Excluded volume contribution to the osmotic second virial coefficient for proteins
A numerical approach was used to evaluate the excluded volume contribution more accurately by making use of crystallographic structural data for globular proteins. The numerical results were significantly larger than those obtained using the idealized shapes, with the main reason for the discrepancy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AIChE journal 1995-04, Vol.41 (4), p.1010-1014 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1014 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1010 |
container_title | AIChE journal |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Neal, Brian L. Lenhoff, Abraham M. |
description | A numerical approach was used to evaluate the excluded volume contribution more accurately by making use of crystallographic structural data for globular proteins. The numerical results were significantly larger than those obtained using the idealized shapes, with the main reason for the discrepancy being the effective surface roughness rather than the overall molecular shape. A reasonable empirical approximation that emerges from the results is that the excluded volume is roughly 6.7 times the molecular volume, compared to 4 times the volume, which is the result for spheres. The use of the new computed value should lead to a good approximation of the excluded volume of proteins. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/aic.690410432 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15689239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15689239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-7fed4471a00d3ac884ef81dd81a82275fb726423fd794ea419df22584e55b7dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90DtPBCEQB3BiNPF8lPZb2a0CCwtb6kU9jdHk4iOxIRwMEd1bFFgf317MGWNlRYb5zUzyR2iP4AOCMT3U3hy0HWYEs4auoQnhTNS8w3wdTTDGpC4fZBNtpfRUKioknaD5yYfpRwu2egv9uITKhCFHvxizD0OVQ5UfoQppGbI3VYLSLdJHr_siwTlvPAy5ciFWLzFk8EPaQRtO9wl2f95tdHt6cjOd1ZfXZ-fTo8vaNFLSWjiwjAmiMbaNNlIycJJYK4mWlAruFoK2jDbOio6BZqSzjlJeGOcLYU2zjfZXe8vh1xFSVkufDPS9HiCMSRHeyo42XYH1CpoYUorg1Ev0Sx0_FcHqOzlVklO_yRUvVv7d9_D5P1ZH59O_kz-XfMrw8Tup47NqRSO4ur86U3cPF1S2s2M1b74A-gGBkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15689239</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Excluded volume contribution to the osmotic second virial coefficient for proteins</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Neal, Brian L. ; Lenhoff, Abraham M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Neal, Brian L. ; Lenhoff, Abraham M.</creatorcontrib><description>A numerical approach was used to evaluate the excluded volume contribution more accurately by making use of crystallographic structural data for globular proteins. The numerical results were significantly larger than those obtained using the idealized shapes, with the main reason for the discrepancy being the effective surface roughness rather than the overall molecular shape. A reasonable empirical approximation that emerges from the results is that the excluded volume is roughly 6.7 times the molecular volume, compared to 4 times the volume, which is the result for spheres. The use of the new computed value should lead to a good approximation of the excluded volume of proteins.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1541</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-5905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aic.690410432</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers</publisher><ispartof>AIChE journal, 1995-04, Vol.41 (4), p.1010-1014</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1995 American Institute of Chemical Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-7fed4471a00d3ac884ef81dd81a82275fb726423fd794ea419df22584e55b7dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-7fed4471a00d3ac884ef81dd81a82275fb726423fd794ea419df22584e55b7dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Faic.690410432$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Faic.690410432$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neal, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenhoff, Abraham M.</creatorcontrib><title>Excluded volume contribution to the osmotic second virial coefficient for proteins</title><title>AIChE journal</title><addtitle>AIChE J</addtitle><description>A numerical approach was used to evaluate the excluded volume contribution more accurately by making use of crystallographic structural data for globular proteins. The numerical results were significantly larger than those obtained using the idealized shapes, with the main reason for the discrepancy being the effective surface roughness rather than the overall molecular shape. A reasonable empirical approximation that emerges from the results is that the excluded volume is roughly 6.7 times the molecular volume, compared to 4 times the volume, which is the result for spheres. The use of the new computed value should lead to a good approximation of the excluded volume of proteins.</description><issn>0001-1541</issn><issn>1547-5905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90DtPBCEQB3BiNPF8lPZb2a0CCwtb6kU9jdHk4iOxIRwMEd1bFFgf317MGWNlRYb5zUzyR2iP4AOCMT3U3hy0HWYEs4auoQnhTNS8w3wdTTDGpC4fZBNtpfRUKioknaD5yYfpRwu2egv9uITKhCFHvxizD0OVQ5UfoQppGbI3VYLSLdJHr_siwTlvPAy5ciFWLzFk8EPaQRtO9wl2f95tdHt6cjOd1ZfXZ-fTo8vaNFLSWjiwjAmiMbaNNlIycJJYK4mWlAruFoK2jDbOio6BZqSzjlJeGOcLYU2zjfZXe8vh1xFSVkufDPS9HiCMSRHeyo42XYH1CpoYUorg1Ev0Sx0_FcHqOzlVklO_yRUvVv7d9_D5P1ZH59O_kz-XfMrw8Tup47NqRSO4ur86U3cPF1S2s2M1b74A-gGBkQ</recordid><startdate>199504</startdate><enddate>199504</enddate><creator>Neal, Brian L.</creator><creator>Lenhoff, Abraham M.</creator><general>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199504</creationdate><title>Excluded volume contribution to the osmotic second virial coefficient for proteins</title><author>Neal, Brian L. ; Lenhoff, Abraham M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-7fed4471a00d3ac884ef81dd81a82275fb726423fd794ea419df22584e55b7dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neal, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenhoff, Abraham M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>AIChE journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neal, Brian L.</au><au>Lenhoff, Abraham M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Excluded volume contribution to the osmotic second virial coefficient for proteins</atitle><jtitle>AIChE journal</jtitle><addtitle>AIChE J</addtitle><date>1995-04</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1010</spage><epage>1014</epage><pages>1010-1014</pages><issn>0001-1541</issn><eissn>1547-5905</eissn><abstract>A numerical approach was used to evaluate the excluded volume contribution more accurately by making use of crystallographic structural data for globular proteins. The numerical results were significantly larger than those obtained using the idealized shapes, with the main reason for the discrepancy being the effective surface roughness rather than the overall molecular shape. A reasonable empirical approximation that emerges from the results is that the excluded volume is roughly 6.7 times the molecular volume, compared to 4 times the volume, which is the result for spheres. The use of the new computed value should lead to a good approximation of the excluded volume of proteins.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</pub><doi>10.1002/aic.690410432</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-1541 |
ispartof | AIChE journal, 1995-04, Vol.41 (4), p.1010-1014 |
issn | 0001-1541 1547-5905 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15689239 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
title | Excluded volume contribution to the osmotic second virial coefficient for proteins |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T13%3A02%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Excluded%20volume%20contribution%20to%20the%20osmotic%20second%20virial%20coefficient%20for%20proteins&rft.jtitle=AIChE%20journal&rft.au=Neal,%20Brian%20L.&rft.date=1995-04&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1010&rft.epage=1014&rft.pages=1010-1014&rft.issn=0001-1541&rft.eissn=1547-5905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aic.690410432&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15689239%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15689239&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |