The effect of the setting of a positive surgical margin in soft tissue sarcoma
BACKGROUND The objectives of this study were to evaluate the risk of local recurrence and survival after soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection with positive margins and to evaluate the safety of sparing adjacent critical structures. METHODS One hundred sixty‐nine patients with localized STS who had po...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer 2014-09, Vol.120 (18), p.2866-2875 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2875 |
---|---|
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 2866 |
container_title | Cancer |
container_volume | 120 |
creator | O'Donnell, Patrick W. Griffin, Anthony M. Eward, William C. Sternheim, Amir Catton, Charles N. Chung, Peter W. O'Sullivan, Brian Ferguson, Peter C. Wunder, Jay S. |
description | BACKGROUND
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the risk of local recurrence and survival after soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection with positive margins and to evaluate the safety of sparing adjacent critical structures.
METHODS
One hundred sixty‐nine patients with localized STS who had positive resection margins were identified from a prospective database. Patients who had positive margins were stratified into 3 groups, each representing a specific clinical scenario: critical structure positive margin (eg major nerve, vessel, or bone), tumor bed resection positive margin, and unexpected positive margin. The rates of local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS) and cause‐specific survival (CSS) were calculated and compared with relevant control patients who had negative margins after STS resection.
RESULTS
After planned close dissection to preserve critical structures, the 5‐year LRFS and CSS rates both depended on the quality of the surgical margins (97% and 80.3%, respectively, for those with negative margins vs 85.4% and 59.4%, respectively, for those with positive margins; P = .015 and P = .05, respectively). Negative margins achieved through resection of critical structures because of tumor invasion or encasement only slightly improved the 5‐year rates of LRFS (91.2%) and CSS (63.6%; P = .8 and P = .9, respectively). The lowest 5‐year LRFS and CSS rates were 63.4% and 59.2%, respectively, after an unexpected positive margin during primary surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
After patients undergo resection of STS with positive margins, oncologic outcomes can be predicted based on the clinical context. Sparing adjacent critical structures in this setting is safe and contributes to improved functional outcomes. Cancer 2014;120:2866–2875. © 2014 American Cancer Society.
After resection of soft tissue sarcoma with positive margins, oncologic outcomes can be predicted based on the clinical context. Sparing adjacent critical structures in this setting is safe and contributes to improved functional outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cncr.28793 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1561032592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1561032592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4953-44b945bfd5ed8abe8bab2cffdc7d8ca9d1f526a760a8d5a7dae7aa635e6a3da23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLwzAUx4Mobk5f_ADSF0GEziRNenmU4g3GBJngWznNZUZ6mU2q7Nub2qlvQuDkf_LjHPJD6JTgOcGYXolGdHOaJlm0h6YEZ0mICaP7aIoxTkPOopcJOrL2zceE8ugQTShLMxbzeIqWq1cVKK2VcEGrA-eTVc6ZZj1ECDatNc58-G7frY2AKqjBX5rAH9tqFzhjbe-foRNtDcfoQENl1cmuztDz7c0qvw8Xj3cP-fUiFCzjUchYmTFeasmVTKFUaQklFVpLkchUQCaJ5jSGJMaQSg6JBJUAxBFXMUQSaDRDF-PcTde-98q6ojZWqKqCRrW9LQiPCY4ozwb0ckRF11rbKV1sOuM_sS0ILgZ_xeCv-Pbn4bPd3L6slfxFf4R54HwHgPU2dAeNMPaPS5OYYUo8R0bu01Rq-8_KIl_mT-PyL2QriUU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1561032592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of the setting of a positive surgical margin in soft tissue sarcoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>O'Donnell, Patrick W. ; Griffin, Anthony M. ; Eward, William C. ; Sternheim, Amir ; Catton, Charles N. ; Chung, Peter W. ; O'Sullivan, Brian ; Ferguson, Peter C. ; Wunder, Jay S.</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Patrick W. ; Griffin, Anthony M. ; Eward, William C. ; Sternheim, Amir ; Catton, Charles N. ; Chung, Peter W. ; O'Sullivan, Brian ; Ferguson, Peter C. ; Wunder, Jay S.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the risk of local recurrence and survival after soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection with positive margins and to evaluate the safety of sparing adjacent critical structures.
METHODS
One hundred sixty‐nine patients with localized STS who had positive resection margins were identified from a prospective database. Patients who had positive margins were stratified into 3 groups, each representing a specific clinical scenario: critical structure positive margin (eg major nerve, vessel, or bone), tumor bed resection positive margin, and unexpected positive margin. The rates of local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS) and cause‐specific survival (CSS) were calculated and compared with relevant control patients who had negative margins after STS resection.
RESULTS
After planned close dissection to preserve critical structures, the 5‐year LRFS and CSS rates both depended on the quality of the surgical margins (97% and 80.3%, respectively, for those with negative margins vs 85.4% and 59.4%, respectively, for those with positive margins; P = .015 and P = .05, respectively). Negative margins achieved through resection of critical structures because of tumor invasion or encasement only slightly improved the 5‐year rates of LRFS (91.2%) and CSS (63.6%; P = .8 and P = .9, respectively). The lowest 5‐year LRFS and CSS rates were 63.4% and 59.2%, respectively, after an unexpected positive margin during primary surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
After patients undergo resection of STS with positive margins, oncologic outcomes can be predicted based on the clinical context. Sparing adjacent critical structures in this setting is safe and contributes to improved functional outcomes. Cancer 2014;120:2866–2875. © 2014 American Cancer Society.
After resection of soft tissue sarcoma with positive margins, oncologic outcomes can be predicted based on the clinical context. Sparing adjacent critical structures in this setting is safe and contributes to improved functional outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28793</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24894656</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Dermatology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; morbidity ; Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects) ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; recurrence ; sarcoma ; Sarcoma - mortality ; Sarcoma - pathology ; Sarcoma - surgery ; survival ; Survival Rate ; Tumors ; Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2014-09, Vol.120 (18), p.2866-2875</ispartof><rights>2014 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2014 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4953-44b945bfd5ed8abe8bab2cffdc7d8ca9d1f526a760a8d5a7dae7aa635e6a3da23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4953-44b945bfd5ed8abe8bab2cffdc7d8ca9d1f526a760a8d5a7dae7aa635e6a3da23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.28793$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.28793$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28764021$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24894656$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Patrick W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Anthony M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eward, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sternheim, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catton, Charles N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Peter W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wunder, Jay S.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of the setting of a positive surgical margin in soft tissue sarcoma</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the risk of local recurrence and survival after soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection with positive margins and to evaluate the safety of sparing adjacent critical structures.
METHODS
One hundred sixty‐nine patients with localized STS who had positive resection margins were identified from a prospective database. Patients who had positive margins were stratified into 3 groups, each representing a specific clinical scenario: critical structure positive margin (eg major nerve, vessel, or bone), tumor bed resection positive margin, and unexpected positive margin. The rates of local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS) and cause‐specific survival (CSS) were calculated and compared with relevant control patients who had negative margins after STS resection.
RESULTS
After planned close dissection to preserve critical structures, the 5‐year LRFS and CSS rates both depended on the quality of the surgical margins (97% and 80.3%, respectively, for those with negative margins vs 85.4% and 59.4%, respectively, for those with positive margins; P = .015 and P = .05, respectively). Negative margins achieved through resection of critical structures because of tumor invasion or encasement only slightly improved the 5‐year rates of LRFS (91.2%) and CSS (63.6%; P = .8 and P = .9, respectively). The lowest 5‐year LRFS and CSS rates were 63.4% and 59.2%, respectively, after an unexpected positive margin during primary surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
After patients undergo resection of STS with positive margins, oncologic outcomes can be predicted based on the clinical context. Sparing adjacent critical structures in this setting is safe and contributes to improved functional outcomes. Cancer 2014;120:2866–2875. © 2014 American Cancer Society.
After resection of soft tissue sarcoma with positive margins, oncologic outcomes can be predicted based on the clinical context. Sparing adjacent critical structures in this setting is safe and contributes to improved functional outcomes.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>morbidity</subject><subject>Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>recurrence</subject><subject>sarcoma</subject><subject>Sarcoma - mortality</subject><subject>Sarcoma - pathology</subject><subject>Sarcoma - surgery</subject><subject>survival</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFtLwzAUx4Mobk5f_ADSF0GEziRNenmU4g3GBJngWznNZUZ6mU2q7Nub2qlvQuDkf_LjHPJD6JTgOcGYXolGdHOaJlm0h6YEZ0mICaP7aIoxTkPOopcJOrL2zceE8ugQTShLMxbzeIqWq1cVKK2VcEGrA-eTVc6ZZj1ECDatNc58-G7frY2AKqjBX5rAH9tqFzhjbe-foRNtDcfoQENl1cmuztDz7c0qvw8Xj3cP-fUiFCzjUchYmTFeasmVTKFUaQklFVpLkchUQCaJ5jSGJMaQSg6JBJUAxBFXMUQSaDRDF-PcTde-98q6ojZWqKqCRrW9LQiPCY4ozwb0ckRF11rbKV1sOuM_sS0ILgZ_xeCv-Pbn4bPd3L6slfxFf4R54HwHgPU2dAeNMPaPS5OYYUo8R0bu01Rq-8_KIl_mT-PyL2QriUU</recordid><startdate>20140915</startdate><enddate>20140915</enddate><creator>O'Donnell, Patrick W.</creator><creator>Griffin, Anthony M.</creator><creator>Eward, William C.</creator><creator>Sternheim, Amir</creator><creator>Catton, Charles N.</creator><creator>Chung, Peter W.</creator><creator>O'Sullivan, Brian</creator><creator>Ferguson, Peter C.</creator><creator>Wunder, Jay S.</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140915</creationdate><title>The effect of the setting of a positive surgical margin in soft tissue sarcoma</title><author>O'Donnell, Patrick W. ; Griffin, Anthony M. ; Eward, William C. ; Sternheim, Amir ; Catton, Charles N. ; Chung, Peter W. ; O'Sullivan, Brian ; Ferguson, Peter C. ; Wunder, Jay S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4953-44b945bfd5ed8abe8bab2cffdc7d8ca9d1f526a760a8d5a7dae7aa635e6a3da23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>morbidity</topic><topic>Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>recurrence</topic><topic>sarcoma</topic><topic>Sarcoma - mortality</topic><topic>Sarcoma - pathology</topic><topic>Sarcoma - surgery</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Patrick W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Anthony M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eward, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sternheim, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catton, Charles N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Peter W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wunder, Jay S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Donnell, Patrick W.</au><au>Griffin, Anthony M.</au><au>Eward, William C.</au><au>Sternheim, Amir</au><au>Catton, Charles N.</au><au>Chung, Peter W.</au><au>O'Sullivan, Brian</au><au>Ferguson, Peter C.</au><au>Wunder, Jay S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of the setting of a positive surgical margin in soft tissue sarcoma</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2014-09-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>2866</spage><epage>2875</epage><pages>2866-2875</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the risk of local recurrence and survival after soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection with positive margins and to evaluate the safety of sparing adjacent critical structures.
METHODS
One hundred sixty‐nine patients with localized STS who had positive resection margins were identified from a prospective database. Patients who had positive margins were stratified into 3 groups, each representing a specific clinical scenario: critical structure positive margin (eg major nerve, vessel, or bone), tumor bed resection positive margin, and unexpected positive margin. The rates of local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS) and cause‐specific survival (CSS) were calculated and compared with relevant control patients who had negative margins after STS resection.
RESULTS
After planned close dissection to preserve critical structures, the 5‐year LRFS and CSS rates both depended on the quality of the surgical margins (97% and 80.3%, respectively, for those with negative margins vs 85.4% and 59.4%, respectively, for those with positive margins; P = .015 and P = .05, respectively). Negative margins achieved through resection of critical structures because of tumor invasion or encasement only slightly improved the 5‐year rates of LRFS (91.2%) and CSS (63.6%; P = .8 and P = .9, respectively). The lowest 5‐year LRFS and CSS rates were 63.4% and 59.2%, respectively, after an unexpected positive margin during primary surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
After patients undergo resection of STS with positive margins, oncologic outcomes can be predicted based on the clinical context. Sparing adjacent critical structures in this setting is safe and contributes to improved functional outcomes. Cancer 2014;120:2866–2875. © 2014 American Cancer Society.
After resection of soft tissue sarcoma with positive margins, oncologic outcomes can be predicted based on the clinical context. Sparing adjacent critical structures in this setting is safe and contributes to improved functional outcomes.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>24894656</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.28793</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-543X |
ispartof | Cancer, 2014-09, Vol.120 (18), p.2866-2875 |
issn | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1561032592 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Biological and medical sciences Case-Control Studies Dermatology Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged morbidity Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects) Neoplasm Grading Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis Neoplasm Staging Prognosis Prospective Studies recurrence sarcoma Sarcoma - mortality Sarcoma - pathology Sarcoma - surgery survival Survival Rate Tumors Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions |
title | The effect of the setting of a positive surgical margin in soft tissue sarcoma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T04%3A07%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20the%20setting%20of%20a%20positive%20surgical%20margin%20in%20soft%20tissue%20sarcoma&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=O'Donnell,%20Patrick%20W.&rft.date=2014-09-15&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=2866&rft.epage=2875&rft.pages=2866-2875&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.28793&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1561032592%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1561032592&rft_id=info:pmid/24894656&rfr_iscdi=true |