Management of type III female genital mutilation in Birmingham, UK: A retrospective audit

to audit clinical management of women with type III female genital mutilation (FGM) according to local guidelines. Secondary objectives were to describe the population that uses the service and compare obstetric outcomes of intrapartum deinfibulation and antenatal deinfibulation. retrospective audit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Midwifery 2014-03, Vol.30 (3), p.282-288
Hauptverfasser: Paliwal, Priya, Ali, Sarah, Bradshaw, Sally, Hughes, Alison, Jolly, Kate
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 288
container_issue 3
container_start_page 282
container_title Midwifery
container_volume 30
creator Paliwal, Priya
Ali, Sarah
Bradshaw, Sally
Hughes, Alison
Jolly, Kate
description to audit clinical management of women with type III female genital mutilation (FGM) according to local guidelines. Secondary objectives were to describe the population that uses the service and compare obstetric outcomes of intrapartum deinfibulation and antenatal deinfibulation. retrospective audit. a hospital midwifery-led FGM specialist service in Birmingham, UK. 253 women with type III FGM who gave birth between January 2008 and December 2009 retrospective case analysis using patient records. proportion of women managed according to locally agreed criteria for the management of FGM; obstetric outcomes including perineal tears, episiotomy rates, estimated blood loss, infant APGAR scores and indications for caesarean section. 91 (36%) women booked into antenatal care after 16 weeks gestation. Only 26 (10.3%) were managed fully according to guidelines. The area with poorest performance was child protection, where the presence of normal genitalia was documented in only 52 (38.8%) of medical notes following birth of a female infant. The majority of women (214, 84.6%) had been deinfibulated in a previous pregnancy. Of the 39 infibulated at booking, only 9 (23.1%) were deinfibulated antenatally, the rest opted for intrapartum deinfibulation. Women who had intrapartum deinfibulation had a higher average blood loss and more tears than those deinfibulated antenatally, although this was not statistically significant. alternative systems should be considered to improve documentation of child protection related information. Further research is needed to confirm or refute the adverse findings among those that delayed deinfibulation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.midw.2013.04.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1561039639</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0266613813001265</els_id><sourcerecordid>1561039639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-d35796dc7ab89173865829f4516deb95e4f251d6e50fdcd53b3b7d0ddb1d90223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkTtvFDEUhS0EIkvgD1AglxTMcP0eI5ok4rEiiIYUVJZnfGfxah6L7QnKv2dWGyhRqtN85xTnI-Qlg5oB02_39RjD75oDEzXIGqB5RDZMCV4JsPYx2QDXutJMNGfkWc57ALASzFNyxoWRhluxIT---snvcMSp0Lmn5e6AdLvd0h5HPyDd4RSLH-i4lDj4EueJxolexjTGaffTj2_ozZd39IImLGnOB-xKvEXqlxDLc_Kk90PGF_d5Tm4-fvh-9bm6_vZpe3VxXXWS81IFoYzVoTO-bSwzotGq4baXiumArVUoe65Y0KigD11QohWtCRBCy4IFzsU5eX3aPaT514K5uDHmDofBTzgv2TGlGQirhX0AKpltDBPmAShIIxk3ekX5Ce3WC3LC3h1SHH26cwzcUZTbu6ModxTlQLpV1Fp6db-_tCOGf5W_Zlbg_QnA9bvbiMnlLuLUYYhpvdmFOf5v_w8po6Kf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504741276</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management of type III female genital mutilation in Birmingham, UK: A retrospective audit</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Paliwal, Priya ; Ali, Sarah ; Bradshaw, Sally ; Hughes, Alison ; Jolly, Kate</creator><creatorcontrib>Paliwal, Priya ; Ali, Sarah ; Bradshaw, Sally ; Hughes, Alison ; Jolly, Kate</creatorcontrib><description>to audit clinical management of women with type III female genital mutilation (FGM) according to local guidelines. Secondary objectives were to describe the population that uses the service and compare obstetric outcomes of intrapartum deinfibulation and antenatal deinfibulation. retrospective audit. a hospital midwifery-led FGM specialist service in Birmingham, UK. 253 women with type III FGM who gave birth between January 2008 and December 2009 retrospective case analysis using patient records. proportion of women managed according to locally agreed criteria for the management of FGM; obstetric outcomes including perineal tears, episiotomy rates, estimated blood loss, infant APGAR scores and indications for caesarean section. 91 (36%) women booked into antenatal care after 16 weeks gestation. Only 26 (10.3%) were managed fully according to guidelines. The area with poorest performance was child protection, where the presence of normal genitalia was documented in only 52 (38.8%) of medical notes following birth of a female infant. The majority of women (214, 84.6%) had been deinfibulated in a previous pregnancy. Of the 39 infibulated at booking, only 9 (23.1%) were deinfibulated antenatally, the rest opted for intrapartum deinfibulation. Women who had intrapartum deinfibulation had a higher average blood loss and more tears than those deinfibulated antenatally, although this was not statistically significant. alternative systems should be considered to improve documentation of child protection related information. Further research is needed to confirm or refute the adverse findings among those that delayed deinfibulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-6138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.04.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23747293</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Blood ; Child protection ; Childbirth ; Circumcision, Female - adverse effects ; Circumcision, Female - nursing ; Cultural Diversity ; Deinfibulation ; Female ; Female genital mutilation ; Genitalia, Female - surgery ; Humans ; Infants ; Medical Audit ; Nursing ; Obstetric Labor Complications - epidemiology ; Obstetric Labor Complications - etiology ; Obstetric outcomes ; Obstetrics ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Retrospective Studies ; State Medicine ; United Kingdom - epidemiology ; Women ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Midwifery, 2014-03, Vol.30 (3), p.282-288</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-d35796dc7ab89173865829f4516deb95e4f251d6e50fdcd53b3b7d0ddb1d90223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-d35796dc7ab89173865829f4516deb95e4f251d6e50fdcd53b3b7d0ddb1d90223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.04.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,31005,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23747293$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paliwal, Priya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolly, Kate</creatorcontrib><title>Management of type III female genital mutilation in Birmingham, UK: A retrospective audit</title><title>Midwifery</title><addtitle>Midwifery</addtitle><description>to audit clinical management of women with type III female genital mutilation (FGM) according to local guidelines. Secondary objectives were to describe the population that uses the service and compare obstetric outcomes of intrapartum deinfibulation and antenatal deinfibulation. retrospective audit. a hospital midwifery-led FGM specialist service in Birmingham, UK. 253 women with type III FGM who gave birth between January 2008 and December 2009 retrospective case analysis using patient records. proportion of women managed according to locally agreed criteria for the management of FGM; obstetric outcomes including perineal tears, episiotomy rates, estimated blood loss, infant APGAR scores and indications for caesarean section. 91 (36%) women booked into antenatal care after 16 weeks gestation. Only 26 (10.3%) were managed fully according to guidelines. The area with poorest performance was child protection, where the presence of normal genitalia was documented in only 52 (38.8%) of medical notes following birth of a female infant. The majority of women (214, 84.6%) had been deinfibulated in a previous pregnancy. Of the 39 infibulated at booking, only 9 (23.1%) were deinfibulated antenatally, the rest opted for intrapartum deinfibulation. Women who had intrapartum deinfibulation had a higher average blood loss and more tears than those deinfibulated antenatally, although this was not statistically significant. alternative systems should be considered to improve documentation of child protection related information. Further research is needed to confirm or refute the adverse findings among those that delayed deinfibulation.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Child protection</subject><subject>Childbirth</subject><subject>Circumcision, Female - adverse effects</subject><subject>Circumcision, Female - nursing</subject><subject>Cultural Diversity</subject><subject>Deinfibulation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital mutilation</subject><subject>Genitalia, Female - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Obstetric Labor Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Obstetric Labor Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Obstetric outcomes</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>State Medicine</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0266-6138</issn><issn>1532-3099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkTtvFDEUhS0EIkvgD1AglxTMcP0eI5ok4rEiiIYUVJZnfGfxah6L7QnKv2dWGyhRqtN85xTnI-Qlg5oB02_39RjD75oDEzXIGqB5RDZMCV4JsPYx2QDXutJMNGfkWc57ALASzFNyxoWRhluxIT---snvcMSp0Lmn5e6AdLvd0h5HPyDd4RSLH-i4lDj4EueJxolexjTGaffTj2_ozZd39IImLGnOB-xKvEXqlxDLc_Kk90PGF_d5Tm4-fvh-9bm6_vZpe3VxXXWS81IFoYzVoTO-bSwzotGq4baXiumArVUoe65Y0KigD11QohWtCRBCy4IFzsU5eX3aPaT514K5uDHmDofBTzgv2TGlGQirhX0AKpltDBPmAShIIxk3ekX5Ce3WC3LC3h1SHH26cwzcUZTbu6ModxTlQLpV1Fp6db-_tCOGf5W_Zlbg_QnA9bvbiMnlLuLUYYhpvdmFOf5v_w8po6Kf</recordid><startdate>201403</startdate><enddate>201403</enddate><creator>Paliwal, Priya</creator><creator>Ali, Sarah</creator><creator>Bradshaw, Sally</creator><creator>Hughes, Alison</creator><creator>Jolly, Kate</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201403</creationdate><title>Management of type III female genital mutilation in Birmingham, UK: A retrospective audit</title><author>Paliwal, Priya ; Ali, Sarah ; Bradshaw, Sally ; Hughes, Alison ; Jolly, Kate</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-d35796dc7ab89173865829f4516deb95e4f251d6e50fdcd53b3b7d0ddb1d90223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Child protection</topic><topic>Childbirth</topic><topic>Circumcision, Female - adverse effects</topic><topic>Circumcision, Female - nursing</topic><topic>Cultural Diversity</topic><topic>Deinfibulation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital mutilation</topic><topic>Genitalia, Female - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Obstetric Labor Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Obstetric Labor Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Obstetric outcomes</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>State Medicine</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paliwal, Priya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolly, Kate</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Midwifery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paliwal, Priya</au><au>Ali, Sarah</au><au>Bradshaw, Sally</au><au>Hughes, Alison</au><au>Jolly, Kate</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management of type III female genital mutilation in Birmingham, UK: A retrospective audit</atitle><jtitle>Midwifery</jtitle><addtitle>Midwifery</addtitle><date>2014-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>282</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>282-288</pages><issn>0266-6138</issn><eissn>1532-3099</eissn><abstract>to audit clinical management of women with type III female genital mutilation (FGM) according to local guidelines. Secondary objectives were to describe the population that uses the service and compare obstetric outcomes of intrapartum deinfibulation and antenatal deinfibulation. retrospective audit. a hospital midwifery-led FGM specialist service in Birmingham, UK. 253 women with type III FGM who gave birth between January 2008 and December 2009 retrospective case analysis using patient records. proportion of women managed according to locally agreed criteria for the management of FGM; obstetric outcomes including perineal tears, episiotomy rates, estimated blood loss, infant APGAR scores and indications for caesarean section. 91 (36%) women booked into antenatal care after 16 weeks gestation. Only 26 (10.3%) were managed fully according to guidelines. The area with poorest performance was child protection, where the presence of normal genitalia was documented in only 52 (38.8%) of medical notes following birth of a female infant. The majority of women (214, 84.6%) had been deinfibulated in a previous pregnancy. Of the 39 infibulated at booking, only 9 (23.1%) were deinfibulated antenatally, the rest opted for intrapartum deinfibulation. Women who had intrapartum deinfibulation had a higher average blood loss and more tears than those deinfibulated antenatally, although this was not statistically significant. alternative systems should be considered to improve documentation of child protection related information. Further research is needed to confirm or refute the adverse findings among those that delayed deinfibulation.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23747293</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.midw.2013.04.008</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-6138
ispartof Midwifery, 2014-03, Vol.30 (3), p.282-288
issn 0266-6138
1532-3099
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1561039639
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Blood
Child protection
Childbirth
Circumcision, Female - adverse effects
Circumcision, Female - nursing
Cultural Diversity
Deinfibulation
Female
Female genital mutilation
Genitalia, Female - surgery
Humans
Infants
Medical Audit
Nursing
Obstetric Labor Complications - epidemiology
Obstetric Labor Complications - etiology
Obstetric outcomes
Obstetrics
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Retrospective Studies
State Medicine
United Kingdom - epidemiology
Women
Young Adult
title Management of type III female genital mutilation in Birmingham, UK: A retrospective audit
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T15%3A36%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20of%20type%20III%20female%20genital%20mutilation%20in%20Birmingham,%20UK:%20A%20retrospective%20audit&rft.jtitle=Midwifery&rft.au=Paliwal,%20Priya&rft.date=2014-03&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=282&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=282-288&rft.issn=0266-6138&rft.eissn=1532-3099&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.midw.2013.04.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1561039639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504741276&rft_id=info:pmid/23747293&rft_els_id=S0266613813001265&rfr_iscdi=true