Trauma system overtriage: are we on track?
The American College of Surgeons (ACS) recommends trauma overtriage rate (OT) below 50 per cent to maximize efficiency while ensuring optimal care. This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate OT rates in our Level I trauma center using the most recent criteria and guidelines. OT rates during...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American surgeon 2014-10, Vol.80 (10), p.960-965 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 965 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 960 |
container_title | The American surgeon |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | Fullerton, Zoe Donald, Graham W Cryer, Henry G Lewis, Catherine E Cheaito, Ali Cohen, Marilyn Tillou, Areti |
description | The American College of Surgeons (ACS) recommends trauma overtriage rate (OT) below 50 per cent to maximize efficiency while ensuring optimal care. This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate OT rates in our Level I trauma center using the most recent criteria and guidelines. OT rates during a 12-month period were measured using six definitions based on combinations of Injury Severity Score (ISS), length of hospital stay (LOS, in days), procedures, and disposition after the emergency department. Reason for trauma activation was 55 per cent criteria, 16 per cent guidelines, 11 per cent paramedic judgment, five per cent no reason, and 13 per cent no documentation. OT rates ranged from 22.6 per cent (ISS less than 9, LOS 1 day or less, no consults) to 48.2 per cent (ISS less than 9, LOS 3 days or less, with procedures/consults) and were in compliance with ACS recommendations. Physiologic assessment criteria and anatomic injury had the lowest OT rates and contained all mortalities. Passenger space intrusion (PSI), pedestrian versus automobile (criterion and guideline), and extrication (guideline) all had consistently high rates of OT. We conclude that PSI should be reduced to a guideline, the pedestrian versus automobile criterion and guideline should be combined, and extrication could be removed from the triage scheme. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/000313481408001011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1566823928</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1566823928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4f8953f53294167cfcb5d53741cb1e239b26ce413dd965e3d229babfa77b920f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AQ8S8CJCdGc_s15Eil9Q8FLPYXczkdSmqbuJ0n9vQqsHPQ0Dz_sy8xByCvQKQOtrSikHLjIQNKMUKMAeGYOUMjUZ4_tkPADpQIzIUYyLfhVKwiEZMcmUUNyMyeU82K62SdzEFuuk-cTQhsq-4U1iAyZfmDSrpA3Wv98ek4PSLiOe7OaEvD7cz6dP6ezl8Xl6N0s917JNRZkZyUvJmRGgtC-9k4XkWoB3gIwbx5RHAbwojJLIC8aMs660WjvDaMkn5GLbuw7NR4exzesqelwu7QqbLuYgler_Myzr0fM_6KLpwqq_bqC0NlKB6Sm2pXxoYgxY5utQ1TZscqD5YDL_b7IPne2qO1dj8Rv5Uce_AfMbar4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1567795619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trauma system overtriage: are we on track?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Fullerton, Zoe ; Donald, Graham W ; Cryer, Henry G ; Lewis, Catherine E ; Cheaito, Ali ; Cohen, Marilyn ; Tillou, Areti</creator><creatorcontrib>Fullerton, Zoe ; Donald, Graham W ; Cryer, Henry G ; Lewis, Catherine E ; Cheaito, Ali ; Cohen, Marilyn ; Tillou, Areti</creatorcontrib><description>The American College of Surgeons (ACS) recommends trauma overtriage rate (OT) below 50 per cent to maximize efficiency while ensuring optimal care. This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate OT rates in our Level I trauma center using the most recent criteria and guidelines. OT rates during a 12-month period were measured using six definitions based on combinations of Injury Severity Score (ISS), length of hospital stay (LOS, in days), procedures, and disposition after the emergency department. Reason for trauma activation was 55 per cent criteria, 16 per cent guidelines, 11 per cent paramedic judgment, five per cent no reason, and 13 per cent no documentation. OT rates ranged from 22.6 per cent (ISS less than 9, LOS 1 day or less, no consults) to 48.2 per cent (ISS less than 9, LOS 3 days or less, with procedures/consults) and were in compliance with ACS recommendations. Physiologic assessment criteria and anatomic injury had the lowest OT rates and contained all mortalities. Passenger space intrusion (PSI), pedestrian versus automobile (criterion and guideline), and extrication (guideline) all had consistently high rates of OT. We conclude that PSI should be reduced to a guideline, the pedestrian versus automobile criterion and guideline should be combined, and extrication could be removed from the triage scheme.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000313481408001011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25264639</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</publisher><subject>Cost control ; Disease control ; Female ; Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Length of Stay ; Los Angeles ; Male ; Mortality ; Patients ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Retrospective Studies ; Studies ; Trauma care ; Trauma centers ; Trauma Centers - standards ; Trauma Centers - statistics & numerical data ; Triage - methods ; Triage - standards ; Triage - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2014-10, Vol.80 (10), p.960-965</ispartof><rights>Copyright Southeastern Surgical Congress Oct 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4f8953f53294167cfcb5d53741cb1e239b26ce413dd965e3d229babfa77b920f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4f8953f53294167cfcb5d53741cb1e239b26ce413dd965e3d229babfa77b920f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25264639$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fullerton, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donald, Graham W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cryer, Henry G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Catherine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheaito, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tillou, Areti</creatorcontrib><title>Trauma system overtriage: are we on track?</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>The American College of Surgeons (ACS) recommends trauma overtriage rate (OT) below 50 per cent to maximize efficiency while ensuring optimal care. This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate OT rates in our Level I trauma center using the most recent criteria and guidelines. OT rates during a 12-month period were measured using six definitions based on combinations of Injury Severity Score (ISS), length of hospital stay (LOS, in days), procedures, and disposition after the emergency department. Reason for trauma activation was 55 per cent criteria, 16 per cent guidelines, 11 per cent paramedic judgment, five per cent no reason, and 13 per cent no documentation. OT rates ranged from 22.6 per cent (ISS less than 9, LOS 1 day or less, no consults) to 48.2 per cent (ISS less than 9, LOS 3 days or less, with procedures/consults) and were in compliance with ACS recommendations. Physiologic assessment criteria and anatomic injury had the lowest OT rates and contained all mortalities. Passenger space intrusion (PSI), pedestrian versus automobile (criterion and guideline), and extrication (guideline) all had consistently high rates of OT. We conclude that PSI should be reduced to a guideline, the pedestrian versus automobile criterion and guideline should be combined, and extrication could be removed from the triage scheme.</description><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injury Severity Score</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Los Angeles</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trauma care</subject><subject>Trauma centers</subject><subject>Trauma Centers - standards</subject><subject>Trauma Centers - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Triage - methods</subject><subject>Triage - standards</subject><subject>Triage - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AQ8S8CJCdGc_s15Eil9Q8FLPYXczkdSmqbuJ0n9vQqsHPQ0Dz_sy8xByCvQKQOtrSikHLjIQNKMUKMAeGYOUMjUZ4_tkPADpQIzIUYyLfhVKwiEZMcmUUNyMyeU82K62SdzEFuuk-cTQhsq-4U1iAyZfmDSrpA3Wv98ek4PSLiOe7OaEvD7cz6dP6ezl8Xl6N0s917JNRZkZyUvJmRGgtC-9k4XkWoB3gIwbx5RHAbwojJLIC8aMs660WjvDaMkn5GLbuw7NR4exzesqelwu7QqbLuYgler_Myzr0fM_6KLpwqq_bqC0NlKB6Sm2pXxoYgxY5utQ1TZscqD5YDL_b7IPne2qO1dj8Rv5Uce_AfMbar4</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Fullerton, Zoe</creator><creator>Donald, Graham W</creator><creator>Cryer, Henry G</creator><creator>Lewis, Catherine E</creator><creator>Cheaito, Ali</creator><creator>Cohen, Marilyn</creator><creator>Tillou, Areti</creator><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Trauma system overtriage: are we on track?</title><author>Fullerton, Zoe ; Donald, Graham W ; Cryer, Henry G ; Lewis, Catherine E ; Cheaito, Ali ; Cohen, Marilyn ; Tillou, Areti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4f8953f53294167cfcb5d53741cb1e239b26ce413dd965e3d229babfa77b920f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injury Severity Score</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Los Angeles</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trauma care</topic><topic>Trauma centers</topic><topic>Trauma Centers - standards</topic><topic>Trauma Centers - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Triage - methods</topic><topic>Triage - standards</topic><topic>Triage - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fullerton, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donald, Graham W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cryer, Henry G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Catherine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheaito, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tillou, Areti</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fullerton, Zoe</au><au>Donald, Graham W</au><au>Cryer, Henry G</au><au>Lewis, Catherine E</au><au>Cheaito, Ali</au><au>Cohen, Marilyn</au><au>Tillou, Areti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trauma system overtriage: are we on track?</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>960</spage><epage>965</epage><pages>960-965</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><abstract>The American College of Surgeons (ACS) recommends trauma overtriage rate (OT) below 50 per cent to maximize efficiency while ensuring optimal care. This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate OT rates in our Level I trauma center using the most recent criteria and guidelines. OT rates during a 12-month period were measured using six definitions based on combinations of Injury Severity Score (ISS), length of hospital stay (LOS, in days), procedures, and disposition after the emergency department. Reason for trauma activation was 55 per cent criteria, 16 per cent guidelines, 11 per cent paramedic judgment, five per cent no reason, and 13 per cent no documentation. OT rates ranged from 22.6 per cent (ISS less than 9, LOS 1 day or less, no consults) to 48.2 per cent (ISS less than 9, LOS 3 days or less, with procedures/consults) and were in compliance with ACS recommendations. Physiologic assessment criteria and anatomic injury had the lowest OT rates and contained all mortalities. Passenger space intrusion (PSI), pedestrian versus automobile (criterion and guideline), and extrication (guideline) all had consistently high rates of OT. We conclude that PSI should be reduced to a guideline, the pedestrian versus automobile criterion and guideline should be combined, and extrication could be removed from the triage scheme.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</pub><pmid>25264639</pmid><doi>10.1177/000313481408001011</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-1348 |
ispartof | The American surgeon, 2014-10, Vol.80 (10), p.960-965 |
issn | 0003-1348 1555-9823 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1566823928 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Cost control Disease control Female Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data Hospitals Humans Injury Severity Score Length of Stay Los Angeles Male Mortality Patients Practice Guidelines as Topic Retrospective Studies Studies Trauma care Trauma centers Trauma Centers - standards Trauma Centers - statistics & numerical data Triage - methods Triage - standards Triage - statistics & numerical data |
title | Trauma system overtriage: are we on track? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A53%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trauma%20system%20overtriage:%20are%20we%20on%20track?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Fullerton,%20Zoe&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=960&rft.epage=965&rft.pages=960-965&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000313481408001011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1566823928%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1567795619&rft_id=info:pmid/25264639&rfr_iscdi=true |