Invasive species contribute to biotic resistance: negative effect of caprellid amphipods on an invasive tunicate

As the number of introductions of non-indigenous species (NIS) continues to rise, ecologists are faced with new and unique opportunities to observe interactions between species that do not naturally co-exist. These interactions can have important implications on the invasion process, potentially det...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological invasions 2014, Vol.16 (10), p.2209-2219
Hauptverfasser: Collin, Samuel B, Johnson, Ladd E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2219
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2209
container_title Biological invasions
container_volume 16
creator Collin, Samuel B
Johnson, Ladd E
description As the number of introductions of non-indigenous species (NIS) continues to rise, ecologists are faced with new and unique opportunities to observe interactions between species that do not naturally co-exist. These interactions can have important implications on the invasion process, potentially determining whether NIS become widespread and abundant, survive in small numbers, or fail to establish and disappear. Although many studies have naturally focused on the interactions between NIS and native species to examine their effects and the biological resistance of the recipient community to invasion, few have examined the effects that NIS have on each other. In some cases, interactions can facilitate the invasion process of one or both species (i.e., “invasional meltdowns”), but competition or predation can lead to negative interactions as well. The introduction of the vase tunicate, Ciona intestinalis, in Prince Edward Island (Canada) has harmed mussel aquaculture via heavy biofouling of equipment and mussels. Through both a broad-scale survey and small-scale field experiments, we show that Ciona recruitment is drastically reduced by caprellid amphipods, including the NIS Caprella mutica. This study provides an exciting example of how established invasive species can negatively impact the recruitment of a secondary invader, highlighting the potential for non-additive effects of multiple invasions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10530-014-0659-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1566843761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1566843761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-64babc08e9716e0b27fccc96fdcd58d201a48b2f568093e89d674d5dc1958f503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxQdRsFY_gCsDIrgZvZn8HXdS1BYKLrTrkMncPFPeS8YkU_Dbm2GqiIuu7oV7zo_DPV33ksI7CqDeFwqCQQ-U9yDF2PNH3RkVivWUS_647UyrngmunnbPSrkFgFGBOOuWq3hnS7hDUhZ0AQtxKdYcprUiqYlMIdXgSMYSSrXR4QcS8WDr5kDv0VWSPHF2yXg8hpnY0_IjLGkuJEViIwl_8HWNwdmKz7sn3h4Lvrif593N50_fLy77669fri4-XveOK1Z7ySc7OdA4KioRpkF559wo_exmoecBqOV6GryQGkaGepyl4rOYHR2F9gLYefd25y45_VyxVHMKxbWQNmJai6FCSs2ZkrRJX_8nvU1rji3dpgKgFNgGpLvK5VRKRm-WHE42_zIUzNaB2TswrQOzdWB487y5J9vi7NHn9sFQ_hoHrbQY9MYedl1pp3jA_E-CB-CvdpO3ydhDbuCbb-0xvCUWbADNfgPeT6CN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1560011030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Invasive species contribute to biotic resistance: negative effect of caprellid amphipods on an invasive tunicate</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Collin, Samuel B ; Johnson, Ladd E</creator><creatorcontrib>Collin, Samuel B ; Johnson, Ladd E</creatorcontrib><description>As the number of introductions of non-indigenous species (NIS) continues to rise, ecologists are faced with new and unique opportunities to observe interactions between species that do not naturally co-exist. These interactions can have important implications on the invasion process, potentially determining whether NIS become widespread and abundant, survive in small numbers, or fail to establish and disappear. Although many studies have naturally focused on the interactions between NIS and native species to examine their effects and the biological resistance of the recipient community to invasion, few have examined the effects that NIS have on each other. In some cases, interactions can facilitate the invasion process of one or both species (i.e., “invasional meltdowns”), but competition or predation can lead to negative interactions as well. The introduction of the vase tunicate, Ciona intestinalis, in Prince Edward Island (Canada) has harmed mussel aquaculture via heavy biofouling of equipment and mussels. Through both a broad-scale survey and small-scale field experiments, we show that Ciona recruitment is drastically reduced by caprellid amphipods, including the NIS Caprella mutica. This study provides an exciting example of how established invasive species can negatively impact the recruitment of a secondary invader, highlighting the potential for non-additive effects of multiple invasions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-3547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10530-014-0659-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Amphipoda ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Aquaculture ; Aquatic life ; Biofouling ; Biological and medical sciences ; biological resistance ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Caprella mutica ; Ciona intestinalis ; Community ecology ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Crustacea ; Developmental Biology ; ecologists ; Ecology ; field experimentation ; Field tests ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Indigenous species ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; Invertebrates ; Less representative or incertae sedis groups: acanthocephala, chaetognatha, gnathostomulida, lophophoria, merostomata, mesozoa, myxozoa, nematorhyncha, pararthropoda, placozoa, priapuloidea, prochordata, pycnogonida, rotifera ; Life Sciences ; mollusc culture ; Mollusks ; mussels ; Nonnative species ; Original Paper ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Plant Sciences ; predation ; recruitment ; surveys</subject><ispartof>Biological invasions, 2014, Vol.16 (10), p.2209-2219</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-64babc08e9716e0b27fccc96fdcd58d201a48b2f568093e89d674d5dc1958f503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-64babc08e9716e0b27fccc96fdcd58d201a48b2f568093e89d674d5dc1958f503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10530-014-0659-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10530-014-0659-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28785280$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Collin, Samuel B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Ladd E</creatorcontrib><title>Invasive species contribute to biotic resistance: negative effect of caprellid amphipods on an invasive tunicate</title><title>Biological invasions</title><addtitle>Biol Invasions</addtitle><description>As the number of introductions of non-indigenous species (NIS) continues to rise, ecologists are faced with new and unique opportunities to observe interactions between species that do not naturally co-exist. These interactions can have important implications on the invasion process, potentially determining whether NIS become widespread and abundant, survive in small numbers, or fail to establish and disappear. Although many studies have naturally focused on the interactions between NIS and native species to examine their effects and the biological resistance of the recipient community to invasion, few have examined the effects that NIS have on each other. In some cases, interactions can facilitate the invasion process of one or both species (i.e., “invasional meltdowns”), but competition or predation can lead to negative interactions as well. The introduction of the vase tunicate, Ciona intestinalis, in Prince Edward Island (Canada) has harmed mussel aquaculture via heavy biofouling of equipment and mussels. Through both a broad-scale survey and small-scale field experiments, we show that Ciona recruitment is drastically reduced by caprellid amphipods, including the NIS Caprella mutica. This study provides an exciting example of how established invasive species can negatively impact the recruitment of a secondary invader, highlighting the potential for non-additive effects of multiple invasions.</description><subject>Amphipoda</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Aquatic life</subject><subject>Biofouling</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biological resistance</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Caprella mutica</subject><subject>Ciona intestinalis</subject><subject>Community ecology</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Crustacea</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>ecologists</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Less representative or incertae sedis groups: acanthocephala, chaetognatha, gnathostomulida, lophophoria, merostomata, mesozoa, myxozoa, nematorhyncha, pararthropoda, placozoa, priapuloidea, prochordata, pycnogonida, rotifera</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>mollusc culture</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>mussels</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>predation</subject><subject>recruitment</subject><subject>surveys</subject><issn>1387-3547</issn><issn>1573-1464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxQdRsFY_gCsDIrgZvZn8HXdS1BYKLrTrkMncPFPeS8YkU_Dbm2GqiIuu7oV7zo_DPV33ksI7CqDeFwqCQQ-U9yDF2PNH3RkVivWUS_647UyrngmunnbPSrkFgFGBOOuWq3hnS7hDUhZ0AQtxKdYcprUiqYlMIdXgSMYSSrXR4QcS8WDr5kDv0VWSPHF2yXg8hpnY0_IjLGkuJEViIwl_8HWNwdmKz7sn3h4Lvrif593N50_fLy77669fri4-XveOK1Z7ySc7OdA4KioRpkF559wo_exmoecBqOV6GryQGkaGepyl4rOYHR2F9gLYefd25y45_VyxVHMKxbWQNmJai6FCSs2ZkrRJX_8nvU1rji3dpgKgFNgGpLvK5VRKRm-WHE42_zIUzNaB2TswrQOzdWB487y5J9vi7NHn9sFQ_hoHrbQY9MYedl1pp3jA_E-CB-CvdpO3ydhDbuCbb-0xvCUWbADNfgPeT6CN</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Collin, Samuel B</creator><creator>Johnson, Ladd E</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Invasive species contribute to biotic resistance: negative effect of caprellid amphipods on an invasive tunicate</title><author>Collin, Samuel B ; Johnson, Ladd E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-64babc08e9716e0b27fccc96fdcd58d201a48b2f568093e89d674d5dc1958f503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Amphipoda</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Aquatic life</topic><topic>Biofouling</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biological resistance</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Caprella mutica</topic><topic>Ciona intestinalis</topic><topic>Community ecology</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Crustacea</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>ecologists</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Less representative or incertae sedis groups: acanthocephala, chaetognatha, gnathostomulida, lophophoria, merostomata, mesozoa, myxozoa, nematorhyncha, pararthropoda, placozoa, priapuloidea, prochordata, pycnogonida, rotifera</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>mollusc culture</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>mussels</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>predation</topic><topic>recruitment</topic><topic>surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Collin, Samuel B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Ladd E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Collin, Samuel B</au><au>Johnson, Ladd E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Invasive species contribute to biotic resistance: negative effect of caprellid amphipods on an invasive tunicate</atitle><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle><stitle>Biol Invasions</stitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2209</spage><epage>2219</epage><pages>2209-2219</pages><issn>1387-3547</issn><eissn>1573-1464</eissn><abstract>As the number of introductions of non-indigenous species (NIS) continues to rise, ecologists are faced with new and unique opportunities to observe interactions between species that do not naturally co-exist. These interactions can have important implications on the invasion process, potentially determining whether NIS become widespread and abundant, survive in small numbers, or fail to establish and disappear. Although many studies have naturally focused on the interactions between NIS and native species to examine their effects and the biological resistance of the recipient community to invasion, few have examined the effects that NIS have on each other. In some cases, interactions can facilitate the invasion process of one or both species (i.e., “invasional meltdowns”), but competition or predation can lead to negative interactions as well. The introduction of the vase tunicate, Ciona intestinalis, in Prince Edward Island (Canada) has harmed mussel aquaculture via heavy biofouling of equipment and mussels. Through both a broad-scale survey and small-scale field experiments, we show that Ciona recruitment is drastically reduced by caprellid amphipods, including the NIS Caprella mutica. This study provides an exciting example of how established invasive species can negatively impact the recruitment of a secondary invader, highlighting the potential for non-additive effects of multiple invasions.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10530-014-0659-4</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1387-3547
ispartof Biological invasions, 2014, Vol.16 (10), p.2209-2219
issn 1387-3547
1573-1464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1566843761
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Amphipoda
Animal populations
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Aquaculture
Aquatic life
Biofouling
Biological and medical sciences
biological resistance
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Caprella mutica
Ciona intestinalis
Community ecology
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Crustacea
Developmental Biology
ecologists
Ecology
field experimentation
Field tests
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Indigenous species
Introduced species
Invasive species
Invertebrates
Less representative or incertae sedis groups: acanthocephala, chaetognatha, gnathostomulida, lophophoria, merostomata, mesozoa, myxozoa, nematorhyncha, pararthropoda, placozoa, priapuloidea, prochordata, pycnogonida, rotifera
Life Sciences
mollusc culture
Mollusks
mussels
Nonnative species
Original Paper
Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking
Plant Sciences
predation
recruitment
surveys
title Invasive species contribute to biotic resistance: negative effect of caprellid amphipods on an invasive tunicate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T11%3A35%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Invasive%20species%20contribute%20to%20biotic%20resistance:%20negative%20effect%20of%20caprellid%20amphipods%20on%20an%20invasive%20tunicate&rft.jtitle=Biological%20invasions&rft.au=Collin,%20Samuel%20B&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2209&rft.epage=2219&rft.pages=2209-2219&rft.issn=1387-3547&rft.eissn=1573-1464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10530-014-0659-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1566843761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1560011030&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true