Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review
Abstract Bone quality and quantity are important factors with regard to the survival rate of dental implants. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of dental implants inserted in low-density bone and to determine the survival rate of dental implants with surface treatments over ti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2014-09, Vol.43 (9), p.1108-1116 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1116 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1108 |
| container_title | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery |
| container_volume | 43 |
| creator | Goiato, M.C dos Santos, D.M Jr. Santiago, J.F Moreno, A Pellizzer, E.P |
| description | Abstract Bone quality and quantity are important factors with regard to the survival rate of dental implants. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of dental implants inserted in low-density bone and to determine the survival rate of dental implants with surface treatments over time. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken by two independent individuals; the Medline/PubMed database was searched for the period July 1975 to March 2013. Relevant reports on bone quality and osseointegration of dental implants were selected. The search retrieved 1018 references, and after inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 19 studies were selected for review. A total of 3937 patients, who had received a total of 12,465 dental implants, were analyzed. The survival rates of dental implants according to the bone density were: type I, 97.6%; type II, 96.2%; type III, 96.5%; and type IV, 88.8%. The survival rate of treated surface implants inserted in low-density bone was higher (97.1%) than that of machined surface implants (91.6%). Surface-treated dental implants inserted in low-density bone have a high survival rate and may be indicated for oral rehabilitation. However, more randomized studies are required to better evaluate this issue. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.016 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1564602053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0901502714000976</els_id><sourcerecordid>1564602053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-39d80b4cfad5901f1dec0a08808340fbb89c1d38b0333fb6f8337d3a4af164993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBCILoU_wAH5yCXhOfYmNkJIVQVtpZU48HG1HPsZOSTxEnuL8u9xtIUDB05PGs2M3swQ8pJBzYC1b4Y6DHGqG2CihqYu0COyY1ypCqCBx2QHCli1h6a7IM9SGgBAcdk9JReNaDslRbMjV4c4f8f7kFcaPXU4ZzPSMB1HM-dEw0zzekR69432cca31NC0poyTycHSpejw13PyxJsx4YuHe0m-fvzw5fq2Ony6ubu-OlRWSJYrrpyEXlhv3L685ZlDCwakBMkF-L6XyjLHZQ-cc9-3XnLeOW6E8awVSvFL8vrse1zizxOmrKeQLI7lU4ynpNm-FW3JveeF2pypdokpLej1cQmTWVbNQG_V6UFv1emtOg2NLlARvXrwP_UTur-SP10VwrszAUvKknzRyQacLbqwoM3axfB___f_yO0Y5mDN-ANXTEM8LXPpTzOdikB_3sbbtmNi261r-W8UP5NQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1564602053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Goiato, M.C ; dos Santos, D.M ; Jr. Santiago, J.F ; Moreno, A ; Pellizzer, E.P</creator><creatorcontrib>Goiato, M.C ; dos Santos, D.M ; Jr. Santiago, J.F ; Moreno, A ; Pellizzer, E.P</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Bone quality and quantity are important factors with regard to the survival rate of dental implants. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of dental implants inserted in low-density bone and to determine the survival rate of dental implants with surface treatments over time. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken by two independent individuals; the Medline/PubMed database was searched for the period July 1975 to March 2013. Relevant reports on bone quality and osseointegration of dental implants were selected. The search retrieved 1018 references, and after inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 19 studies were selected for review. A total of 3937 patients, who had received a total of 12,465 dental implants, were analyzed. The survival rates of dental implants according to the bone density were: type I, 97.6%; type II, 96.2%; type III, 96.5%; and type IV, 88.8%. The survival rate of treated surface implants inserted in low-density bone was higher (97.1%) than that of machined surface implants (91.6%). Surface-treated dental implants inserted in low-density bone have a high survival rate and may be indicated for oral rehabilitation. However, more randomized studies are required to better evaluate this issue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0901-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24679842</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>alveolar bone ; Bone Density ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous ; Dental Implants ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dental Prosthesis Retention ; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported ; Dental Restoration Failure ; Dentistry ; Humans ; implant-supported dental prosthesis ; Osseointegration ; randomized controlled trial ; Surface Properties ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2014-09, Vol.43 (9), p.1108-1116</ispartof><rights>International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2014 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-39d80b4cfad5901f1dec0a08808340fbb89c1d38b0333fb6f8337d3a4af164993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-39d80b4cfad5901f1dec0a08808340fbb89c1d38b0333fb6f8337d3a4af164993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24679842$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goiato, M.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, D.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jr. Santiago, J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellizzer, E.P</creatorcontrib><title>Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review</title><title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Bone quality and quantity are important factors with regard to the survival rate of dental implants. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of dental implants inserted in low-density bone and to determine the survival rate of dental implants with surface treatments over time. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken by two independent individuals; the Medline/PubMed database was searched for the period July 1975 to March 2013. Relevant reports on bone quality and osseointegration of dental implants were selected. The search retrieved 1018 references, and after inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 19 studies were selected for review. A total of 3937 patients, who had received a total of 12,465 dental implants, were analyzed. The survival rates of dental implants according to the bone density were: type I, 97.6%; type II, 96.2%; type III, 96.5%; and type IV, 88.8%. The survival rate of treated surface implants inserted in low-density bone was higher (97.1%) than that of machined surface implants (91.6%). Surface-treated dental implants inserted in low-density bone have a high survival rate and may be indicated for oral rehabilitation. However, more randomized studies are required to better evaluate this issue.</description><subject>alveolar bone</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Retention</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Failure</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implant-supported dental prosthesis</subject><subject>Osseointegration</subject><subject>randomized controlled trial</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0901-5027</issn><issn>1399-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBCILoU_wAH5yCXhOfYmNkJIVQVtpZU48HG1HPsZOSTxEnuL8u9xtIUDB05PGs2M3swQ8pJBzYC1b4Y6DHGqG2CihqYu0COyY1ypCqCBx2QHCli1h6a7IM9SGgBAcdk9JReNaDslRbMjV4c4f8f7kFcaPXU4ZzPSMB1HM-dEw0zzekR69432cca31NC0poyTycHSpejw13PyxJsx4YuHe0m-fvzw5fq2Ony6ubu-OlRWSJYrrpyEXlhv3L685ZlDCwakBMkF-L6XyjLHZQ-cc9-3XnLeOW6E8awVSvFL8vrse1zizxOmrKeQLI7lU4ynpNm-FW3JveeF2pypdokpLej1cQmTWVbNQG_V6UFv1emtOg2NLlARvXrwP_UTur-SP10VwrszAUvKknzRyQacLbqwoM3axfB___f_yO0Y5mDN-ANXTEM8LXPpTzOdikB_3sbbtmNi261r-W8UP5NQ</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Goiato, M.C</creator><creator>dos Santos, D.M</creator><creator>Jr. Santiago, J.F</creator><creator>Moreno, A</creator><creator>Pellizzer, E.P</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review</title><author>Goiato, M.C ; dos Santos, D.M ; Jr. Santiago, J.F ; Moreno, A ; Pellizzer, E.P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-39d80b4cfad5901f1dec0a08808340fbb89c1d38b0333fb6f8337d3a4af164993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>alveolar bone</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Retention</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Failure</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implant-supported dental prosthesis</topic><topic>Osseointegration</topic><topic>randomized controlled trial</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goiato, M.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, D.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jr. Santiago, J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellizzer, E.P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goiato, M.C</au><au>dos Santos, D.M</au><au>Jr. Santiago, J.F</au><au>Moreno, A</au><au>Pellizzer, E.P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1108</spage><epage>1116</epage><pages>1108-1116</pages><issn>0901-5027</issn><eissn>1399-0020</eissn><abstract>Abstract Bone quality and quantity are important factors with regard to the survival rate of dental implants. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of dental implants inserted in low-density bone and to determine the survival rate of dental implants with surface treatments over time. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken by two independent individuals; the Medline/PubMed database was searched for the period July 1975 to March 2013. Relevant reports on bone quality and osseointegration of dental implants were selected. The search retrieved 1018 references, and after inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 19 studies were selected for review. A total of 3937 patients, who had received a total of 12,465 dental implants, were analyzed. The survival rates of dental implants according to the bone density were: type I, 97.6%; type II, 96.2%; type III, 96.5%; and type IV, 88.8%. The survival rate of treated surface implants inserted in low-density bone was higher (97.1%) than that of machined surface implants (91.6%). Surface-treated dental implants inserted in low-density bone have a high survival rate and may be indicated for oral rehabilitation. However, more randomized studies are required to better evaluate this issue.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24679842</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.016</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0901-5027 |
| ispartof | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2014-09, Vol.43 (9), p.1108-1116 |
| issn | 0901-5027 1399-0020 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1564602053 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | alveolar bone Bone Density Dental Implantation, Endosseous Dental Implants Dental Prosthesis Design Dental Prosthesis Retention Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported Dental Restoration Failure Dentistry Humans implant-supported dental prosthesis Osseointegration randomized controlled trial Surface Properties Surgery |
| title | Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T11%3A26%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Longevity%20of%20dental%20implants%20in%20type%20IV%20bone:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Goiato,%20M.C&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1108&rft.epage=1116&rft.pages=1108-1116&rft.issn=0901-5027&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1564602053%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1564602053&rft_id=info:pmid/24679842&rft_els_id=S0901502714000976&rfr_iscdi=true |