The mutual constitution of risk and inequalities: intersectional risk theory
In this article, we examine the conceptual importance of integrating risk and intersectionality theory for the study of how risk and various forms of inequality intersect and are mutually constitutive. We argue that an intersectional perspective can advance risk research by incorporating more effect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health, risk & society risk & society, 2014-07, Vol.16 (5), p.417-430 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 430 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 417 |
container_title | Health, risk & society |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Olofsson, Anna Zinn, Jens O. Griffin, Gabriele Nygren, Katarina Giritli Cebulla, Andreas Hannah-Moffat, Kelly |
description | In this article, we examine the conceptual importance of integrating risk and intersectionality theory for the study of how risk and various forms of inequality intersect and are mutually constitutive. We argue that an intersectional perspective can advance risk research by incorporating more effectively the role of such social categories as gender and race into the analysis of 'risk' as an empirical phenomenon. In doing so, the intersectional perspective articulates more clearly the connection between the social construction of risk and, on the one hand, the reproduction of new and complex social inequalities and, on the other, intersections of social class, gender, ethnicity and other social categorisations. We trace the intellectual division between risk and feminist-inspired intersectionality research, showing how these approaches can be aligned to study, for example, risk-based welfare and social policy. We use a discussion of general directions within welfare policy to illustrate how an intersectional perspective can be used to show the ways in which new governance strategies create new divisions and reproduce existing forms of social inequality. We conclude the article with a call for a new research agenda to integrate intersectional frameworks with risk theory in order to provide a more nuanced analysis of the relationship between social inequality and risk. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13698575.2014.942258 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1562144287</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1562144287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c651t-fe56b049d70829c78c5a5a3780d94a55a3947c5054ab8d3edb682fb88f3dfe053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ktv1DAQAOAIgURZ-AccIiEkDs12_IzNBVWlhUor9dJytRzHoS7ZeOuHqv33OE3bAwfak8fyN36Mp6o-IlgjEHCECJeCtWyNAdG1pBgz8ao6QJTLRhCCXpeYzHExb6t3Md4AAAJCD6rN5bWttzllPdbGTzG5lJPzU-2HOrj4p9ZTX7vJ3hbgkrPxa5klG6I1MytZ9ypdWx_276s3gx6j_fAwrqqrs9PLk5_N5uLH-cnxpjGcodQMlvEOqOxbEFiaVhimmSatgF5SzUooaWsYMKo70RPbd1zgoRNiIP1ggZFVdbjsG-_sLndqF9xWh73y2qnv7tex8uG3ylnhVuLy_lXVPM-3Lk8K45ZC8V8Wvwv-NtuYymI0dhz1ZH2OCnEOgBHIl1LAkj5PGeeCciblSyhGlGLRFvrpH3rjcyj_MitGUAsM5mvSRZngYwx2eKoBAjW3kHpsITW3kFpaqKR9fthcR6PHIejJuPiUi4WglN4X-Nvi3DT4sNV3Poy9Sno_-vCYRP570l9Ln9ho</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1553170500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The mutual constitution of risk and inequalities: intersectional risk theory</title><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Olofsson, Anna ; Zinn, Jens O. ; Griffin, Gabriele ; Nygren, Katarina Giritli ; Cebulla, Andreas ; Hannah-Moffat, Kelly</creator><creatorcontrib>Olofsson, Anna ; Zinn, Jens O. ; Griffin, Gabriele ; Nygren, Katarina Giritli ; Cebulla, Andreas ; Hannah-Moffat, Kelly</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, we examine the conceptual importance of integrating risk and intersectionality theory for the study of how risk and various forms of inequality intersect and are mutually constitutive. We argue that an intersectional perspective can advance risk research by incorporating more effectively the role of such social categories as gender and race into the analysis of 'risk' as an empirical phenomenon. In doing so, the intersectional perspective articulates more clearly the connection between the social construction of risk and, on the one hand, the reproduction of new and complex social inequalities and, on the other, intersections of social class, gender, ethnicity and other social categorisations. We trace the intellectual division between risk and feminist-inspired intersectionality research, showing how these approaches can be aligned to study, for example, risk-based welfare and social policy. We use a discussion of general directions within welfare policy to illustrate how an intersectional perspective can be used to show the ways in which new governance strategies create new divisions and reproduce existing forms of social inequality. We conclude the article with a call for a new research agenda to integrate intersectional frameworks with risk theory in order to provide a more nuanced analysis of the relationship between social inequality and risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-8575</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1469-8331</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13698575.2014.942258</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Ethnicity ; Gender ; Gender Studies ; Genusvetenskap ; Governance ; Inequality ; Intellectuals ; intersectionality ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Race ; Risk ; Risk factors ; Risk theory ; Sex ; Social Class ; Social Constructionism ; Social Inequality ; Social Policy</subject><ispartof>Health, risk & society, 2014-07, Vol.16 (5), p.417-430</ispartof><rights>2014 Taylor & Francis 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c651t-fe56b049d70829c78c5a5a3780d94a55a3947c5054ab8d3edb682fb88f3dfe053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c651t-fe56b049d70829c78c5a5a3780d94a55a3947c5054ab8d3edb682fb88f3dfe053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,552,780,784,885,27924,27925,33774,33775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28844483$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-22740$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-279283$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olofsson, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zinn, Jens O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nygren, Katarina Giritli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cebulla, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannah-Moffat, Kelly</creatorcontrib><title>The mutual constitution of risk and inequalities: intersectional risk theory</title><title>Health, risk & society</title><description>In this article, we examine the conceptual importance of integrating risk and intersectionality theory for the study of how risk and various forms of inequality intersect and are mutually constitutive. We argue that an intersectional perspective can advance risk research by incorporating more effectively the role of such social categories as gender and race into the analysis of 'risk' as an empirical phenomenon. In doing so, the intersectional perspective articulates more clearly the connection between the social construction of risk and, on the one hand, the reproduction of new and complex social inequalities and, on the other, intersections of social class, gender, ethnicity and other social categorisations. We trace the intellectual division between risk and feminist-inspired intersectionality research, showing how these approaches can be aligned to study, for example, risk-based welfare and social policy. We use a discussion of general directions within welfare policy to illustrate how an intersectional perspective can be used to show the ways in which new governance strategies create new divisions and reproduce existing forms of social inequality. We conclude the article with a call for a new research agenda to integrate intersectional frameworks with risk theory in order to provide a more nuanced analysis of the relationship between social inequality and risk.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender Studies</subject><subject>Genusvetenskap</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>intersectionality</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Risk theory</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Social Constructionism</subject><subject>Social Inequality</subject><subject>Social Policy</subject><issn>1369-8575</issn><issn>1469-8331</issn><issn>1469-8331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ktv1DAQAOAIgURZ-AccIiEkDs12_IzNBVWlhUor9dJytRzHoS7ZeOuHqv33OE3bAwfak8fyN36Mp6o-IlgjEHCECJeCtWyNAdG1pBgz8ao6QJTLRhCCXpeYzHExb6t3Md4AAAJCD6rN5bWttzllPdbGTzG5lJPzU-2HOrj4p9ZTX7vJ3hbgkrPxa5klG6I1MytZ9ypdWx_276s3gx6j_fAwrqqrs9PLk5_N5uLH-cnxpjGcodQMlvEOqOxbEFiaVhimmSatgF5SzUooaWsYMKo70RPbd1zgoRNiIP1ggZFVdbjsG-_sLndqF9xWh73y2qnv7tex8uG3ylnhVuLy_lXVPM-3Lk8K45ZC8V8Wvwv-NtuYymI0dhz1ZH2OCnEOgBHIl1LAkj5PGeeCciblSyhGlGLRFvrpH3rjcyj_MitGUAsM5mvSRZngYwx2eKoBAjW3kHpsITW3kFpaqKR9fthcR6PHIejJuPiUi4WglN4X-Nvi3DT4sNV3Poy9Sno_-vCYRP570l9Ln9ho</recordid><startdate>20140704</startdate><enddate>20140704</enddate><creator>Olofsson, Anna</creator><creator>Zinn, Jens O.</creator><creator>Griffin, Gabriele</creator><creator>Nygren, Katarina Giritli</creator><creator>Cebulla, Andreas</creator><creator>Hannah-Moffat, Kelly</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AKRZP</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>DG5</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DF2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140704</creationdate><title>The mutual constitution of risk and inequalities: intersectional risk theory</title><author>Olofsson, Anna ; Zinn, Jens O. ; Griffin, Gabriele ; Nygren, Katarina Giritli ; Cebulla, Andreas ; Hannah-Moffat, Kelly</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c651t-fe56b049d70829c78c5a5a3780d94a55a3947c5054ab8d3edb682fb88f3dfe053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender Studies</topic><topic>Genusvetenskap</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>intersectionality</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Risk theory</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Social Constructionism</topic><topic>Social Inequality</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olofsson, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zinn, Jens O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nygren, Katarina Giritli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cebulla, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannah-Moffat, Kelly</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SWEPUB Mittuniversitetet full text</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Mittuniversitetet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><jtitle>Health, risk & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olofsson, Anna</au><au>Zinn, Jens O.</au><au>Griffin, Gabriele</au><au>Nygren, Katarina Giritli</au><au>Cebulla, Andreas</au><au>Hannah-Moffat, Kelly</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The mutual constitution of risk and inequalities: intersectional risk theory</atitle><jtitle>Health, risk & society</jtitle><date>2014-07-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>417</spage><epage>430</epage><pages>417-430</pages><issn>1369-8575</issn><issn>1469-8331</issn><eissn>1469-8331</eissn><abstract>In this article, we examine the conceptual importance of integrating risk and intersectionality theory for the study of how risk and various forms of inequality intersect and are mutually constitutive. We argue that an intersectional perspective can advance risk research by incorporating more effectively the role of such social categories as gender and race into the analysis of 'risk' as an empirical phenomenon. In doing so, the intersectional perspective articulates more clearly the connection between the social construction of risk and, on the one hand, the reproduction of new and complex social inequalities and, on the other, intersections of social class, gender, ethnicity and other social categorisations. We trace the intellectual division between risk and feminist-inspired intersectionality research, showing how these approaches can be aligned to study, for example, risk-based welfare and social policy. We use a discussion of general directions within welfare policy to illustrate how an intersectional perspective can be used to show the ways in which new governance strategies create new divisions and reproduce existing forms of social inequality. We conclude the article with a call for a new research agenda to integrate intersectional frameworks with risk theory in order to provide a more nuanced analysis of the relationship between social inequality and risk.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13698575.2014.942258</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1369-8575 |
ispartof | Health, risk & society, 2014-07, Vol.16 (5), p.417-430 |
issn | 1369-8575 1469-8331 1469-8331 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1562144287 |
source | SWEPUB Freely available online; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Analysis Biological and medical sciences Ethnicity Gender Gender Studies Genusvetenskap Governance Inequality Intellectuals intersectionality Medical sciences Miscellaneous Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Race Risk Risk factors Risk theory Sex Social Class Social Constructionism Social Inequality Social Policy |
title | The mutual constitution of risk and inequalities: intersectional risk theory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A30%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20mutual%20constitution%20of%20risk%20and%20inequalities:%20intersectional%20risk%20theory&rft.jtitle=Health,%20risk%20&%20society&rft.au=Olofsson,%20Anna&rft.date=2014-07-04&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=417&rft.epage=430&rft.pages=417-430&rft.issn=1369-8575&rft.eissn=1469-8331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13698575.2014.942258&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1562144287%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1553170500&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |