Reliability of Clinician Erythema Assessment grading scale

Background Facial erythema is a clinical hallmark of rosacea and often causes social and psychological distress. Although facial erythema assessments are a common endpoint in rosacea clinical trials, their reliability has not been evaluated. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2014-10, Vol.71 (4), p.760-763
Hauptverfasser: Tan, Jerry, MD, Liu, Hong, PhD, Leyden, James J., MD, Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 763
container_issue 4
container_start_page 760
container_title Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
container_volume 71
creator Tan, Jerry, MD
Liu, Hong, PhD
Leyden, James J., MD
Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA
description Background Facial erythema is a clinical hallmark of rosacea and often causes social and psychological distress. Although facial erythema assessments are a common endpoint in rosacea clinical trials, their reliability has not been evaluated. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intrarater reliability of the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), a 5-point grading scale of facial erythema severity. Methods Twelve board-certified dermatologists, previously trained on use of the scale, rated erythema of 28 rosacea subjects twice on the same day. Interrater and intrarater agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation and κ statistic. Results The CEA had high interrater reliability and good intrarater reliability with an overall intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for session 1 and session 2 of 0.601 and 0.576, respectively; the overall weighted κ statistic for session 1 and session 2 was 0.692. Limitations Raters were experienced dermatologists and there may be a risk of recall bias. Conclusion When used by trained raters, CEA is a reliable scale for measuring the facial erythema of rosacea.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.05.044
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1562427744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0190962214015321</els_id><sourcerecordid>1562427744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-fbbca8be55a6172dac3040ed3332aa769cac53385ce0225e5b305fb47a84420c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtL5EAUhQtRtH38ARdDlm4Sb71SHZEBaXyBIPhYFzeVG61MHk5VeqD__XRsdeHC1d1858D9DmPHHDIOPD9tsgaxygRwlYHOQKktNuNQmDQ3c7PNZsALSItciD22H2MDAIWSZpftCVUUhTAwY2cP1HosfevHVTLUyaL1vXce--QyrMZX6jC5iJFi7Kgfk5eAle9fkuiwpUO2U2Mb6ejjHrDnq8unxU16d399u7i4S51SakzrsnQ4L0lrzLkRFToJCqiSUgpEkxcOnZZyrh2BEJp0KUHXpTI4V0qAkwfsZNP7Foa_S4qj7Xx01LbY07CMlutcKGGMUmtUbFAXhhgD1fYt-A7DynKwkzPb2MmZnZxZ0BbeQ78--pdlR9VX5FPSGjjfALT-8p-nYKPz1DuqfCA32mrwP_f__hZ375Kx_UMris2wDP3an-U2Cgv2cVptGo0r4FoKLv8DQCaRLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1562427744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of Clinician Erythema Assessment grading scale</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Tan, Jerry, MD ; Liu, Hong, PhD ; Leyden, James J., MD ; Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jerry, MD ; Liu, Hong, PhD ; Leyden, James J., MD ; Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA</creatorcontrib><description>Background Facial erythema is a clinical hallmark of rosacea and often causes social and psychological distress. Although facial erythema assessments are a common endpoint in rosacea clinical trials, their reliability has not been evaluated. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intrarater reliability of the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), a 5-point grading scale of facial erythema severity. Methods Twelve board-certified dermatologists, previously trained on use of the scale, rated erythema of 28 rosacea subjects twice on the same day. Interrater and intrarater agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation and κ statistic. Results The CEA had high interrater reliability and good intrarater reliability with an overall intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for session 1 and session 2 of 0.601 and 0.576, respectively; the overall weighted κ statistic for session 1 and session 2 was 0.692. Limitations Raters were experienced dermatologists and there may be a risk of recall bias. Conclusion When used by trained raters, CEA is a reliable scale for measuring the facial erythema of rosacea.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-9622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.05.044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24999270</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Clinical Competence ; Clinician Erythema Assessment ; Cohort Studies ; Dermatology ; Dermatology - methods ; erythema ; Erythema - diagnosis ; Facial Dermatoses - diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; rating scale ; Reproducibility of Results ; rosacea ; Rosacea - diagnosis ; scale validation ; Severity of Illness Index ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2014-10, Vol.71 (4), p.760-763</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.</rights><rights>2014 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-fbbca8be55a6172dac3040ed3332aa769cac53385ce0225e5b305fb47a84420c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-fbbca8be55a6172dac3040ed3332aa769cac53385ce0225e5b305fb47a84420c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2014.05.044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24999270$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jerry, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hong, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyden, James J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of Clinician Erythema Assessment grading scale</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</title><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><description>Background Facial erythema is a clinical hallmark of rosacea and often causes social and psychological distress. Although facial erythema assessments are a common endpoint in rosacea clinical trials, their reliability has not been evaluated. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intrarater reliability of the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), a 5-point grading scale of facial erythema severity. Methods Twelve board-certified dermatologists, previously trained on use of the scale, rated erythema of 28 rosacea subjects twice on the same day. Interrater and intrarater agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation and κ statistic. Results The CEA had high interrater reliability and good intrarater reliability with an overall intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for session 1 and session 2 of 0.601 and 0.576, respectively; the overall weighted κ statistic for session 1 and session 2 was 0.692. Limitations Raters were experienced dermatologists and there may be a risk of recall bias. Conclusion When used by trained raters, CEA is a reliable scale for measuring the facial erythema of rosacea.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Clinician Erythema Assessment</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Dermatology - methods</subject><subject>erythema</subject><subject>Erythema - diagnosis</subject><subject>Facial Dermatoses - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>rating scale</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>rosacea</subject><subject>Rosacea - diagnosis</subject><subject>scale validation</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0190-9622</issn><issn>1097-6787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtL5EAUhQtRtH38ARdDlm4Sb71SHZEBaXyBIPhYFzeVG61MHk5VeqD__XRsdeHC1d1858D9DmPHHDIOPD9tsgaxygRwlYHOQKktNuNQmDQ3c7PNZsALSItciD22H2MDAIWSZpftCVUUhTAwY2cP1HosfevHVTLUyaL1vXce--QyrMZX6jC5iJFi7Kgfk5eAle9fkuiwpUO2U2Mb6ejjHrDnq8unxU16d399u7i4S51SakzrsnQ4L0lrzLkRFToJCqiSUgpEkxcOnZZyrh2BEJp0KUHXpTI4V0qAkwfsZNP7Foa_S4qj7Xx01LbY07CMlutcKGGMUmtUbFAXhhgD1fYt-A7DynKwkzPb2MmZnZxZ0BbeQ78--pdlR9VX5FPSGjjfALT-8p-nYKPz1DuqfCA32mrwP_f__hZ375Kx_UMris2wDP3an-U2Cgv2cVptGo0r4FoKLv8DQCaRLw</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Tan, Jerry, MD</creator><creator>Liu, Hong, PhD</creator><creator>Leyden, James J., MD</creator><creator>Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Reliability of Clinician Erythema Assessment grading scale</title><author>Tan, Jerry, MD ; Liu, Hong, PhD ; Leyden, James J., MD ; Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-fbbca8be55a6172dac3040ed3332aa769cac53385ce0225e5b305fb47a84420c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Clinician Erythema Assessment</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Dermatology - methods</topic><topic>erythema</topic><topic>Erythema - diagnosis</topic><topic>Facial Dermatoses - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>rating scale</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>rosacea</topic><topic>Rosacea - diagnosis</topic><topic>scale validation</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jerry, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hong, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyden, James J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Jerry, MD</au><au>Liu, Hong, PhD</au><au>Leyden, James J., MD</au><au>Leoni, Matthew J., MD, MBA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of Clinician Erythema Assessment grading scale</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>760</spage><epage>763</epage><pages>760-763</pages><issn>0190-9622</issn><eissn>1097-6787</eissn><abstract>Background Facial erythema is a clinical hallmark of rosacea and often causes social and psychological distress. Although facial erythema assessments are a common endpoint in rosacea clinical trials, their reliability has not been evaluated. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intrarater reliability of the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), a 5-point grading scale of facial erythema severity. Methods Twelve board-certified dermatologists, previously trained on use of the scale, rated erythema of 28 rosacea subjects twice on the same day. Interrater and intrarater agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation and κ statistic. Results The CEA had high interrater reliability and good intrarater reliability with an overall intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for session 1 and session 2 of 0.601 and 0.576, respectively; the overall weighted κ statistic for session 1 and session 2 was 0.692. Limitations Raters were experienced dermatologists and there may be a risk of recall bias. Conclusion When used by trained raters, CEA is a reliable scale for measuring the facial erythema of rosacea.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24999270</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jaad.2014.05.044</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0190-9622
ispartof Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2014-10, Vol.71 (4), p.760-763
issn 0190-9622
1097-6787
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1562427744
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Clinical Competence
Clinician Erythema Assessment
Cohort Studies
Dermatology
Dermatology - methods
erythema
Erythema - diagnosis
Facial Dermatoses - diagnosis
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
rating scale
Reproducibility of Results
rosacea
Rosacea - diagnosis
scale validation
Severity of Illness Index
Young Adult
title Reliability of Clinician Erythema Assessment grading scale
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A21%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20Clinician%20Erythema%20Assessment%20grading%20scale&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology&rft.au=Tan,%20Jerry,%20MD&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=760&rft.epage=763&rft.pages=760-763&rft.issn=0190-9622&rft.eissn=1097-6787&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaad.2014.05.044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1562427744%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1562427744&rft_id=info:pmid/24999270&rft_els_id=S0190962214015321&rfr_iscdi=true