An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part II: Handling Constraints and Extending to an Adaptive Approach
In the precursor paper, a many-objective optimization method (NSGA-III), based on the NSGA-II framework, was suggested and applied to a number of unconstrained test and practical problems with box constraints alone. In this paper, we extend NSGA-III to solve generic constrained many-objective optimi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation 2014-08, Vol.18 (4), p.602-622 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 622 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 602 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Jain, Himanshu Deb, Kalyanmoy |
description | In the precursor paper, a many-objective optimization method (NSGA-III), based on the NSGA-II framework, was suggested and applied to a number of unconstrained test and practical problems with box constraints alone. In this paper, we extend NSGA-III to solve generic constrained many-objective optimization problems. In the process, we also suggest three types of constrained test problems that are scalable to any number of objectives and provide different types of challenges to a many-objective optimizer. A previously suggested MOEA/D algorithm is also extended to solve constrained problems. Results using constrained NSGA-III and constrained MOEA/D show an edge of the former, particularly in solving problems with a large number of objectives. Furthermore, the NSGA-III algorithm is made adaptive in updating and including new reference points on the fly. The resulting adaptive NSGA-III is shown to provide a denser representation of the Pareto-optimal front, compared to the original NSGA-III with an identical computational effort. This, and the original NSGA-III paper, together suggest and amply test a viable evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm for handling constrained and unconstrained problems. These studies should encourage researchers to use and pay further attention in evolutionary many-objective optimization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281534 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1567122490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6595567</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>3393377211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-9cf35ff252152afcdb6b43d273dfdc373f4b0b7a6df2ab8b8f5342c481a6db563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1u1DAUhSMEEqXwAIiNJYTURTP4N4nZhdFAR2qZClrELnL803qU2MH2VJTn4gFxOkMXrGzf893jq3uK4jWCC4Qgf3-1-r5cYIjIAuMGMUKfFEeIU1RCiKun-Q4bXtZ18-N58SLGLYSIMsSPij-tA6s7P-yS9U6Ee3Ah3H256bdaJnunwWZKdrS_xSyDdrjxwabbEVxH627AV2100E7q8tJbl8BHEbUCX7xTfrROpPz45kOa0Xaaghfy9hRcipDAev0BnAmnhllbehdTENkhglwDq19JOzUryecCaJWYHob5Z_KyeGbEEPWrw3lcXH9aXS3PyvPN5_WyPS8lrWEquTSEGYMZRgwLI1Vf9ZQoXBNllCQ1MbSHfS0qZbDom74xeW9Y0gblUs8qclyc7H3ztz93OqZutFHqYRBO-13sEKtqhDHlMKNv_0O3fhdcni5TDOGGomqm0J6SwccYtOmmYMe89g7Bbs6xm3Ps5hy7Q465593BWUQpBhOEkzY-NuKmpogTnrk3e85qrR_linGWpyR_ASzIqY0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1551284160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part II: Handling Constraints and Extending to an Adaptive Approach</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Jain, Himanshu ; Deb, Kalyanmoy</creator><creatorcontrib>Jain, Himanshu ; Deb, Kalyanmoy</creatorcontrib><description>In the precursor paper, a many-objective optimization method (NSGA-III), based on the NSGA-II framework, was suggested and applied to a number of unconstrained test and practical problems with box constraints alone. In this paper, we extend NSGA-III to solve generic constrained many-objective optimization problems. In the process, we also suggest three types of constrained test problems that are scalable to any number of objectives and provide different types of challenges to a many-objective optimizer. A previously suggested MOEA/D algorithm is also extended to solve constrained problems. Results using constrained NSGA-III and constrained MOEA/D show an edge of the former, particularly in solving problems with a large number of objectives. Furthermore, the NSGA-III algorithm is made adaptive in updating and including new reference points on the fly. The resulting adaptive NSGA-III is shown to provide a denser representation of the Pareto-optimal front, compared to the original NSGA-III with an identical computational effort. This, and the original NSGA-III paper, together suggest and amply test a viable evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm for handling constrained and unconstrained problems. These studies should encourage researchers to use and pay further attention in evolutionary many-objective optimization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1089-778X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-0026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281534</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITEVF5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: IEEE</publisher><subject>Adaptive algorithms ; Algorithm design and analysis ; Algorithmics. Computability. Computer arithmetics ; Algorithms ; Applied sciences ; Computer science; control theory; systems ; Constraints ; Educational institutions ; Evolutionary ; Evolutionary algorithms ; evolutionary computation ; Exact sciences and technology ; Handling ; Heuristic ; large dimension ; Many-objective optimization ; Measurement ; multi-criterion optimization ; non-dominated sorting ; NSGA-III ; Optimization ; Optimization algorithms ; Precursors ; Sociology ; Sorting ; Statistics ; Theoretical computing</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 2014-08, Vol.18 (4), p.602-622</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Aug 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-9cf35ff252152afcdb6b43d273dfdc373f4b0b7a6df2ab8b8f5342c481a6db563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-9cf35ff252152afcdb6b43d273dfdc373f4b0b7a6df2ab8b8f5342c481a6db563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6595567$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6595567$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28741939$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jain, Himanshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deb, Kalyanmoy</creatorcontrib><title>An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part II: Handling Constraints and Extending to an Adaptive Approach</title><title>IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation</title><addtitle>TEVC</addtitle><description>In the precursor paper, a many-objective optimization method (NSGA-III), based on the NSGA-II framework, was suggested and applied to a number of unconstrained test and practical problems with box constraints alone. In this paper, we extend NSGA-III to solve generic constrained many-objective optimization problems. In the process, we also suggest three types of constrained test problems that are scalable to any number of objectives and provide different types of challenges to a many-objective optimizer. A previously suggested MOEA/D algorithm is also extended to solve constrained problems. Results using constrained NSGA-III and constrained MOEA/D show an edge of the former, particularly in solving problems with a large number of objectives. Furthermore, the NSGA-III algorithm is made adaptive in updating and including new reference points on the fly. The resulting adaptive NSGA-III is shown to provide a denser representation of the Pareto-optimal front, compared to the original NSGA-III with an identical computational effort. This, and the original NSGA-III paper, together suggest and amply test a viable evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm for handling constrained and unconstrained problems. These studies should encourage researchers to use and pay further attention in evolutionary many-objective optimization.</description><subject>Adaptive algorithms</subject><subject>Algorithm design and analysis</subject><subject>Algorithmics. Computability. Computer arithmetics</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Computer science; control theory; systems</subject><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Educational institutions</subject><subject>Evolutionary</subject><subject>Evolutionary algorithms</subject><subject>evolutionary computation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Handling</subject><subject>Heuristic</subject><subject>large dimension</subject><subject>Many-objective optimization</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>multi-criterion optimization</subject><subject>non-dominated sorting</subject><subject>NSGA-III</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Optimization algorithms</subject><subject>Precursors</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sorting</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Theoretical computing</subject><issn>1089-778X</issn><issn>1941-0026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1u1DAUhSMEEqXwAIiNJYTURTP4N4nZhdFAR2qZClrELnL803qU2MH2VJTn4gFxOkMXrGzf893jq3uK4jWCC4Qgf3-1-r5cYIjIAuMGMUKfFEeIU1RCiKun-Q4bXtZ18-N58SLGLYSIMsSPij-tA6s7P-yS9U6Ee3Ah3H256bdaJnunwWZKdrS_xSyDdrjxwabbEVxH627AV2100E7q8tJbl8BHEbUCX7xTfrROpPz45kOa0Xaaghfy9hRcipDAev0BnAmnhllbehdTENkhglwDq19JOzUryecCaJWYHob5Z_KyeGbEEPWrw3lcXH9aXS3PyvPN5_WyPS8lrWEquTSEGYMZRgwLI1Vf9ZQoXBNllCQ1MbSHfS0qZbDom74xeW9Y0gblUs8qclyc7H3ztz93OqZutFHqYRBO-13sEKtqhDHlMKNv_0O3fhdcni5TDOGGomqm0J6SwccYtOmmYMe89g7Bbs6xm3Ps5hy7Q465593BWUQpBhOEkzY-NuKmpogTnrk3e85qrR_linGWpyR_ASzIqY0</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Jain, Himanshu</creator><creator>Deb, Kalyanmoy</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part II: Handling Constraints and Extending to an Adaptive Approach</title><author>Jain, Himanshu ; Deb, Kalyanmoy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-9cf35ff252152afcdb6b43d273dfdc373f4b0b7a6df2ab8b8f5342c481a6db563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adaptive algorithms</topic><topic>Algorithm design and analysis</topic><topic>Algorithmics. Computability. Computer arithmetics</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Computer science; control theory; systems</topic><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Educational institutions</topic><topic>Evolutionary</topic><topic>Evolutionary algorithms</topic><topic>evolutionary computation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Handling</topic><topic>Heuristic</topic><topic>large dimension</topic><topic>Many-objective optimization</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>multi-criterion optimization</topic><topic>non-dominated sorting</topic><topic>NSGA-III</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Optimization algorithms</topic><topic>Precursors</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sorting</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Theoretical computing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jain, Himanshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deb, Kalyanmoy</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jain, Himanshu</au><au>Deb, Kalyanmoy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part II: Handling Constraints and Extending to an Adaptive Approach</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation</jtitle><stitle>TEVC</stitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>602</spage><epage>622</epage><pages>602-622</pages><issn>1089-778X</issn><eissn>1941-0026</eissn><coden>ITEVF5</coden><abstract>In the precursor paper, a many-objective optimization method (NSGA-III), based on the NSGA-II framework, was suggested and applied to a number of unconstrained test and practical problems with box constraints alone. In this paper, we extend NSGA-III to solve generic constrained many-objective optimization problems. In the process, we also suggest three types of constrained test problems that are scalable to any number of objectives and provide different types of challenges to a many-objective optimizer. A previously suggested MOEA/D algorithm is also extended to solve constrained problems. Results using constrained NSGA-III and constrained MOEA/D show an edge of the former, particularly in solving problems with a large number of objectives. Furthermore, the NSGA-III algorithm is made adaptive in updating and including new reference points on the fly. The resulting adaptive NSGA-III is shown to provide a denser representation of the Pareto-optimal front, compared to the original NSGA-III with an identical computational effort. This, and the original NSGA-III paper, together suggest and amply test a viable evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm for handling constrained and unconstrained problems. These studies should encourage researchers to use and pay further attention in evolutionary many-objective optimization.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281534</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1089-778X |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 2014-08, Vol.18 (4), p.602-622 |
issn | 1089-778X 1941-0026 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1567122490 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Adaptive algorithms Algorithm design and analysis Algorithmics. Computability. Computer arithmetics Algorithms Applied sciences Computer science control theory systems Constraints Educational institutions Evolutionary Evolutionary algorithms evolutionary computation Exact sciences and technology Handling Heuristic large dimension Many-objective optimization Measurement multi-criterion optimization non-dominated sorting NSGA-III Optimization Optimization algorithms Precursors Sociology Sorting Statistics Theoretical computing |
title | An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part II: Handling Constraints and Extending to an Adaptive Approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T05%3A57%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Evolutionary%20Many-Objective%20Optimization%20Algorithm%20Using%20Reference-Point%20Based%20Nondominated%20Sorting%20Approach,%20Part%20II:%20Handling%20Constraints%20and%20Extending%20to%20an%20Adaptive%20Approach&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20evolutionary%20computation&rft.au=Jain,%20Himanshu&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=602&rft.epage=622&rft.pages=602-622&rft.issn=1089-778X&rft.eissn=1941-0026&rft.coden=ITEVF5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281534&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E3393377211%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1551284160&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6595567&rfr_iscdi=true |