Energy and exergy analysis of an absorption power cycle

The thermal efficiency of a power cycle is drastically reduced when the temperatures of the heating and cooling fluids approach, which is the case of cycles run by waste heat streams and low temperature solar or geothermal systems. In this work, an absorption LiBr–H2O power cycle is analysed and com...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied thermal engineering 2013-06, Vol.55 (1-2), p.69-77
Hauptverfasser: Garcia-Hernando, Néstor, de Vega, M., Soria-Verdugo, Antonio, Sanchez-Delgado, Sergio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 77
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 69
container_title Applied thermal engineering
container_volume 55
creator Garcia-Hernando, Néstor
de Vega, M.
Soria-Verdugo, Antonio
Sanchez-Delgado, Sergio
description The thermal efficiency of a power cycle is drastically reduced when the temperatures of the heating and cooling fluids approach, which is the case of cycles run by waste heat streams and low temperature solar or geothermal systems. In this work, an absorption LiBr–H2O power cycle is analysed and compared to a conventional Rankine cycle operating between two heat sources at similar temperatures. The absorption power cycle is found to improve the thermal efficiency, and this improvement in efficiency is higher for lower temperature differences between the heating and the cooling external fluids. The relative efficiency improvement of the absorption cycle is as high as 40% operating with a similar turbine to that of the conventional Rankine cycle. The exergy destruction of both the absorption and the conventional cycle was also analysed. In a conventional Rankine cycle, the constant temperature at which phase change occurs leads to higher temperature differences between the operating fluid and the heating and cooling external fluids, producing high exergy destruction. The absorption cycle permits a better temperature match, reducing the exergy destruction. Therefore, the exergetic efficiency of the absorption power cycle is around 10% higher than that of the conventional Rankine cycle. •A LiBr–water absorption power cycle is proposed.•The absorption cycle can operate with low heating and cooling temperature difference.•The absorption cycle permits a better match of temperatures in the heat exchangers.•The LiBr–H2O cycle has better thermal and exergetic efficiencies than a Rankine cycle.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.02.044
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1567060955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1359431113001749</els_id><sourcerecordid>1567060955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-afdab32cd51adcf8922a1636507d3f68dd0c3440db79576c808302a583eb0fa03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AURbNQsFb_QxYKbhrffGVScCOlVaHgRtfD68xLnZImcSZV8-9NaRFc6erdxXn3wkmSKwYZA5bfbjJs26p7o7DFiup1xoGJDHgGUp4kIybUdCIFY2fJeYwbAMYLLUeJntcU1n2KtUvp6xix6qOPaVMOOcVVbELb-aZO2-aTQmp7W9FFclpiFenyeMfJ62L-MnucLJ8fnmb3y4mVPO8mWDpcCW6dYuhsWUw5R5aLXIF2oswL58AKKcGt9FTp3BZQCOCoCkErKBHEOLk59Lahed9R7MzWR0tVhTU1u2iYyjXkMFXqb1TKQnMtYN96d0BtaGIMVJo2-C2G3jAwe51mY37rNHudBrgZdA7v18cljBarMmBtffzpGDaU1owN3OLA0WDow1Mw0XqqLTkfyHbGNf5_g9_AAZUP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1448727300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energy and exergy analysis of an absorption power cycle</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Garcia-Hernando, Néstor ; de Vega, M. ; Soria-Verdugo, Antonio ; Sanchez-Delgado, Sergio</creator><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Hernando, Néstor ; de Vega, M. ; Soria-Verdugo, Antonio ; Sanchez-Delgado, Sergio</creatorcontrib><description>The thermal efficiency of a power cycle is drastically reduced when the temperatures of the heating and cooling fluids approach, which is the case of cycles run by waste heat streams and low temperature solar or geothermal systems. In this work, an absorption LiBr–H2O power cycle is analysed and compared to a conventional Rankine cycle operating between two heat sources at similar temperatures. The absorption power cycle is found to improve the thermal efficiency, and this improvement in efficiency is higher for lower temperature differences between the heating and the cooling external fluids. The relative efficiency improvement of the absorption cycle is as high as 40% operating with a similar turbine to that of the conventional Rankine cycle. The exergy destruction of both the absorption and the conventional cycle was also analysed. In a conventional Rankine cycle, the constant temperature at which phase change occurs leads to higher temperature differences between the operating fluid and the heating and cooling external fluids, producing high exergy destruction. The absorption cycle permits a better temperature match, reducing the exergy destruction. Therefore, the exergetic efficiency of the absorption power cycle is around 10% higher than that of the conventional Rankine cycle. •A LiBr–water absorption power cycle is proposed.•The absorption cycle can operate with low heating and cooling temperature difference.•The absorption cycle permits a better match of temperatures in the heat exchangers.•The LiBr–H2O cycle has better thermal and exergetic efficiencies than a Rankine cycle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-4311</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.02.044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Destruction ; Energy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Exact sciences and technology ; Exergy ; Exergy efficiency ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Fluids ; Heat transfer ; Heating ; LiBr–water absorption ; Low temperature power cycles ; Rankine cycle ; Solar power generation ; Theoretical studies. Data and constants. Metering ; Thermal efficiency</subject><ispartof>Applied thermal engineering, 2013-06, Vol.55 (1-2), p.69-77</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-afdab32cd51adcf8922a1636507d3f68dd0c3440db79576c808302a583eb0fa03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-afdab32cd51adcf8922a1636507d3f68dd0c3440db79576c808302a583eb0fa03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.02.044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27357711$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Hernando, Néstor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vega, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soria-Verdugo, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez-Delgado, Sergio</creatorcontrib><title>Energy and exergy analysis of an absorption power cycle</title><title>Applied thermal engineering</title><description>The thermal efficiency of a power cycle is drastically reduced when the temperatures of the heating and cooling fluids approach, which is the case of cycles run by waste heat streams and low temperature solar or geothermal systems. In this work, an absorption LiBr–H2O power cycle is analysed and compared to a conventional Rankine cycle operating between two heat sources at similar temperatures. The absorption power cycle is found to improve the thermal efficiency, and this improvement in efficiency is higher for lower temperature differences between the heating and the cooling external fluids. The relative efficiency improvement of the absorption cycle is as high as 40% operating with a similar turbine to that of the conventional Rankine cycle. The exergy destruction of both the absorption and the conventional cycle was also analysed. In a conventional Rankine cycle, the constant temperature at which phase change occurs leads to higher temperature differences between the operating fluid and the heating and cooling external fluids, producing high exergy destruction. The absorption cycle permits a better temperature match, reducing the exergy destruction. Therefore, the exergetic efficiency of the absorption power cycle is around 10% higher than that of the conventional Rankine cycle. •A LiBr–water absorption power cycle is proposed.•The absorption cycle can operate with low heating and cooling temperature difference.•The absorption cycle permits a better match of temperatures in the heat exchangers.•The LiBr–H2O cycle has better thermal and exergetic efficiencies than a Rankine cycle.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Destruction</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Exergy</subject><subject>Exergy efficiency</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Fluids</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Heating</subject><subject>LiBr–water absorption</subject><subject>Low temperature power cycles</subject><subject>Rankine cycle</subject><subject>Solar power generation</subject><subject>Theoretical studies. Data and constants. Metering</subject><subject>Thermal efficiency</subject><issn>1359-4311</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AURbNQsFb_QxYKbhrffGVScCOlVaHgRtfD68xLnZImcSZV8-9NaRFc6erdxXn3wkmSKwYZA5bfbjJs26p7o7DFiup1xoGJDHgGUp4kIybUdCIFY2fJeYwbAMYLLUeJntcU1n2KtUvp6xix6qOPaVMOOcVVbELb-aZO2-aTQmp7W9FFclpiFenyeMfJ62L-MnucLJ8fnmb3y4mVPO8mWDpcCW6dYuhsWUw5R5aLXIF2oswL58AKKcGt9FTp3BZQCOCoCkErKBHEOLk59Lahed9R7MzWR0tVhTU1u2iYyjXkMFXqb1TKQnMtYN96d0BtaGIMVJo2-C2G3jAwe51mY37rNHudBrgZdA7v18cljBarMmBtffzpGDaU1owN3OLA0WDow1Mw0XqqLTkfyHbGNf5_g9_AAZUP</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Garcia-Hernando, Néstor</creator><creator>de Vega, M.</creator><creator>Soria-Verdugo, Antonio</creator><creator>Sanchez-Delgado, Sergio</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Energy and exergy analysis of an absorption power cycle</title><author>Garcia-Hernando, Néstor ; de Vega, M. ; Soria-Verdugo, Antonio ; Sanchez-Delgado, Sergio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-afdab32cd51adcf8922a1636507d3f68dd0c3440db79576c808302a583eb0fa03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Destruction</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Exergy</topic><topic>Exergy efficiency</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Fluids</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Heating</topic><topic>LiBr–water absorption</topic><topic>Low temperature power cycles</topic><topic>Rankine cycle</topic><topic>Solar power generation</topic><topic>Theoretical studies. Data and constants. Metering</topic><topic>Thermal efficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Hernando, Néstor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vega, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soria-Verdugo, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez-Delgado, Sergio</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied thermal engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garcia-Hernando, Néstor</au><au>de Vega, M.</au><au>Soria-Verdugo, Antonio</au><au>Sanchez-Delgado, Sergio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energy and exergy analysis of an absorption power cycle</atitle><jtitle>Applied thermal engineering</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>69-77</pages><issn>1359-4311</issn><abstract>The thermal efficiency of a power cycle is drastically reduced when the temperatures of the heating and cooling fluids approach, which is the case of cycles run by waste heat streams and low temperature solar or geothermal systems. In this work, an absorption LiBr–H2O power cycle is analysed and compared to a conventional Rankine cycle operating between two heat sources at similar temperatures. The absorption power cycle is found to improve the thermal efficiency, and this improvement in efficiency is higher for lower temperature differences between the heating and the cooling external fluids. The relative efficiency improvement of the absorption cycle is as high as 40% operating with a similar turbine to that of the conventional Rankine cycle. The exergy destruction of both the absorption and the conventional cycle was also analysed. In a conventional Rankine cycle, the constant temperature at which phase change occurs leads to higher temperature differences between the operating fluid and the heating and cooling external fluids, producing high exergy destruction. The absorption cycle permits a better temperature match, reducing the exergy destruction. Therefore, the exergetic efficiency of the absorption power cycle is around 10% higher than that of the conventional Rankine cycle. •A LiBr–water absorption power cycle is proposed.•The absorption cycle can operate with low heating and cooling temperature difference.•The absorption cycle permits a better match of temperatures in the heat exchangers.•The LiBr–H2O cycle has better thermal and exergetic efficiencies than a Rankine cycle.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.02.044</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1359-4311
ispartof Applied thermal engineering, 2013-06, Vol.55 (1-2), p.69-77
issn 1359-4311
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1567060955
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Applied sciences
Destruction
Energy
Energy. Thermal use of fuels
Exact sciences and technology
Exergy
Exergy efficiency
Fluid dynamics
Fluid flow
Fluids
Heat transfer
Heating
LiBr–water absorption
Low temperature power cycles
Rankine cycle
Solar power generation
Theoretical studies. Data and constants. Metering
Thermal efficiency
title Energy and exergy analysis of an absorption power cycle
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T22%3A36%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energy%20and%20exergy%20analysis%20of%20an%20absorption%20power%20cycle&rft.jtitle=Applied%20thermal%20engineering&rft.au=Garcia-Hernando,%20N%C3%A9stor&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=69-77&rft.issn=1359-4311&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.02.044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1567060955%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1448727300&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1359431113001749&rfr_iscdi=true