A Comparison of Energy Balance Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Thermal Radiation

A radiation balance method and a modified radiation balance method were used to determine hourly and daily values of atmospheric thermal radiation on three clear and three cloudy days during February and March 1970 at Phoenix, Arizona. The radiation balance was used over surfaces of bare soil, Bermu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 1971-02, Vol.7 (1), p.39-45
Hauptverfasser: Cooley, Keith R., Idso, Sherwood B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 45
container_issue 1
container_start_page 39
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 7
creator Cooley, Keith R.
Idso, Sherwood B.
description A radiation balance method and a modified radiation balance method were used to determine hourly and daily values of atmospheric thermal radiation on three clear and three cloudy days during February and March 1970 at Phoenix, Arizona. The radiation balance was used over surfaces of bare soil, Bermuda grass, and open water; whereas the modified radiation balance was used over the open water surface only. The modified radiation balance differed from the pure radiation balance method in that net radiation was calculated as the residual in the energy equation rather than measured. The values of atmospheric thermal radiation thus obtained were compared to valuesobtained from measurements of incoming, all‐wave radiation minus incoming solar radiation.From this analysis it appeared that the best alternative to the semi‐direct measurementof atmospheric thermal radiation was the radiation balance over the bare soil surface.Results from this method were of sufficient accuracy, even on an hourly basis, for mostresearch studies, and were even better on a daily basis. Radiation balances over grass andwater surfaces were somewhat less satisfactory, but still better than the modified radiationbalance method.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/WR007i001p00039
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1566836840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1566836840</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3573-3e46d0adc822aa85d060e433aa65957ae86328adcc3ea9d3ffcd70a5645e61e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1v1DAQxa0KpC4tZ64-cgkd7_grx21YClI_pKXVHi0rmbSGJA52Ktj_vkaLOHDh9DR67zeaeYy9E_BBwLq-2O8ATAAQMwBgfcJWopayMrXBV2wFILESWJtT9ibnbyUmlTYr9nXDmzjOPoUcJx57vp0oPR74pR_81BK_oeUpdpn3MfFtXsLolzA98s0yxjw_UQotvy8y-oHvfBeKG6dz9rr3Q6a3f_SMPXza3jefq-u7qy_N5rpqURmskKTuwHetXa-9t6oDDSQRvdeqVsaT1bi2xW-RfN1h37edAa-0VKQFWTxj74975xR_PFNe3BhyS0O5nOJzdkJpbVFbCSV6cYy2KeacqHdzKr-kgxPgftfn_qmvEPJI_AwDHf4XL3OzswYLVh2xkBf69Rfz6bvTBo1y-9srpxt9-dHu9k7gC5rugeo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1566836840</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Energy Balance Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Thermal Radiation</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Cooley, Keith R. ; Idso, Sherwood B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cooley, Keith R. ; Idso, Sherwood B.</creatorcontrib><description>A radiation balance method and a modified radiation balance method were used to determine hourly and daily values of atmospheric thermal radiation on three clear and three cloudy days during February and March 1970 at Phoenix, Arizona. The radiation balance was used over surfaces of bare soil, Bermuda grass, and open water; whereas the modified radiation balance was used over the open water surface only. The modified radiation balance differed from the pure radiation balance method in that net radiation was calculated as the residual in the energy equation rather than measured. The values of atmospheric thermal radiation thus obtained were compared to valuesobtained from measurements of incoming, all‐wave radiation minus incoming solar radiation.From this analysis it appeared that the best alternative to the semi‐direct measurementof atmospheric thermal radiation was the radiation balance over the bare soil surface.Results from this method were of sufficient accuracy, even on an hourly basis, for mostresearch studies, and were even better on a daily basis. Radiation balances over grass andwater surfaces were somewhat less satisfactory, but still better than the modified radiationbalance method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/WR007i001p00039</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Water resources research, 1971-02, Vol.7 (1), p.39-45</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1971 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3573-3e46d0adc822aa85d060e433aa65957ae86328adcc3ea9d3ffcd70a5645e61e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3573-3e46d0adc822aa85d060e433aa65957ae86328adcc3ea9d3ffcd70a5645e61e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2FWR007i001p00039$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2FWR007i001p00039$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cooley, Keith R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idso, Sherwood B.</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Energy Balance Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Thermal Radiation</title><title>Water resources research</title><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><description>A radiation balance method and a modified radiation balance method were used to determine hourly and daily values of atmospheric thermal radiation on three clear and three cloudy days during February and March 1970 at Phoenix, Arizona. The radiation balance was used over surfaces of bare soil, Bermuda grass, and open water; whereas the modified radiation balance was used over the open water surface only. The modified radiation balance differed from the pure radiation balance method in that net radiation was calculated as the residual in the energy equation rather than measured. The values of atmospheric thermal radiation thus obtained were compared to valuesobtained from measurements of incoming, all‐wave radiation minus incoming solar radiation.From this analysis it appeared that the best alternative to the semi‐direct measurementof atmospheric thermal radiation was the radiation balance over the bare soil surface.Results from this method were of sufficient accuracy, even on an hourly basis, for mostresearch studies, and were even better on a daily basis. Radiation balances over grass andwater surfaces were somewhat less satisfactory, but still better than the modified radiationbalance method.</description><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1971</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1v1DAQxa0KpC4tZ64-cgkd7_grx21YClI_pKXVHi0rmbSGJA52Ktj_vkaLOHDh9DR67zeaeYy9E_BBwLq-2O8ATAAQMwBgfcJWopayMrXBV2wFILESWJtT9ibnbyUmlTYr9nXDmzjOPoUcJx57vp0oPR74pR_81BK_oeUpdpn3MfFtXsLolzA98s0yxjw_UQotvy8y-oHvfBeKG6dz9rr3Q6a3f_SMPXza3jefq-u7qy_N5rpqURmskKTuwHetXa-9t6oDDSQRvdeqVsaT1bi2xW-RfN1h37edAa-0VKQFWTxj74975xR_PFNe3BhyS0O5nOJzdkJpbVFbCSV6cYy2KeacqHdzKr-kgxPgftfn_qmvEPJI_AwDHf4XL3OzswYLVh2xkBf69Rfz6bvTBo1y-9srpxt9-dHu9k7gC5rugeo</recordid><startdate>197102</startdate><enddate>197102</enddate><creator>Cooley, Keith R.</creator><creator>Idso, Sherwood B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197102</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Energy Balance Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Thermal Radiation</title><author>Cooley, Keith R. ; Idso, Sherwood B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3573-3e46d0adc822aa85d060e433aa65957ae86328adcc3ea9d3ffcd70a5645e61e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1971</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cooley, Keith R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idso, Sherwood B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cooley, Keith R.</au><au>Idso, Sherwood B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Energy Balance Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Thermal Radiation</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><date>1971-02</date><risdate>1971</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>39-45</pages><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>A radiation balance method and a modified radiation balance method were used to determine hourly and daily values of atmospheric thermal radiation on three clear and three cloudy days during February and March 1970 at Phoenix, Arizona. The radiation balance was used over surfaces of bare soil, Bermuda grass, and open water; whereas the modified radiation balance was used over the open water surface only. The modified radiation balance differed from the pure radiation balance method in that net radiation was calculated as the residual in the energy equation rather than measured. The values of atmospheric thermal radiation thus obtained were compared to valuesobtained from measurements of incoming, all‐wave radiation minus incoming solar radiation.From this analysis it appeared that the best alternative to the semi‐direct measurementof atmospheric thermal radiation was the radiation balance over the bare soil surface.Results from this method were of sufficient accuracy, even on an hourly basis, for mostresearch studies, and were even better on a daily basis. Radiation balances over grass andwater surfaces were somewhat less satisfactory, but still better than the modified radiationbalance method.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/WR007i001p00039</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 1971-02, Vol.7 (1), p.39-45
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1566836840
source Access via Wiley Online Library
title A Comparison of Energy Balance Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Thermal Radiation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T10%3A29%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Energy%20Balance%20Methods%20for%20Estimating%20Atmospheric%20Thermal%20Radiation&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Cooley,%20Keith%20R.&rft.date=1971-02&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=39-45&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/WR007i001p00039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1566836840%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1566836840&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true