Invasive species contribute to biotic resistance: negative effect of caprellid amphipods on an invasive tunicate
As the number of introductions of non-indigenous species (NIS) continues to rise, ecologists are faced with new and unique opportunities to observe interactions between species that do not naturally co-exist. These interactions can have important implications on the invasion process, potentially det...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological invasions 2014, Vol.16 (10), p.2209-2219 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2219 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2209 |
container_title | Biological invasions |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Collin, Samuel B Johnson, Ladd E |
description | As the number of introductions of non-indigenous species (NIS) continues to rise, ecologists are faced with new and unique opportunities to observe interactions between species that do not naturally co-exist. These interactions can have important implications on the invasion process, potentially determining whether NIS become widespread and abundant, survive in small numbers, or fail to establish and disappear. Although many studies have naturally focused on the interactions between NIS and native species to examine their effects and the biological resistance of the recipient community to invasion, few have examined the effects that NIS have on each other. In some cases, interactions can facilitate the invasion process of one or both species (i.e., “invasional meltdowns”), but competition or predation can lead to negative interactions as well. The introduction of the vase tunicate, Ciona intestinalis, in Prince Edward Island (Canada) has harmed mussel aquaculture via heavy biofouling of equipment and mussels. Through both a broad-scale survey and small-scale field experiments, we show that Ciona recruitment is drastically reduced by caprellid amphipods, including the NIS Caprella mutica. This study provides an exciting example of how established invasive species can negatively impact the recruitment of a secondary invader, highlighting the potential for non-additive effects of multiple invasions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10530-014-0659-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1566843761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1566843761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-64babc08e9716e0b27fccc96fdcd58d201a48b2f568093e89d674d5dc1958f503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxQdRsFY_gCsDIrgZvZn8HXdS1BYKLrTrkMncPFPeS8YkU_Dbm2GqiIuu7oV7zo_DPV33ksI7CqDeFwqCQQ-U9yDF2PNH3RkVivWUS_647UyrngmunnbPSrkFgFGBOOuWq3hnS7hDUhZ0AQtxKdYcprUiqYlMIdXgSMYSSrXR4QcS8WDr5kDv0VWSPHF2yXg8hpnY0_IjLGkuJEViIwl_8HWNwdmKz7sn3h4Lvrif593N50_fLy77669fri4-XveOK1Z7ySc7OdA4KioRpkF559wo_exmoecBqOV6GryQGkaGepyl4rOYHR2F9gLYefd25y45_VyxVHMKxbWQNmJai6FCSs2ZkrRJX_8nvU1rji3dpgKgFNgGpLvK5VRKRm-WHE42_zIUzNaB2TswrQOzdWB487y5J9vi7NHn9sFQ_hoHrbQY9MYedl1pp3jA_E-CB-CvdpO3ydhDbuCbb-0xvCUWbADNfgPeT6CN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1560011030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Invasive species contribute to biotic resistance: negative effect of caprellid amphipods on an invasive tunicate</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Collin, Samuel B ; Johnson, Ladd E</creator><creatorcontrib>Collin, Samuel B ; Johnson, Ladd E</creatorcontrib><description>As the number of introductions of non-indigenous species (NIS) continues to rise, ecologists are faced with new and unique opportunities to observe interactions between species that do not naturally co-exist. These interactions can have important implications on the invasion process, potentially determining whether NIS become widespread and abundant, survive in small numbers, or fail to establish and disappear. Although many studies have naturally focused on the interactions between NIS and native species to examine their effects and the biological resistance of the recipient community to invasion, few have examined the effects that NIS have on each other. In some cases, interactions can facilitate the invasion process of one or both species (i.e., “invasional meltdowns”), but competition or predation can lead to negative interactions as well. The introduction of the vase tunicate, Ciona intestinalis, in Prince Edward Island (Canada) has harmed mussel aquaculture via heavy biofouling of equipment and mussels. Through both a broad-scale survey and small-scale field experiments, we show that Ciona recruitment is drastically reduced by caprellid amphipods, including the NIS Caprella mutica. This study provides an exciting example of how established invasive species can negatively impact the recruitment of a secondary invader, highlighting the potential for non-additive effects of multiple invasions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-3547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10530-014-0659-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Amphipoda ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Aquaculture ; Aquatic life ; Biofouling ; Biological and medical sciences ; biological resistance ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Caprella mutica ; Ciona intestinalis ; Community ecology ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Crustacea ; Developmental Biology ; ecologists ; Ecology ; field experimentation ; Field tests ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Indigenous species ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; Invertebrates ; Less representative or incertae sedis groups: acanthocephala, chaetognatha, gnathostomulida, lophophoria, merostomata, mesozoa, myxozoa, nematorhyncha, pararthropoda, placozoa, priapuloidea, prochordata, pycnogonida, rotifera ; Life Sciences ; mollusc culture ; Mollusks ; mussels ; Nonnative species ; Original Paper ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Plant Sciences ; predation ; recruitment ; surveys</subject><ispartof>Biological invasions, 2014, Vol.16 (10), p.2209-2219</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-64babc08e9716e0b27fccc96fdcd58d201a48b2f568093e89d674d5dc1958f503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-64babc08e9716e0b27fccc96fdcd58d201a48b2f568093e89d674d5dc1958f503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10530-014-0659-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10530-014-0659-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28785280$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Collin, Samuel B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Ladd E</creatorcontrib><title>Invasive species contribute to biotic resistance: negative effect of caprellid amphipods on an invasive tunicate</title><title>Biological invasions</title><addtitle>Biol Invasions</addtitle><description>As the number of introductions of non-indigenous species (NIS) continues to rise, ecologists are faced with new and unique opportunities to observe interactions between species that do not naturally co-exist. These interactions can have important implications on the invasion process, potentially determining whether NIS become widespread and abundant, survive in small numbers, or fail to establish and disappear. Although many studies have naturally focused on the interactions between NIS and native species to examine their effects and the biological resistance of the recipient community to invasion, few have examined the effects that NIS have on each other. In some cases, interactions can facilitate the invasion process of one or both species (i.e., “invasional meltdowns”), but competition or predation can lead to negative interactions as well. The introduction of the vase tunicate, Ciona intestinalis, in Prince Edward Island (Canada) has harmed mussel aquaculture via heavy biofouling of equipment and mussels. Through both a broad-scale survey and small-scale field experiments, we show that Ciona recruitment is drastically reduced by caprellid amphipods, including the NIS Caprella mutica. This study provides an exciting example of how established invasive species can negatively impact the recruitment of a secondary invader, highlighting the potential for non-additive effects of multiple invasions.</description><subject>Amphipoda</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Aquatic life</subject><subject>Biofouling</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biological resistance</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Caprella mutica</subject><subject>Ciona intestinalis</subject><subject>Community ecology</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Crustacea</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>ecologists</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Less representative or incertae sedis groups: acanthocephala, chaetognatha, gnathostomulida, lophophoria, merostomata, mesozoa, myxozoa, nematorhyncha, pararthropoda, placozoa, priapuloidea, prochordata, pycnogonida, rotifera</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>mollusc culture</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>mussels</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>predation</subject><subject>recruitment</subject><subject>surveys</subject><issn>1387-3547</issn><issn>1573-1464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxQdRsFY_gCsDIrgZvZn8HXdS1BYKLrTrkMncPFPeS8YkU_Dbm2GqiIuu7oV7zo_DPV33ksI7CqDeFwqCQQ-U9yDF2PNH3RkVivWUS_647UyrngmunnbPSrkFgFGBOOuWq3hnS7hDUhZ0AQtxKdYcprUiqYlMIdXgSMYSSrXR4QcS8WDr5kDv0VWSPHF2yXg8hpnY0_IjLGkuJEViIwl_8HWNwdmKz7sn3h4Lvrif593N50_fLy77669fri4-XveOK1Z7ySc7OdA4KioRpkF559wo_exmoecBqOV6GryQGkaGepyl4rOYHR2F9gLYefd25y45_VyxVHMKxbWQNmJai6FCSs2ZkrRJX_8nvU1rji3dpgKgFNgGpLvK5VRKRm-WHE42_zIUzNaB2TswrQOzdWB487y5J9vi7NHn9sFQ_hoHrbQY9MYedl1pp3jA_E-CB-CvdpO3ydhDbuCbb-0xvCUWbADNfgPeT6CN</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Collin, Samuel B</creator><creator>Johnson, Ladd E</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Invasive species contribute to biotic resistance: negative effect of caprellid amphipods on an invasive tunicate</title><author>Collin, Samuel B ; Johnson, Ladd E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-64babc08e9716e0b27fccc96fdcd58d201a48b2f568093e89d674d5dc1958f503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Amphipoda</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Aquatic life</topic><topic>Biofouling</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biological resistance</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Caprella mutica</topic><topic>Ciona intestinalis</topic><topic>Community ecology</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Crustacea</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>ecologists</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Less representative or incertae sedis groups: acanthocephala, chaetognatha, gnathostomulida, lophophoria, merostomata, mesozoa, myxozoa, nematorhyncha, pararthropoda, placozoa, priapuloidea, prochordata, pycnogonida, rotifera</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>mollusc culture</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>mussels</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>predation</topic><topic>recruitment</topic><topic>surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Collin, Samuel B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Ladd E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Collin, Samuel B</au><au>Johnson, Ladd E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Invasive species contribute to biotic resistance: negative effect of caprellid amphipods on an invasive tunicate</atitle><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle><stitle>Biol Invasions</stitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2209</spage><epage>2219</epage><pages>2209-2219</pages><issn>1387-3547</issn><eissn>1573-1464</eissn><abstract>As the number of introductions of non-indigenous species (NIS) continues to rise, ecologists are faced with new and unique opportunities to observe interactions between species that do not naturally co-exist. These interactions can have important implications on the invasion process, potentially determining whether NIS become widespread and abundant, survive in small numbers, or fail to establish and disappear. Although many studies have naturally focused on the interactions between NIS and native species to examine their effects and the biological resistance of the recipient community to invasion, few have examined the effects that NIS have on each other. In some cases, interactions can facilitate the invasion process of one or both species (i.e., “invasional meltdowns”), but competition or predation can lead to negative interactions as well. The introduction of the vase tunicate, Ciona intestinalis, in Prince Edward Island (Canada) has harmed mussel aquaculture via heavy biofouling of equipment and mussels. Through both a broad-scale survey and small-scale field experiments, we show that Ciona recruitment is drastically reduced by caprellid amphipods, including the NIS Caprella mutica. This study provides an exciting example of how established invasive species can negatively impact the recruitment of a secondary invader, highlighting the potential for non-additive effects of multiple invasions.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10530-014-0659-4</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1387-3547 |
ispartof | Biological invasions, 2014, Vol.16 (10), p.2209-2219 |
issn | 1387-3547 1573-1464 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1566843761 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Amphipoda Animal populations Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Aquaculture Aquatic life Biofouling Biological and medical sciences biological resistance Biomedical and Life Sciences Caprella mutica Ciona intestinalis Community ecology Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Crustacea Developmental Biology ecologists Ecology field experimentation Field tests Freshwater & Marine Ecology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Indigenous species Introduced species Invasive species Invertebrates Less representative or incertae sedis groups: acanthocephala, chaetognatha, gnathostomulida, lophophoria, merostomata, mesozoa, myxozoa, nematorhyncha, pararthropoda, placozoa, priapuloidea, prochordata, pycnogonida, rotifera Life Sciences mollusc culture Mollusks mussels Nonnative species Original Paper Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking Plant Sciences predation recruitment surveys |
title | Invasive species contribute to biotic resistance: negative effect of caprellid amphipods on an invasive tunicate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T11%3A35%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Invasive%20species%20contribute%20to%20biotic%20resistance:%20negative%20effect%20of%20caprellid%20amphipods%20on%20an%20invasive%20tunicate&rft.jtitle=Biological%20invasions&rft.au=Collin,%20Samuel%20B&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2209&rft.epage=2219&rft.pages=2209-2219&rft.issn=1387-3547&rft.eissn=1573-1464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10530-014-0659-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1566843761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1560011030&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |