Testing the Reliability of Predictions of Far-Side Active Regions from Helioseismology Using STEREO Far-Side Observations of Solar Activity
We test the reliability of helioseismic far-side active-region predictions, made using Dopplergrams from both the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) onboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) and the Global Oscillation Network Group (GONG), by comparison with far-side observation of solar acti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Solar physics 2014-10, Vol.289 (10), p.3617-3640 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3640 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 3617 |
container_title | Solar physics |
container_volume | 289 |
creator | Liewer, P. C. González Hernández, I. Hall, J. R. Lindsey, C. Lin, X. |
description | We test the reliability of helioseismic far-side active-region predictions, made using Dopplergrams from both the
Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager
(HMI) onboard the
Solar Dynamics Observatory
(SDO) and the
Global Oscillation Network Group
(GONG), by comparison with far-side observation of solar activity from the
Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory
(STEREO). Both GONG and HMI produce seismic Carrington maps that show strong magnetic-field regions, labeling predictions of far-side active regions that have a probability ≥ 70 %. By visual comparison of these prediction maps with STEREO extreme ultraviolet (EUV) Carrington maps, we determine whether or not solar activity, as evidenced as brightness in EUV, is observed at the predicted locations. We analyzed nine months of data from 2011 and 2012. For both GONG and HMI, we find that for approximately 90 % of the active-region predictions, activity/brightness is observed in EUV at the predicted location. We also investigated the success of GONG and HMI at predicting large active regions before they appear at the east limb as viewed from Earth. Of the 27 identified large east-limb active regions in the nine months of data analyzed, GONG predicted 15 (55 %) at least once within the week prior to Earth-side appearance and HMI predicted 13 (48 %). Based on the STEREO far-side EUV observations, we suggest that 9 of the 27 active regions were probably too weak to be predicted while on the far side. Overall, we conclude that HMI and GONG have similar reliability using the current data-processing procedures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11207-014-0542-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1566831018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3372299351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-74204058c5e105a3b22a2d6e00ef32f5e8f14740cfca1d9a950e5660b37726fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLuCN95UT5Km7S7HmE4YTPYB3oWsO5kZXTOTbrDf4J82taIieJWv53lPkkPINYU7CpDde0oZZDHQJAaRsDg9IR0qMh5Dj7-ckg4Az5t5fk4uvN8ANJbokPc5-tpU66h-xWiKpVFLU5r6GFkdPTtcmaI2tvLN8kG5eGZWGPXD3qGh159H2tltNAqq9Wj81pZ2fYwWvgmdzYfT4eTHnCw9uoP6jpzZUrk2L9S8JGdalR6vvsYuWTwM54NRPJ48Pg3647jgOavjLGGQgMgLgRSE4kvGFFulCICaMy0w1zTJEih0oeiqp3oCUKQpLHmWsVQj75LbNnfn7Ns-vF9ujS-wLFWFdu8lDXTOKdA8oDd_0I3duyrcLlBJ0kuB8zRQtKUKZ713qOXOma1yR0lBNh8t2_bI0B7ZtEc2DmsdH9hqje5X8r_SB8fVkm8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1544960336</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing the Reliability of Predictions of Far-Side Active Regions from Helioseismology Using STEREO Far-Side Observations of Solar Activity</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Liewer, P. C. ; González Hernández, I. ; Hall, J. R. ; Lindsey, C. ; Lin, X.</creator><creatorcontrib>Liewer, P. C. ; González Hernández, I. ; Hall, J. R. ; Lindsey, C. ; Lin, X.</creatorcontrib><description>We test the reliability of helioseismic far-side active-region predictions, made using Dopplergrams from both the
Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager
(HMI) onboard the
Solar Dynamics Observatory
(SDO) and the
Global Oscillation Network Group
(GONG), by comparison with far-side observation of solar activity from the
Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory
(STEREO). Both GONG and HMI produce seismic Carrington maps that show strong magnetic-field regions, labeling predictions of far-side active regions that have a probability ≥ 70 %. By visual comparison of these prediction maps with STEREO extreme ultraviolet (EUV) Carrington maps, we determine whether or not solar activity, as evidenced as brightness in EUV, is observed at the predicted locations. We analyzed nine months of data from 2011 and 2012. For both GONG and HMI, we find that for approximately 90 % of the active-region predictions, activity/brightness is observed in EUV at the predicted location. We also investigated the success of GONG and HMI at predicting large active regions before they appear at the east limb as viewed from Earth. Of the 27 identified large east-limb active regions in the nine months of data analyzed, GONG predicted 15 (55 %) at least once within the week prior to Earth-side appearance and HMI predicted 13 (48 %). Based on the STEREO far-side EUV observations, we suggest that 9 of the 27 active regions were probably too weak to be predicted while on the far side. Overall, we conclude that HMI and GONG have similar reliability using the current data-processing procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0938</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-093X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11207-014-0542-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Astrophysics and Astroparticles ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Corona ; Data processing ; Magnetic fields ; Physics ; Physics and Astronomy ; Solar activity ; Solar physics ; Space Exploration and Astronautics ; Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</subject><ispartof>Solar physics, 2014-10, Vol.289 (10), p.3617-3640</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-74204058c5e105a3b22a2d6e00ef32f5e8f14740cfca1d9a950e5660b37726fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-74204058c5e105a3b22a2d6e00ef32f5e8f14740cfca1d9a950e5660b37726fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11207-014-0542-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11207-014-0542-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liewer, P. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González Hernández, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, X.</creatorcontrib><title>Testing the Reliability of Predictions of Far-Side Active Regions from Helioseismology Using STEREO Far-Side Observations of Solar Activity</title><title>Solar physics</title><addtitle>Sol Phys</addtitle><description>We test the reliability of helioseismic far-side active-region predictions, made using Dopplergrams from both the
Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager
(HMI) onboard the
Solar Dynamics Observatory
(SDO) and the
Global Oscillation Network Group
(GONG), by comparison with far-side observation of solar activity from the
Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory
(STEREO). Both GONG and HMI produce seismic Carrington maps that show strong magnetic-field regions, labeling predictions of far-side active regions that have a probability ≥ 70 %. By visual comparison of these prediction maps with STEREO extreme ultraviolet (EUV) Carrington maps, we determine whether or not solar activity, as evidenced as brightness in EUV, is observed at the predicted locations. We analyzed nine months of data from 2011 and 2012. For both GONG and HMI, we find that for approximately 90 % of the active-region predictions, activity/brightness is observed in EUV at the predicted location. We also investigated the success of GONG and HMI at predicting large active regions before they appear at the east limb as viewed from Earth. Of the 27 identified large east-limb active regions in the nine months of data analyzed, GONG predicted 15 (55 %) at least once within the week prior to Earth-side appearance and HMI predicted 13 (48 %). Based on the STEREO far-side EUV observations, we suggest that 9 of the 27 active regions were probably too weak to be predicted while on the far side. Overall, we conclude that HMI and GONG have similar reliability using the current data-processing procedures.</description><subject>Astrophysics and Astroparticles</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Corona</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physics and Astronomy</subject><subject>Solar activity</subject><subject>Solar physics</subject><subject>Space Exploration and Astronautics</subject><subject>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</subject><issn>0038-0938</issn><issn>1573-093X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLuCN95UT5Km7S7HmE4YTPYB3oWsO5kZXTOTbrDf4J82taIieJWv53lPkkPINYU7CpDde0oZZDHQJAaRsDg9IR0qMh5Dj7-ckg4Az5t5fk4uvN8ANJbokPc5-tpU66h-xWiKpVFLU5r6GFkdPTtcmaI2tvLN8kG5eGZWGPXD3qGh159H2tltNAqq9Wj81pZ2fYwWvgmdzYfT4eTHnCw9uoP6jpzZUrk2L9S8JGdalR6vvsYuWTwM54NRPJ48Pg3647jgOavjLGGQgMgLgRSE4kvGFFulCICaMy0w1zTJEih0oeiqp3oCUKQpLHmWsVQj75LbNnfn7Ns-vF9ujS-wLFWFdu8lDXTOKdA8oDd_0I3duyrcLlBJ0kuB8zRQtKUKZ713qOXOma1yR0lBNh8t2_bI0B7ZtEc2DmsdH9hqje5X8r_SB8fVkm8</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Liewer, P. C.</creator><creator>González Hernández, I.</creator><creator>Hall, J. R.</creator><creator>Lindsey, C.</creator><creator>Lin, X.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Testing the Reliability of Predictions of Far-Side Active Regions from Helioseismology Using STEREO Far-Side Observations of Solar Activity</title><author>Liewer, P. C. ; González Hernández, I. ; Hall, J. R. ; Lindsey, C. ; Lin, X.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-74204058c5e105a3b22a2d6e00ef32f5e8f14740cfca1d9a950e5660b37726fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Astrophysics and Astroparticles</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Corona</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physics and Astronomy</topic><topic>Solar activity</topic><topic>Solar physics</topic><topic>Space Exploration and Astronautics</topic><topic>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liewer, P. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González Hernández, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, X.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Solar physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liewer, P. C.</au><au>González Hernández, I.</au><au>Hall, J. R.</au><au>Lindsey, C.</au><au>Lin, X.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing the Reliability of Predictions of Far-Side Active Regions from Helioseismology Using STEREO Far-Side Observations of Solar Activity</atitle><jtitle>Solar physics</jtitle><stitle>Sol Phys</stitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>289</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3617</spage><epage>3640</epage><pages>3617-3640</pages><issn>0038-0938</issn><eissn>1573-093X</eissn><abstract>We test the reliability of helioseismic far-side active-region predictions, made using Dopplergrams from both the
Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager
(HMI) onboard the
Solar Dynamics Observatory
(SDO) and the
Global Oscillation Network Group
(GONG), by comparison with far-side observation of solar activity from the
Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory
(STEREO). Both GONG and HMI produce seismic Carrington maps that show strong magnetic-field regions, labeling predictions of far-side active regions that have a probability ≥ 70 %. By visual comparison of these prediction maps with STEREO extreme ultraviolet (EUV) Carrington maps, we determine whether or not solar activity, as evidenced as brightness in EUV, is observed at the predicted locations. We analyzed nine months of data from 2011 and 2012. For both GONG and HMI, we find that for approximately 90 % of the active-region predictions, activity/brightness is observed in EUV at the predicted location. We also investigated the success of GONG and HMI at predicting large active regions before they appear at the east limb as viewed from Earth. Of the 27 identified large east-limb active regions in the nine months of data analyzed, GONG predicted 15 (55 %) at least once within the week prior to Earth-side appearance and HMI predicted 13 (48 %). Based on the STEREO far-side EUV observations, we suggest that 9 of the 27 active regions were probably too weak to be predicted while on the far side. Overall, we conclude that HMI and GONG have similar reliability using the current data-processing procedures.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11207-014-0542-6</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-0938 |
ispartof | Solar physics, 2014-10, Vol.289 (10), p.3617-3640 |
issn | 0038-0938 1573-093X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1566831018 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Astrophysics and Astroparticles Atmospheric Sciences Corona Data processing Magnetic fields Physics Physics and Astronomy Solar activity Solar physics Space Exploration and Astronautics Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics |
title | Testing the Reliability of Predictions of Far-Side Active Regions from Helioseismology Using STEREO Far-Side Observations of Solar Activity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A17%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20the%20Reliability%20of%20Predictions%20of%20Far-Side%20Active%20Regions%20from%20Helioseismology%20Using%20STEREO%20Far-Side%20Observations%20of%20Solar%20Activity&rft.jtitle=Solar%20physics&rft.au=Liewer,%20P.%20C.&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=289&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3617&rft.epage=3640&rft.pages=3617-3640&rft.issn=0038-0938&rft.eissn=1573-093X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11207-014-0542-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3372299351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1544960336&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |