Scent marking in free-ranging tigers, Panthera tigris
Data were colleted on the scent-marking patterns of radio-collared and visually identifiable tigers for 4 years in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Five categories of marking were recorded: urine spraying; scraping with deposits of urine faeces, and anal gland secretions; clawing; cheek rubbing;...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal behaviour 1989, Vol.37 (1), p.1-10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 10 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Animal behaviour |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | David Smith, James L. McDougal, Charles Miquelle, Dale |
description | Data were colleted on the scent-marking patterns of radio-collared and visually identifiable tigers for 4 years in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Five categories of marking were recorded: urine spraying; scraping with deposits of urine faeces, and anal gland secretions; clawing; cheek rubbing; and vegetation flattening. Urine spraying and scraping were the predominant forms of marking in this population. Tigers marked more heavily at territorial boundaries than in the interior of territories. Furthermore, in border areas marks were highly clumped at contact zones where major routes of travel approached territorial boundaries. This pattern appears to be a result of the density of vegetation which channels travel. The intensity of marking in these zones represented a higher frequency of marking rather than an increase in time spent in these areas. Marking was most intensive when tigers were establishing territories, and animals on adjacent territories appeared to mark in response to each other. Females marked intensively just prior to oestrus; this behaviour was reduced during oestrus. Males marked more frequently when females were in oestrus than during other stages of the females' cycle. A model is proposed where an odour field signals the risk of encountering a conspecific, thus allowing animals to compare the costs of possible encounters with the benefits of use of a given area. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0003-3472(89)90001-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15843668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0003347289900018</els_id><sourcerecordid>5762575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c2525d6fe4ffe19d129c2996f02a9cf07e0a2268ea39d7011e4cc1d21bab4e253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKtv4GIQEQVHkzuTTLIRpPgHBQV1HdLMTU1tZ2oyFXx7M7a4cOEqfOHc7yaHkENGLxhl4pJSWuRFWcGpVGcqJZbLLTJgVPFcgoRtMvhFdslejLMUBad8QPizxabLFia8-2aa-SZzATEPppn2ufNTDPE8ezJN94bB9BfBx32y48w84sHmHJLX25uX0X0-frx7GF2Pc1so1uUWOPBaOCydQ6ZqBsqCUsJRMMo6WiE1AEKiKVRdUcawtJbVwCZmUiLwYkhO1r3L0H6sMHZ64aPF-dw02K6iZlyWhRAygUd_wFm7Ck16mwYouVAVQILKNWRDG2NAp5fBp59_aUZ1L1L3lnRvSUulf0Tqvvt4022iNXOX3Fgff2crEElllbCrNYZJyKfHoKP12FisfUDb6br1_-_5BqKWhMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224569722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scent marking in free-ranging tigers, Panthera tigris</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>David Smith, James L. ; McDougal, Charles ; Miquelle, Dale</creator><creatorcontrib>David Smith, James L. ; McDougal, Charles ; Miquelle, Dale</creatorcontrib><description>Data were colleted on the scent-marking patterns of radio-collared and visually identifiable tigers for 4 years in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Five categories of marking were recorded: urine spraying; scraping with deposits of urine faeces, and anal gland secretions; clawing; cheek rubbing; and vegetation flattening. Urine spraying and scraping were the predominant forms of marking in this population. Tigers marked more heavily at territorial boundaries than in the interior of territories. Furthermore, in border areas marks were highly clumped at contact zones where major routes of travel approached territorial boundaries. This pattern appears to be a result of the density of vegetation which channels travel. The intensity of marking in these zones represented a higher frequency of marking rather than an increase in time spent in these areas. Marking was most intensive when tigers were establishing territories, and animals on adjacent territories appeared to mark in response to each other. Females marked intensively just prior to oestrus; this behaviour was reduced during oestrus. Males marked more frequently when females were in oestrus than during other stages of the females' cycle. A model is proposed where an odour field signals the risk of encountering a conspecific, thus allowing animals to compare the costs of possible encounters with the benefits of use of a given area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0003-3472(89)90001-8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANBEA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kent: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal ethology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Mammalia ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Vertebrata ; Wildcats</subject><ispartof>Animal behaviour, 1989, Vol.37 (1), p.1-10</ispartof><rights>1989 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour</rights><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd. Jan 1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c2525d6fe4ffe19d129c2996f02a9cf07e0a2268ea39d7011e4cc1d21bab4e253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c2525d6fe4ffe19d129c2996f02a9cf07e0a2268ea39d7011e4cc1d21bab4e253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003347289900018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7266507$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>David Smith, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDougal, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miquelle, Dale</creatorcontrib><title>Scent marking in free-ranging tigers, Panthera tigris</title><title>Animal behaviour</title><description>Data were colleted on the scent-marking patterns of radio-collared and visually identifiable tigers for 4 years in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Five categories of marking were recorded: urine spraying; scraping with deposits of urine faeces, and anal gland secretions; clawing; cheek rubbing; and vegetation flattening. Urine spraying and scraping were the predominant forms of marking in this population. Tigers marked more heavily at territorial boundaries than in the interior of territories. Furthermore, in border areas marks were highly clumped at contact zones where major routes of travel approached territorial boundaries. This pattern appears to be a result of the density of vegetation which channels travel. The intensity of marking in these zones represented a higher frequency of marking rather than an increase in time spent in these areas. Marking was most intensive when tigers were establishing territories, and animals on adjacent territories appeared to mark in response to each other. Females marked intensively just prior to oestrus; this behaviour was reduced during oestrus. Males marked more frequently when females were in oestrus than during other stages of the females' cycle. A model is proposed where an odour field signals the risk of encountering a conspecific, thus allowing animals to compare the costs of possible encounters with the benefits of use of a given area.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Wildcats</subject><issn>0003-3472</issn><issn>1095-8282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKtv4GIQEQVHkzuTTLIRpPgHBQV1HdLMTU1tZ2oyFXx7M7a4cOEqfOHc7yaHkENGLxhl4pJSWuRFWcGpVGcqJZbLLTJgVPFcgoRtMvhFdslejLMUBad8QPizxabLFia8-2aa-SZzATEPppn2ufNTDPE8ezJN94bB9BfBx32y48w84sHmHJLX25uX0X0-frx7GF2Pc1so1uUWOPBaOCydQ6ZqBsqCUsJRMMo6WiE1AEKiKVRdUcawtJbVwCZmUiLwYkhO1r3L0H6sMHZ64aPF-dw02K6iZlyWhRAygUd_wFm7Ck16mwYouVAVQILKNWRDG2NAp5fBp59_aUZ1L1L3lnRvSUulf0Tqvvt4022iNXOX3Fgff2crEElllbCrNYZJyKfHoKP12FisfUDb6br1_-_5BqKWhMA</recordid><startdate>1989</startdate><enddate>1989</enddate><creator>David Smith, James L.</creator><creator>McDougal, Charles</creator><creator>Miquelle, Dale</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1989</creationdate><title>Scent marking in free-ranging tigers, Panthera tigris</title><author>David Smith, James L. ; McDougal, Charles ; Miquelle, Dale</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c2525d6fe4ffe19d129c2996f02a9cf07e0a2268ea39d7011e4cc1d21bab4e253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Wildcats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>David Smith, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDougal, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miquelle, Dale</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>David Smith, James L.</au><au>McDougal, Charles</au><au>Miquelle, Dale</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scent marking in free-ranging tigers, Panthera tigris</atitle><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle><date>1989</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>0003-3472</issn><eissn>1095-8282</eissn><coden>ANBEA8</coden><abstract>Data were colleted on the scent-marking patterns of radio-collared and visually identifiable tigers for 4 years in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Five categories of marking were recorded: urine spraying; scraping with deposits of urine faeces, and anal gland secretions; clawing; cheek rubbing; and vegetation flattening. Urine spraying and scraping were the predominant forms of marking in this population. Tigers marked more heavily at territorial boundaries than in the interior of territories. Furthermore, in border areas marks were highly clumped at contact zones where major routes of travel approached territorial boundaries. This pattern appears to be a result of the density of vegetation which channels travel. The intensity of marking in these zones represented a higher frequency of marking rather than an increase in time spent in these areas. Marking was most intensive when tigers were establishing territories, and animals on adjacent territories appeared to mark in response to each other. Females marked intensively just prior to oestrus; this behaviour was reduced during oestrus. Males marked more frequently when females were in oestrus than during other stages of the females' cycle. A model is proposed where an odour field signals the risk of encountering a conspecific, thus allowing animals to compare the costs of possible encounters with the benefits of use of a given area.</abstract><cop>Kent</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0003-3472(89)90001-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-3472 |
ispartof | Animal behaviour, 1989, Vol.37 (1), p.1-10 |
issn | 0003-3472 1095-8282 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15843668 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal ethology Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Mammalia Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Vertebrata Wildcats |
title | Scent marking in free-ranging tigers, Panthera tigris |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T09%3A17%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scent%20marking%20in%20free-ranging%20tigers,%20Panthera%20tigris&rft.jtitle=Animal%20behaviour&rft.au=David%20Smith,%20James%20L.&rft.date=1989&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=0003-3472&rft.eissn=1095-8282&rft.coden=ANBEA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0003-3472(89)90001-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E5762575%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224569722&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0003347289900018&rfr_iscdi=true |