A field comparison of several methods for measuring pesticide evaporation rates from soil
Four methodologies-an aerodynamic vertical profile, a bulk-transfer technique, an integrated horizontal flux method, and a theoretical profile shape method-determine the postapplication volatilization flux of pesticides from fallow soil. Chlorpyrifos, diazinon, lindane, and nitrapyrin were applied t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science & technology 1990-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1490-1497 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1497 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1490 |
| container_title | Environmental science & technology |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Majewski, Michael S Glotfelty, Dwight E U, Kyaw Tha Paw Seiber, James N |
| description | Four methodologies-an aerodynamic vertical profile, a bulk-transfer technique, an integrated horizontal flux method, and a theoretical profile shape method-determine the postapplication volatilization flux of pesticides from fallow soil. Chlorpyrifos, diazinon, lindane, and nitrapyrin were applied to the soil surface in a side-by-side field study. All of the methods gave statistically equivalent results. However, all have inherent flaws such as the assumption of the equivalence of the transfer coefficients for each pesticide to heat or water. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1021/es00080a006 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15729913</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14270021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-63448f552572c4503c26ba263bb7c8c6a9d06fbcf8ec73f6754bb8aea22deee13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1TAQxC0EEo-WEzdOvgCHKsUfseMcqyegtEVUaivBydo46-KSxKmdV8F_j6tUwAGJ01ia345Xs4S84OyQM8HfYmaMGQaM6Udkw5VglTKKPyYbxrisWqm_PCXPcr4pmJDMbMjXI-oDDj11cZwhhRwnGj3NeIcJBjri8i32mfqYyhvyLoXpms6Yl-BCjxTvYI4JllDGimAhUxxpjmHYJ088DBmfP-geuXr_7nJ7XJ19_vBxe3RWQV2bpdKyiFdKqEa4WjHphO5AaNl1jTNOQ9sz7TvnDbpGet2ouusMIAjRIyKXe-T1mjuneLsrm9kxZIfDABPGXba8BLctl_8Ha9GUWu4TD1bQpZhzQm_nFEZIPy1n9r5n-1fPhX71EAvZweATTC7kPyOt4ULUdeGqlQt5wR-_fUjfrW5ko-zl-YWVRm7lyadze1r4lyvvIVq4LqexVxdt-V6LtphvVhNctjdxl6ZS8T_X-wXlj6Fu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14270021</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A field comparison of several methods for measuring pesticide evaporation rates from soil</title><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Majewski, Michael S ; Glotfelty, Dwight E ; U, Kyaw Tha Paw ; Seiber, James N</creator><creatorcontrib>Majewski, Michael S ; Glotfelty, Dwight E ; U, Kyaw Tha Paw ; Seiber, James N</creatorcontrib><description>Four methodologies-an aerodynamic vertical profile, a bulk-transfer technique, an integrated horizontal flux method, and a theoretical profile shape method-determine the postapplication volatilization flux of pesticides from fallow soil. Chlorpyrifos, diazinon, lindane, and nitrapyrin were applied to the soil surface in a side-by-side field study. All of the methods gave statistically equivalent results. However, all have inherent flaws such as the assumption of the equivalence of the transfer coefficients for each pesticide to heat or water.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es00080a006</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Atmospheric pollution ; Dispersed sources and other ; EVAPORACION ; EVAPORATION ; Exact sciences and technology ; FALLOW SYSTEMS ; MEASUREMENT ; MEDICION ; MESURE ; METHODE ; METHODS ; METODOS ; PESTICIDE ; PESTICIDES ; PLAGUICIDAS ; Pollution ; Pollution sources. Measurement results ; SISTEMAS CON BARBECHO ; SOIL ; SOL ; SUELO ; SYSTEME JACHERE ; VOLATILIZATION</subject><ispartof>Environmental science & technology, 1990-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1490-1497</ispartof><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-63448f552572c4503c26ba263bb7c8c6a9d06fbcf8ec73f6754bb8aea22deee13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es00080a006$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es00080a006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19812244$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Majewski, Michael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glotfelty, Dwight E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>U, Kyaw Tha Paw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seiber, James N</creatorcontrib><title>A field comparison of several methods for measuring pesticide evaporation rates from soil</title><title>Environmental science & technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Four methodologies-an aerodynamic vertical profile, a bulk-transfer technique, an integrated horizontal flux method, and a theoretical profile shape method-determine the postapplication volatilization flux of pesticides from fallow soil. Chlorpyrifos, diazinon, lindane, and nitrapyrin were applied to the soil surface in a side-by-side field study. All of the methods gave statistically equivalent results. However, all have inherent flaws such as the assumption of the equivalence of the transfer coefficients for each pesticide to heat or water.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Dispersed sources and other</subject><subject>EVAPORACION</subject><subject>EVAPORATION</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>FALLOW SYSTEMS</subject><subject>MEASUREMENT</subject><subject>MEDICION</subject><subject>MESURE</subject><subject>METHODE</subject><subject>METHODS</subject><subject>METODOS</subject><subject>PESTICIDE</subject><subject>PESTICIDES</subject><subject>PLAGUICIDAS</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution sources. Measurement results</subject><subject>SISTEMAS CON BARBECHO</subject><subject>SOIL</subject><subject>SOL</subject><subject>SUELO</subject><subject>SYSTEME JACHERE</subject><subject>VOLATILIZATION</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1v1TAQxC0EEo-WEzdOvgCHKsUfseMcqyegtEVUaivBydo46-KSxKmdV8F_j6tUwAGJ01ia345Xs4S84OyQM8HfYmaMGQaM6Udkw5VglTKKPyYbxrisWqm_PCXPcr4pmJDMbMjXI-oDDj11cZwhhRwnGj3NeIcJBjri8i32mfqYyhvyLoXpms6Yl-BCjxTvYI4JllDGimAhUxxpjmHYJ088DBmfP-geuXr_7nJ7XJ19_vBxe3RWQV2bpdKyiFdKqEa4WjHphO5AaNl1jTNOQ9sz7TvnDbpGet2ouusMIAjRIyKXe-T1mjuneLsrm9kxZIfDABPGXba8BLctl_8Ha9GUWu4TD1bQpZhzQm_nFEZIPy1n9r5n-1fPhX71EAvZweATTC7kPyOt4ULUdeGqlQt5wR-_fUjfrW5ko-zl-YWVRm7lyadze1r4lyvvIVq4LqexVxdt-V6LtphvVhNctjdxl6ZS8T_X-wXlj6Fu</recordid><startdate>19901001</startdate><enddate>19901001</enddate><creator>Majewski, Michael S</creator><creator>Glotfelty, Dwight E</creator><creator>U, Kyaw Tha Paw</creator><creator>Seiber, James N</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19901001</creationdate><title>A field comparison of several methods for measuring pesticide evaporation rates from soil</title><author>Majewski, Michael S ; Glotfelty, Dwight E ; U, Kyaw Tha Paw ; Seiber, James N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a448t-63448f552572c4503c26ba263bb7c8c6a9d06fbcf8ec73f6754bb8aea22deee13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Dispersed sources and other</topic><topic>EVAPORACION</topic><topic>EVAPORATION</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>FALLOW SYSTEMS</topic><topic>MEASUREMENT</topic><topic>MEDICION</topic><topic>MESURE</topic><topic>METHODE</topic><topic>METHODS</topic><topic>METODOS</topic><topic>PESTICIDE</topic><topic>PESTICIDES</topic><topic>PLAGUICIDAS</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution sources. Measurement results</topic><topic>SISTEMAS CON BARBECHO</topic><topic>SOIL</topic><topic>SOL</topic><topic>SUELO</topic><topic>SYSTEME JACHERE</topic><topic>VOLATILIZATION</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Majewski, Michael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glotfelty, Dwight E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>U, Kyaw Tha Paw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seiber, James N</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Majewski, Michael S</au><au>Glotfelty, Dwight E</au><au>U, Kyaw Tha Paw</au><au>Seiber, James N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A field comparison of several methods for measuring pesticide evaporation rates from soil</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>1990-10-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1490</spage><epage>1497</epage><pages>1490-1497</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Four methodologies-an aerodynamic vertical profile, a bulk-transfer technique, an integrated horizontal flux method, and a theoretical profile shape method-determine the postapplication volatilization flux of pesticides from fallow soil. Chlorpyrifos, diazinon, lindane, and nitrapyrin were applied to the soil surface in a side-by-side field study. All of the methods gave statistically equivalent results. However, all have inherent flaws such as the assumption of the equivalence of the transfer coefficients for each pesticide to heat or water.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/es00080a006</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0013-936X |
| ispartof | Environmental science & technology, 1990-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1490-1497 |
| issn | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15729913 |
| source | American Chemical Society Journals |
| subjects | Applied sciences Atmospheric pollution Dispersed sources and other EVAPORACION EVAPORATION Exact sciences and technology FALLOW SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT MEDICION MESURE METHODE METHODS METODOS PESTICIDE PESTICIDES PLAGUICIDAS Pollution Pollution sources. Measurement results SISTEMAS CON BARBECHO SOIL SOL SUELO SYSTEME JACHERE VOLATILIZATION |
| title | A field comparison of several methods for measuring pesticide evaporation rates from soil |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A03%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20field%20comparison%20of%20several%20methods%20for%20measuring%20pesticide%20evaporation%20rates%20from%20soil&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Majewski,%20Michael%20S&rft.date=1990-10-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1490&rft.epage=1497&rft.pages=1490-1497&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es00080a006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14270021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14270021&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |