Transoral incisionless fundoplication: is it as safe and efficacious as a Nissen or Toupet fundoplication?

Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) was U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved in 2007 to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but comparative data are lacking. This study was undertaken to compare outcomes for patients with GERD undergoing TIF versus laparoscopic Nissen or Toup...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American surgeon 2014-09, Vol.80 (9), p.860-867
Hauptverfasser: Toomey, Paul, Teta, Anthony, Patel, Krishen, Ross, Sharona, Sukharamwala, Prashant, Rosemurgy, Alexander S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 867
container_issue 9
container_start_page 860
container_title The American surgeon
container_volume 80
creator Toomey, Paul
Teta, Anthony
Patel, Krishen
Ross, Sharona
Sukharamwala, Prashant
Rosemurgy, Alexander S
description Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) was U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved in 2007 to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but comparative data are lacking. This study was undertaken to compare outcomes for patients with GERD undergoing TIF versus laparoscopic Nissen or Toupet fundoplications. We undertook a case-controlled study of three cohorts of 20 patients undergoing TIF or laparoscopic Nissen or Toupet fundoplications from 2010 to 2013 controlling for age, body mass index, and preoperative DeMeester scores. All patients were prospectively followed. Median data are reported. Patients undergoing TIF had significantly shorter operative times (in minutes: 71 vs 119 and 85, respectively, P < 0.001) and length of stay (in days: 1, 2, and 1, respectively, P < 0.001). No matter the approach, patients reported dramatic and similar reduction in symptom frequency and severity (e.g., heartburn 8 to 0, P < 0.05). At follow-up, 83 per cent of patients after TIF, 80 per cent after Nissen, or 92 per cent after Toupet fundoplications had symptoms less than once per month (P = 0.12). TIF leads to dramatic symptom resolution, similar when compared with Nissen or Toupet fundoplications. TIF promotes shorter operative times and lengths of stay. Patient satisfaction and effective palliation of symptoms show that TIF is safe and efficacious in comparison to Nissen and Toupet fundoplications and support its continued application and evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/000313481408000918
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1561128043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1561128043</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-95bf967a92b227d8f7404b1d760f64d23fbd72c531011e98bdd6df7cb36d82c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkT1rHDEQhkWIyV1s_wEXRpDGzcYaafWxaYI5Ejtg7OZcL1p9gI691UWzW-TfW8c5KZxqvp55eZkh5ArYVwCtbxljAkRroGWm5h2YD2QNUsqmM1x8JOsj0ByJFfmMuKtlqyR8IisuodNGw5rstsVOmIsdaZpcwpSnMSDSuEw-H8bk7Fxb32hCmmZqkaKNgdrJ0xBjnbqUFzz2LX1KiGGiudBtXg5hfqfx_YKcRTtiuHyL5-Tl54_t5qF5fL7_tbl7bJzQcm46OcROadvxgXPtTdQtawfwWrGoWs9FHLzmTgpgAKEzg_fKR-0GobzhjotzcnPSPZT8ewk49_uELoyjnUI124NUANywVlT0yzt0l5cyVXeVkp1RgilWKX6iXMmIJcT-UNLelj89sP74if7_T9Sl6zfpZdgH_2_l7-nFK1nLgyM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1559863060</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transoral incisionless fundoplication: is it as safe and efficacious as a Nissen or Toupet fundoplication?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Toomey, Paul ; Teta, Anthony ; Patel, Krishen ; Ross, Sharona ; Sukharamwala, Prashant ; Rosemurgy, Alexander S</creator><creatorcontrib>Toomey, Paul ; Teta, Anthony ; Patel, Krishen ; Ross, Sharona ; Sukharamwala, Prashant ; Rosemurgy, Alexander S</creatorcontrib><description>Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) was U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved in 2007 to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but comparative data are lacking. This study was undertaken to compare outcomes for patients with GERD undergoing TIF versus laparoscopic Nissen or Toupet fundoplications. We undertook a case-controlled study of three cohorts of 20 patients undergoing TIF or laparoscopic Nissen or Toupet fundoplications from 2010 to 2013 controlling for age, body mass index, and preoperative DeMeester scores. All patients were prospectively followed. Median data are reported. Patients undergoing TIF had significantly shorter operative times (in minutes: 71 vs 119 and 85, respectively, P &lt; 0.001) and length of stay (in days: 1, 2, and 1, respectively, P &lt; 0.001). No matter the approach, patients reported dramatic and similar reduction in symptom frequency and severity (e.g., heartburn 8 to 0, P &lt; 0.05). At follow-up, 83 per cent of patients after TIF, 80 per cent after Nissen, or 92 per cent after Toupet fundoplications had symptoms less than once per month (P = 0.12). TIF leads to dramatic symptom resolution, similar when compared with Nissen or Toupet fundoplications. TIF promotes shorter operative times and lengths of stay. Patient satisfaction and effective palliation of symptoms show that TIF is safe and efficacious in comparison to Nissen and Toupet fundoplications and support its continued application and evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000313481408000918</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25197871</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</publisher><subject>Aged ; Body mass index ; Case-Control Studies ; Chest Pain - etiology ; Conversion to Open Surgery - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Cough - etiology ; Deglutition Disorders - etiology ; Drug therapy ; FDA approval ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fundoplication - adverse effects ; Fundoplication - methods ; Gastroesophageal reflux ; Gastroesophageal Reflux - surgery ; Heartburn - etiology ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Laryngopharyngeal Reflux - etiology ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Operative Time ; Osteoporosis ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2014-09, Vol.80 (9), p.860-867</ispartof><rights>Copyright Southeastern Surgical Congress Sep 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-95bf967a92b227d8f7404b1d760f64d23fbd72c531011e98bdd6df7cb36d82c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-95bf967a92b227d8f7404b1d760f64d23fbd72c531011e98bdd6df7cb36d82c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25197871$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Toomey, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teta, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Krishen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Sharona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sukharamwala, Prashant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosemurgy, Alexander S</creatorcontrib><title>Transoral incisionless fundoplication: is it as safe and efficacious as a Nissen or Toupet fundoplication?</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) was U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved in 2007 to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but comparative data are lacking. This study was undertaken to compare outcomes for patients with GERD undergoing TIF versus laparoscopic Nissen or Toupet fundoplications. We undertook a case-controlled study of three cohorts of 20 patients undergoing TIF or laparoscopic Nissen or Toupet fundoplications from 2010 to 2013 controlling for age, body mass index, and preoperative DeMeester scores. All patients were prospectively followed. Median data are reported. Patients undergoing TIF had significantly shorter operative times (in minutes: 71 vs 119 and 85, respectively, P &lt; 0.001) and length of stay (in days: 1, 2, and 1, respectively, P &lt; 0.001). No matter the approach, patients reported dramatic and similar reduction in symptom frequency and severity (e.g., heartburn 8 to 0, P &lt; 0.05). At follow-up, 83 per cent of patients after TIF, 80 per cent after Nissen, or 92 per cent after Toupet fundoplications had symptoms less than once per month (P = 0.12). TIF leads to dramatic symptom resolution, similar when compared with Nissen or Toupet fundoplications. TIF promotes shorter operative times and lengths of stay. Patient satisfaction and effective palliation of symptoms show that TIF is safe and efficacious in comparison to Nissen and Toupet fundoplications and support its continued application and evaluation.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Chest Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Conversion to Open Surgery - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Cough - etiology</subject><subject>Deglutition Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Fundoplication - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fundoplication - methods</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal reflux</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux - surgery</subject><subject>Heartburn - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laryngopharyngeal Reflux - etiology</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplkT1rHDEQhkWIyV1s_wEXRpDGzcYaafWxaYI5Ejtg7OZcL1p9gI691UWzW-TfW8c5KZxqvp55eZkh5ArYVwCtbxljAkRroGWm5h2YD2QNUsqmM1x8JOsj0ByJFfmMuKtlqyR8IisuodNGw5rstsVOmIsdaZpcwpSnMSDSuEw-H8bk7Fxb32hCmmZqkaKNgdrJ0xBjnbqUFzz2LX1KiGGiudBtXg5hfqfx_YKcRTtiuHyL5-Tl54_t5qF5fL7_tbl7bJzQcm46OcROadvxgXPtTdQtawfwWrGoWs9FHLzmTgpgAKEzg_fKR-0GobzhjotzcnPSPZT8ewk49_uELoyjnUI124NUANywVlT0yzt0l5cyVXeVkp1RgilWKX6iXMmIJcT-UNLelj89sP74if7_T9Sl6zfpZdgH_2_l7-nFK1nLgyM</recordid><startdate>201409</startdate><enddate>201409</enddate><creator>Toomey, Paul</creator><creator>Teta, Anthony</creator><creator>Patel, Krishen</creator><creator>Ross, Sharona</creator><creator>Sukharamwala, Prashant</creator><creator>Rosemurgy, Alexander S</creator><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201409</creationdate><title>Transoral incisionless fundoplication: is it as safe and efficacious as a Nissen or Toupet fundoplication?</title><author>Toomey, Paul ; Teta, Anthony ; Patel, Krishen ; Ross, Sharona ; Sukharamwala, Prashant ; Rosemurgy, Alexander S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-95bf967a92b227d8f7404b1d760f64d23fbd72c531011e98bdd6df7cb36d82c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Chest Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Conversion to Open Surgery - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Cough - etiology</topic><topic>Deglutition Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Fundoplication - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fundoplication - methods</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal reflux</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux - surgery</topic><topic>Heartburn - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laryngopharyngeal Reflux - etiology</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Toomey, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teta, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Krishen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Sharona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sukharamwala, Prashant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosemurgy, Alexander S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Toomey, Paul</au><au>Teta, Anthony</au><au>Patel, Krishen</au><au>Ross, Sharona</au><au>Sukharamwala, Prashant</au><au>Rosemurgy, Alexander S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transoral incisionless fundoplication: is it as safe and efficacious as a Nissen or Toupet fundoplication?</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2014-09</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>860</spage><epage>867</epage><pages>860-867</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><abstract>Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) was U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved in 2007 to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but comparative data are lacking. This study was undertaken to compare outcomes for patients with GERD undergoing TIF versus laparoscopic Nissen or Toupet fundoplications. We undertook a case-controlled study of three cohorts of 20 patients undergoing TIF or laparoscopic Nissen or Toupet fundoplications from 2010 to 2013 controlling for age, body mass index, and preoperative DeMeester scores. All patients were prospectively followed. Median data are reported. Patients undergoing TIF had significantly shorter operative times (in minutes: 71 vs 119 and 85, respectively, P &lt; 0.001) and length of stay (in days: 1, 2, and 1, respectively, P &lt; 0.001). No matter the approach, patients reported dramatic and similar reduction in symptom frequency and severity (e.g., heartburn 8 to 0, P &lt; 0.05). At follow-up, 83 per cent of patients after TIF, 80 per cent after Nissen, or 92 per cent after Toupet fundoplications had symptoms less than once per month (P = 0.12). TIF leads to dramatic symptom resolution, similar when compared with Nissen or Toupet fundoplications. TIF promotes shorter operative times and lengths of stay. Patient satisfaction and effective palliation of symptoms show that TIF is safe and efficacious in comparison to Nissen and Toupet fundoplications and support its continued application and evaluation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</pub><pmid>25197871</pmid><doi>10.1177/000313481408000918</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-1348
ispartof The American surgeon, 2014-09, Vol.80 (9), p.860-867
issn 0003-1348
1555-9823
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1561128043
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Aged
Body mass index
Case-Control Studies
Chest Pain - etiology
Conversion to Open Surgery - statistics & numerical data
Cough - etiology
Deglutition Disorders - etiology
Drug therapy
FDA approval
Feasibility Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fundoplication - adverse effects
Fundoplication - methods
Gastroesophageal reflux
Gastroesophageal Reflux - surgery
Heartburn - etiology
Humans
Laparoscopy
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux - etiology
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods
Operative Time
Osteoporosis
Patient Satisfaction
Patients
Prospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
title Transoral incisionless fundoplication: is it as safe and efficacious as a Nissen or Toupet fundoplication?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T01%3A31%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transoral%20incisionless%20fundoplication:%20is%20it%20as%20safe%20and%20efficacious%20as%20a%20Nissen%20or%20Toupet%20fundoplication?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Toomey,%20Paul&rft.date=2014-09&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=860&rft.epage=867&rft.pages=860-867&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000313481408000918&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1561128043%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1559863060&rft_id=info:pmid/25197871&rfr_iscdi=true