Excluded volume contribution to the osmotic second virial coefficient for proteins

A numerical approach was used to evaluate the excluded volume contribution more accurately by making use of crystallographic structural data for globular proteins. The numerical results were significantly larger than those obtained using the idealized shapes, with the main reason for the discrepancy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIChE journal 1995-04, Vol.41 (4), p.1010-1014
Hauptverfasser: Neal, Brian L., Lenhoff, Abraham M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1014
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1010
container_title AIChE journal
container_volume 41
creator Neal, Brian L.
Lenhoff, Abraham M.
description A numerical approach was used to evaluate the excluded volume contribution more accurately by making use of crystallographic structural data for globular proteins. The numerical results were significantly larger than those obtained using the idealized shapes, with the main reason for the discrepancy being the effective surface roughness rather than the overall molecular shape. A reasonable empirical approximation that emerges from the results is that the excluded volume is roughly 6.7 times the molecular volume, compared to 4 times the volume, which is the result for spheres. The use of the new computed value should lead to a good approximation of the excluded volume of proteins.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/aic.690410432
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15689239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15689239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-7fed4471a00d3ac884ef81dd81a82275fb726423fd794ea419df22584e55b7dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90DtPBCEQB3BiNPF8lPZb2a0CCwtb6kU9jdHk4iOxIRwMEd1bFFgf317MGWNlRYb5zUzyR2iP4AOCMT3U3hy0HWYEs4auoQnhTNS8w3wdTTDGpC4fZBNtpfRUKioknaD5yYfpRwu2egv9uITKhCFHvxizD0OVQ5UfoQppGbI3VYLSLdJHr_siwTlvPAy5ciFWLzFk8EPaQRtO9wl2f95tdHt6cjOd1ZfXZ-fTo8vaNFLSWjiwjAmiMbaNNlIycJJYK4mWlAruFoK2jDbOio6BZqSzjlJeGOcLYU2zjfZXe8vh1xFSVkufDPS9HiCMSRHeyo42XYH1CpoYUorg1Ev0Sx0_FcHqOzlVklO_yRUvVv7d9_D5P1ZH59O_kz-XfMrw8Tup47NqRSO4ur86U3cPF1S2s2M1b74A-gGBkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15689239</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Excluded volume contribution to the osmotic second virial coefficient for proteins</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Neal, Brian L. ; Lenhoff, Abraham M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Neal, Brian L. ; Lenhoff, Abraham M.</creatorcontrib><description>A numerical approach was used to evaluate the excluded volume contribution more accurately by making use of crystallographic structural data for globular proteins. The numerical results were significantly larger than those obtained using the idealized shapes, with the main reason for the discrepancy being the effective surface roughness rather than the overall molecular shape. A reasonable empirical approximation that emerges from the results is that the excluded volume is roughly 6.7 times the molecular volume, compared to 4 times the volume, which is the result for spheres. The use of the new computed value should lead to a good approximation of the excluded volume of proteins.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1541</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-5905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aic.690410432</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers</publisher><ispartof>AIChE journal, 1995-04, Vol.41 (4), p.1010-1014</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1995 American Institute of Chemical Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-7fed4471a00d3ac884ef81dd81a82275fb726423fd794ea419df22584e55b7dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-7fed4471a00d3ac884ef81dd81a82275fb726423fd794ea419df22584e55b7dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Faic.690410432$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Faic.690410432$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neal, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenhoff, Abraham M.</creatorcontrib><title>Excluded volume contribution to the osmotic second virial coefficient for proteins</title><title>AIChE journal</title><addtitle>AIChE J</addtitle><description>A numerical approach was used to evaluate the excluded volume contribution more accurately by making use of crystallographic structural data for globular proteins. The numerical results were significantly larger than those obtained using the idealized shapes, with the main reason for the discrepancy being the effective surface roughness rather than the overall molecular shape. A reasonable empirical approximation that emerges from the results is that the excluded volume is roughly 6.7 times the molecular volume, compared to 4 times the volume, which is the result for spheres. The use of the new computed value should lead to a good approximation of the excluded volume of proteins.</description><issn>0001-1541</issn><issn>1547-5905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90DtPBCEQB3BiNPF8lPZb2a0CCwtb6kU9jdHk4iOxIRwMEd1bFFgf317MGWNlRYb5zUzyR2iP4AOCMT3U3hy0HWYEs4auoQnhTNS8w3wdTTDGpC4fZBNtpfRUKioknaD5yYfpRwu2egv9uITKhCFHvxizD0OVQ5UfoQppGbI3VYLSLdJHr_siwTlvPAy5ciFWLzFk8EPaQRtO9wl2f95tdHt6cjOd1ZfXZ-fTo8vaNFLSWjiwjAmiMbaNNlIycJJYK4mWlAruFoK2jDbOio6BZqSzjlJeGOcLYU2zjfZXe8vh1xFSVkufDPS9HiCMSRHeyo42XYH1CpoYUorg1Ev0Sx0_FcHqOzlVklO_yRUvVv7d9_D5P1ZH59O_kz-XfMrw8Tup47NqRSO4ur86U3cPF1S2s2M1b74A-gGBkQ</recordid><startdate>199504</startdate><enddate>199504</enddate><creator>Neal, Brian L.</creator><creator>Lenhoff, Abraham M.</creator><general>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199504</creationdate><title>Excluded volume contribution to the osmotic second virial coefficient for proteins</title><author>Neal, Brian L. ; Lenhoff, Abraham M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-7fed4471a00d3ac884ef81dd81a82275fb726423fd794ea419df22584e55b7dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neal, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenhoff, Abraham M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>AIChE journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neal, Brian L.</au><au>Lenhoff, Abraham M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Excluded volume contribution to the osmotic second virial coefficient for proteins</atitle><jtitle>AIChE journal</jtitle><addtitle>AIChE J</addtitle><date>1995-04</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1010</spage><epage>1014</epage><pages>1010-1014</pages><issn>0001-1541</issn><eissn>1547-5905</eissn><abstract>A numerical approach was used to evaluate the excluded volume contribution more accurately by making use of crystallographic structural data for globular proteins. The numerical results were significantly larger than those obtained using the idealized shapes, with the main reason for the discrepancy being the effective surface roughness rather than the overall molecular shape. A reasonable empirical approximation that emerges from the results is that the excluded volume is roughly 6.7 times the molecular volume, compared to 4 times the volume, which is the result for spheres. The use of the new computed value should lead to a good approximation of the excluded volume of proteins.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</pub><doi>10.1002/aic.690410432</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-1541
ispartof AIChE journal, 1995-04, Vol.41 (4), p.1010-1014
issn 0001-1541
1547-5905
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15689239
source Access via Wiley Online Library
title Excluded volume contribution to the osmotic second virial coefficient for proteins
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T13%3A02%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Excluded%20volume%20contribution%20to%20the%20osmotic%20second%20virial%20coefficient%20for%20proteins&rft.jtitle=AIChE%20journal&rft.au=Neal,%20Brian%20L.&rft.date=1995-04&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1010&rft.epage=1014&rft.pages=1010-1014&rft.issn=0001-1541&rft.eissn=1547-5905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aic.690410432&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15689239%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15689239&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true