Study on centralising acute stroke services provides no firm conclusions
The improvement in London and Manchester stroke services is important and has offered real clinical benefits to patients. 1 However, several problems with the study of Morris and colleagues (and more broadly) limit the extent of the conclusion that increased centralisation of stroke (and other) serv...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ (Online) 2014-09, Vol.349 (sep23 12), p.g5715-g5715 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | g5715 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | sep23 12 |
| container_start_page | g5715 |
| container_title | BMJ (Online) |
| container_volume | 349 |
| creator | Rudd, Matthew P |
| description | The improvement in London and Manchester stroke services is important and has offered real clinical benefits to patients. 1 However, several problems with the study of Morris and colleagues (and more broadly) limit the extent of the conclusion that increased centralisation of stroke (and other) services automatically improves clinical outcomes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.g5715 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1566113826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26517303</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26517303</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b239t-412b1853f3d8e5910dbd6eb124ac227cd49d62246eaba0d92f5555ea4642d81e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LwzAYh4Mobswd_ABKQQ966MyfJk2OMtQJAw_quaRJOjrbRJN2sG9vZqeC4Ht5A7-HX14eAE4RnCFE2E3ZrmcrmiN6AMYopyxFnJBDMIaCipQjwkdgGsIaQohJzgWjx2CEKc4E5vkYLJ67Xm8TZxNlbOdlU4farhKp-s4kofPuLS7jN7UyIXn3blPr-LAuqWrfJspZ1fShdjacgKNKNsFM93sCXu_vXuaLdPn08Di_XaYlJqJLM4RLxCmpiOaGCgR1qZkpEc6kwjhXOhOaYZwxI0sJtcAVjWNkxjKsOTJkAq6G3njMR29CV7R1UKZppDWuDwWijEUvHLOIXvxB1673Nl5XoDwOFxBmkboeKOVdCN5UxbuvW-m3BYLFznARDRdfhiN7vm_sy9boH_LbZwTOBmAdOud_c0ZRTiCJ-eWQ7zr__-cTpJ6LOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777789004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Study on centralising acute stroke services provides no firm conclusions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Rudd, Matthew P</creator><creatorcontrib>Rudd, Matthew P</creatorcontrib><description>The improvement in London and Manchester stroke services is important and has offered real clinical benefits to patients. 1 However, several problems with the study of Morris and colleagues (and more broadly) limit the extent of the conclusion that increased centralisation of stroke (and other) services automatically improves clinical outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g5715</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25249287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>CENTRALISING ACUTE STROKE SERVICES ; Clinical outcomes ; Female ; Humans ; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Mortality ; Stroke - mortality ; Stroke - therapy ; Urban Health Services - organization & administration</subject><ispartof>BMJ (Online), 2014-09, Vol.349 (sep23 12), p.g5715-g5715</ispartof><rights>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2014</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Sep 23, 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g5715.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g5715.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,777,781,800,3183,23552,27905,27906,57998,58231,77349,77380</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25249287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rudd, Matthew P</creatorcontrib><title>Study on centralising acute stroke services provides no firm conclusions</title><title>BMJ (Online)</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>The improvement in London and Manchester stroke services is important and has offered real clinical benefits to patients. 1 However, several problems with the study of Morris and colleagues (and more broadly) limit the extent of the conclusion that increased centralisation of stroke (and other) services automatically improves clinical outcomes.</description><subject>CENTRALISING ACUTE STROKE SERVICES</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Stroke - mortality</subject><subject>Stroke - therapy</subject><subject>Urban Health Services - organization & administration</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LwzAYh4Mobswd_ABKQQ966MyfJk2OMtQJAw_quaRJOjrbRJN2sG9vZqeC4Ht5A7-HX14eAE4RnCFE2E3ZrmcrmiN6AMYopyxFnJBDMIaCipQjwkdgGsIaQohJzgWjx2CEKc4E5vkYLJ67Xm8TZxNlbOdlU4farhKp-s4kofPuLS7jN7UyIXn3blPr-LAuqWrfJspZ1fShdjacgKNKNsFM93sCXu_vXuaLdPn08Di_XaYlJqJLM4RLxCmpiOaGCgR1qZkpEc6kwjhXOhOaYZwxI0sJtcAVjWNkxjKsOTJkAq6G3njMR29CV7R1UKZppDWuDwWijEUvHLOIXvxB1673Nl5XoDwOFxBmkboeKOVdCN5UxbuvW-m3BYLFznARDRdfhiN7vm_sy9boH_LbZwTOBmAdOud_c0ZRTiCJ-eWQ7zr__-cTpJ6LOw</recordid><startdate>20140923</startdate><enddate>20140923</enddate><creator>Rudd, Matthew P</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140923</creationdate><title>Study on centralising acute stroke services provides no firm conclusions</title><author>Rudd, Matthew P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b239t-412b1853f3d8e5910dbd6eb124ac227cd49d62246eaba0d92f5555ea4642d81e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>CENTRALISING ACUTE STROKE SERVICES</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Stroke - mortality</topic><topic>Stroke - therapy</topic><topic>Urban Health Services - organization & administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rudd, Matthew P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rudd, Matthew P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Study on centralising acute stroke services provides no firm conclusions</atitle><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2014-09-23</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>349</volume><issue>sep23 12</issue><spage>g5715</spage><epage>g5715</epage><pages>g5715-g5715</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>The improvement in London and Manchester stroke services is important and has offered real clinical benefits to patients. 1 However, several problems with the study of Morris and colleagues (and more broadly) limit the extent of the conclusion that increased centralisation of stroke (and other) services automatically improves clinical outcomes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>25249287</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.g5715</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0959-8138 |
| ispartof | BMJ (Online), 2014-09, Vol.349 (sep23 12), p.g5715-g5715 |
| issn | 0959-8138 1756-1833 1756-1833 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1566113826 |
| source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | CENTRALISING ACUTE STROKE SERVICES Clinical outcomes Female Humans Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data Male Mortality Stroke - mortality Stroke - therapy Urban Health Services - organization & administration |
| title | Study on centralising acute stroke services provides no firm conclusions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A27%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Study%20on%20centralising%20acute%20stroke%20services%20provides%20no%20firm%20conclusions&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20(Online)&rft.au=Rudd,%20Matthew%20P&rft.date=2014-09-23&rft.volume=349&rft.issue=sep23%2012&rft.spage=g5715&rft.epage=g5715&rft.pages=g5715-g5715&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1756-1833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.g5715&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26517303%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777789004&rft_id=info:pmid/25249287&rft_jstor_id=26517303&rfr_iscdi=true |