Attention in risky choice

Previous research on the processes involved in risky decisions has rarely linked process data to choice directly. We used a simple measure based on the relative amount of attentional deployment to different components (gains/losses and their probabilities) of a risky gamble during the choice process...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta psychologica 2014-10, Vol.152, p.166-176
Hauptverfasser: Brandstätter, Eduard, Körner, Christof
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 176
container_issue
container_start_page 166
container_title Acta psychologica
container_volume 152
creator Brandstätter, Eduard
Körner, Christof
description Previous research on the processes involved in risky decisions has rarely linked process data to choice directly. We used a simple measure based on the relative amount of attentional deployment to different components (gains/losses and their probabilities) of a risky gamble during the choice process, and we related this measure to the actual choice. In an experiment we recorded the decisions, decision times, and eye movements of 80 participants who made decisions on 11 choice problems. We used the number of eye fixations and fixation transitions to trace the deployment of attention during the choice process and obtained the following main results. First, different components of a gamble attracted different amounts of attention depending on participants' actual choice. This was reflected in both the number of fixations and the fixation transitions. Second, the last-fixated gamble but not the last-fixated reason predicted participants' choices. Third, a comparison of data obtained with eye tracking and data obtained with verbal protocols from a previous study showed a large degree of convergence regarding the process of risky choice. Together these findings tend to support dimensional decision strategies such as the priority heuristic. •Attention depended on the dimension that determined the choice.•Transitions occurred within the dimension that determined the choice.•The last-fixated gamble and not the last-fixated dimension predicted choice.•Verbal data, attention measures, and choices tend to support dimensional processes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1586106212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001691814001942</els_id><sourcerecordid>1586106212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-413f6c1afa2e76859432762b80f3f151c410ccb5e62ca0ebd5b5432467a734ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M9LwzAUwPEgis7pHyCI7CJ4ac1LkzS9CGP4CwZe9BzS1wQzt3YmnbD_3oxOvXkKgc97CV9CLoHmQEHeLnKD_Tpuc0aB51TllKoDMgJVFplkVXlIRpRSyGQF6oScxrhIVw4VHJMTJhiTgqsRuZj2vW1737UT306Cjx_bCb53Hu0ZOXJmGe35_hyTt4f719lTNn95fJ5N5xkWFeszDoWTCMYZZkupRMULVkpWK-oKBwKQA0WshZUMDbV1I2qRCJelKQvuXDEmN8Pedeg-Nzb2euUj2uXStLbbRA1CSaCSAUuUDxRDF2OwTq-DX5mw1UD1Lope6CGK3kXRVOkUJY1d7V_Y1Cvb_A79VEjgeg9MRLN0wbTo459TiisOkNzd4Gzq8eVt0BG9bdE2PljsddP5_3_yDSXHf0c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1586106212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attention in risky choice</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Brandstätter, Eduard ; Körner, Christof</creator><creatorcontrib>Brandstätter, Eduard ; Körner, Christof</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research on the processes involved in risky decisions has rarely linked process data to choice directly. We used a simple measure based on the relative amount of attentional deployment to different components (gains/losses and their probabilities) of a risky gamble during the choice process, and we related this measure to the actual choice. In an experiment we recorded the decisions, decision times, and eye movements of 80 participants who made decisions on 11 choice problems. We used the number of eye fixations and fixation transitions to trace the deployment of attention during the choice process and obtained the following main results. First, different components of a gamble attracted different amounts of attention depending on participants' actual choice. This was reflected in both the number of fixations and the fixation transitions. Second, the last-fixated gamble but not the last-fixated reason predicted participants' choices. Third, a comparison of data obtained with eye tracking and data obtained with verbal protocols from a previous study showed a large degree of convergence regarding the process of risky choice. Together these findings tend to support dimensional decision strategies such as the priority heuristic. •Attention depended on the dimension that determined the choice.•Transitions occurred within the dimension that determined the choice.•The last-fixated gamble and not the last-fixated dimension predicted choice.•Verbal data, attention measures, and choices tend to support dimensional processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25226548</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APSOAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Decision making ; Decision making. Choice ; Eye Movements ; Eye tracking ; Female ; Fixation, Ocular ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Probability ; Process tracing ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Risk ; Risk-Taking ; Risky choice ; Verbal protocols ; Vigilance. Attention. Sleep ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Acta psychologica, 2014-10, Vol.152, p.166-176</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-413f6c1afa2e76859432762b80f3f151c410ccb5e62ca0ebd5b5432467a734ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-413f6c1afa2e76859432762b80f3f151c410ccb5e62ca0ebd5b5432467a734ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28848411$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25226548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brandstätter, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Körner, Christof</creatorcontrib><title>Attention in risky choice</title><title>Acta psychologica</title><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><description>Previous research on the processes involved in risky decisions has rarely linked process data to choice directly. We used a simple measure based on the relative amount of attentional deployment to different components (gains/losses and their probabilities) of a risky gamble during the choice process, and we related this measure to the actual choice. In an experiment we recorded the decisions, decision times, and eye movements of 80 participants who made decisions on 11 choice problems. We used the number of eye fixations and fixation transitions to trace the deployment of attention during the choice process and obtained the following main results. First, different components of a gamble attracted different amounts of attention depending on participants' actual choice. This was reflected in both the number of fixations and the fixation transitions. Second, the last-fixated gamble but not the last-fixated reason predicted participants' choices. Third, a comparison of data obtained with eye tracking and data obtained with verbal protocols from a previous study showed a large degree of convergence regarding the process of risky choice. Together these findings tend to support dimensional decision strategies such as the priority heuristic. •Attention depended on the dimension that determined the choice.•Transitions occurred within the dimension that determined the choice.•The last-fixated gamble and not the last-fixated dimension predicted choice.•Verbal data, attention measures, and choices tend to support dimensional processes.</description><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision making. Choice</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Eye tracking</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Process tracing</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>Risky choice</subject><subject>Verbal protocols</subject><subject>Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-6918</issn><issn>1873-6297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M9LwzAUwPEgis7pHyCI7CJ4ac1LkzS9CGP4CwZe9BzS1wQzt3YmnbD_3oxOvXkKgc97CV9CLoHmQEHeLnKD_Tpuc0aB51TllKoDMgJVFplkVXlIRpRSyGQF6oScxrhIVw4VHJMTJhiTgqsRuZj2vW1737UT306Cjx_bCb53Hu0ZOXJmGe35_hyTt4f719lTNn95fJ5N5xkWFeszDoWTCMYZZkupRMULVkpWK-oKBwKQA0WshZUMDbV1I2qRCJelKQvuXDEmN8Pedeg-Nzb2euUj2uXStLbbRA1CSaCSAUuUDxRDF2OwTq-DX5mw1UD1Lope6CGK3kXRVOkUJY1d7V_Y1Cvb_A79VEjgeg9MRLN0wbTo459TiisOkNzd4Gzq8eVt0BG9bdE2PljsddP5_3_yDSXHf0c</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Brandstätter, Eduard</creator><creator>Körner, Christof</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Attention in risky choice</title><author>Brandstätter, Eduard ; Körner, Christof</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-413f6c1afa2e76859432762b80f3f151c410ccb5e62ca0ebd5b5432467a734ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision making. Choice</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Eye tracking</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Process tracing</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>Risky choice</topic><topic>Verbal protocols</topic><topic>Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brandstätter, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Körner, Christof</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brandstätter, Eduard</au><au>Körner, Christof</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attention in risky choice</atitle><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>152</volume><spage>166</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>166-176</pages><issn>0001-6918</issn><eissn>1873-6297</eissn><coden>APSOAZ</coden><abstract>Previous research on the processes involved in risky decisions has rarely linked process data to choice directly. We used a simple measure based on the relative amount of attentional deployment to different components (gains/losses and their probabilities) of a risky gamble during the choice process, and we related this measure to the actual choice. In an experiment we recorded the decisions, decision times, and eye movements of 80 participants who made decisions on 11 choice problems. We used the number of eye fixations and fixation transitions to trace the deployment of attention during the choice process and obtained the following main results. First, different components of a gamble attracted different amounts of attention depending on participants' actual choice. This was reflected in both the number of fixations and the fixation transitions. Second, the last-fixated gamble but not the last-fixated reason predicted participants' choices. Third, a comparison of data obtained with eye tracking and data obtained with verbal protocols from a previous study showed a large degree of convergence regarding the process of risky choice. Together these findings tend to support dimensional decision strategies such as the priority heuristic. •Attention depended on the dimension that determined the choice.•Transitions occurred within the dimension that determined the choice.•The last-fixated gamble and not the last-fixated dimension predicted choice.•Verbal data, attention measures, and choices tend to support dimensional processes.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25226548</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.008</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-6918
ispartof Acta psychologica, 2014-10, Vol.152, p.166-176
issn 0001-6918
1873-6297
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1586106212
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Activity levels. Psychomotricity
Adolescent
Adult
Attention
Biological and medical sciences
Choice Behavior
Cognition. Intelligence
Decision making
Decision making. Choice
Eye Movements
Eye tracking
Female
Fixation, Ocular
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Probability
Process tracing
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reaction Time
Risk
Risk-Taking
Risky choice
Verbal protocols
Vigilance. Attention. Sleep
Young Adult
title Attention in risky choice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A36%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attention%20in%20risky%20choice&rft.jtitle=Acta%20psychologica&rft.au=Brandst%C3%A4tter,%20Eduard&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=152&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=166-176&rft.issn=0001-6918&rft.eissn=1873-6297&rft.coden=APSOAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1586106212%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1586106212&rft_id=info:pmid/25226548&rft_els_id=S0001691814001942&rfr_iscdi=true