Assessing the potential for environmental monitoring using ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) with riverside and Scottish data

Ground beetle survey data were used to produce three habitat classifications; a national and a local riverside classification generated by hand searching and a Scottish classification from a pitfall trap survey. The classifications provided a clear picture of the habitats of the assemblages sampled,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annales zoologici fennici 1996-01, Vol.33 (1), p.157-163
Hauptverfasser: Eyre, Michael D., Lott, Derek A., Garside, Adam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 163
container_issue 1
container_start_page 157
container_title Annales zoologici fennici
container_volume 33
creator Eyre, Michael D.
Lott, Derek A.
Garside, Adam
description Ground beetle survey data were used to produce three habitat classifications; a national and a local riverside classification generated by hand searching and a Scottish classification from a pitfall trap survey. The classifications provided a clear picture of the habitats of the assemblages sampled, even when the data were from a number of sources, and were especially good with data from standardised sampling. Species rarity scores were derived from distribution records from either national or local surveys. These were used to generate site rarity values by summing species scores and dividing by the number of species. These were used as a measure of site quality and provided a mechanism for ranking sites within habitat groups. This methodology worked at the local, regional and national scales and it appears that there is great potential for the use of ground beetle data from structured, standardised surveys in assessing environmental quality.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15861128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23735415</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23735415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j206t-5cbbcdecbf33776e1c2e523e68a7ee87724b91207cea2e5fce52fee8d07c846b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0tLxDAUhYMoOI7-BCEr0UUhj6bpuBuKLxhwoYK7kqS30wxtU5N0xK2_3Oi4unC-7xy4R2hB5UpmLBfkGC0IITzLhXg_RWch7AhhopBkgb7XIUAIdtzi2AGeXIQxWtXj1nkM4956Nw4pSsngRhud_1Xnv8LWu3lssAaIPQR8Xbke3BTBq1tcKa-0bRTc4E8bO-ztHnywDWCVKi_GxWhDhxsV1Tk6aVUf4OL_LtHb_d1r9Zhtnh-eqvUm2zFSxEwYrU0DRrecS1kANQwE41CUSgKUUrJcrygj0oBKpDWJtgk0KSnzQvMlujrsTt59zBBiPdhgoO_VCG4ONRVlQSkrk3h5EHch_VtP3g7Kf9WMSy5yKvgP9qBryA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15861128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the potential for environmental monitoring using ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) with riverside and Scottish data</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Eyre, Michael D. ; Lott, Derek A. ; Garside, Adam</creator><creatorcontrib>Eyre, Michael D. ; Lott, Derek A. ; Garside, Adam</creatorcontrib><description>Ground beetle survey data were used to produce three habitat classifications; a national and a local riverside classification generated by hand searching and a Scottish classification from a pitfall trap survey. The classifications provided a clear picture of the habitats of the assemblages sampled, even when the data were from a number of sources, and were especially good with data from standardised sampling. Species rarity scores were derived from distribution records from either national or local surveys. These were used to generate site rarity values by summing species scores and dividing by the number of species. These were used as a measure of site quality and provided a mechanism for ranking sites within habitat groups. This methodology worked at the local, regional and national scales and it appears that there is great potential for the use of ground beetle data from structured, standardised surveys in assessing environmental quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-455X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1797-2450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board</publisher><subject>Beetles ; Carabidae ; Datasets ; Environmental change and conservation ; Habitat conservation ; Information classification ; Insect ecology ; Riverine habitats ; Sediments ; Species ; Squares ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Annales zoologici fennici, 1996-01, Vol.33 (1), p.157-163</ispartof><rights>Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23735415$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23735415$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eyre, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lott, Derek A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garside, Adam</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the potential for environmental monitoring using ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) with riverside and Scottish data</title><title>Annales zoologici fennici</title><description>Ground beetle survey data were used to produce three habitat classifications; a national and a local riverside classification generated by hand searching and a Scottish classification from a pitfall trap survey. The classifications provided a clear picture of the habitats of the assemblages sampled, even when the data were from a number of sources, and were especially good with data from standardised sampling. Species rarity scores were derived from distribution records from either national or local surveys. These were used to generate site rarity values by summing species scores and dividing by the number of species. These were used as a measure of site quality and provided a mechanism for ranking sites within habitat groups. This methodology worked at the local, regional and national scales and it appears that there is great potential for the use of ground beetle data from structured, standardised surveys in assessing environmental quality.</description><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Carabidae</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Environmental change and conservation</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Information classification</subject><subject>Insect ecology</subject><subject>Riverine habitats</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Squares</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0003-455X</issn><issn>1797-2450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotj0tLxDAUhYMoOI7-BCEr0UUhj6bpuBuKLxhwoYK7kqS30wxtU5N0xK2_3Oi4unC-7xy4R2hB5UpmLBfkGC0IITzLhXg_RWch7AhhopBkgb7XIUAIdtzi2AGeXIQxWtXj1nkM4956Nw4pSsngRhud_1Xnv8LWu3lssAaIPQR8Xbke3BTBq1tcKa-0bRTc4E8bO-ztHnywDWCVKi_GxWhDhxsV1Tk6aVUf4OL_LtHb_d1r9Zhtnh-eqvUm2zFSxEwYrU0DRrecS1kANQwE41CUSgKUUrJcrygj0oBKpDWJtgk0KSnzQvMlujrsTt59zBBiPdhgoO_VCG4ONRVlQSkrk3h5EHch_VtP3g7Kf9WMSy5yKvgP9qBryA</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>Eyre, Michael D.</creator><creator>Lott, Derek A.</creator><creator>Garside, Adam</creator><general>Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board</general><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>Assessing the potential for environmental monitoring using ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) with riverside and Scottish data</title><author>Eyre, Michael D. ; Lott, Derek A. ; Garside, Adam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j206t-5cbbcdecbf33776e1c2e523e68a7ee87724b91207cea2e5fce52fee8d07c846b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Carabidae</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Environmental change and conservation</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Information classification</topic><topic>Insect ecology</topic><topic>Riverine habitats</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Squares</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eyre, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lott, Derek A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garside, Adam</creatorcontrib><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Annales zoologici fennici</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eyre, Michael D.</au><au>Lott, Derek A.</au><au>Garside, Adam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the potential for environmental monitoring using ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) with riverside and Scottish data</atitle><jtitle>Annales zoologici fennici</jtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>157-163</pages><issn>0003-455X</issn><eissn>1797-2450</eissn><abstract>Ground beetle survey data were used to produce three habitat classifications; a national and a local riverside classification generated by hand searching and a Scottish classification from a pitfall trap survey. The classifications provided a clear picture of the habitats of the assemblages sampled, even when the data were from a number of sources, and were especially good with data from standardised sampling. Species rarity scores were derived from distribution records from either national or local surveys. These were used to generate site rarity values by summing species scores and dividing by the number of species. These were used as a measure of site quality and provided a mechanism for ranking sites within habitat groups. This methodology worked at the local, regional and national scales and it appears that there is great potential for the use of ground beetle data from structured, standardised surveys in assessing environmental quality.</abstract><pub>Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board</pub><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-455X
ispartof Annales zoologici fennici, 1996-01, Vol.33 (1), p.157-163
issn 0003-455X
1797-2450
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15861128
source Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free E- Journals
subjects Beetles
Carabidae
Datasets
Environmental change and conservation
Habitat conservation
Information classification
Insect ecology
Riverine habitats
Sediments
Species
Squares
Vegetation
title Assessing the potential for environmental monitoring using ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) with riverside and Scottish data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A33%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20potential%20for%20environmental%20monitoring%20using%20ground%20beetles%20(Coleoptera:%20Carabidae)%20with%20riverside%20and%20Scottish%20data&rft.jtitle=Annales%20zoologici%20fennici&rft.au=Eyre,%20Michael%20D.&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=157-163&rft.issn=0003-455X&rft.eissn=1797-2450&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23735415%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15861128&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23735415&rfr_iscdi=true