Kruidenier et al. reply
Replying to B. Heinemann et al. Nature514, 10.1038/nature13688 (2014) We welcome the accompanying Comment 1 by Heinemann et al. , in which the authors use an extensive panel of sensitive KDM assays to independently confirm our results 2 that GSK-J1 is a potent KDM6 inhibitor. Additionally, Heinemann...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature (London) 2014-10, Vol.514 (7520), p.E2-E2 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Replying to
B. Heinemann
et al. Nature514, 10.1038/nature13688 (2014)
We welcome the accompanying Comment
1
by
Heinemann et al.
, in which the authors use an extensive panel of sensitive KDM assays to independently confirm our results
2
that GSK-J1 is a potent KDM6 inhibitor. Additionally, Heinemann
et al.
1
demonstrate that GSK-J1 has some, albeit weaker, activity towards KDM5B and KDM5C, for which we only had preliminary data available at the time of our original publication. As our jumonji assay portfolio expands, we have continued to update the GSK-J1 activity profile on the SGC website (
http://www.thesgc.org/chemical-probes/GSKJ1
); this includes KDM5 inhibition activity by GSK-J1 similar to that reported by Heinemann. In conclusion, GSK-J1 remains the most selective KDM inhibitor yet disclosed and thus a valuable chemical tool. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-0836 1476-4687 |
DOI: | 10.1038/nature13689 |