Trauma system overtriage: are we on track?

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) recommends trauma overtriage rate (OT) below 50 per cent to maximize efficiency while ensuring optimal care. This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate OT rates in our Level I trauma center using the most recent criteria and guidelines. OT rates during...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American surgeon 2014-10, Vol.80 (10), p.960-965
Hauptverfasser: Fullerton, Zoe, Donald, Graham W, Cryer, Henry G, Lewis, Catherine E, Cheaito, Ali, Cohen, Marilyn, Tillou, Areti
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 965
container_issue 10
container_start_page 960
container_title The American surgeon
container_volume 80
creator Fullerton, Zoe
Donald, Graham W
Cryer, Henry G
Lewis, Catherine E
Cheaito, Ali
Cohen, Marilyn
Tillou, Areti
description The American College of Surgeons (ACS) recommends trauma overtriage rate (OT) below 50 per cent to maximize efficiency while ensuring optimal care. This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate OT rates in our Level I trauma center using the most recent criteria and guidelines. OT rates during a 12-month period were measured using six definitions based on combinations of Injury Severity Score (ISS), length of hospital stay (LOS, in days), procedures, and disposition after the emergency department. Reason for trauma activation was 55 per cent criteria, 16 per cent guidelines, 11 per cent paramedic judgment, five per cent no reason, and 13 per cent no documentation. OT rates ranged from 22.6 per cent (ISS less than 9, LOS 1 day or less, no consults) to 48.2 per cent (ISS less than 9, LOS 3 days or less, with procedures/consults) and were in compliance with ACS recommendations. Physiologic assessment criteria and anatomic injury had the lowest OT rates and contained all mortalities. Passenger space intrusion (PSI), pedestrian versus automobile (criterion and guideline), and extrication (guideline) all had consistently high rates of OT. We conclude that PSI should be reduced to a guideline, the pedestrian versus automobile criterion and guideline should be combined, and extrication could be removed from the triage scheme.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/000313481408001011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1566823928</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1566823928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4f8953f53294167cfcb5d53741cb1e239b26ce413dd965e3d229babfa77b920f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AQ8S8CJCdGc_s15Eil9Q8FLPYXczkdSmqbuJ0n9vQqsHPQ0Dz_sy8xByCvQKQOtrSikHLjIQNKMUKMAeGYOUMjUZ4_tkPADpQIzIUYyLfhVKwiEZMcmUUNyMyeU82K62SdzEFuuk-cTQhsq-4U1iAyZfmDSrpA3Wv98ek4PSLiOe7OaEvD7cz6dP6ezl8Xl6N0s917JNRZkZyUvJmRGgtC-9k4XkWoB3gIwbx5RHAbwojJLIC8aMs660WjvDaMkn5GLbuw7NR4exzesqelwu7QqbLuYgler_Myzr0fM_6KLpwqq_bqC0NlKB6Sm2pXxoYgxY5utQ1TZscqD5YDL_b7IPne2qO1dj8Rv5Uce_AfMbar4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1567795619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trauma system overtriage: are we on track?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Fullerton, Zoe ; Donald, Graham W ; Cryer, Henry G ; Lewis, Catherine E ; Cheaito, Ali ; Cohen, Marilyn ; Tillou, Areti</creator><creatorcontrib>Fullerton, Zoe ; Donald, Graham W ; Cryer, Henry G ; Lewis, Catherine E ; Cheaito, Ali ; Cohen, Marilyn ; Tillou, Areti</creatorcontrib><description>The American College of Surgeons (ACS) recommends trauma overtriage rate (OT) below 50 per cent to maximize efficiency while ensuring optimal care. This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate OT rates in our Level I trauma center using the most recent criteria and guidelines. OT rates during a 12-month period were measured using six definitions based on combinations of Injury Severity Score (ISS), length of hospital stay (LOS, in days), procedures, and disposition after the emergency department. Reason for trauma activation was 55 per cent criteria, 16 per cent guidelines, 11 per cent paramedic judgment, five per cent no reason, and 13 per cent no documentation. OT rates ranged from 22.6 per cent (ISS less than 9, LOS 1 day or less, no consults) to 48.2 per cent (ISS less than 9, LOS 3 days or less, with procedures/consults) and were in compliance with ACS recommendations. Physiologic assessment criteria and anatomic injury had the lowest OT rates and contained all mortalities. Passenger space intrusion (PSI), pedestrian versus automobile (criterion and guideline), and extrication (guideline) all had consistently high rates of OT. We conclude that PSI should be reduced to a guideline, the pedestrian versus automobile criterion and guideline should be combined, and extrication could be removed from the triage scheme.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000313481408001011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25264639</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</publisher><subject>Cost control ; Disease control ; Female ; Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Length of Stay ; Los Angeles ; Male ; Mortality ; Patients ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Retrospective Studies ; Studies ; Trauma care ; Trauma centers ; Trauma Centers - standards ; Trauma Centers - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Triage - methods ; Triage - standards ; Triage - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2014-10, Vol.80 (10), p.960-965</ispartof><rights>Copyright Southeastern Surgical Congress Oct 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4f8953f53294167cfcb5d53741cb1e239b26ce413dd965e3d229babfa77b920f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4f8953f53294167cfcb5d53741cb1e239b26ce413dd965e3d229babfa77b920f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25264639$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fullerton, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donald, Graham W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cryer, Henry G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Catherine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheaito, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tillou, Areti</creatorcontrib><title>Trauma system overtriage: are we on track?</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>The American College of Surgeons (ACS) recommends trauma overtriage rate (OT) below 50 per cent to maximize efficiency while ensuring optimal care. This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate OT rates in our Level I trauma center using the most recent criteria and guidelines. OT rates during a 12-month period were measured using six definitions based on combinations of Injury Severity Score (ISS), length of hospital stay (LOS, in days), procedures, and disposition after the emergency department. Reason for trauma activation was 55 per cent criteria, 16 per cent guidelines, 11 per cent paramedic judgment, five per cent no reason, and 13 per cent no documentation. OT rates ranged from 22.6 per cent (ISS less than 9, LOS 1 day or less, no consults) to 48.2 per cent (ISS less than 9, LOS 3 days or less, with procedures/consults) and were in compliance with ACS recommendations. Physiologic assessment criteria and anatomic injury had the lowest OT rates and contained all mortalities. Passenger space intrusion (PSI), pedestrian versus automobile (criterion and guideline), and extrication (guideline) all had consistently high rates of OT. We conclude that PSI should be reduced to a guideline, the pedestrian versus automobile criterion and guideline should be combined, and extrication could be removed from the triage scheme.</description><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injury Severity Score</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Los Angeles</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trauma care</subject><subject>Trauma centers</subject><subject>Trauma Centers - standards</subject><subject>Trauma Centers - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Triage - methods</subject><subject>Triage - standards</subject><subject>Triage - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AQ8S8CJCdGc_s15Eil9Q8FLPYXczkdSmqbuJ0n9vQqsHPQ0Dz_sy8xByCvQKQOtrSikHLjIQNKMUKMAeGYOUMjUZ4_tkPADpQIzIUYyLfhVKwiEZMcmUUNyMyeU82K62SdzEFuuk-cTQhsq-4U1iAyZfmDSrpA3Wv98ek4PSLiOe7OaEvD7cz6dP6ezl8Xl6N0s917JNRZkZyUvJmRGgtC-9k4XkWoB3gIwbx5RHAbwojJLIC8aMs660WjvDaMkn5GLbuw7NR4exzesqelwu7QqbLuYgler_Myzr0fM_6KLpwqq_bqC0NlKB6Sm2pXxoYgxY5utQ1TZscqD5YDL_b7IPne2qO1dj8Rv5Uce_AfMbar4</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Fullerton, Zoe</creator><creator>Donald, Graham W</creator><creator>Cryer, Henry G</creator><creator>Lewis, Catherine E</creator><creator>Cheaito, Ali</creator><creator>Cohen, Marilyn</creator><creator>Tillou, Areti</creator><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Trauma system overtriage: are we on track?</title><author>Fullerton, Zoe ; Donald, Graham W ; Cryer, Henry G ; Lewis, Catherine E ; Cheaito, Ali ; Cohen, Marilyn ; Tillou, Areti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4f8953f53294167cfcb5d53741cb1e239b26ce413dd965e3d229babfa77b920f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injury Severity Score</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Los Angeles</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trauma care</topic><topic>Trauma centers</topic><topic>Trauma Centers - standards</topic><topic>Trauma Centers - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Triage - methods</topic><topic>Triage - standards</topic><topic>Triage - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fullerton, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donald, Graham W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cryer, Henry G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Catherine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheaito, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tillou, Areti</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fullerton, Zoe</au><au>Donald, Graham W</au><au>Cryer, Henry G</au><au>Lewis, Catherine E</au><au>Cheaito, Ali</au><au>Cohen, Marilyn</au><au>Tillou, Areti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trauma system overtriage: are we on track?</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>960</spage><epage>965</epage><pages>960-965</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><abstract>The American College of Surgeons (ACS) recommends trauma overtriage rate (OT) below 50 per cent to maximize efficiency while ensuring optimal care. This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate OT rates in our Level I trauma center using the most recent criteria and guidelines. OT rates during a 12-month period were measured using six definitions based on combinations of Injury Severity Score (ISS), length of hospital stay (LOS, in days), procedures, and disposition after the emergency department. Reason for trauma activation was 55 per cent criteria, 16 per cent guidelines, 11 per cent paramedic judgment, five per cent no reason, and 13 per cent no documentation. OT rates ranged from 22.6 per cent (ISS less than 9, LOS 1 day or less, no consults) to 48.2 per cent (ISS less than 9, LOS 3 days or less, with procedures/consults) and were in compliance with ACS recommendations. Physiologic assessment criteria and anatomic injury had the lowest OT rates and contained all mortalities. Passenger space intrusion (PSI), pedestrian versus automobile (criterion and guideline), and extrication (guideline) all had consistently high rates of OT. We conclude that PSI should be reduced to a guideline, the pedestrian versus automobile criterion and guideline should be combined, and extrication could be removed from the triage scheme.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</pub><pmid>25264639</pmid><doi>10.1177/000313481408001011</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-1348
ispartof The American surgeon, 2014-10, Vol.80 (10), p.960-965
issn 0003-1348
1555-9823
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1566823928
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Cost control
Disease control
Female
Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data
Hospitals
Humans
Injury Severity Score
Length of Stay
Los Angeles
Male
Mortality
Patients
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Retrospective Studies
Studies
Trauma care
Trauma centers
Trauma Centers - standards
Trauma Centers - statistics & numerical data
Triage - methods
Triage - standards
Triage - statistics & numerical data
title Trauma system overtriage: are we on track?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A53%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trauma%20system%20overtriage:%20are%20we%20on%20track?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Fullerton,%20Zoe&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=960&rft.epage=965&rft.pages=960-965&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000313481408001011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1566823928%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1567795619&rft_id=info:pmid/25264639&rfr_iscdi=true