Reliability of Clinician Erythema Assessment grading scale
Background Facial erythema is a clinical hallmark of rosacea and often causes social and psychological distress. Although facial erythema assessments are a common endpoint in rosacea clinical trials, their reliability has not been evaluated. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2014-10, Vol.71 (4), p.760-763 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 763 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 760 |
container_title | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Tan, Jerry, MD Liu, Hong, PhD Leyden, James J., MD Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA |
description | Background Facial erythema is a clinical hallmark of rosacea and often causes social and psychological distress. Although facial erythema assessments are a common endpoint in rosacea clinical trials, their reliability has not been evaluated. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intrarater reliability of the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), a 5-point grading scale of facial erythema severity. Methods Twelve board-certified dermatologists, previously trained on use of the scale, rated erythema of 28 rosacea subjects twice on the same day. Interrater and intrarater agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation and κ statistic. Results The CEA had high interrater reliability and good intrarater reliability with an overall intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for session 1 and session 2 of 0.601 and 0.576, respectively; the overall weighted κ statistic for session 1 and session 2 was 0.692. Limitations Raters were experienced dermatologists and there may be a risk of recall bias. Conclusion When used by trained raters, CEA is a reliable scale for measuring the facial erythema of rosacea. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.05.044 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1562427744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0190962214015321</els_id><sourcerecordid>1562427744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-fbbca8be55a6172dac3040ed3332aa769cac53385ce0225e5b305fb47a84420c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtL5EAUhQtRtH38ARdDlm4Sb71SHZEBaXyBIPhYFzeVG61MHk5VeqD__XRsdeHC1d1858D9DmPHHDIOPD9tsgaxygRwlYHOQKktNuNQmDQ3c7PNZsALSItciD22H2MDAIWSZpftCVUUhTAwY2cP1HosfevHVTLUyaL1vXce--QyrMZX6jC5iJFi7Kgfk5eAle9fkuiwpUO2U2Mb6ejjHrDnq8unxU16d399u7i4S51SakzrsnQ4L0lrzLkRFToJCqiSUgpEkxcOnZZyrh2BEJp0KUHXpTI4V0qAkwfsZNP7Foa_S4qj7Xx01LbY07CMlutcKGGMUmtUbFAXhhgD1fYt-A7DynKwkzPb2MmZnZxZ0BbeQ78--pdlR9VX5FPSGjjfALT-8p-nYKPz1DuqfCA32mrwP_f__hZ375Kx_UMris2wDP3an-U2Cgv2cVptGo0r4FoKLv8DQCaRLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1562427744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of Clinician Erythema Assessment grading scale</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Tan, Jerry, MD ; Liu, Hong, PhD ; Leyden, James J., MD ; Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jerry, MD ; Liu, Hong, PhD ; Leyden, James J., MD ; Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA</creatorcontrib><description>Background Facial erythema is a clinical hallmark of rosacea and often causes social and psychological distress. Although facial erythema assessments are a common endpoint in rosacea clinical trials, their reliability has not been evaluated. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intrarater reliability of the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), a 5-point grading scale of facial erythema severity. Methods Twelve board-certified dermatologists, previously trained on use of the scale, rated erythema of 28 rosacea subjects twice on the same day. Interrater and intrarater agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation and κ statistic. Results The CEA had high interrater reliability and good intrarater reliability with an overall intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for session 1 and session 2 of 0.601 and 0.576, respectively; the overall weighted κ statistic for session 1 and session 2 was 0.692. Limitations Raters were experienced dermatologists and there may be a risk of recall bias. Conclusion When used by trained raters, CEA is a reliable scale for measuring the facial erythema of rosacea.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-9622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.05.044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24999270</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Clinical Competence ; Clinician Erythema Assessment ; Cohort Studies ; Dermatology ; Dermatology - methods ; erythema ; Erythema - diagnosis ; Facial Dermatoses - diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; rating scale ; Reproducibility of Results ; rosacea ; Rosacea - diagnosis ; scale validation ; Severity of Illness Index ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2014-10, Vol.71 (4), p.760-763</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.</rights><rights>2014 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-fbbca8be55a6172dac3040ed3332aa769cac53385ce0225e5b305fb47a84420c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-fbbca8be55a6172dac3040ed3332aa769cac53385ce0225e5b305fb47a84420c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2014.05.044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999270$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jerry, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hong, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyden, James J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of Clinician Erythema Assessment grading scale</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</title><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><description>Background Facial erythema is a clinical hallmark of rosacea and often causes social and psychological distress. Although facial erythema assessments are a common endpoint in rosacea clinical trials, their reliability has not been evaluated. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intrarater reliability of the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), a 5-point grading scale of facial erythema severity. Methods Twelve board-certified dermatologists, previously trained on use of the scale, rated erythema of 28 rosacea subjects twice on the same day. Interrater and intrarater agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation and κ statistic. Results The CEA had high interrater reliability and good intrarater reliability with an overall intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for session 1 and session 2 of 0.601 and 0.576, respectively; the overall weighted κ statistic for session 1 and session 2 was 0.692. Limitations Raters were experienced dermatologists and there may be a risk of recall bias. Conclusion When used by trained raters, CEA is a reliable scale for measuring the facial erythema of rosacea.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Clinician Erythema Assessment</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Dermatology - methods</subject><subject>erythema</subject><subject>Erythema - diagnosis</subject><subject>Facial Dermatoses - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>rating scale</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>rosacea</subject><subject>Rosacea - diagnosis</subject><subject>scale validation</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0190-9622</issn><issn>1097-6787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtL5EAUhQtRtH38ARdDlm4Sb71SHZEBaXyBIPhYFzeVG61MHk5VeqD__XRsdeHC1d1858D9DmPHHDIOPD9tsgaxygRwlYHOQKktNuNQmDQ3c7PNZsALSItciD22H2MDAIWSZpftCVUUhTAwY2cP1HosfevHVTLUyaL1vXce--QyrMZX6jC5iJFi7Kgfk5eAle9fkuiwpUO2U2Mb6ejjHrDnq8unxU16d399u7i4S51SakzrsnQ4L0lrzLkRFToJCqiSUgpEkxcOnZZyrh2BEJp0KUHXpTI4V0qAkwfsZNP7Foa_S4qj7Xx01LbY07CMlutcKGGMUmtUbFAXhhgD1fYt-A7DynKwkzPb2MmZnZxZ0BbeQ78--pdlR9VX5FPSGjjfALT-8p-nYKPz1DuqfCA32mrwP_f__hZ375Kx_UMris2wDP3an-U2Cgv2cVptGo0r4FoKLv8DQCaRLw</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Tan, Jerry, MD</creator><creator>Liu, Hong, PhD</creator><creator>Leyden, James J., MD</creator><creator>Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Reliability of Clinician Erythema Assessment grading scale</title><author>Tan, Jerry, MD ; Liu, Hong, PhD ; Leyden, James J., MD ; Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-fbbca8be55a6172dac3040ed3332aa769cac53385ce0225e5b305fb47a84420c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Clinician Erythema Assessment</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Dermatology - methods</topic><topic>erythema</topic><topic>Erythema - diagnosis</topic><topic>Facial Dermatoses - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>rating scale</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>rosacea</topic><topic>Rosacea - diagnosis</topic><topic>scale validation</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jerry, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hong, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyden, James J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Jerry, MD</au><au>Liu, Hong, PhD</au><au>Leyden, James J., MD</au><au>Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of Clinician Erythema Assessment grading scale</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>760</spage><epage>763</epage><pages>760-763</pages><issn>0190-9622</issn><eissn>1097-6787</eissn><abstract>Background Facial erythema is a clinical hallmark of rosacea and often causes social and psychological distress. Although facial erythema assessments are a common endpoint in rosacea clinical trials, their reliability has not been evaluated. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intrarater reliability of the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), a 5-point grading scale of facial erythema severity. Methods Twelve board-certified dermatologists, previously trained on use of the scale, rated erythema of 28 rosacea subjects twice on the same day. Interrater and intrarater agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation and κ statistic. Results The CEA had high interrater reliability and good intrarater reliability with an overall intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for session 1 and session 2 of 0.601 and 0.576, respectively; the overall weighted κ statistic for session 1 and session 2 was 0.692. Limitations Raters were experienced dermatologists and there may be a risk of recall bias. Conclusion When used by trained raters, CEA is a reliable scale for measuring the facial erythema of rosacea.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24999270</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jaad.2014.05.044</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0190-9622 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2014-10, Vol.71 (4), p.760-763 |
issn | 0190-9622 1097-6787 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1562427744 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Clinical Competence Clinician Erythema Assessment Cohort Studies Dermatology Dermatology - methods erythema Erythema - diagnosis Facial Dermatoses - diagnosis Female Humans Male Middle Aged Observer Variation rating scale Reproducibility of Results rosacea Rosacea - diagnosis scale validation Severity of Illness Index Young Adult |
title | Reliability of Clinician Erythema Assessment grading scale |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A21%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20Clinician%20Erythema%20Assessment%20grading%20scale&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology&rft.au=Tan,%20Jerry,%20MD&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=760&rft.epage=763&rft.pages=760-763&rft.issn=0190-9622&rft.eissn=1097-6787&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaad.2014.05.044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1562427744%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1562427744&rft_id=info:pmid/24999270&rft_els_id=S0190962214015321&rfr_iscdi=true |