Multivariate respiratory motion prediction

In extracranial robotic radiotherapy, tumour motion is compensated by tracking external and internal surrogates. To compensate system specific time delays, time series prediction of the external optical surrogates is used. We investigate whether the prediction accuracy can be increased by expanding...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics in medicine & biology 2014-10, Vol.59 (20), p.6043-6060
Hauptverfasser: Dürichen, R, Wissel, T, Ernst, F, Schlaefer, A, Schweikard, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6060
container_issue 20
container_start_page 6043
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 59
creator Dürichen, R
Wissel, T
Ernst, F
Schlaefer, A
Schweikard, A
description In extracranial robotic radiotherapy, tumour motion is compensated by tracking external and internal surrogates. To compensate system specific time delays, time series prediction of the external optical surrogates is used. We investigate whether the prediction accuracy can be increased by expanding the current clinical setup by an accelerometer, a strain belt and a flow sensor. Four previously published prediction algorithms are adapted to multivariate inputs-normalized least mean squares (nLMS), wavelet-based least mean squares (wLMS), support vector regression (SVR) and relevance vector machines (RVM)-and evaluated for three different prediction horizons. The measurement involves 18 subjects and consists of two phases, focusing on long term trends (M1) and breathing artefacts (M2). To select the most relevant and least redundant sensors, a sequential forward selection (SFS) method is proposed. Using a multivariate setting, the results show that the clinically used nLMS algorithm is susceptible to large outliers. In the case of irregular breathing (M2), the mean root mean square error (RMSE) of a univariate nLMS algorithm is 0.66 mm and can be decreased to 0.46 mm by a multivariate RVM model (best algorithm on average). To investigate the full potential of this approach, the optimal sensor combination was also estimated on the complete test set. The results indicate that a further decrease in RMSE is possible for RVM (to 0.42 mm). This motivates further research about sensor selection methods. Besides the optical surrogates, the sensors most frequently selected by the algorithms are the accelerometer and the strain belt. These sensors could be easily integrated in the current clinical setup and would allow a more precise motion compensation.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/0031-9155/59/20/6043
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1566107841</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1566107841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-2fab45a654c5f21a178754438051d67cd1696d4d8e2c11dde0fca1188c013ed83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6D0T2KELtTJqk6VHEL1jxoueQTVLI0m5q0gr7723ZdY-eZg7POx8PIdcI9whS5gAFZhVynvMqp5ALYMUJmWMhMBNcwCmZH5EZuUhpA4AoKTsnM8opZwUt5-TufWh6_6Oj171bRpc6H3Uf4m7Zht6H7bKLznoztZfkrNZNcleHuiBfz0-fj6_Z6uPl7fFhlZmCyT6jtV4zrgVnhtcUNZay5IwVEjhaURqLohKWWemoQbTWQW30eJg0gIWzsliQ2_3cLobvwaVetT4Z1zR668KQFHIhEErJcETZHjUxpBRdrbroWx13CkFNltSkQE0KFK8UBTVZGmM3hw3DunX2GPrTMgKwB3zo1CYMcTs-_P_MXyRjb7M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1566107841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multivariate respiratory motion prediction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Dürichen, R ; Wissel, T ; Ernst, F ; Schlaefer, A ; Schweikard, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Dürichen, R ; Wissel, T ; Ernst, F ; Schlaefer, A ; Schweikard, A</creatorcontrib><description>In extracranial robotic radiotherapy, tumour motion is compensated by tracking external and internal surrogates. To compensate system specific time delays, time series prediction of the external optical surrogates is used. We investigate whether the prediction accuracy can be increased by expanding the current clinical setup by an accelerometer, a strain belt and a flow sensor. Four previously published prediction algorithms are adapted to multivariate inputs-normalized least mean squares (nLMS), wavelet-based least mean squares (wLMS), support vector regression (SVR) and relevance vector machines (RVM)-and evaluated for three different prediction horizons. The measurement involves 18 subjects and consists of two phases, focusing on long term trends (M1) and breathing artefacts (M2). To select the most relevant and least redundant sensors, a sequential forward selection (SFS) method is proposed. Using a multivariate setting, the results show that the clinically used nLMS algorithm is susceptible to large outliers. In the case of irregular breathing (M2), the mean root mean square error (RMSE) of a univariate nLMS algorithm is 0.66 mm and can be decreased to 0.46 mm by a multivariate RVM model (best algorithm on average). To investigate the full potential of this approach, the optimal sensor combination was also estimated on the complete test set. The results indicate that a further decrease in RMSE is possible for RVM (to 0.42 mm). This motivates further research about sensor selection methods. Besides the optical surrogates, the sensors most frequently selected by the algorithms are the accelerometer and the strain belt. These sensors could be easily integrated in the current clinical setup and would allow a more precise motion compensation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/20/6043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25254327</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHMBA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Adult ; Algorithms ; feature selection ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Models, Theoretical ; Motion ; multivariate signal analysis ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Respiration ; respiratory motion prediction ; robotic radiotherapy ; Robotics</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 2014-10, Vol.59 (20), p.6043-6060</ispartof><rights>2014 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-2fab45a654c5f21a178754438051d67cd1696d4d8e2c11dde0fca1188c013ed83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-2fab45a654c5f21a178754438051d67cd1696d4d8e2c11dde0fca1188c013ed83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9155/59/20/6043/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,53821,53868</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25254327$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dürichen, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wissel, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernst, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlaefer, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweikard, A</creatorcontrib><title>Multivariate respiratory motion prediction</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>PMB</addtitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><description>In extracranial robotic radiotherapy, tumour motion is compensated by tracking external and internal surrogates. To compensate system specific time delays, time series prediction of the external optical surrogates is used. We investigate whether the prediction accuracy can be increased by expanding the current clinical setup by an accelerometer, a strain belt and a flow sensor. Four previously published prediction algorithms are adapted to multivariate inputs-normalized least mean squares (nLMS), wavelet-based least mean squares (wLMS), support vector regression (SVR) and relevance vector machines (RVM)-and evaluated for three different prediction horizons. The measurement involves 18 subjects and consists of two phases, focusing on long term trends (M1) and breathing artefacts (M2). To select the most relevant and least redundant sensors, a sequential forward selection (SFS) method is proposed. Using a multivariate setting, the results show that the clinically used nLMS algorithm is susceptible to large outliers. In the case of irregular breathing (M2), the mean root mean square error (RMSE) of a univariate nLMS algorithm is 0.66 mm and can be decreased to 0.46 mm by a multivariate RVM model (best algorithm on average). To investigate the full potential of this approach, the optimal sensor combination was also estimated on the complete test set. The results indicate that a further decrease in RMSE is possible for RVM (to 0.42 mm). This motivates further research about sensor selection methods. Besides the optical surrogates, the sensors most frequently selected by the algorithms are the accelerometer and the strain belt. These sensors could be easily integrated in the current clinical setup and would allow a more precise motion compensation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>feature selection</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>multivariate signal analysis</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>respiratory motion prediction</subject><subject>robotic radiotherapy</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6D0T2KELtTJqk6VHEL1jxoueQTVLI0m5q0gr7723ZdY-eZg7POx8PIdcI9whS5gAFZhVynvMqp5ALYMUJmWMhMBNcwCmZH5EZuUhpA4AoKTsnM8opZwUt5-TufWh6_6Oj171bRpc6H3Uf4m7Zht6H7bKLznoztZfkrNZNcleHuiBfz0-fj6_Z6uPl7fFhlZmCyT6jtV4zrgVnhtcUNZay5IwVEjhaURqLohKWWemoQbTWQW30eJg0gIWzsliQ2_3cLobvwaVetT4Z1zR668KQFHIhEErJcETZHjUxpBRdrbroWx13CkFNltSkQE0KFK8UBTVZGmM3hw3DunX2GPrTMgKwB3zo1CYMcTs-_P_MXyRjb7M</recordid><startdate>20141021</startdate><enddate>20141021</enddate><creator>Dürichen, R</creator><creator>Wissel, T</creator><creator>Ernst, F</creator><creator>Schlaefer, A</creator><creator>Schweikard, A</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141021</creationdate><title>Multivariate respiratory motion prediction</title><author>Dürichen, R ; Wissel, T ; Ernst, F ; Schlaefer, A ; Schweikard, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-2fab45a654c5f21a178754438051d67cd1696d4d8e2c11dde0fca1188c013ed83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>feature selection</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>multivariate signal analysis</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>respiratory motion prediction</topic><topic>robotic radiotherapy</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dürichen, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wissel, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernst, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlaefer, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweikard, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dürichen, R</au><au>Wissel, T</au><au>Ernst, F</au><au>Schlaefer, A</au><au>Schweikard, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multivariate respiratory motion prediction</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><stitle>PMB</stitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><date>2014-10-21</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>6043</spage><epage>6060</epage><pages>6043-6060</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><coden>PHMBA7</coden><abstract>In extracranial robotic radiotherapy, tumour motion is compensated by tracking external and internal surrogates. To compensate system specific time delays, time series prediction of the external optical surrogates is used. We investigate whether the prediction accuracy can be increased by expanding the current clinical setup by an accelerometer, a strain belt and a flow sensor. Four previously published prediction algorithms are adapted to multivariate inputs-normalized least mean squares (nLMS), wavelet-based least mean squares (wLMS), support vector regression (SVR) and relevance vector machines (RVM)-and evaluated for three different prediction horizons. The measurement involves 18 subjects and consists of two phases, focusing on long term trends (M1) and breathing artefacts (M2). To select the most relevant and least redundant sensors, a sequential forward selection (SFS) method is proposed. Using a multivariate setting, the results show that the clinically used nLMS algorithm is susceptible to large outliers. In the case of irregular breathing (M2), the mean root mean square error (RMSE) of a univariate nLMS algorithm is 0.66 mm and can be decreased to 0.46 mm by a multivariate RVM model (best algorithm on average). To investigate the full potential of this approach, the optimal sensor combination was also estimated on the complete test set. The results indicate that a further decrease in RMSE is possible for RVM (to 0.42 mm). This motivates further research about sensor selection methods. Besides the optical surrogates, the sensors most frequently selected by the algorithms are the accelerometer and the strain belt. These sensors could be easily integrated in the current clinical setup and would allow a more precise motion compensation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>25254327</pmid><doi>10.1088/0031-9155/59/20/6043</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 2014-10, Vol.59 (20), p.6043-6060
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1566107841
source MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects Adult
Algorithms
feature selection
Female
Humans
Male
Models, Theoretical
Motion
multivariate signal analysis
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Respiration
respiratory motion prediction
robotic radiotherapy
Robotics
title Multivariate respiratory motion prediction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T18%3A49%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multivariate%20respiratory%20motion%20prediction&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=D%C3%BCrichen,%20R&rft.date=2014-10-21&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=6043&rft.epage=6060&rft.pages=6043-6060&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.coden=PHMBA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0031-9155/59/20/6043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1566107841%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1566107841&rft_id=info:pmid/25254327&rfr_iscdi=true