwE41CUSgKUUrJcrygj0oBKpDWJtgk0KSnzQvMlujrsTt59zBBiPdhgoO_VCG4ONRVlQSkrk3h5EHch_VtP3g7Kf9WMSy5yKvgP9qBryA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15861128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the potential for environmental monitoring using ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) with riverside and Scottish data</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Eyre, Michael D. ; Lott, Derek A. ; Garside, Adam</creator><creatorcontrib>Eyre, Michael D. ; Lott, Derek A. ; Garside, Adam</creatorcontrib><description>Ground beetle survey data were used to produce three habitat classifications; a national and a local riverside classification generated by hand searching and a Scottish classification from a pitfall trap survey. The classifications provided a clear picture of the habitats of the assemblages sampled, even when the data were from a number of sources, and were especially good with data from standardised sampling. Species rarity scores were derived from distribution records from either national or local surveys. These were used to generate site rarity values by summing species scores and dividing by the number of species. These were used as a measure of site quality and provided a mechanism for ranking sites within habitat groups. This methodology worked at the local, regional and national scales and it appears that there is great potential for the use of ground beetle data from structured, standardised surveys in assessing environmental quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-455X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1797-2450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board</publisher><subject>Beetles ; Carabidae ; Datasets ; Environmental change and conservation ; Habitat conservation ; Information classification ; Insect ecology ; Riverine habitats ; Sediments ; Species ; Squares ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Annales zoologici fennici, 1996-01, Vol.33 (1), p.157-163</ispartof><rights>Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23735415$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23735415$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eyre, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lott, Derek A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garside, Adam</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the potential for environmental monitoring using ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) with riverside and Scottish data</title><title>Annales zoologici fennici</title><description>Ground beetle survey data were used to produce three habitat classifications; a national and a local riverside classification generated by hand searching and a Scottish classification from a pitfall trap survey. The classifications provided a clear picture of the habitats of the assemblages sampled, even when the data were from a number of sources, and were especially good with data from standardised sampling. Species rarity scores were derived from distribution records from either national or local surveys. These were used to generate site rarity values by summing species scores and dividing by the number of species. These were used as a measure of site quality and provided a mechanism for ranking sites within habitat groups. This methodology worked at the local, regional and national scales and it appears that there is great potential for the use of ground beetle data from structured, standardised surveys in assessing environmental quality.</description><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Carabidae</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Environmental change and conservation</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Information classification</subject><subject>Insect ecology</subject><subject>Riverine habitats</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Squares</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0003-455X</issn><issn>1797-2450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotj0tLxDAUhYMoOI7-BCEr0UUhj6bpuBuKLxhwoYK7kqS30wxtU5N0xK2_3Oi4unC-7xy4R2hB5UpmLBfkGC0IITzLhXg_RWch7AhhopBkgb7XIUAIdtzi2AGeXIQxWtXj1nkM4956Nw4pSsngRhud_1Xnv8LWu3lssAaIPQR8Xbke3BTBq1tcKa-0bRTc4E8bO-ztHnywDWCVKi_GxWhDhxsV1Tk6aVUf4OL_LtHb_d1r9Zhtnh-eqvUm2zFSxEwYrU0DRrecS1kANQwE41CUSgKUUrJcrygj0oBKpDWJtgk0KSnzQvMlujrsTt59zBBiPdhgoO_VCG4ONRVlQSkrk3h5EHch_VtP3g7Kf9WMSy5yKvgP9qBryA</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>Eyre, Michael D.</creator><creator>Lott, Derek A.</creator><creator>Garside, Adam</creator><general>Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board</general><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>Assessing the potential for environmental monitoring using ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) with riverside and Scottish data</title><author>Eyre, Michael D. ; Lott, Derek A. ; Garside, Adam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j206t-5cbbcdecbf33776e1c2e523e68a7ee87724b91207cea2e5fce52fee8d07c846b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Carabidae</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Environmental change and conservation</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Information classification</topic><topic>Insect ecology</topic><topic>Riverine habitats</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Squares</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eyre, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lott, Derek A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garside, Adam</creatorcontrib><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Annales zoologici fennici</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eyre, Michael D.</au><au>Lott, Derek A.</au><au>Garside, Adam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the potential for environmental monitoring using ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) with riverside and Scottish data</atitle><jtitle>Annales zoologici fennici</jtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>157-163</pages><issn>0003-455X</issn><eissn>1797-2450</eissn><abstract>Ground beetle survey data were used to produce three habitat classifications; a national and a local riverside classification generated by hand searching and a Scottish classification from a pitfall trap survey. The classifications provided a clear picture of the habitats of the assemblages sampled, even when the data were from a number of sources, and were especially good with data from standardised sampling. Species rarity scores were derived from distribution records from either national or local surveys. These were used to generate site rarity values by summing species scores and dividing by the number of species. These were used as a measure of site quality and provided a mechanism for ranking sites within habitat groups. This methodology worked at the local, regional and national scales and it appears that there is great potential for the use of ground beetle data from structured, standardised surveys in assessing environmental quality.</abstract><pub>Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board</pub><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-455X |
ispartof | Annales zoologici fennici, 1996-01, Vol.33 (1), p.157-163 |
issn | 0003-455X 1797-2450 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15861128 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free E- Journals |
subjects | Beetles Carabidae Datasets Environmental change and conservation Habitat conservation Information classification Insect ecology Riverine habitats Sediments Species Squares Vegetation |
title | Assessing the potential for environmental monitoring using ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) with riverside and Scottish data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A33%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20potential%20for%20environmental%20monitoring%20using%20ground%20beetles%20(Coleoptera:%20Carabidae)%20with%20riverside%20and%20Scottish%20data&rft.jtitle=Annales%20zoologici%20fennici&rft.au=Eyre,%20Michael%20D.&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=157-163&rft.issn=0003-455X&rft.eissn=1797-2450&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23735415%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15861128&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23735415&rfr_iscdi=true |