Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Modular Cementless Femoral Stem

Abstract We retrospectively reviewed 123 patients who underwent cementless THA with modular femoral stem designs for revision THA or conversion of failed ORIF and found 75 patients available for analysis. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 52 ± 14 to 86 ± 11 ( P < 0.001). The femoral stem w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2014-09, Vol.29 (9), p.1803-1807
Hauptverfasser: Pelt, Christoper E., MD, Madsen, Wes, MD, Erickson, Jill A., PA-C, Gililland, Jeremy M., MD, Anderson, Mike B., MS ATC, Peters, Christopher L., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1807
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1803
container_title The Journal of arthroplasty
container_volume 29
creator Pelt, Christoper E., MD
Madsen, Wes, MD
Erickson, Jill A., PA-C
Gililland, Jeremy M., MD
Anderson, Mike B., MS ATC
Peters, Christopher L., MD
description Abstract We retrospectively reviewed 123 patients who underwent cementless THA with modular femoral stem designs for revision THA or conversion of failed ORIF and found 75 patients available for analysis. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 52 ± 14 to 86 ± 11 ( P < 0.001). The femoral stem was re-revised in eight patients (11%). The mean time to re-revision was 1.1 years (0.13–2.54). Reasons for re-revision included infection (n = 5, 7%), aseptic loosening (n = 2, 3%) and significant pain (n = 1, 1%). There were no failures of the modular junctions. PC stems had an increased rate of intraoperative fractures (PC 28% vs. STS 9%, P = 0.04). Modular cementless femoral stems provide acceptable mid-term results in revision THA.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.042
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1562441538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540314003003</els_id><sourcerecordid>1562441538</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-85c7bc2336f2653589cdc6af0f29fdd1bb0bd7c599c98f78417d35186ae3d1933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9r3DAUxEVoSTZpvkAPxcdevNVfrwwhEJZsUkgpNCk5Cll6JtrK1kaSA_vtI7NpDj0UBt5lZuD9BqHPBC8JJs237VLH_LSkmPAlnkWP0IIIRmvJcfMBLbCUrBYcsxN0mtIWY0KE4MfohPKWtlSyBdr8gheXXBirh5C1r27drroqrTHsvE55Xz26_FTp6kewk9exWsMAY_aQUrWBIcQSuc8wfEIfe-0TnL_dM_R7c_2wvq3vft58X1_d1YZLkmspzKozlLGmp41gQrbGmkb3uKdtby3pOtzZlRFta1rZryQnK8sEkY0GZknL2Bn6eujdxfA8QcpqcMmA93qEMCVFREM5LwxksdKD1cSQUoRe7aIbdNwrgtXMT23VzE_N_BSeRUvoy1v_1A1g3yN_gRXDxcEA5csXB1El42A0YF0Ek5UN7v_9l__EjXejM9r_gT2kbZjiWPgpohJVWN3PC84DEo4xK2KvsDeVUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1562441538</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Modular Cementless Femoral Stem</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Pelt, Christoper E., MD ; Madsen, Wes, MD ; Erickson, Jill A., PA-C ; Gililland, Jeremy M., MD ; Anderson, Mike B., MS ATC ; Peters, Christopher L., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Pelt, Christoper E., MD ; Madsen, Wes, MD ; Erickson, Jill A., PA-C ; Gililland, Jeremy M., MD ; Anderson, Mike B., MS ATC ; Peters, Christopher L., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract We retrospectively reviewed 123 patients who underwent cementless THA with modular femoral stem designs for revision THA or conversion of failed ORIF and found 75 patients available for analysis. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 52 ± 14 to 86 ± 11 ( P &lt; 0.001). The femoral stem was re-revised in eight patients (11%). The mean time to re-revision was 1.1 years (0.13–2.54). Reasons for re-revision included infection (n = 5, 7%), aseptic loosening (n = 2, 3%) and significant pain (n = 1, 1%). There were no failures of the modular junctions. PC stems had an increased rate of intraoperative fractures (PC 28% vs. STS 9%, P = 0.04). Modular cementless femoral stems provide acceptable mid-term results in revision THA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24929283</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - mortality ; cementless femoral stem ; Female ; Femur ; Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging ; Femur Neck - surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; modular femoral stem ; Orthopedics ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Radiography ; Reoperation - methods ; Reoperation - mortality ; Retrospective Studies ; revision total hip arthroplasty ; taper junction ; total hip arthroplasty ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2014-09, Vol.29 (9), p.1803-1807</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-85c7bc2336f2653589cdc6af0f29fdd1bb0bd7c599c98f78417d35186ae3d1933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-85c7bc2336f2653589cdc6af0f29fdd1bb0bd7c599c98f78417d35186ae3d1933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.042$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24929283$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pelt, Christoper E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Wes, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Jill A., PA-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gililland, Jeremy M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Mike B., MS ATC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Christopher L., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Modular Cementless Femoral Stem</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>Abstract We retrospectively reviewed 123 patients who underwent cementless THA with modular femoral stem designs for revision THA or conversion of failed ORIF and found 75 patients available for analysis. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 52 ± 14 to 86 ± 11 ( P &lt; 0.001). The femoral stem was re-revised in eight patients (11%). The mean time to re-revision was 1.1 years (0.13–2.54). Reasons for re-revision included infection (n = 5, 7%), aseptic loosening (n = 2, 3%) and significant pain (n = 1, 1%). There were no failures of the modular junctions. PC stems had an increased rate of intraoperative fractures (PC 28% vs. STS 9%, P = 0.04). Modular cementless femoral stems provide acceptable mid-term results in revision THA.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - mortality</subject><subject>cementless femoral stem</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur Neck - surgery</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>modular femoral stem</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Reoperation - methods</subject><subject>Reoperation - mortality</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>revision total hip arthroplasty</subject><subject>taper junction</subject><subject>total hip arthroplasty</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9r3DAUxEVoSTZpvkAPxcdevNVfrwwhEJZsUkgpNCk5Cll6JtrK1kaSA_vtI7NpDj0UBt5lZuD9BqHPBC8JJs237VLH_LSkmPAlnkWP0IIIRmvJcfMBLbCUrBYcsxN0mtIWY0KE4MfohPKWtlSyBdr8gheXXBirh5C1r27drroqrTHsvE55Xz26_FTp6kewk9exWsMAY_aQUrWBIcQSuc8wfEIfe-0TnL_dM_R7c_2wvq3vft58X1_d1YZLkmspzKozlLGmp41gQrbGmkb3uKdtby3pOtzZlRFta1rZryQnK8sEkY0GZknL2Bn6eujdxfA8QcpqcMmA93qEMCVFREM5LwxksdKD1cSQUoRe7aIbdNwrgtXMT23VzE_N_BSeRUvoy1v_1A1g3yN_gRXDxcEA5csXB1El42A0YF0Ek5UN7v_9l__EjXejM9r_gT2kbZjiWPgpohJVWN3PC84DEo4xK2KvsDeVUg</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Pelt, Christoper E., MD</creator><creator>Madsen, Wes, MD</creator><creator>Erickson, Jill A., PA-C</creator><creator>Gililland, Jeremy M., MD</creator><creator>Anderson, Mike B., MS ATC</creator><creator>Peters, Christopher L., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Modular Cementless Femoral Stem</title><author>Pelt, Christoper E., MD ; Madsen, Wes, MD ; Erickson, Jill A., PA-C ; Gililland, Jeremy M., MD ; Anderson, Mike B., MS ATC ; Peters, Christopher L., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-85c7bc2336f2653589cdc6af0f29fdd1bb0bd7c599c98f78417d35186ae3d1933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - mortality</topic><topic>cementless femoral stem</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur Neck - surgery</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>modular femoral stem</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Reoperation - methods</topic><topic>Reoperation - mortality</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>revision total hip arthroplasty</topic><topic>taper junction</topic><topic>total hip arthroplasty</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pelt, Christoper E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Wes, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Jill A., PA-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gililland, Jeremy M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Mike B., MS ATC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Christopher L., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pelt, Christoper E., MD</au><au>Madsen, Wes, MD</au><au>Erickson, Jill A., PA-C</au><au>Gililland, Jeremy M., MD</au><au>Anderson, Mike B., MS ATC</au><au>Peters, Christopher L., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Modular Cementless Femoral Stem</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1803</spage><epage>1807</epage><pages>1803-1807</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>Abstract We retrospectively reviewed 123 patients who underwent cementless THA with modular femoral stem designs for revision THA or conversion of failed ORIF and found 75 patients available for analysis. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 52 ± 14 to 86 ± 11 ( P &lt; 0.001). The femoral stem was re-revised in eight patients (11%). The mean time to re-revision was 1.1 years (0.13–2.54). Reasons for re-revision included infection (n = 5, 7%), aseptic loosening (n = 2, 3%) and significant pain (n = 1, 1%). There were no failures of the modular junctions. PC stems had an increased rate of intraoperative fractures (PC 28% vs. STS 9%, P = 0.04). Modular cementless femoral stems provide acceptable mid-term results in revision THA.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24929283</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.042</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-5403
ispartof The Journal of arthroplasty, 2014-09, Vol.29 (9), p.1803-1807
issn 0883-5403
1532-8406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1562441538
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - mortality
cementless femoral stem
Female
Femur
Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging
Femur Neck - surgery
Follow-Up Studies
Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
modular femoral stem
Orthopedics
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Radiography
Reoperation - methods
Reoperation - mortality
Retrospective Studies
revision total hip arthroplasty
taper junction
total hip arthroplasty
Treatment Outcome
title Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Modular Cementless Femoral Stem
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T16%3A02%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revision%20Total%20Hip%20Arthroplasty%20With%20a%20Modular%20Cementless%20Femoral%20Stem&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Pelt,%20Christoper%20E.,%20MD&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1803&rft.epage=1807&rft.pages=1803-1807&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1562441538%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1562441538&rft_id=info:pmid/24929283&rft_els_id=S0883540314003003&rfr_iscdi=true