Biodynamics of Particle Processing in Bivalve Molluscs: Models, Data, and Future Directions
Previous models of particle feeding have focused on optimal solutions for particle acquisition or absorption. We propose two conceptual approaches to treat particle feeders as an integrated system of compartments, in hopes of understanding critical limiting factors that might be overlooked by focusi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Invertebrate biology 1996-01, Vol.115 (3), p.232-242 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 242 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 232 |
container_title | Invertebrate biology |
container_volume | 115 |
creator | Levinton, Jeffrey S. Ward, J. Evan Thompson, Raymond J. |
description | Previous models of particle feeding have focused on optimal solutions for particle acquisition or absorption. We propose two conceptual approaches to treat particle feeders as an integrated system of compartments, in hopes of understanding critical limiting factors that might be overlooked by focusing on only one part. The compartment model treats a particle feeder as a series of structures that process particles, with characteristic residence times within compartments and transfer points between them. These might change with overall particle food value and proportion of poor particles. As a non-exclusive alternative, the pathway model considers particle transfer as being analogous to enzyme control systems, with feedback loops that may involve interactions such as negative feedback between compartments that engage in no direct transfer. We examine these models in the light of some studies of particle handling by the deposit-feeding bivalves Yoldia limatula, Macoma secta, and M. nasuta, and the suspension-feeding oyster Crassostrea gigas. In Y. limatula, palp overloading results in feedback that shuts down the particle-collecting palp proboscis. In Macoma, nearly all particles are rejected, suggesting that rejection is necessary because digestion and gut residence time are limiting factors. We suggest that a whole-system approach is important in understanding particle processing by deposit feeders and suspension feeders. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3226933 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15648039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3226933</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3226933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-6e0e8366b752cbb97c11c8e10fe0cf32fa2258b90060366cc4d23c9b72b9bfa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10DFPwzAUBGALgUQpiL_gAcHSwLOd2gkbbSkgFdEBJobIcRzkyo2LX1Kp_75B7cp0N3y64Qi5ZnDPBagHwbnMhTghA6bSNFEpg9O-g1JJJkCekwvEFQBkLJUD8j1xodo1eu0M0lDTpY6tM97SZQzGIrrmh7qGTtxW-62l78H7Dg0-9q2yHkd0pls9orqp6Lxru2jpzEVrWhcavCRntfZor445JF_z58_pa7L4eHmbPi0SwzPRJtKCzYSUpRpzU5a5MoyZzDKoLZha8FpzPs7KHEBCz4xJKy5MXipe5mWtlRiS28PuJobfzmJbrB0a671ubOiwYGOZZiDyHt4doIkBMdq62ES31nFXMCj-ziuO5_Xy5iBX2Ib4L9sDi25r4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15648039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biodynamics of Particle Processing in Bivalve Molluscs: Models, Data, and Future Directions</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Levinton, Jeffrey S. ; Ward, J. Evan ; Thompson, Raymond J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Levinton, Jeffrey S. ; Ward, J. Evan ; Thompson, Raymond J.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous models of particle feeding have focused on optimal solutions for particle acquisition or absorption. We propose two conceptual approaches to treat particle feeders as an integrated system of compartments, in hopes of understanding critical limiting factors that might be overlooked by focusing on only one part. The compartment model treats a particle feeder as a series of structures that process particles, with characteristic residence times within compartments and transfer points between them. These might change with overall particle food value and proportion of poor particles. As a non-exclusive alternative, the pathway model considers particle transfer as being analogous to enzyme control systems, with feedback loops that may involve interactions such as negative feedback between compartments that engage in no direct transfer. We examine these models in the light of some studies of particle handling by the deposit-feeding bivalves Yoldia limatula, Macoma secta, and M. nasuta, and the suspension-feeding oyster Crassostrea gigas. In Y. limatula, palp overloading results in feedback that shuts down the particle-collecting palp proboscis. In Macoma, nearly all particles are rejected, suggesting that rejection is necessary because digestion and gut residence time are limiting factors. We suggest that a whole-system approach is important in understanding particle processing by deposit feeders and suspension feeders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1077-8306</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-7410</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3226933</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Microscopical Society, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal organs ; Chemical suspensions ; Crassostrea gigas ; Ecological modeling ; Enzymes ; Food ; Macoma nasuta ; Macoma secta ; Marine ; Mollusks ; Oysters ; Palps ; Proboscis ; Sediments ; Yoldia limatula</subject><ispartof>Invertebrate biology, 1996-01, Vol.115 (3), p.232-242</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 American Microscopical Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-6e0e8366b752cbb97c11c8e10fe0cf32fa2258b90060366cc4d23c9b72b9bfa73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3226933$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3226933$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Levinton, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, J. Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Raymond J.</creatorcontrib><title>Biodynamics of Particle Processing in Bivalve Molluscs: Models, Data, and Future Directions</title><title>Invertebrate biology</title><description>Previous models of particle feeding have focused on optimal solutions for particle acquisition or absorption. We propose two conceptual approaches to treat particle feeders as an integrated system of compartments, in hopes of understanding critical limiting factors that might be overlooked by focusing on only one part. The compartment model treats a particle feeder as a series of structures that process particles, with characteristic residence times within compartments and transfer points between them. These might change with overall particle food value and proportion of poor particles. As a non-exclusive alternative, the pathway model considers particle transfer as being analogous to enzyme control systems, with feedback loops that may involve interactions such as negative feedback between compartments that engage in no direct transfer. We examine these models in the light of some studies of particle handling by the deposit-feeding bivalves Yoldia limatula, Macoma secta, and M. nasuta, and the suspension-feeding oyster Crassostrea gigas. In Y. limatula, palp overloading results in feedback that shuts down the particle-collecting palp proboscis. In Macoma, nearly all particles are rejected, suggesting that rejection is necessary because digestion and gut residence time are limiting factors. We suggest that a whole-system approach is important in understanding particle processing by deposit feeders and suspension feeders.</description><subject>Animal organs</subject><subject>Chemical suspensions</subject><subject>Crassostrea gigas</subject><subject>Ecological modeling</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Macoma nasuta</subject><subject>Macoma secta</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Oysters</subject><subject>Palps</subject><subject>Proboscis</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Yoldia limatula</subject><issn>1077-8306</issn><issn>1744-7410</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10DFPwzAUBGALgUQpiL_gAcHSwLOd2gkbbSkgFdEBJobIcRzkyo2LX1Kp_75B7cp0N3y64Qi5ZnDPBagHwbnMhTghA6bSNFEpg9O-g1JJJkCekwvEFQBkLJUD8j1xodo1eu0M0lDTpY6tM97SZQzGIrrmh7qGTtxW-62l78H7Dg0-9q2yHkd0pls9orqp6Lxru2jpzEVrWhcavCRntfZor445JF_z58_pa7L4eHmbPi0SwzPRJtKCzYSUpRpzU5a5MoyZzDKoLZha8FpzPs7KHEBCz4xJKy5MXipe5mWtlRiS28PuJobfzmJbrB0a671ubOiwYGOZZiDyHt4doIkBMdq62ES31nFXMCj-ziuO5_Xy5iBX2Ib4L9sDi25r4w</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>Levinton, Jeffrey S.</creator><creator>Ward, J. Evan</creator><creator>Thompson, Raymond J.</creator><general>American Microscopical Society, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>Biodynamics of Particle Processing in Bivalve Molluscs: Models, Data, and Future Directions</title><author>Levinton, Jeffrey S. ; Ward, J. Evan ; Thompson, Raymond J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-6e0e8366b752cbb97c11c8e10fe0cf32fa2258b90060366cc4d23c9b72b9bfa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animal organs</topic><topic>Chemical suspensions</topic><topic>Crassostrea gigas</topic><topic>Ecological modeling</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Macoma nasuta</topic><topic>Macoma secta</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Oysters</topic><topic>Palps</topic><topic>Proboscis</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Yoldia limatula</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levinton, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, J. Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Raymond J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Invertebrate biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levinton, Jeffrey S.</au><au>Ward, J. Evan</au><au>Thompson, Raymond J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biodynamics of Particle Processing in Bivalve Molluscs: Models, Data, and Future Directions</atitle><jtitle>Invertebrate biology</jtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>232</spage><epage>242</epage><pages>232-242</pages><issn>1077-8306</issn><eissn>1744-7410</eissn><abstract>Previous models of particle feeding have focused on optimal solutions for particle acquisition or absorption. We propose two conceptual approaches to treat particle feeders as an integrated system of compartments, in hopes of understanding critical limiting factors that might be overlooked by focusing on only one part. The compartment model treats a particle feeder as a series of structures that process particles, with characteristic residence times within compartments and transfer points between them. These might change with overall particle food value and proportion of poor particles. As a non-exclusive alternative, the pathway model considers particle transfer as being analogous to enzyme control systems, with feedback loops that may involve interactions such as negative feedback between compartments that engage in no direct transfer. We examine these models in the light of some studies of particle handling by the deposit-feeding bivalves Yoldia limatula, Macoma secta, and M. nasuta, and the suspension-feeding oyster Crassostrea gigas. In Y. limatula, palp overloading results in feedback that shuts down the particle-collecting palp proboscis. In Macoma, nearly all particles are rejected, suggesting that rejection is necessary because digestion and gut residence time are limiting factors. We suggest that a whole-system approach is important in understanding particle processing by deposit feeders and suspension feeders.</abstract><pub>American Microscopical Society, Inc</pub><doi>10.2307/3226933</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1077-8306 |
ispartof | Invertebrate biology, 1996-01, Vol.115 (3), p.232-242 |
issn | 1077-8306 1744-7410 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15648039 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Animal organs Chemical suspensions Crassostrea gigas Ecological modeling Enzymes Food Macoma nasuta Macoma secta Marine Mollusks Oysters Palps Proboscis Sediments Yoldia limatula |
title | Biodynamics of Particle Processing in Bivalve Molluscs: Models, Data, and Future Directions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A32%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biodynamics%20of%20Particle%20Processing%20in%20Bivalve%20Molluscs:%20Models,%20Data,%20and%20Future%20Directions&rft.jtitle=Invertebrate%20biology&rft.au=Levinton,%20Jeffrey%20S.&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=232&rft.epage=242&rft.pages=232-242&rft.issn=1077-8306&rft.eissn=1744-7410&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3226933&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3226933%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15648039&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3226933&rfr_iscdi=true |