DO GROUP DYNAMICS INFLUENCE SOCIAL CAPITAL GAINS AMONG MICROFINANCE CLIENTS? EVIDENCE FROM A RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENT IN URBAN INDIA

As an intrinsic part of the classic microfinance model, group meetings are intended to employ social capital to ensure timely repayment. Recent research suggests that more frequent meetings can increase social capital among first-time clients. Using randomized variation in group meeting frequency fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of policy analysis and management 2014-09, Vol.33 (4), p.932-949
Hauptverfasser: Feigenberg, Benjamin, Field, Erica, Pande, Rohini, Rigol, Natalia, Sarkar, Shayak
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 949
container_issue 4
container_start_page 932
container_title Journal of policy analysis and management
container_volume 33
creator Feigenberg, Benjamin
Field, Erica
Pande, Rohini
Rigol, Natalia
Sarkar, Shayak
description As an intrinsic part of the classic microfinance model, group meetings are intended to employ social capital to ensure timely repayment. Recent research suggests that more frequent meetings can increase social capital among first-time clients. Using randomized variation in group meeting frequency for 174 microfinance groups in India, we demonstrate that social capital gains associated with more frequent meetings continue to accrue across multiple lending cycles. However, these effects are reduced when group members differ in their borrowing history. In addition, clients who start with low levels of empowerment report higher social capital gains when matched with similar clients. We discuss how current microfinance policy debates overlook the creation of social capital, including through repayment meeting frequency, and we encourage regulators to undertake a holistic understanding of microfinance's impacts. © 2014 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pam.21790
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1586104906</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24033316</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24033316</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4930-5067486c5ecf1c4afa977fed676280a573aee6dfb008bf19506394741d408f093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U2P0zAQBmALgUQpHPgBSJa4wCG74zixkxPyJmnWUuKUtOXrYmVTR2q33ZS4FeyRf467gT0gcZqR5nntkQah1wQuCIB_eWj2Fz7hMTxBExL64DEWRU_RBHzOvIjT-Dl6Ye0WAEKIyQT9Siuc19VqjtOvSpQyWWCpZsUqU0mGF1UiRYETMZdLV3Mh1QKLslI5drKuZlKJs0sKmanl4gPOPsn0ITmrqxILXAuVVqX8lqU4-zLPalk65z7Aq_pKKNekUrxEz7pmZ82rP3WKVrNsmVx7RZXLRBReG8QUvBAYDyLWhqbtSBs0XRNz3pk148yPoAk5bYxh6-4GILrpSOw8jQMekHUAUQcxnaJ347uHof9-Mvao9xvbmt2uuTP9yWoSRoxAELvcFL39h27703DntnOKhSH1I-I79X5U7dBbO5hOH4bNvhnuNQF9PoZ2x9APx3D2crQ_Njtz_3-o56L8m3gzJrb22A-PCT8ASik57-iN8409mp-P82a41YxTHurPKte5ur4qP5JcJ_Q30EOXMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1565532812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DO GROUP DYNAMICS INFLUENCE SOCIAL CAPITAL GAINS AMONG MICROFINANCE CLIENTS? EVIDENCE FROM A RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENT IN URBAN INDIA</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Feigenberg, Benjamin ; Field, Erica ; Pande, Rohini ; Rigol, Natalia ; Sarkar, Shayak</creator><creatorcontrib>Feigenberg, Benjamin ; Field, Erica ; Pande, Rohini ; Rigol, Natalia ; Sarkar, Shayak</creatorcontrib><description>As an intrinsic part of the classic microfinance model, group meetings are intended to employ social capital to ensure timely repayment. Recent research suggests that more frequent meetings can increase social capital among first-time clients. Using randomized variation in group meeting frequency for 174 microfinance groups in India, we demonstrate that social capital gains associated with more frequent meetings continue to accrue across multiple lending cycles. However, these effects are reduced when group members differ in their borrowing history. In addition, clients who start with low levels of empowerment report higher social capital gains when matched with similar clients. We discuss how current microfinance policy debates overlook the creation of social capital, including through repayment meeting frequency, and we encourage regulators to undertake a holistic understanding of microfinance's impacts. © 2014 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0276-8739</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6688</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pam.21790</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPAMD7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Capital gains ; Customers ; Debt repayment ; Economic regulation ; Empowerment ; Group dynamics ; India ; Loans ; Meetings ; Microfinance ; Neighborhoods ; Public policy ; Regulation of financial institutions ; Regulatory agencies ; Repayments ; Social capital ; Social interaction ; Standard deviation ; Studies ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>Journal of policy analysis and management, 2014-09, Vol.33 (4), p.932-949</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management</rights><rights>2014 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Fall 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4930-5067486c5ecf1c4afa977fed676280a573aee6dfb008bf19506394741d408f093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4930-5067486c5ecf1c4afa977fed676280a573aee6dfb008bf19506394741d408f093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24033316$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24033316$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,27864,27922,27923,45572,45573,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feigenberg, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Field, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pande, Rohini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigol, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Shayak</creatorcontrib><title>DO GROUP DYNAMICS INFLUENCE SOCIAL CAPITAL GAINS AMONG MICROFINANCE CLIENTS? EVIDENCE FROM A RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENT IN URBAN INDIA</title><title>Journal of policy analysis and management</title><addtitle>J. Pol. Anal. Manage</addtitle><description>As an intrinsic part of the classic microfinance model, group meetings are intended to employ social capital to ensure timely repayment. Recent research suggests that more frequent meetings can increase social capital among first-time clients. Using randomized variation in group meeting frequency for 174 microfinance groups in India, we demonstrate that social capital gains associated with more frequent meetings continue to accrue across multiple lending cycles. However, these effects are reduced when group members differ in their borrowing history. In addition, clients who start with low levels of empowerment report higher social capital gains when matched with similar clients. We discuss how current microfinance policy debates overlook the creation of social capital, including through repayment meeting frequency, and we encourage regulators to undertake a holistic understanding of microfinance's impacts. © 2014 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.</description><subject>Capital gains</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Debt repayment</subject><subject>Economic regulation</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Loans</subject><subject>Meetings</subject><subject>Microfinance</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Regulation of financial institutions</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Repayments</subject><subject>Social capital</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0276-8739</issn><issn>1520-6688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U2P0zAQBmALgUQpHPgBSJa4wCG74zixkxPyJmnWUuKUtOXrYmVTR2q33ZS4FeyRf467gT0gcZqR5nntkQah1wQuCIB_eWj2Fz7hMTxBExL64DEWRU_RBHzOvIjT-Dl6Ye0WAEKIyQT9Siuc19VqjtOvSpQyWWCpZsUqU0mGF1UiRYETMZdLV3Mh1QKLslI5drKuZlKJs0sKmanl4gPOPsn0ITmrqxILXAuVVqX8lqU4-zLPalk65z7Aq_pKKNekUrxEz7pmZ82rP3WKVrNsmVx7RZXLRBReG8QUvBAYDyLWhqbtSBs0XRNz3pk148yPoAk5bYxh6-4GILrpSOw8jQMekHUAUQcxnaJ347uHof9-Mvao9xvbmt2uuTP9yWoSRoxAELvcFL39h27703DntnOKhSH1I-I79X5U7dBbO5hOH4bNvhnuNQF9PoZ2x9APx3D2crQ_Njtz_3-o56L8m3gzJrb22A-PCT8ASik57-iN8409mp-P82a41YxTHurPKte5ur4qP5JcJ_Q30EOXMg</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Feigenberg, Benjamin</creator><creator>Field, Erica</creator><creator>Pande, Rohini</creator><creator>Rigol, Natalia</creator><creator>Sarkar, Shayak</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>DO GROUP DYNAMICS INFLUENCE SOCIAL CAPITAL GAINS AMONG MICROFINANCE CLIENTS? EVIDENCE FROM A RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENT IN URBAN INDIA</title><author>Feigenberg, Benjamin ; Field, Erica ; Pande, Rohini ; Rigol, Natalia ; Sarkar, Shayak</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4930-5067486c5ecf1c4afa977fed676280a573aee6dfb008bf19506394741d408f093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Capital gains</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Debt repayment</topic><topic>Economic regulation</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Loans</topic><topic>Meetings</topic><topic>Microfinance</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Regulation of financial institutions</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Repayments</topic><topic>Social capital</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feigenberg, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Field, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pande, Rohini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigol, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Shayak</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of policy analysis and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feigenberg, Benjamin</au><au>Field, Erica</au><au>Pande, Rohini</au><au>Rigol, Natalia</au><au>Sarkar, Shayak</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DO GROUP DYNAMICS INFLUENCE SOCIAL CAPITAL GAINS AMONG MICROFINANCE CLIENTS? EVIDENCE FROM A RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENT IN URBAN INDIA</atitle><jtitle>Journal of policy analysis and management</jtitle><addtitle>J. Pol. Anal. Manage</addtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>932</spage><epage>949</epage><pages>932-949</pages><issn>0276-8739</issn><eissn>1520-6688</eissn><coden>JPAMD7</coden><abstract>As an intrinsic part of the classic microfinance model, group meetings are intended to employ social capital to ensure timely repayment. Recent research suggests that more frequent meetings can increase social capital among first-time clients. Using randomized variation in group meeting frequency for 174 microfinance groups in India, we demonstrate that social capital gains associated with more frequent meetings continue to accrue across multiple lending cycles. However, these effects are reduced when group members differ in their borrowing history. In addition, clients who start with low levels of empowerment report higher social capital gains when matched with similar clients. We discuss how current microfinance policy debates overlook the creation of social capital, including through repayment meeting frequency, and we encourage regulators to undertake a holistic understanding of microfinance's impacts. © 2014 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/pam.21790</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0276-8739
ispartof Journal of policy analysis and management, 2014-09, Vol.33 (4), p.932-949
issn 0276-8739
1520-6688
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1586104906
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Capital gains
Customers
Debt repayment
Economic regulation
Empowerment
Group dynamics
India
Loans
Meetings
Microfinance
Neighborhoods
Public policy
Regulation of financial institutions
Regulatory agencies
Repayments
Social capital
Social interaction
Standard deviation
Studies
Urban areas
title DO GROUP DYNAMICS INFLUENCE SOCIAL CAPITAL GAINS AMONG MICROFINANCE CLIENTS? EVIDENCE FROM A RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENT IN URBAN INDIA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T07%3A28%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DO%20GROUP%20DYNAMICS%20INFLUENCE%20SOCIAL%20CAPITAL%20GAINS%20AMONG%20MICROFINANCE%20CLIENTS?%20EVIDENCE%20FROM%20A%20RANDOMIZED%20EXPERIMENT%20IN%20URBAN%20INDIA&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20policy%20analysis%20and%20management&rft.au=Feigenberg,%20Benjamin&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=932&rft.epage=949&rft.pages=932-949&rft.issn=0276-8739&rft.eissn=1520-6688&rft.coden=JPAMD7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pam.21790&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24033316%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1565532812&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24033316&rfr_iscdi=true