Contribution of soil-borne bacteria to the rotation effect in corn

Few efforts have been directed at understanding how the rhizosphere microbiology of continuous corn may effect crop yields. This relationship may explain, in part, the decreases in yield associated with continuous corn as compared to the corn in rotation with a second crop. This study was conducted...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant and soil 1990-02, Vol.122 (1), p.115-120
Hauptverfasser: TURCO, R.F., BISCHOFF, M., BREAKWELL, D.P., GRIFFITH, D.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 120
container_issue 1
container_start_page 115
container_title Plant and soil
container_volume 122
creator TURCO, R.F.
BISCHOFF, M.
BREAKWELL, D.P.
GRIFFITH, D.R.
description Few efforts have been directed at understanding how the rhizosphere microbiology of continuous corn may effect crop yields. This relationship may explain, in part, the decreases in yield associated with continuous corn as compared to the corn in rotation with a second crop. This study was conducted to determine the importance of soil-borne microorganisms to yield declines in long term continuous corn. Continuous corn (Zea mays L.) or rotated corn-soybean (Glycine max L.) field plots, established in 1975, under either fall plowing or no-till tillage treatments were used. Treatments consisted of methyl bromide applied at 48.8 gm⁻² 3 days prior to planting in all four combinations. Total plant samples from both the fumigated and non-fumigated areas were collected 14 days after planting. Rhizosphere bacteria were recovered and tested for their ability to impact plant growth. Bacterial assessments were made in a test tube bioassay where germinated corn was transported in to agar containing a bacterial isolate. In the first year of the study a highly significant interaction of fumigation and rotation was indicated. With fumigation continuous corn yields were similar to that of rotated corn-bean. Rotated corn yields were less affected by fumigation. In the second year, the effects were similar but less significant. Over 130 bacterial isolates were tested for their effect on plant growth. Approximately 22% were able to inhibit plant growth. Of these, 72% were from the continuous corn system. Clearly, the interaction of rotation and yield is at a microbiological level. The suggestion that microorganisms similar to those isolated are responsible for controlling early plant growth in the continuous corn system is indicated.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02851918
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15651426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42938396</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42938396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-b0655ee7c347e59d52444d6296bd540a16f402b47d775499a5266f71660f95723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0L1LAzEYBvAgCtbq4q5kchBO33w3oxarQtFFwS3k7hJNuV5qkg7-91490enl4f3xDA9CpwSuCIC6vl0AnQmiyWwPTYhQrBLA5D6aADBagdJvh-go5xXsMpETdDuPfUmh3pYQexw9zjF0VR1T73Btm-JSsLhEXD4cTrHYH-a8d03BocfNAI_Rgbdddie_d4peF3cv84dq-Xz_OL9ZVg0DUaoapBDOqYZx5YRuBeWct5JqWbeCgyXSc6A1V61SgmttBZXSKyIleC0UZVN0MfZuUvzculzMOuTGdZ3tXdxmQ4QUhFM5wMsRNinmnJw3mxTWNn0ZAmY3k_mfacBnI17lEtOf5FSzGdO7svPx72009j2FbJ6WROthQaX5UPANLpJqhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15651426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contribution of soil-borne bacteria to the rotation effect in corn</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>TURCO, R.F. ; BISCHOFF, M. ; BREAKWELL, D.P. ; GRIFFITH, D.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>TURCO, R.F. ; BISCHOFF, M. ; BREAKWELL, D.P. ; GRIFFITH, D.R. ; Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN (USA). Dept. of Agronomy</creatorcontrib><description>Few efforts have been directed at understanding how the rhizosphere microbiology of continuous corn may effect crop yields. This relationship may explain, in part, the decreases in yield associated with continuous corn as compared to the corn in rotation with a second crop. This study was conducted to determine the importance of soil-borne microorganisms to yield declines in long term continuous corn. Continuous corn (Zea mays L.) or rotated corn-soybean (Glycine max L.) field plots, established in 1975, under either fall plowing or no-till tillage treatments were used. Treatments consisted of methyl bromide applied at 48.8 gm⁻² 3 days prior to planting in all four combinations. Total plant samples from both the fumigated and non-fumigated areas were collected 14 days after planting. Rhizosphere bacteria were recovered and tested for their ability to impact plant growth. Bacterial assessments were made in a test tube bioassay where germinated corn was transported in to agar containing a bacterial isolate. In the first year of the study a highly significant interaction of fumigation and rotation was indicated. With fumigation continuous corn yields were similar to that of rotated corn-bean. Rotated corn yields were less affected by fumigation. In the second year, the effects were similar but less significant. Over 130 bacterial isolates were tested for their effect on plant growth. Approximately 22% were able to inhibit plant growth. Of these, 72% were from the continuous corn system. Clearly, the interaction of rotation and yield is at a microbiological level. The suggestion that microorganisms similar to those isolated are responsible for controlling early plant growth in the continuous corn system is indicated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02851918</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Agricultural soils ; Bacteria ; Corn ; Crop rotation ; cultivo en rotacion ; Fumigation ; Glycine max ; organisme transmissible par le sol ; organismos transmitidos por suelo ; Plants ; Pseudomonas ; Rhizosphere ; rotation culturale ; rotational cropping ; soilborne organisms ; Tillage ; Toxins ; zea mays</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 1990-02, Vol.122 (1), p.115-120</ispartof><rights>1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-b0655ee7c347e59d52444d6296bd540a16f402b47d775499a5266f71660f95723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-b0655ee7c347e59d52444d6296bd540a16f402b47d775499a5266f71660f95723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42938396$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42938396$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>TURCO, R.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BISCHOFF, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREAKWELL, D.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRIFFITH, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN (USA). Dept. of Agronomy</creatorcontrib><title>Contribution of soil-borne bacteria to the rotation effect in corn</title><title>Plant and soil</title><description>Few efforts have been directed at understanding how the rhizosphere microbiology of continuous corn may effect crop yields. This relationship may explain, in part, the decreases in yield associated with continuous corn as compared to the corn in rotation with a second crop. This study was conducted to determine the importance of soil-borne microorganisms to yield declines in long term continuous corn. Continuous corn (Zea mays L.) or rotated corn-soybean (Glycine max L.) field plots, established in 1975, under either fall plowing or no-till tillage treatments were used. Treatments consisted of methyl bromide applied at 48.8 gm⁻² 3 days prior to planting in all four combinations. Total plant samples from both the fumigated and non-fumigated areas were collected 14 days after planting. Rhizosphere bacteria were recovered and tested for their ability to impact plant growth. Bacterial assessments were made in a test tube bioassay where germinated corn was transported in to agar containing a bacterial isolate. In the first year of the study a highly significant interaction of fumigation and rotation was indicated. With fumigation continuous corn yields were similar to that of rotated corn-bean. Rotated corn yields were less affected by fumigation. In the second year, the effects were similar but less significant. Over 130 bacterial isolates were tested for their effect on plant growth. Approximately 22% were able to inhibit plant growth. Of these, 72% were from the continuous corn system. Clearly, the interaction of rotation and yield is at a microbiological level. The suggestion that microorganisms similar to those isolated are responsible for controlling early plant growth in the continuous corn system is indicated.</description><subject>Agricultural soils</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>cultivo en rotacion</subject><subject>Fumigation</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>organisme transmissible par le sol</subject><subject>organismos transmitidos por suelo</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Pseudomonas</subject><subject>Rhizosphere</subject><subject>rotation culturale</subject><subject>rotational cropping</subject><subject>soilborne organisms</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><subject>zea mays</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpF0L1LAzEYBvAgCtbq4q5kchBO33w3oxarQtFFwS3k7hJNuV5qkg7-91490enl4f3xDA9CpwSuCIC6vl0AnQmiyWwPTYhQrBLA5D6aADBagdJvh-go5xXsMpETdDuPfUmh3pYQexw9zjF0VR1T73Btm-JSsLhEXD4cTrHYH-a8d03BocfNAI_Rgbdddie_d4peF3cv84dq-Xz_OL9ZVg0DUaoapBDOqYZx5YRuBeWct5JqWbeCgyXSc6A1V61SgmttBZXSKyIleC0UZVN0MfZuUvzculzMOuTGdZ3tXdxmQ4QUhFM5wMsRNinmnJw3mxTWNn0ZAmY3k_mfacBnI17lEtOf5FSzGdO7svPx72009j2FbJ6WROthQaX5UPANLpJqhQ</recordid><startdate>19900201</startdate><enddate>19900201</enddate><creator>TURCO, R.F.</creator><creator>BISCHOFF, M.</creator><creator>BREAKWELL, D.P.</creator><creator>GRIFFITH, D.R.</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900201</creationdate><title>Contribution of soil-borne bacteria to the rotation effect in corn</title><author>TURCO, R.F. ; BISCHOFF, M. ; BREAKWELL, D.P. ; GRIFFITH, D.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-b0655ee7c347e59d52444d6296bd540a16f402b47d775499a5266f71660f95723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Agricultural soils</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>cultivo en rotacion</topic><topic>Fumigation</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>organisme transmissible par le sol</topic><topic>organismos transmitidos por suelo</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Pseudomonas</topic><topic>Rhizosphere</topic><topic>rotation culturale</topic><topic>rotational cropping</topic><topic>soilborne organisms</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><topic>zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>TURCO, R.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BISCHOFF, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREAKWELL, D.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRIFFITH, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN (USA). Dept. of Agronomy</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>TURCO, R.F.</au><au>BISCHOFF, M.</au><au>BREAKWELL, D.P.</au><au>GRIFFITH, D.R.</au><aucorp>Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN (USA). Dept. of Agronomy</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contribution of soil-borne bacteria to the rotation effect in corn</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><date>1990-02-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>115-120</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><abstract>Few efforts have been directed at understanding how the rhizosphere microbiology of continuous corn may effect crop yields. This relationship may explain, in part, the decreases in yield associated with continuous corn as compared to the corn in rotation with a second crop. This study was conducted to determine the importance of soil-borne microorganisms to yield declines in long term continuous corn. Continuous corn (Zea mays L.) or rotated corn-soybean (Glycine max L.) field plots, established in 1975, under either fall plowing or no-till tillage treatments were used. Treatments consisted of methyl bromide applied at 48.8 gm⁻² 3 days prior to planting in all four combinations. Total plant samples from both the fumigated and non-fumigated areas were collected 14 days after planting. Rhizosphere bacteria were recovered and tested for their ability to impact plant growth. Bacterial assessments were made in a test tube bioassay where germinated corn was transported in to agar containing a bacterial isolate. In the first year of the study a highly significant interaction of fumigation and rotation was indicated. With fumigation continuous corn yields were similar to that of rotated corn-bean. Rotated corn yields were less affected by fumigation. In the second year, the effects were similar but less significant. Over 130 bacterial isolates were tested for their effect on plant growth. Approximately 22% were able to inhibit plant growth. Of these, 72% were from the continuous corn system. Clearly, the interaction of rotation and yield is at a microbiological level. The suggestion that microorganisms similar to those isolated are responsible for controlling early plant growth in the continuous corn system is indicated.</abstract><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02851918</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-079X
ispartof Plant and soil, 1990-02, Vol.122 (1), p.115-120
issn 0032-079X
1573-5036
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15651426
source SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Agricultural soils
Bacteria
Corn
Crop rotation
cultivo en rotacion
Fumigation
Glycine max
organisme transmissible par le sol
organismos transmitidos por suelo
Plants
Pseudomonas
Rhizosphere
rotation culturale
rotational cropping
soilborne organisms
Tillage
Toxins
zea mays
title Contribution of soil-borne bacteria to the rotation effect in corn
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T19%3A09%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contribution%20of%20soil-borne%20bacteria%20to%20the%20rotation%20effect%20in%20corn&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=TURCO,%20R.F.&rft.aucorp=Purdue%20Univ.,%20West%20Lafayette,%20IN%20(USA).%20Dept.%20of%20Agronomy&rft.date=1990-02-01&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=115-120&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02851918&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42938396%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15651426&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42938396&rfr_iscdi=true