Institutional arrangements for conservation on private land in New Zealand
One-third of New Zealand's land is protected as Crown-owned national park or reserve. Large areas of land with high conservation values remain in private ownership. In particular, many rare and valuable types of native forest, especially in lowland and coastal areas, are found only on private l...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental management 1990-12, Vol.31 (4), p.313-326 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 326 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 313 |
container_title | Journal of environmental management |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Edwards, Victoria M. Sharp, Basil M.H. |
description | One-third of New Zealand's land is protected as Crown-owned national park or reserve. Large areas of land with high conservation values remain in private ownership. In particular, many rare and valuable types of native forest, especially in lowland and coastal areas, are found only on private land. A framework for analysing the institutional arrangements for protecting conservation values on private land is outlined in terms of costs, benefits and efficiency. The choice of either public or private provision may not provide the flexibility necessary to achieve conservation objectives. Narrowly defined institutions focus on a particular subset of landowners, limiting participation by others. A more flexible and dynamic arrangement could harness the private benefits of protection across a greater diversity of landowners. This should lead to more efficient protection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80060-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15831063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030147970580060X</els_id><sourcerecordid>15831063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-78a717fa8353f3187e65aa5106de9bc8a8f363e536e50091f2bf7d90daf672c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QdiDiB5WJ5vmY08ixY9K0YMKxUtIsxOJbHc12Vb892at9FoIhCHPvDN5CDmmcEGBistnYEDzkSzlGfBzBSAgn-2QAYWS50ow2CWDDbJPDmL8AABWUDkgD5Mmdr5bdr5tTJ2ZEEzzjgtsupi5NmS2bSKGlenfs3Q-g08FZrVpqsw32SN-Z29o-vKQ7DlTRzz6v4fk9fbmZXyfT5_uJuPraW5ZqbpcKiOpdEYxzhyjSqLgxnAKosJybpVRjgmGnAnkACV1xdzJqoTKOCELW7AhOV3nfob2a4mx0wsfLdZpB2yXUVOuWEpj28FRIaiEUQL5GrShjTGg0-mbCxN-NAXdK9Z_inXvTwPXf4r1LPWd_A8w0ZraJXfWx00z56Co6uOv1hgmKyuPQUfrsbFY-YC201Xrtwz6BYjPkBk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14261704</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutional arrangements for conservation on private land in New Zealand</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Edwards, Victoria M. ; Sharp, Basil M.H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Victoria M. ; Sharp, Basil M.H.</creatorcontrib><description>One-third of New Zealand's land is protected as Crown-owned national park or reserve. Large areas of land with high conservation values remain in private ownership. In particular, many rare and valuable types of native forest, especially in lowland and coastal areas, are found only on private land. A framework for analysing the institutional arrangements for protecting conservation values on private land is outlined in terms of costs, benefits and efficiency. The choice of either public or private provision may not provide the flexibility necessary to achieve conservation objectives. Narrowly defined institutions focus on a particular subset of landowners, limiting participation by others. A more flexible and dynamic arrangement could harness the private benefits of protection across a greater diversity of landowners. This should lead to more efficient protection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80060-X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVMAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; conservation ; covenants ; efficiency ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; institutions ; native forest ; private land</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 1990-12, Vol.31 (4), p.313-326</ispartof><rights>1990 Academic Press Limited</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-78a717fa8353f3187e65aa5106de9bc8a8f363e536e50091f2bf7d90daf672c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-78a717fa8353f3187e65aa5106de9bc8a8f363e536e50091f2bf7d90daf672c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80060-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5508184$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Victoria M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Basil M.H.</creatorcontrib><title>Institutional arrangements for conservation on private land in New Zealand</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><description>One-third of New Zealand's land is protected as Crown-owned national park or reserve. Large areas of land with high conservation values remain in private ownership. In particular, many rare and valuable types of native forest, especially in lowland and coastal areas, are found only on private land. A framework for analysing the institutional arrangements for protecting conservation values on private land is outlined in terms of costs, benefits and efficiency. The choice of either public or private provision may not provide the flexibility necessary to achieve conservation objectives. Narrowly defined institutions focus on a particular subset of landowners, limiting participation by others. A more flexible and dynamic arrangement could harness the private benefits of protection across a greater diversity of landowners. This should lead to more efficient protection.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>conservation</subject><subject>covenants</subject><subject>efficiency</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>institutions</subject><subject>native forest</subject><subject>private land</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QdiDiB5WJ5vmY08ixY9K0YMKxUtIsxOJbHc12Vb892at9FoIhCHPvDN5CDmmcEGBistnYEDzkSzlGfBzBSAgn-2QAYWS50ow2CWDDbJPDmL8AABWUDkgD5Mmdr5bdr5tTJ2ZEEzzjgtsupi5NmS2bSKGlenfs3Q-g08FZrVpqsw32SN-Z29o-vKQ7DlTRzz6v4fk9fbmZXyfT5_uJuPraW5ZqbpcKiOpdEYxzhyjSqLgxnAKosJybpVRjgmGnAnkACV1xdzJqoTKOCELW7AhOV3nfob2a4mx0wsfLdZpB2yXUVOuWEpj28FRIaiEUQL5GrShjTGg0-mbCxN-NAXdK9Z_inXvTwPXf4r1LPWd_A8w0ZraJXfWx00z56Co6uOv1hgmKyuPQUfrsbFY-YC201Xrtwz6BYjPkBk</recordid><startdate>19901201</startdate><enddate>19901201</enddate><creator>Edwards, Victoria M.</creator><creator>Sharp, Basil M.H.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19901201</creationdate><title>Institutional arrangements for conservation on private land in New Zealand</title><author>Edwards, Victoria M. ; Sharp, Basil M.H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-78a717fa8353f3187e65aa5106de9bc8a8f363e536e50091f2bf7d90daf672c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>conservation</topic><topic>covenants</topic><topic>efficiency</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>institutions</topic><topic>native forest</topic><topic>private land</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Victoria M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Basil M.H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edwards, Victoria M.</au><au>Sharp, Basil M.H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutional arrangements for conservation on private land in New Zealand</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><date>1990-12-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>313</spage><epage>326</epage><pages>313-326</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><coden>JEVMAW</coden><abstract>One-third of New Zealand's land is protected as Crown-owned national park or reserve. Large areas of land with high conservation values remain in private ownership. In particular, many rare and valuable types of native forest, especially in lowland and coastal areas, are found only on private land. A framework for analysing the institutional arrangements for protecting conservation values on private land is outlined in terms of costs, benefits and efficiency. The choice of either public or private provision may not provide the flexibility necessary to achieve conservation objectives. Narrowly defined institutions focus on a particular subset of landowners, limiting participation by others. A more flexible and dynamic arrangement could harness the private benefits of protection across a greater diversity of landowners. This should lead to more efficient protection.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80060-X</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4797 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental management, 1990-12, Vol.31 (4), p.313-326 |
issn | 0301-4797 1095-8630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15831063 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences conservation covenants efficiency Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology institutions native forest private land |
title | Institutional arrangements for conservation on private land in New Zealand |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A39%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutional%20arrangements%20for%20conservation%20on%20private%20land%20in%20New%20Zealand&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Edwards,%20Victoria%20M.&rft.date=1990-12-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=313&rft.epage=326&rft.pages=313-326&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft.coden=JEVMAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80060-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15831063%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14261704&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S030147970580060X&rfr_iscdi=true |