Investigation of national policy shifts to impact orbital debris environments
Low earth orbit has become increasingly congested as the satellite population has grown over the past few decades, making orbital debris a major concern for the operational stability of space assets. This congestion was highlighted by the collision of the Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251 satellites in 200...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Space policy 2014-02, Vol.30 (1), p.23-33 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 33 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | Space policy |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Percy, Thomas K. Landrum, D. Brian |
description | Low earth orbit has become increasingly congested as the satellite population has grown over the past few decades, making orbital debris a major concern for the operational stability of space assets. This congestion was highlighted by the collision of the Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251 satellites in 2009. This paper addresses the current state of orbital debris regulation in the United States and asks what might be done through policy change to mitigate risks in the orbital debris environment. A brief discussion of the nature of orbital debris addresses the major contributing factors including size classes, locations of population concentrations, projected satellite populations, and current challenges presented in using post-mission active debris removal to mitigate orbital debris. An overview of the current orbital debris regulatory structure of the United States reveals the fragmented nature of having six regulating bodies providing varying levels of oversight to their markets. A closer look into the regulatory policy of these agencies shows that, while they all take direction from The U.S. Government Orbital Debris Mitigation Standard Practices, this policy is a guideline with no real penalty for non-compliance. Various policy solutions to the orbital debris problem are presented, ranging from a business as usual approach to a consolidated regulation system which would encourage spacecraft operator compliance. The positive aspects of these options are presented as themes that would comprise an effective policy shift towards successful LEO conservation. Potential economic and physical limitations to this policy approach are also addressed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.spacepol.2014.02.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1567039666</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S026596461400006X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1559674188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-dbeee5ba2c02052f02de5ec0aa829f16580183922dd2efd879d41b36744bb34e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwFVCPXFqcpE3bG2jiz6QhLiBxi9LEhUxdM5Js0r49GYMznGzJzz_7PUIuKRQUqLheFmGtNK7dUDCgZQGsAOBHZEKbus05b96OyQSYqPJWlOKUnIWwBIC6rsoJeZqPWwzRvqto3Zi5Phu_OzVkCWj1Lgsfto8hiy6zq3QnZs53Nqa5wc7bkOG4td6NKxxjOCcnvRoCXvzUKXm9v3uZPeaL54f57HaRa143MTcdIladYhoYVKwHZrBCDUo1rO2pqBqgDW8ZM4Zhb5INU9KOi7osu46XyKfk6sBde_e5Sf_LlQ0ah0GN6DZB0krUwFshxD-kVZvAtGmSVByk2rsQPPZy7e1K-Z2kIPdRy6X8jVruo5bAZIo6Ld4cFjF53lr0MmiLo0ZjPeoojbN_Ib4AgwmMRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1559674188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of national policy shifts to impact orbital debris environments</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Percy, Thomas K. ; Landrum, D. Brian</creator><creatorcontrib>Percy, Thomas K. ; Landrum, D. Brian</creatorcontrib><description>Low earth orbit has become increasingly congested as the satellite population has grown over the past few decades, making orbital debris a major concern for the operational stability of space assets. This congestion was highlighted by the collision of the Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251 satellites in 2009. This paper addresses the current state of orbital debris regulation in the United States and asks what might be done through policy change to mitigate risks in the orbital debris environment. A brief discussion of the nature of orbital debris addresses the major contributing factors including size classes, locations of population concentrations, projected satellite populations, and current challenges presented in using post-mission active debris removal to mitigate orbital debris. An overview of the current orbital debris regulatory structure of the United States reveals the fragmented nature of having six regulating bodies providing varying levels of oversight to their markets. A closer look into the regulatory policy of these agencies shows that, while they all take direction from The U.S. Government Orbital Debris Mitigation Standard Practices, this policy is a guideline with no real penalty for non-compliance. Various policy solutions to the orbital debris problem are presented, ranging from a business as usual approach to a consolidated regulation system which would encourage spacecraft operator compliance. The positive aspects of these options are presented as themes that would comprise an effective policy shift towards successful LEO conservation. Potential economic and physical limitations to this policy approach are also addressed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-9646</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-338X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2014.02.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>25 year rule ; Conservation ; Control ; Economics ; Markets ; Orbital debris ; Policies ; Population ; Post mission disposal ; Regulation ; Risk ; Satellite ; Satellites ; Space debris ; Space policy ; Space research and technology ; Spacecraft ; Surveillance ; United States</subject><ispartof>Space policy, 2014-02, Vol.30 (1), p.23-33</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-dbeee5ba2c02052f02de5ec0aa829f16580183922dd2efd879d41b36744bb34e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-dbeee5ba2c02052f02de5ec0aa829f16580183922dd2efd879d41b36744bb34e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2014.02.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27865,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Percy, Thomas K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landrum, D. Brian</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of national policy shifts to impact orbital debris environments</title><title>Space policy</title><description>Low earth orbit has become increasingly congested as the satellite population has grown over the past few decades, making orbital debris a major concern for the operational stability of space assets. This congestion was highlighted by the collision of the Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251 satellites in 2009. This paper addresses the current state of orbital debris regulation in the United States and asks what might be done through policy change to mitigate risks in the orbital debris environment. A brief discussion of the nature of orbital debris addresses the major contributing factors including size classes, locations of population concentrations, projected satellite populations, and current challenges presented in using post-mission active debris removal to mitigate orbital debris. An overview of the current orbital debris regulatory structure of the United States reveals the fragmented nature of having six regulating bodies providing varying levels of oversight to their markets. A closer look into the regulatory policy of these agencies shows that, while they all take direction from The U.S. Government Orbital Debris Mitigation Standard Practices, this policy is a guideline with no real penalty for non-compliance. Various policy solutions to the orbital debris problem are presented, ranging from a business as usual approach to a consolidated regulation system which would encourage spacecraft operator compliance. The positive aspects of these options are presented as themes that would comprise an effective policy shift towards successful LEO conservation. Potential economic and physical limitations to this policy approach are also addressed.</description><subject>25 year rule</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Orbital debris</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Post mission disposal</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Satellite</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Space debris</subject><subject>Space policy</subject><subject>Space research and technology</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0265-9646</issn><issn>1879-338X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwFVCPXFqcpE3bG2jiz6QhLiBxi9LEhUxdM5Js0r49GYMznGzJzz_7PUIuKRQUqLheFmGtNK7dUDCgZQGsAOBHZEKbus05b96OyQSYqPJWlOKUnIWwBIC6rsoJeZqPWwzRvqto3Zi5Phu_OzVkCWj1Lgsfto8hiy6zq3QnZs53Nqa5wc7bkOG4td6NKxxjOCcnvRoCXvzUKXm9v3uZPeaL54f57HaRa143MTcdIladYhoYVKwHZrBCDUo1rO2pqBqgDW8ZM4Zhb5INU9KOi7osu46XyKfk6sBde_e5Sf_LlQ0ah0GN6DZB0krUwFshxD-kVZvAtGmSVByk2rsQPPZy7e1K-Z2kIPdRy6X8jVruo5bAZIo6Ld4cFjF53lr0MmiLo0ZjPeoojbN_Ib4AgwmMRg</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Percy, Thomas K.</creator><creator>Landrum, D. Brian</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Investigation of national policy shifts to impact orbital debris environments</title><author>Percy, Thomas K. ; Landrum, D. Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-dbeee5ba2c02052f02de5ec0aa829f16580183922dd2efd879d41b36744bb34e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>25 year rule</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Orbital debris</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Post mission disposal</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Satellite</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Space debris</topic><topic>Space policy</topic><topic>Space research and technology</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Percy, Thomas K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landrum, D. Brian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Space policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Percy, Thomas K.</au><au>Landrum, D. Brian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of national policy shifts to impact orbital debris environments</atitle><jtitle>Space policy</jtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>23-33</pages><issn>0265-9646</issn><eissn>1879-338X</eissn><abstract>Low earth orbit has become increasingly congested as the satellite population has grown over the past few decades, making orbital debris a major concern for the operational stability of space assets. This congestion was highlighted by the collision of the Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251 satellites in 2009. This paper addresses the current state of orbital debris regulation in the United States and asks what might be done through policy change to mitigate risks in the orbital debris environment. A brief discussion of the nature of orbital debris addresses the major contributing factors including size classes, locations of population concentrations, projected satellite populations, and current challenges presented in using post-mission active debris removal to mitigate orbital debris. An overview of the current orbital debris regulatory structure of the United States reveals the fragmented nature of having six regulating bodies providing varying levels of oversight to their markets. A closer look into the regulatory policy of these agencies shows that, while they all take direction from The U.S. Government Orbital Debris Mitigation Standard Practices, this policy is a guideline with no real penalty for non-compliance. Various policy solutions to the orbital debris problem are presented, ranging from a business as usual approach to a consolidated regulation system which would encourage spacecraft operator compliance. The positive aspects of these options are presented as themes that would comprise an effective policy shift towards successful LEO conservation. Potential economic and physical limitations to this policy approach are also addressed.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.spacepol.2014.02.003</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0265-9646 |
ispartof | Space policy, 2014-02, Vol.30 (1), p.23-33 |
issn | 0265-9646 1879-338X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1567039666 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index |
subjects | 25 year rule Conservation Control Economics Markets Orbital debris Policies Population Post mission disposal Regulation Risk Satellite Satellites Space debris Space policy Space research and technology Spacecraft Surveillance United States |
title | Investigation of national policy shifts to impact orbital debris environments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A42%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20national%20policy%20shifts%20to%20impact%20orbital%20debris%20environments&rft.jtitle=Space%20policy&rft.au=Percy,%20Thomas%20K.&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=23-33&rft.issn=0265-9646&rft.eissn=1879-338X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spacepol.2014.02.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1559674188%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1559674188&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S026596461400006X&rfr_iscdi=true |