Perception of degraded speech sounds differs in chinchilla and human listeners

The behavioral responses of chinchillas to noise-vocoded versions of naturally spoken speech sounds were measured using stimulus generalization and operant conditioning. Behavioral performance for speech generalization by chinchillas is compared to recognition by a group of human listeners for the i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2014-04, Vol.135 (4), p.2065-2077
1. Verfasser: Shofner, William P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2077
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2065
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 135
creator Shofner, William P
description The behavioral responses of chinchillas to noise-vocoded versions of naturally spoken speech sounds were measured using stimulus generalization and operant conditioning. Behavioral performance for speech generalization by chinchillas is compared to recognition by a group of human listeners for the identical speech sounds. The ability of chinchillas to generalize the vocoded versions as tokens of the natural speech sounds is far less than recognition by human listeners. In many cases, responses of chinchillas to noise-vocoded speech sounds were more similar to responses to band limited noise than to the responses to natural speech sounds. Chinchillas were also tested with a middle C musical note as played on a piano. Comparison of the responses of chinchillas for the middle C condition to the responses obtained for the speech conditions suggest that chinchillas may be more influenced by fundamental frequency than by formant structure. The differences between vocoded speech perception in chinchillas and human listeners may reflect differences in their abilities to resolve the formants along the cochlea. It is argued that lengthening of the cochlea during human evolution may have provided one of the auditory mechanisms that influenced the evolution of speech-specific mechanisms.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.4867362
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1563983975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1563983975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-109ceb580a530dc825692cc83652b156911bd550e783f360c3f1a8694e76adda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68A9IjnromkmaND2K-AWLetBzSZOpW2nTmrQH_72RXT0MwwsPLzMPIefA1gAcrmGda1UIxQ_IEiRnmZY8PyRLxhhkeanUgpzE-Jmi1KI8JgsuuZCM5Uvy_IrB4ji1g6dDQx1-BOPQ0Tgi2i2Nw-xdpK5tGgyRtp7abevTdJ2hxju6nXvjadfGCX0iTslRY7qIZ_u9Iu_3d2-3j9nm5eHp9maTWSFhyoCVFmupmZGCOau5VCW3VgsleQ0pANROSoaFFo1QzIoGjFZljoUyzhmxIpe73jEMXzPGqerbaDFd5XGYY5U6RJl-LWRCr3aoDUOMAZtqDG1vwncFrPrVV0G115fYi33tXPfo_sk_X-IHzvZo8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1563983975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perception of degraded speech sounds differs in chinchilla and human listeners</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Shofner, William P</creator><creatorcontrib>Shofner, William P</creatorcontrib><description>The behavioral responses of chinchillas to noise-vocoded versions of naturally spoken speech sounds were measured using stimulus generalization and operant conditioning. Behavioral performance for speech generalization by chinchillas is compared to recognition by a group of human listeners for the identical speech sounds. The ability of chinchillas to generalize the vocoded versions as tokens of the natural speech sounds is far less than recognition by human listeners. In many cases, responses of chinchillas to noise-vocoded speech sounds were more similar to responses to band limited noise than to the responses to natural speech sounds. Chinchillas were also tested with a middle C musical note as played on a piano. Comparison of the responses of chinchillas for the middle C condition to the responses obtained for the speech conditions suggest that chinchillas may be more influenced by fundamental frequency than by formant structure. The differences between vocoded speech perception in chinchillas and human listeners may reflect differences in their abilities to resolve the formants along the cochlea. It is argued that lengthening of the cochlea during human evolution may have provided one of the auditory mechanisms that influenced the evolution of speech-specific mechanisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.4867362</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25235004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Animals ; Audiometry, Speech ; Auditory Perception ; Chinchilla - psychology ; Conditioning, Operant ; Cues ; Generalization (Psychology) ; Humans ; Psychoacoustics ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Sound Spectrography ; Speech Perception</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014-04, Vol.135 (4), p.2065-2077</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-109ceb580a530dc825692cc83652b156911bd550e783f360c3f1a8694e76adda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-109ceb580a530dc825692cc83652b156911bd550e783f360c3f1a8694e76adda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25235004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shofner, William P</creatorcontrib><title>Perception of degraded speech sounds differs in chinchilla and human listeners</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>The behavioral responses of chinchillas to noise-vocoded versions of naturally spoken speech sounds were measured using stimulus generalization and operant conditioning. Behavioral performance for speech generalization by chinchillas is compared to recognition by a group of human listeners for the identical speech sounds. The ability of chinchillas to generalize the vocoded versions as tokens of the natural speech sounds is far less than recognition by human listeners. In many cases, responses of chinchillas to noise-vocoded speech sounds were more similar to responses to band limited noise than to the responses to natural speech sounds. Chinchillas were also tested with a middle C musical note as played on a piano. Comparison of the responses of chinchillas for the middle C condition to the responses obtained for the speech conditions suggest that chinchillas may be more influenced by fundamental frequency than by formant structure. The differences between vocoded speech perception in chinchillas and human listeners may reflect differences in their abilities to resolve the formants along the cochlea. It is argued that lengthening of the cochlea during human evolution may have provided one of the auditory mechanisms that influenced the evolution of speech-specific mechanisms.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Audiometry, Speech</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Chinchilla - psychology</subject><subject>Conditioning, Operant</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Generalization (Psychology)</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Psychoacoustics</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sound Spectrography</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68A9IjnromkmaND2K-AWLetBzSZOpW2nTmrQH_72RXT0MwwsPLzMPIefA1gAcrmGda1UIxQ_IEiRnmZY8PyRLxhhkeanUgpzE-Jmi1KI8JgsuuZCM5Uvy_IrB4ji1g6dDQx1-BOPQ0Tgi2i2Nw-xdpK5tGgyRtp7abevTdJ2hxju6nXvjadfGCX0iTslRY7qIZ_u9Iu_3d2-3j9nm5eHp9maTWSFhyoCVFmupmZGCOau5VCW3VgsleQ0pANROSoaFFo1QzIoGjFZljoUyzhmxIpe73jEMXzPGqerbaDFd5XGYY5U6RJl-LWRCr3aoDUOMAZtqDG1vwncFrPrVV0G115fYi33tXPfo_sk_X-IHzvZo8A</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Shofner, William P</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Perception of degraded speech sounds differs in chinchilla and human listeners</title><author>Shofner, William P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-109ceb580a530dc825692cc83652b156911bd550e783f360c3f1a8694e76adda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Audiometry, Speech</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Chinchilla - psychology</topic><topic>Conditioning, Operant</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Generalization (Psychology)</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Psychoacoustics</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sound Spectrography</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shofner, William P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shofner, William P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perception of degraded speech sounds differs in chinchilla and human listeners</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>135</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2065</spage><epage>2077</epage><pages>2065-2077</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>The behavioral responses of chinchillas to noise-vocoded versions of naturally spoken speech sounds were measured using stimulus generalization and operant conditioning. Behavioral performance for speech generalization by chinchillas is compared to recognition by a group of human listeners for the identical speech sounds. The ability of chinchillas to generalize the vocoded versions as tokens of the natural speech sounds is far less than recognition by human listeners. In many cases, responses of chinchillas to noise-vocoded speech sounds were more similar to responses to band limited noise than to the responses to natural speech sounds. Chinchillas were also tested with a middle C musical note as played on a piano. Comparison of the responses of chinchillas for the middle C condition to the responses obtained for the speech conditions suggest that chinchillas may be more influenced by fundamental frequency than by formant structure. The differences between vocoded speech perception in chinchillas and human listeners may reflect differences in their abilities to resolve the formants along the cochlea. It is argued that lengthening of the cochlea during human evolution may have provided one of the auditory mechanisms that influenced the evolution of speech-specific mechanisms.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>25235004</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.4867362</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014-04, Vol.135 (4), p.2065-2077
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1563983975
source MEDLINE; AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America
subjects Acoustic Stimulation
Animals
Audiometry, Speech
Auditory Perception
Chinchilla - psychology
Conditioning, Operant
Cues
Generalization (Psychology)
Humans
Psychoacoustics
Recognition (Psychology)
Sound Spectrography
Speech Perception
title Perception of degraded speech sounds differs in chinchilla and human listeners
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T07%3A06%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perception%20of%20degraded%20speech%20sounds%20differs%20in%20chinchilla%20and%20human%20listeners&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Shofner,%20William%20P&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=135&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2065&rft.epage=2077&rft.pages=2065-2077&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.4867362&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1563983975%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1563983975&rft_id=info:pmid/25235004&rfr_iscdi=true