Stochasticity in Bird Habitat Selection: Year-to-Year Changes in Territory Locations in a Boreal Forest Bird Assemblage

We studied the degree of apparently stochastic variation in the location of the breeding territories of 17 species of birds in a 36-ha study plot in a heterogeneous coniferous forest in southern Finland over six consecutive years; 'apparent stochasticity' was defined as the sum effect of f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oikos 1996-09, Vol.76 (3), p.536-552
Hauptverfasser: Haila, Yrjö, Nicholls, A. O., Hanski, Ilpo K., Raivio, Suvi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 552
container_issue 3
container_start_page 536
container_title Oikos
container_volume 76
creator Haila, Yrjö
Nicholls, A. O.
Hanski, Ilpo K.
Raivio, Suvi
description We studied the degree of apparently stochastic variation in the location of the breeding territories of 17 species of birds in a 36-ha study plot in a heterogeneous coniferous forest in southern Finland over six consecutive years; 'apparent stochasticity' was defined as the sum effect of factors that are contingent relative to structural attributes of the habitats as they are measured by human observers. The data were collected by territory mapping, with 50 × 50 m spatial resolution, and the analysis involved three steps: (1) calculation of frequency of use of each 50 × 50 m grid cell in the plot by each species over the six years; (2) construction of logistic regression models (using GLIM) to describe the habitat attributes of cells favoured by each species in the plot; and (3) exploration of stochasticity by analysing how much random models need to be constrained to generate frequency distributions of grid cell occupancy that resemble those observed - for this purpose we used both binomial probabilities and Monte Carlo simulations. For a majority of the species a sufficient constraint was avoidance of such grid cells not used by the birds during the six years at all: the fit between expectations and observations improved in the binomial model, and improved markedly in the simulation model which also included an adjacency constraint and a weak preference constraint on the 'centroid' of the simulated territories. Six of the 17 species showed stronger preference for particular grid cells than predicted by the avoidance models; four of them presumably for nest site and nesting/foraging substrate (Dendrocopos major, Ficedula hypoleuca, Parus major, Certhia familiaris), and two for a particular habitat (Phylloscopus trochilus, Regulus regulus). Four of these species occupied in years with low population size predominantly such grid cells that were occupied in the other years, in accordance with the 'buffer effect' idea. Overall, however, in 11 of the 17 species the territory locations seemed to vary stochastically from year to year once the grid cells not used at all during the study years were excluded. We discuss theoretical and methodological implications of this conclusion for bird habitat relationships.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3546347
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15857836</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3546347</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3546347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-ffa3763b5762294169ae6c80ab018ebb20a746b68b9e645a0c358fa9a3b844f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEURoMoWH_wFbIQXY3eSTLJjLu2WCsUXKgLV8NNzNiU6aQmKdK3d2qLrlwduBwOl4-QixxuGAd1ywshuVAHZJBLgAwUyEMyAOCQ5ayqjslJjAsAUEqJAfl6Tt7MMSZnXNpQ19GRC-90itolTPTZttYk57s7-mYxZMlnW9LxHLsPG7f-iw3BJR82dOYNbt2fM9KRDxZbOukR0y47jNEudYsf9owcNdhGe77nKXmd3L-Mp9ns6eFxPJxlhucsZU2DXEmuCyUZq0QuK7TSlIAa8tJqzQCVkFqWurJSFAiGF2WDFXJdCtEwfkqudt1V8J_r_pF66aKxbYud9etY50VZqJLLXrzeiSb4GINt6lVwSwybOod6O2y9H7Y3L_dJjAbbJmBnXPzVORPAGfxpi9iv82_tG6DKgig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15857836</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stochasticity in Bird Habitat Selection: Year-to-Year Changes in Territory Locations in a Boreal Forest Bird Assemblage</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Haila, Yrjö ; Nicholls, A. O. ; Hanski, Ilpo K. ; Raivio, Suvi</creator><creatorcontrib>Haila, Yrjö ; Nicholls, A. O. ; Hanski, Ilpo K. ; Raivio, Suvi</creatorcontrib><description>We studied the degree of apparently stochastic variation in the location of the breeding territories of 17 species of birds in a 36-ha study plot in a heterogeneous coniferous forest in southern Finland over six consecutive years; 'apparent stochasticity' was defined as the sum effect of factors that are contingent relative to structural attributes of the habitats as they are measured by human observers. The data were collected by territory mapping, with 50 × 50 m spatial resolution, and the analysis involved three steps: (1) calculation of frequency of use of each 50 × 50 m grid cell in the plot by each species over the six years; (2) construction of logistic regression models (using GLIM) to describe the habitat attributes of cells favoured by each species in the plot; and (3) exploration of stochasticity by analysing how much random models need to be constrained to generate frequency distributions of grid cell occupancy that resemble those observed - for this purpose we used both binomial probabilities and Monte Carlo simulations. For a majority of the species a sufficient constraint was avoidance of such grid cells not used by the birds during the six years at all: the fit between expectations and observations improved in the binomial model, and improved markedly in the simulation model which also included an adjacency constraint and a weak preference constraint on the 'centroid' of the simulated territories. Six of the 17 species showed stronger preference for particular grid cells than predicted by the avoidance models; four of them presumably for nest site and nesting/foraging substrate (Dendrocopos major, Ficedula hypoleuca, Parus major, Certhia familiaris), and two for a particular habitat (Phylloscopus trochilus, Regulus regulus). Four of these species occupied in years with low population size predominantly such grid cells that were occupied in the other years, in accordance with the 'buffer effect' idea. Overall, however, in 11 of the 17 species the territory locations seemed to vary stochastically from year to year once the grid cells not used at all during the study years were excluded. We discuss theoretical and methodological implications of this conclusion for bird habitat relationships.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-1299</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3546347</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OIKSAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Munksgaard International Publishers, Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Aves ; Aviculture ; Binomials ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; Coniferous forests ; Deciduous forests ; Forest habitats ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat selection ; Modeling ; Old growth forests ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>Oikos, 1996-09, Vol.76 (3), p.536-552</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Munksgaard International Publishers Ltd.</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-ffa3763b5762294169ae6c80ab018ebb20a746b68b9e645a0c358fa9a3b844f23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3546347$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3546347$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3240320$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haila, Yrjö</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholls, A. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanski, Ilpo K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raivio, Suvi</creatorcontrib><title>Stochasticity in Bird Habitat Selection: Year-to-Year Changes in Territory Locations in a Boreal Forest Bird Assemblage</title><title>Oikos</title><description>We studied the degree of apparently stochastic variation in the location of the breeding territories of 17 species of birds in a 36-ha study plot in a heterogeneous coniferous forest in southern Finland over six consecutive years; 'apparent stochasticity' was defined as the sum effect of factors that are contingent relative to structural attributes of the habitats as they are measured by human observers. The data were collected by territory mapping, with 50 × 50 m spatial resolution, and the analysis involved three steps: (1) calculation of frequency of use of each 50 × 50 m grid cell in the plot by each species over the six years; (2) construction of logistic regression models (using GLIM) to describe the habitat attributes of cells favoured by each species in the plot; and (3) exploration of stochasticity by analysing how much random models need to be constrained to generate frequency distributions of grid cell occupancy that resemble those observed - for this purpose we used both binomial probabilities and Monte Carlo simulations. For a majority of the species a sufficient constraint was avoidance of such grid cells not used by the birds during the six years at all: the fit between expectations and observations improved in the binomial model, and improved markedly in the simulation model which also included an adjacency constraint and a weak preference constraint on the 'centroid' of the simulated territories. Six of the 17 species showed stronger preference for particular grid cells than predicted by the avoidance models; four of them presumably for nest site and nesting/foraging substrate (Dendrocopos major, Ficedula hypoleuca, Parus major, Certhia familiaris), and two for a particular habitat (Phylloscopus trochilus, Regulus regulus). Four of these species occupied in years with low population size predominantly such grid cells that were occupied in the other years, in accordance with the 'buffer effect' idea. Overall, however, in 11 of the 17 species the territory locations seemed to vary stochastically from year to year once the grid cells not used at all during the study years were excluded. We discuss theoretical and methodological implications of this conclusion for bird habitat relationships.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Aviculture</subject><subject>Binomials</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Deciduous forests</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Old growth forests</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0030-1299</issn><issn>1600-0706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEURoMoWH_wFbIQXY3eSTLJjLu2WCsUXKgLV8NNzNiU6aQmKdK3d2qLrlwduBwOl4-QixxuGAd1ywshuVAHZJBLgAwUyEMyAOCQ5ayqjslJjAsAUEqJAfl6Tt7MMSZnXNpQ19GRC-90itolTPTZttYk57s7-mYxZMlnW9LxHLsPG7f-iw3BJR82dOYNbt2fM9KRDxZbOukR0y47jNEudYsf9owcNdhGe77nKXmd3L-Mp9ns6eFxPJxlhucsZU2DXEmuCyUZq0QuK7TSlIAa8tJqzQCVkFqWurJSFAiGF2WDFXJdCtEwfkqudt1V8J_r_pF66aKxbYud9etY50VZqJLLXrzeiSb4GINt6lVwSwybOod6O2y9H7Y3L_dJjAbbJmBnXPzVORPAGfxpi9iv82_tG6DKgig</recordid><startdate>19960901</startdate><enddate>19960901</enddate><creator>Haila, Yrjö</creator><creator>Nicholls, A. O.</creator><creator>Hanski, Ilpo K.</creator><creator>Raivio, Suvi</creator><general>Munksgaard International Publishers, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960901</creationdate><title>Stochasticity in Bird Habitat Selection: Year-to-Year Changes in Territory Locations in a Boreal Forest Bird Assemblage</title><author>Haila, Yrjö ; Nicholls, A. O. ; Hanski, Ilpo K. ; Raivio, Suvi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-ffa3763b5762294169ae6c80ab018ebb20a746b68b9e645a0c358fa9a3b844f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Aviculture</topic><topic>Binomials</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Deciduous forests</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Old growth forests</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haila, Yrjö</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholls, A. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanski, Ilpo K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raivio, Suvi</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haila, Yrjö</au><au>Nicholls, A. O.</au><au>Hanski, Ilpo K.</au><au>Raivio, Suvi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stochasticity in Bird Habitat Selection: Year-to-Year Changes in Territory Locations in a Boreal Forest Bird Assemblage</atitle><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle><date>1996-09-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>536</spage><epage>552</epage><pages>536-552</pages><issn>0030-1299</issn><eissn>1600-0706</eissn><coden>OIKSAA</coden><abstract>We studied the degree of apparently stochastic variation in the location of the breeding territories of 17 species of birds in a 36-ha study plot in a heterogeneous coniferous forest in southern Finland over six consecutive years; 'apparent stochasticity' was defined as the sum effect of factors that are contingent relative to structural attributes of the habitats as they are measured by human observers. The data were collected by territory mapping, with 50 × 50 m spatial resolution, and the analysis involved three steps: (1) calculation of frequency of use of each 50 × 50 m grid cell in the plot by each species over the six years; (2) construction of logistic regression models (using GLIM) to describe the habitat attributes of cells favoured by each species in the plot; and (3) exploration of stochasticity by analysing how much random models need to be constrained to generate frequency distributions of grid cell occupancy that resemble those observed - for this purpose we used both binomial probabilities and Monte Carlo simulations. For a majority of the species a sufficient constraint was avoidance of such grid cells not used by the birds during the six years at all: the fit between expectations and observations improved in the binomial model, and improved markedly in the simulation model which also included an adjacency constraint and a weak preference constraint on the 'centroid' of the simulated territories. Six of the 17 species showed stronger preference for particular grid cells than predicted by the avoidance models; four of them presumably for nest site and nesting/foraging substrate (Dendrocopos major, Ficedula hypoleuca, Parus major, Certhia familiaris), and two for a particular habitat (Phylloscopus trochilus, Regulus regulus). Four of these species occupied in years with low population size predominantly such grid cells that were occupied in the other years, in accordance with the 'buffer effect' idea. Overall, however, in 11 of the 17 species the territory locations seemed to vary stochastically from year to year once the grid cells not used at all during the study years were excluded. We discuss theoretical and methodological implications of this conclusion for bird habitat relationships.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Munksgaard International Publishers, Ltd</pub><doi>10.2307/3546347</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-1299
ispartof Oikos, 1996-09, Vol.76 (3), p.536-552
issn 0030-1299
1600-0706
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15857836
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Aves
Aviculture
Binomials
Biological and medical sciences
Birds
Coniferous forests
Deciduous forests
Forest habitats
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Habitat selection
Modeling
Old growth forests
Synecology
Terrestrial ecosystems
Wildlife habitats
title Stochasticity in Bird Habitat Selection: Year-to-Year Changes in Territory Locations in a Boreal Forest Bird Assemblage
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T17%3A12%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stochasticity%20in%20Bird%20Habitat%20Selection:%20Year-to-Year%20Changes%20in%20Territory%20Locations%20in%20a%20Boreal%20Forest%20Bird%20Assemblage&rft.jtitle=Oikos&rft.au=Haila,%20Yrj%C3%B6&rft.date=1996-09-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=536&rft.epage=552&rft.pages=536-552&rft.issn=0030-1299&rft.eissn=1600-0706&rft.coden=OIKSAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3546347&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3546347%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15857836&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3546347&rfr_iscdi=true