Habitat-Specific Solute Retention in Two Small Streams: An Intersite Comparison

We measured uptake rates of phosphorus, nitrate, calcium, and dissolved organic carbon within two headwater streams, one in the Appalachian mountains of North Carolina and the other in the Cascade range of Oregon. The major physical differences between these two streams are parent geology and local...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology (Durham) 1990-12, Vol.71 (6), p.2069-2082
Hauptverfasser: Munn, Nancy L., Meyer, Judy L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2082
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2069
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 71
creator Munn, Nancy L.
Meyer, Judy L.
description We measured uptake rates of phosphorus, nitrate, calcium, and dissolved organic carbon within two headwater streams, one in the Appalachian mountains of North Carolina and the other in the Cascade range of Oregon. The major physical differences between these two streams are parent geology and local geomorphic structure. Uptake rates were measured following low-level nutrient releases during summer 1987 in 20-m reaches with different geomorphology. The relative importance of biotic vs. abiotic sorption of nitrogen and phosphorus by sediments from the two streams was assessed by laboratory experiments. Nitrate-N uptake rates were high for the western stream (11.9 @mg@?m^-^2@?min^-^1) and low for the eastern stream (3.9 @mg@?m^-^2@?min^-^1) during the summer. The debris dam reaches in Oregon were the most retentive of N (shortest uptake length of 17 m). Conversely, soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) uptake rates were higher for the eastern stream (18.6 @mg@?m^-^2@?min^-^1), primarily through biotic processes. SRP uptake lengths were short for the cobble (32 m), debris dam (35 m), and rock outcrop (40 m) reaches in the eastern stream. Uptake of SRP in either stream was not related to sediment size fraction but rather to a combination of sediment infiltration rates and quality of organic material. Calcium (Ca) uptake lengths were long in the Oregon stream (1278 m) but short in the Appalachian stream (106 m). Surprisingly, the eastern stream was more retentive of Ca than nitrate (shorter uptake lengths for Ca) during this time period. Debris dams greatly enhanced retention of dissolved organic carbon in both streams (60% of all uptake in the eastern stream and 81% in the western stream), although retention was greater in the eastern stream. The lower uptake rate of phosphorus and higher uptake rate of nitrate in the Oregon stream were expected based on geographic location and parent geology; streams in this area drain catchments of volcanic origin and tend to have low N:P (atomic; 1.8 for the western stream) ratios, indicating potential N limitation. Streams flowing over granitic bedrock, such as the eastern stream, tend to have lower P availability (N:P = 15.5). The combined results of laboratory and field measurements indicate that in the eastern stream, strong biotic control of P uptake coupled with high P demand result in relatively short P uptake lengths and a strong impact of P spiraling on ecosystem dynamics. In the western stream, strong biotic control of
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1938621
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15763897</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1938621</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1938621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3929-e58d8eadb4b59692dc0550ab4fa335ee4facbb93228783268f6ef66f904c5e433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLAzEUBeAgCtYq_oVBRVejeUwyiTspPgoFwerC1ZBJ70DKTFKTFPHfG2lREJrNzeLjcDgInRJ8TRmub4hiUlCyh0b5p0pFaryPRhgTWirB5SE6inGJ8yOVHKHnJ93apFM5X4GxnTXF3PfrBMULJHDJeldYV7x--mI-6L4v5imAHuJtceeKqUsQos144oeVDjZ6d4wOOt1HONneMXp7uH-dPJWz58fp5G5WGqaoKoHLhQS9aKuWK6HowmDOsW6rTjPGAfI1basYpbKWjArZCeiE6BSuDIeKsTG63OSugv9YQ0zNYKOBvtcO_Do2hNeCSVVnePYPLv06uNytoURhXLE80xid70KEKlHROi-X1dVGmeBjDNA1q2AHHb4agpuf7Zvt9llebPN0NLrvgnbGxl_Of5oJmhnbsE_bw9eutOZ-8k6UwjURFAv1F76MyYedHb4B63aadA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296427658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Habitat-Specific Solute Retention in Two Small Streams: An Intersite Comparison</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Munn, Nancy L. ; Meyer, Judy L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Munn, Nancy L. ; Meyer, Judy L.</creatorcontrib><description>We measured uptake rates of phosphorus, nitrate, calcium, and dissolved organic carbon within two headwater streams, one in the Appalachian mountains of North Carolina and the other in the Cascade range of Oregon. The major physical differences between these two streams are parent geology and local geomorphic structure. Uptake rates were measured following low-level nutrient releases during summer 1987 in 20-m reaches with different geomorphology. The relative importance of biotic vs. abiotic sorption of nitrogen and phosphorus by sediments from the two streams was assessed by laboratory experiments. Nitrate-N uptake rates were high for the western stream (11.9 @mg@?m^-^2@?min^-^1) and low for the eastern stream (3.9 @mg@?m^-^2@?min^-^1) during the summer. The debris dam reaches in Oregon were the most retentive of N (shortest uptake length of 17 m). Conversely, soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) uptake rates were higher for the eastern stream (18.6 @mg@?m^-^2@?min^-^1), primarily through biotic processes. SRP uptake lengths were short for the cobble (32 m), debris dam (35 m), and rock outcrop (40 m) reaches in the eastern stream. Uptake of SRP in either stream was not related to sediment size fraction but rather to a combination of sediment infiltration rates and quality of organic material. Calcium (Ca) uptake lengths were long in the Oregon stream (1278 m) but short in the Appalachian stream (106 m). Surprisingly, the eastern stream was more retentive of Ca than nitrate (shorter uptake lengths for Ca) during this time period. Debris dams greatly enhanced retention of dissolved organic carbon in both streams (60% of all uptake in the eastern stream and 81% in the western stream), although retention was greater in the eastern stream. The lower uptake rate of phosphorus and higher uptake rate of nitrate in the Oregon stream were expected based on geographic location and parent geology; streams in this area drain catchments of volcanic origin and tend to have low N:P (atomic; 1.8 for the western stream) ratios, indicating potential N limitation. Streams flowing over granitic bedrock, such as the eastern stream, tend to have lower P availability (N:P = 15.5). The combined results of laboratory and field measurements indicate that in the eastern stream, strong biotic control of P uptake coupled with high P demand result in relatively short P uptake lengths and a strong impact of P spiraling on ecosystem dynamics. In the western stream, strong biotic control of N uptake combined with strong N demand result in short N uptake lengths. This is especially true at sites of downed timber that retain both FPOM and CPOM, creating a high N demand (shortening N spirals).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1938621</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: The Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; calcium ; Chemicals ; Cobbles ; Dams ; dissolved organic carbon ; Ecology ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; geology ; geomorphology ; Habitats ; nitrate ; Nitrates ; Phosphorus ; retention ; Sediments ; Solutes ; Sorption ; spiraling ; Stream habitats ; Streams ; uptake lengths ; uptake rates ; Waterways</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 1990-12, Vol.71 (6), p.2069-2082</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1990 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Dec 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3929-e58d8eadb4b59692dc0550ab4fa335ee4facbb93228783268f6ef66f904c5e433</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1938621$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1938621$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5389762$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munn, Nancy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Judy L.</creatorcontrib><title>Habitat-Specific Solute Retention in Two Small Streams: An Intersite Comparison</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>We measured uptake rates of phosphorus, nitrate, calcium, and dissolved organic carbon within two headwater streams, one in the Appalachian mountains of North Carolina and the other in the Cascade range of Oregon. The major physical differences between these two streams are parent geology and local geomorphic structure. Uptake rates were measured following low-level nutrient releases during summer 1987 in 20-m reaches with different geomorphology. The relative importance of biotic vs. abiotic sorption of nitrogen and phosphorus by sediments from the two streams was assessed by laboratory experiments. Nitrate-N uptake rates were high for the western stream (11.9 @mg@?m^-^2@?min^-^1) and low for the eastern stream (3.9 @mg@?m^-^2@?min^-^1) during the summer. The debris dam reaches in Oregon were the most retentive of N (shortest uptake length of 17 m). Conversely, soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) uptake rates were higher for the eastern stream (18.6 @mg@?m^-^2@?min^-^1), primarily through biotic processes. SRP uptake lengths were short for the cobble (32 m), debris dam (35 m), and rock outcrop (40 m) reaches in the eastern stream. Uptake of SRP in either stream was not related to sediment size fraction but rather to a combination of sediment infiltration rates and quality of organic material. Calcium (Ca) uptake lengths were long in the Oregon stream (1278 m) but short in the Appalachian stream (106 m). Surprisingly, the eastern stream was more retentive of Ca than nitrate (shorter uptake lengths for Ca) during this time period. Debris dams greatly enhanced retention of dissolved organic carbon in both streams (60% of all uptake in the eastern stream and 81% in the western stream), although retention was greater in the eastern stream. The lower uptake rate of phosphorus and higher uptake rate of nitrate in the Oregon stream were expected based on geographic location and parent geology; streams in this area drain catchments of volcanic origin and tend to have low N:P (atomic; 1.8 for the western stream) ratios, indicating potential N limitation. Streams flowing over granitic bedrock, such as the eastern stream, tend to have lower P availability (N:P = 15.5). The combined results of laboratory and field measurements indicate that in the eastern stream, strong biotic control of P uptake coupled with high P demand result in relatively short P uptake lengths and a strong impact of P spiraling on ecosystem dynamics. In the western stream, strong biotic control of N uptake combined with strong N demand result in short N uptake lengths. This is especially true at sites of downed timber that retain both FPOM and CPOM, creating a high N demand (shortening N spirals).</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>calcium</subject><subject>Chemicals</subject><subject>Cobbles</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>geology</subject><subject>geomorphology</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>nitrate</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>retention</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Solutes</subject><subject>Sorption</subject><subject>spiraling</subject><subject>Stream habitats</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>uptake lengths</subject><subject>uptake rates</subject><subject>Waterways</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EtLAzEUBeAgCtYq_oVBRVejeUwyiTspPgoFwerC1ZBJ70DKTFKTFPHfG2lREJrNzeLjcDgInRJ8TRmub4hiUlCyh0b5p0pFaryPRhgTWirB5SE6inGJ8yOVHKHnJ93apFM5X4GxnTXF3PfrBMULJHDJeldYV7x--mI-6L4v5imAHuJtceeKqUsQos144oeVDjZ6d4wOOt1HONneMXp7uH-dPJWz58fp5G5WGqaoKoHLhQS9aKuWK6HowmDOsW6rTjPGAfI1basYpbKWjArZCeiE6BSuDIeKsTG63OSugv9YQ0zNYKOBvtcO_Do2hNeCSVVnePYPLv06uNytoURhXLE80xid70KEKlHROi-X1dVGmeBjDNA1q2AHHb4agpuf7Zvt9llebPN0NLrvgnbGxl_Of5oJmhnbsE_bw9eutOZ-8k6UwjURFAv1F76MyYedHb4B63aadA</recordid><startdate>199012</startdate><enddate>199012</enddate><creator>Munn, Nancy L.</creator><creator>Meyer, Judy L.</creator><general>The Ecological Society of America</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>Brooklyn Botanic Garden, etc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199012</creationdate><title>Habitat-Specific Solute Retention in Two Small Streams: An Intersite Comparison</title><author>Munn, Nancy L. ; Meyer, Judy L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3929-e58d8eadb4b59692dc0550ab4fa335ee4facbb93228783268f6ef66f904c5e433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>calcium</topic><topic>Chemicals</topic><topic>Cobbles</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>geology</topic><topic>geomorphology</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>nitrate</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>retention</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Solutes</topic><topic>Sorption</topic><topic>spiraling</topic><topic>Stream habitats</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>uptake lengths</topic><topic>uptake rates</topic><topic>Waterways</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munn, Nancy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Judy L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munn, Nancy L.</au><au>Meyer, Judy L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Habitat-Specific Solute Retention in Two Small Streams: An Intersite Comparison</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>1990-12</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2069</spage><epage>2082</epage><pages>2069-2082</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>We measured uptake rates of phosphorus, nitrate, calcium, and dissolved organic carbon within two headwater streams, one in the Appalachian mountains of North Carolina and the other in the Cascade range of Oregon. The major physical differences between these two streams are parent geology and local geomorphic structure. Uptake rates were measured following low-level nutrient releases during summer 1987 in 20-m reaches with different geomorphology. The relative importance of biotic vs. abiotic sorption of nitrogen and phosphorus by sediments from the two streams was assessed by laboratory experiments. Nitrate-N uptake rates were high for the western stream (11.9 @mg@?m^-^2@?min^-^1) and low for the eastern stream (3.9 @mg@?m^-^2@?min^-^1) during the summer. The debris dam reaches in Oregon were the most retentive of N (shortest uptake length of 17 m). Conversely, soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) uptake rates were higher for the eastern stream (18.6 @mg@?m^-^2@?min^-^1), primarily through biotic processes. SRP uptake lengths were short for the cobble (32 m), debris dam (35 m), and rock outcrop (40 m) reaches in the eastern stream. Uptake of SRP in either stream was not related to sediment size fraction but rather to a combination of sediment infiltration rates and quality of organic material. Calcium (Ca) uptake lengths were long in the Oregon stream (1278 m) but short in the Appalachian stream (106 m). Surprisingly, the eastern stream was more retentive of Ca than nitrate (shorter uptake lengths for Ca) during this time period. Debris dams greatly enhanced retention of dissolved organic carbon in both streams (60% of all uptake in the eastern stream and 81% in the western stream), although retention was greater in the eastern stream. The lower uptake rate of phosphorus and higher uptake rate of nitrate in the Oregon stream were expected based on geographic location and parent geology; streams in this area drain catchments of volcanic origin and tend to have low N:P (atomic; 1.8 for the western stream) ratios, indicating potential N limitation. Streams flowing over granitic bedrock, such as the eastern stream, tend to have lower P availability (N:P = 15.5). The combined results of laboratory and field measurements indicate that in the eastern stream, strong biotic control of P uptake coupled with high P demand result in relatively short P uptake lengths and a strong impact of P spiraling on ecosystem dynamics. In the western stream, strong biotic control of N uptake combined with strong N demand result in short N uptake lengths. This is especially true at sites of downed timber that retain both FPOM and CPOM, creating a high N demand (shortening N spirals).</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>The Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.2307/1938621</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 1990-12, Vol.71 (6), p.2069-2082
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15763897
source Periodicals Index Online; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
calcium
Chemicals
Cobbles
Dams
dissolved organic carbon
Ecology
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
geology
geomorphology
Habitats
nitrate
Nitrates
Phosphorus
retention
Sediments
Solutes
Sorption
spiraling
Stream habitats
Streams
uptake lengths
uptake rates
Waterways
title Habitat-Specific Solute Retention in Two Small Streams: An Intersite Comparison
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A55%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Habitat-Specific%20Solute%20Retention%20in%20Two%20Small%20Streams:%20An%20Intersite%20Comparison&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Munn,%20Nancy%20L.&rft.date=1990-12&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2069&rft.epage=2082&rft.pages=2069-2082&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1938621&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1938621%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296427658&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1938621&rfr_iscdi=true