Attention in risky choice
Previous research on the processes involved in risky decisions has rarely linked process data to choice directly. We used a simple measure based on the relative amount of attentional deployment to different components (gains/losses and their probabilities) of a risky gamble during the choice process...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta psychologica 2014-10, Vol.152, p.166-176 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 176 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 166 |
container_title | Acta psychologica |
container_volume | 152 |
creator | Brandstätter, Eduard Körner, Christof |
description | Previous research on the processes involved in risky decisions has rarely linked process data to choice directly. We used a simple measure based on the relative amount of attentional deployment to different components (gains/losses and their probabilities) of a risky gamble during the choice process, and we related this measure to the actual choice. In an experiment we recorded the decisions, decision times, and eye movements of 80 participants who made decisions on 11 choice problems. We used the number of eye fixations and fixation transitions to trace the deployment of attention during the choice process and obtained the following main results. First, different components of a gamble attracted different amounts of attention depending on participants' actual choice. This was reflected in both the number of fixations and the fixation transitions. Second, the last-fixated gamble but not the last-fixated reason predicted participants' choices. Third, a comparison of data obtained with eye tracking and data obtained with verbal protocols from a previous study showed a large degree of convergence regarding the process of risky choice. Together these findings tend to support dimensional decision strategies such as the priority heuristic.
•Attention depended on the dimension that determined the choice.•Transitions occurred within the dimension that determined the choice.•The last-fixated gamble and not the last-fixated dimension predicted choice.•Verbal data, attention measures, and choices tend to support dimensional processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1586106212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001691814001942</els_id><sourcerecordid>1586106212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-413f6c1afa2e76859432762b80f3f151c410ccb5e62ca0ebd5b5432467a734ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M9LwzAUwPEgis7pHyCI7CJ4ac1LkzS9CGP4CwZe9BzS1wQzt3YmnbD_3oxOvXkKgc97CV9CLoHmQEHeLnKD_Tpuc0aB51TllKoDMgJVFplkVXlIRpRSyGQF6oScxrhIVw4VHJMTJhiTgqsRuZj2vW1737UT306Cjx_bCb53Hu0ZOXJmGe35_hyTt4f719lTNn95fJ5N5xkWFeszDoWTCMYZZkupRMULVkpWK-oKBwKQA0WshZUMDbV1I2qRCJelKQvuXDEmN8Pedeg-Nzb2euUj2uXStLbbRA1CSaCSAUuUDxRDF2OwTq-DX5mw1UD1Lope6CGK3kXRVOkUJY1d7V_Y1Cvb_A79VEjgeg9MRLN0wbTo459TiisOkNzd4Gzq8eVt0BG9bdE2PljsddP5_3_yDSXHf0c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1586106212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attention in risky choice</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Brandstätter, Eduard ; Körner, Christof</creator><creatorcontrib>Brandstätter, Eduard ; Körner, Christof</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research on the processes involved in risky decisions has rarely linked process data to choice directly. We used a simple measure based on the relative amount of attentional deployment to different components (gains/losses and their probabilities) of a risky gamble during the choice process, and we related this measure to the actual choice. In an experiment we recorded the decisions, decision times, and eye movements of 80 participants who made decisions on 11 choice problems. We used the number of eye fixations and fixation transitions to trace the deployment of attention during the choice process and obtained the following main results. First, different components of a gamble attracted different amounts of attention depending on participants' actual choice. This was reflected in both the number of fixations and the fixation transitions. Second, the last-fixated gamble but not the last-fixated reason predicted participants' choices. Third, a comparison of data obtained with eye tracking and data obtained with verbal protocols from a previous study showed a large degree of convergence regarding the process of risky choice. Together these findings tend to support dimensional decision strategies such as the priority heuristic.
•Attention depended on the dimension that determined the choice.•Transitions occurred within the dimension that determined the choice.•The last-fixated gamble and not the last-fixated dimension predicted choice.•Verbal data, attention measures, and choices tend to support dimensional processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25226548</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APSOAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Decision making ; Decision making. Choice ; Eye Movements ; Eye tracking ; Female ; Fixation, Ocular ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Probability ; Process tracing ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Risk ; Risk-Taking ; Risky choice ; Verbal protocols ; Vigilance. Attention. Sleep ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Acta psychologica, 2014-10, Vol.152, p.166-176</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-413f6c1afa2e76859432762b80f3f151c410ccb5e62ca0ebd5b5432467a734ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-413f6c1afa2e76859432762b80f3f151c410ccb5e62ca0ebd5b5432467a734ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28848411$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25226548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brandstätter, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Körner, Christof</creatorcontrib><title>Attention in risky choice</title><title>Acta psychologica</title><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><description>Previous research on the processes involved in risky decisions has rarely linked process data to choice directly. We used a simple measure based on the relative amount of attentional deployment to different components (gains/losses and their probabilities) of a risky gamble during the choice process, and we related this measure to the actual choice. In an experiment we recorded the decisions, decision times, and eye movements of 80 participants who made decisions on 11 choice problems. We used the number of eye fixations and fixation transitions to trace the deployment of attention during the choice process and obtained the following main results. First, different components of a gamble attracted different amounts of attention depending on participants' actual choice. This was reflected in both the number of fixations and the fixation transitions. Second, the last-fixated gamble but not the last-fixated reason predicted participants' choices. Third, a comparison of data obtained with eye tracking and data obtained with verbal protocols from a previous study showed a large degree of convergence regarding the process of risky choice. Together these findings tend to support dimensional decision strategies such as the priority heuristic.
•Attention depended on the dimension that determined the choice.•Transitions occurred within the dimension that determined the choice.•The last-fixated gamble and not the last-fixated dimension predicted choice.•Verbal data, attention measures, and choices tend to support dimensional processes.</description><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision making. Choice</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Eye tracking</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Process tracing</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>Risky choice</subject><subject>Verbal protocols</subject><subject>Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-6918</issn><issn>1873-6297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M9LwzAUwPEgis7pHyCI7CJ4ac1LkzS9CGP4CwZe9BzS1wQzt3YmnbD_3oxOvXkKgc97CV9CLoHmQEHeLnKD_Tpuc0aB51TllKoDMgJVFplkVXlIRpRSyGQF6oScxrhIVw4VHJMTJhiTgqsRuZj2vW1737UT306Cjx_bCb53Hu0ZOXJmGe35_hyTt4f719lTNn95fJ5N5xkWFeszDoWTCMYZZkupRMULVkpWK-oKBwKQA0WshZUMDbV1I2qRCJelKQvuXDEmN8Pedeg-Nzb2euUj2uXStLbbRA1CSaCSAUuUDxRDF2OwTq-DX5mw1UD1Lope6CGK3kXRVOkUJY1d7V_Y1Cvb_A79VEjgeg9MRLN0wbTo459TiisOkNzd4Gzq8eVt0BG9bdE2PljsddP5_3_yDSXHf0c</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Brandstätter, Eduard</creator><creator>Körner, Christof</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Attention in risky choice</title><author>Brandstätter, Eduard ; Körner, Christof</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-413f6c1afa2e76859432762b80f3f151c410ccb5e62ca0ebd5b5432467a734ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision making. Choice</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Eye tracking</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Process tracing</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>Risky choice</topic><topic>Verbal protocols</topic><topic>Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brandstätter, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Körner, Christof</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brandstätter, Eduard</au><au>Körner, Christof</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attention in risky choice</atitle><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>152</volume><spage>166</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>166-176</pages><issn>0001-6918</issn><eissn>1873-6297</eissn><coden>APSOAZ</coden><abstract>Previous research on the processes involved in risky decisions has rarely linked process data to choice directly. We used a simple measure based on the relative amount of attentional deployment to different components (gains/losses and their probabilities) of a risky gamble during the choice process, and we related this measure to the actual choice. In an experiment we recorded the decisions, decision times, and eye movements of 80 participants who made decisions on 11 choice problems. We used the number of eye fixations and fixation transitions to trace the deployment of attention during the choice process and obtained the following main results. First, different components of a gamble attracted different amounts of attention depending on participants' actual choice. This was reflected in both the number of fixations and the fixation transitions. Second, the last-fixated gamble but not the last-fixated reason predicted participants' choices. Third, a comparison of data obtained with eye tracking and data obtained with verbal protocols from a previous study showed a large degree of convergence regarding the process of risky choice. Together these findings tend to support dimensional decision strategies such as the priority heuristic.
•Attention depended on the dimension that determined the choice.•Transitions occurred within the dimension that determined the choice.•The last-fixated gamble and not the last-fixated dimension predicted choice.•Verbal data, attention measures, and choices tend to support dimensional processes.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25226548</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.008</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-6918 |
ispartof | Acta psychologica, 2014-10, Vol.152, p.166-176 |
issn | 0001-6918 1873-6297 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1586106212 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE |
subjects | Activity levels. Psychomotricity Adolescent Adult Attention Biological and medical sciences Choice Behavior Cognition. Intelligence Decision making Decision making. Choice Eye Movements Eye tracking Female Fixation, Ocular Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Middle Aged Probability Process tracing Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time Risk Risk-Taking Risky choice Verbal protocols Vigilance. Attention. Sleep Young Adult |
title | Attention in risky choice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A36%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attention%20in%20risky%20choice&rft.jtitle=Acta%20psychologica&rft.au=Brandst%C3%A4tter,%20Eduard&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=152&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=166-176&rft.issn=0001-6918&rft.eissn=1873-6297&rft.coden=APSOAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1586106212%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1586106212&rft_id=info:pmid/25226548&rft_els_id=S0001691814001942&rfr_iscdi=true |