The effect of the setting of a positive surgical margin in soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND The objectives of this study were to evaluate the risk of local recurrence and survival after soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection with positive margins and to evaluate the safety of sparing adjacent critical structures. METHODS One hundred sixty‐nine patients with localized STS who had po...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2014-09, Vol.120 (18), p.2866-2875
Hauptverfasser: O'Donnell, Patrick W., Griffin, Anthony M., Eward, William C., Sternheim, Amir, Catton, Charles N., Chung, Peter W., O'Sullivan, Brian, Ferguson, Peter C., Wunder, Jay S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2875
container_issue 18
container_start_page 2866
container_title Cancer
container_volume 120
creator O'Donnell, Patrick W.
Griffin, Anthony M.
Eward, William C.
Sternheim, Amir
Catton, Charles N.
Chung, Peter W.
O'Sullivan, Brian
Ferguson, Peter C.
Wunder, Jay S.
description BACKGROUND The objectives of this study were to evaluate the risk of local recurrence and survival after soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection with positive margins and to evaluate the safety of sparing adjacent critical structures. METHODS One hundred sixty‐nine patients with localized STS who had positive resection margins were identified from a prospective database. Patients who had positive margins were stratified into 3 groups, each representing a specific clinical scenario: critical structure positive margin (eg major nerve, vessel, or bone), tumor bed resection positive margin, and unexpected positive margin. The rates of local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS) and cause‐specific survival (CSS) were calculated and compared with relevant control patients who had negative margins after STS resection. RESULTS After planned close dissection to preserve critical structures, the 5‐year LRFS and CSS rates both depended on the quality of the surgical margins (97% and 80.3%, respectively, for those with negative margins vs 85.4% and 59.4%, respectively, for those with positive margins; P = .015 and P = .05, respectively). Negative margins achieved through resection of critical structures because of tumor invasion or encasement only slightly improved the 5‐year rates of LRFS (91.2%) and CSS (63.6%; P = .8 and P = .9, respectively). The lowest 5‐year LRFS and CSS rates were 63.4% and 59.2%, respectively, after an unexpected positive margin during primary surgery. CONCLUSIONS After patients undergo resection of STS with positive margins, oncologic outcomes can be predicted based on the clinical context. Sparing adjacent critical structures in this setting is safe and contributes to improved functional outcomes. Cancer 2014;120:2866–2875. © 2014 American Cancer Society. After resection of soft tissue sarcoma with positive margins, oncologic outcomes can be predicted based on the clinical context. Sparing adjacent critical structures in this setting is safe and contributes to improved functional outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.28793
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1561032592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1561032592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4953-44b945bfd5ed8abe8bab2cffdc7d8ca9d1f526a760a8d5a7dae7aa635e6a3da23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLwzAUx4Mobk5f_ADSF0GEziRNenmU4g3GBJngWznNZUZ6mU2q7Nub2qlvQuDkf_LjHPJD6JTgOcGYXolGdHOaJlm0h6YEZ0mICaP7aIoxTkPOopcJOrL2zceE8ugQTShLMxbzeIqWq1cVKK2VcEGrA-eTVc6ZZj1ECDatNc58-G7frY2AKqjBX5rAH9tqFzhjbe-foRNtDcfoQENl1cmuztDz7c0qvw8Xj3cP-fUiFCzjUchYmTFeasmVTKFUaQklFVpLkchUQCaJ5jSGJMaQSg6JBJUAxBFXMUQSaDRDF-PcTde-98q6ojZWqKqCRrW9LQiPCY4ozwb0ckRF11rbKV1sOuM_sS0ILgZ_xeCv-Pbn4bPd3L6slfxFf4R54HwHgPU2dAeNMPaPS5OYYUo8R0bu01Rq-8_KIl_mT-PyL2QriUU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1561032592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of the setting of a positive surgical margin in soft tissue sarcoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>O'Donnell, Patrick W. ; Griffin, Anthony M. ; Eward, William C. ; Sternheim, Amir ; Catton, Charles N. ; Chung, Peter W. ; O'Sullivan, Brian ; Ferguson, Peter C. ; Wunder, Jay S.</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Patrick W. ; Griffin, Anthony M. ; Eward, William C. ; Sternheim, Amir ; Catton, Charles N. ; Chung, Peter W. ; O'Sullivan, Brian ; Ferguson, Peter C. ; Wunder, Jay S.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND The objectives of this study were to evaluate the risk of local recurrence and survival after soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection with positive margins and to evaluate the safety of sparing adjacent critical structures. METHODS One hundred sixty‐nine patients with localized STS who had positive resection margins were identified from a prospective database. Patients who had positive margins were stratified into 3 groups, each representing a specific clinical scenario: critical structure positive margin (eg major nerve, vessel, or bone), tumor bed resection positive margin, and unexpected positive margin. The rates of local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS) and cause‐specific survival (CSS) were calculated and compared with relevant control patients who had negative margins after STS resection. RESULTS After planned close dissection to preserve critical structures, the 5‐year LRFS and CSS rates both depended on the quality of the surgical margins (97% and 80.3%, respectively, for those with negative margins vs 85.4% and 59.4%, respectively, for those with positive margins; P = .015 and P = .05, respectively). Negative margins achieved through resection of critical structures because of tumor invasion or encasement only slightly improved the 5‐year rates of LRFS (91.2%) and CSS (63.6%; P = .8 and P = .9, respectively). The lowest 5‐year LRFS and CSS rates were 63.4% and 59.2%, respectively, after an unexpected positive margin during primary surgery. CONCLUSIONS After patients undergo resection of STS with positive margins, oncologic outcomes can be predicted based on the clinical context. Sparing adjacent critical structures in this setting is safe and contributes to improved functional outcomes. Cancer 2014;120:2866–2875. © 2014 American Cancer Society. After resection of soft tissue sarcoma with positive margins, oncologic outcomes can be predicted based on the clinical context. Sparing adjacent critical structures in this setting is safe and contributes to improved functional outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28793</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24894656</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Dermatology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; morbidity ; Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects) ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; recurrence ; sarcoma ; Sarcoma - mortality ; Sarcoma - pathology ; Sarcoma - surgery ; survival ; Survival Rate ; Tumors ; Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2014-09, Vol.120 (18), p.2866-2875</ispartof><rights>2014 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2014 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4953-44b945bfd5ed8abe8bab2cffdc7d8ca9d1f526a760a8d5a7dae7aa635e6a3da23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4953-44b945bfd5ed8abe8bab2cffdc7d8ca9d1f526a760a8d5a7dae7aa635e6a3da23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.28793$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.28793$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28764021$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24894656$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Patrick W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Anthony M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eward, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sternheim, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catton, Charles N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Peter W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wunder, Jay S.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of the setting of a positive surgical margin in soft tissue sarcoma</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND The objectives of this study were to evaluate the risk of local recurrence and survival after soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection with positive margins and to evaluate the safety of sparing adjacent critical structures. METHODS One hundred sixty‐nine patients with localized STS who had positive resection margins were identified from a prospective database. Patients who had positive margins were stratified into 3 groups, each representing a specific clinical scenario: critical structure positive margin (eg major nerve, vessel, or bone), tumor bed resection positive margin, and unexpected positive margin. The rates of local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS) and cause‐specific survival (CSS) were calculated and compared with relevant control patients who had negative margins after STS resection. RESULTS After planned close dissection to preserve critical structures, the 5‐year LRFS and CSS rates both depended on the quality of the surgical margins (97% and 80.3%, respectively, for those with negative margins vs 85.4% and 59.4%, respectively, for those with positive margins; P = .015 and P = .05, respectively). Negative margins achieved through resection of critical structures because of tumor invasion or encasement only slightly improved the 5‐year rates of LRFS (91.2%) and CSS (63.6%; P = .8 and P = .9, respectively). The lowest 5‐year LRFS and CSS rates were 63.4% and 59.2%, respectively, after an unexpected positive margin during primary surgery. CONCLUSIONS After patients undergo resection of STS with positive margins, oncologic outcomes can be predicted based on the clinical context. Sparing adjacent critical structures in this setting is safe and contributes to improved functional outcomes. Cancer 2014;120:2866–2875. © 2014 American Cancer Society. After resection of soft tissue sarcoma with positive margins, oncologic outcomes can be predicted based on the clinical context. Sparing adjacent critical structures in this setting is safe and contributes to improved functional outcomes.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>morbidity</subject><subject>Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>recurrence</subject><subject>sarcoma</subject><subject>Sarcoma - mortality</subject><subject>Sarcoma - pathology</subject><subject>Sarcoma - surgery</subject><subject>survival</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFtLwzAUx4Mobk5f_ADSF0GEziRNenmU4g3GBJngWznNZUZ6mU2q7Nub2qlvQuDkf_LjHPJD6JTgOcGYXolGdHOaJlm0h6YEZ0mICaP7aIoxTkPOopcJOrL2zceE8ugQTShLMxbzeIqWq1cVKK2VcEGrA-eTVc6ZZj1ECDatNc58-G7frY2AKqjBX5rAH9tqFzhjbe-foRNtDcfoQENl1cmuztDz7c0qvw8Xj3cP-fUiFCzjUchYmTFeasmVTKFUaQklFVpLkchUQCaJ5jSGJMaQSg6JBJUAxBFXMUQSaDRDF-PcTde-98q6ojZWqKqCRrW9LQiPCY4ozwb0ckRF11rbKV1sOuM_sS0ILgZ_xeCv-Pbn4bPd3L6slfxFf4R54HwHgPU2dAeNMPaPS5OYYUo8R0bu01Rq-8_KIl_mT-PyL2QriUU</recordid><startdate>20140915</startdate><enddate>20140915</enddate><creator>O'Donnell, Patrick W.</creator><creator>Griffin, Anthony M.</creator><creator>Eward, William C.</creator><creator>Sternheim, Amir</creator><creator>Catton, Charles N.</creator><creator>Chung, Peter W.</creator><creator>O'Sullivan, Brian</creator><creator>Ferguson, Peter C.</creator><creator>Wunder, Jay S.</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140915</creationdate><title>The effect of the setting of a positive surgical margin in soft tissue sarcoma</title><author>O'Donnell, Patrick W. ; Griffin, Anthony M. ; Eward, William C. ; Sternheim, Amir ; Catton, Charles N. ; Chung, Peter W. ; O'Sullivan, Brian ; Ferguson, Peter C. ; Wunder, Jay S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4953-44b945bfd5ed8abe8bab2cffdc7d8ca9d1f526a760a8d5a7dae7aa635e6a3da23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>morbidity</topic><topic>Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>recurrence</topic><topic>sarcoma</topic><topic>Sarcoma - mortality</topic><topic>Sarcoma - pathology</topic><topic>Sarcoma - surgery</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Patrick W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Anthony M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eward, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sternheim, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catton, Charles N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Peter W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wunder, Jay S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Donnell, Patrick W.</au><au>Griffin, Anthony M.</au><au>Eward, William C.</au><au>Sternheim, Amir</au><au>Catton, Charles N.</au><au>Chung, Peter W.</au><au>O'Sullivan, Brian</au><au>Ferguson, Peter C.</au><au>Wunder, Jay S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of the setting of a positive surgical margin in soft tissue sarcoma</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2014-09-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>2866</spage><epage>2875</epage><pages>2866-2875</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND The objectives of this study were to evaluate the risk of local recurrence and survival after soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection with positive margins and to evaluate the safety of sparing adjacent critical structures. METHODS One hundred sixty‐nine patients with localized STS who had positive resection margins were identified from a prospective database. Patients who had positive margins were stratified into 3 groups, each representing a specific clinical scenario: critical structure positive margin (eg major nerve, vessel, or bone), tumor bed resection positive margin, and unexpected positive margin. The rates of local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS) and cause‐specific survival (CSS) were calculated and compared with relevant control patients who had negative margins after STS resection. RESULTS After planned close dissection to preserve critical structures, the 5‐year LRFS and CSS rates both depended on the quality of the surgical margins (97% and 80.3%, respectively, for those with negative margins vs 85.4% and 59.4%, respectively, for those with positive margins; P = .015 and P = .05, respectively). Negative margins achieved through resection of critical structures because of tumor invasion or encasement only slightly improved the 5‐year rates of LRFS (91.2%) and CSS (63.6%; P = .8 and P = .9, respectively). The lowest 5‐year LRFS and CSS rates were 63.4% and 59.2%, respectively, after an unexpected positive margin during primary surgery. CONCLUSIONS After patients undergo resection of STS with positive margins, oncologic outcomes can be predicted based on the clinical context. Sparing adjacent critical structures in this setting is safe and contributes to improved functional outcomes. Cancer 2014;120:2866–2875. © 2014 American Cancer Society. After resection of soft tissue sarcoma with positive margins, oncologic outcomes can be predicted based on the clinical context. Sparing adjacent critical structures in this setting is safe and contributes to improved functional outcomes.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>24894656</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.28793</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2014-09, Vol.120 (18), p.2866-2875
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1561032592
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Case-Control Studies
Dermatology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
morbidity
Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
recurrence
sarcoma
Sarcoma - mortality
Sarcoma - pathology
Sarcoma - surgery
survival
Survival Rate
Tumors
Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions
title The effect of the setting of a positive surgical margin in soft tissue sarcoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T04%3A07%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20the%20setting%20of%20a%20positive%20surgical%20margin%20in%20soft%20tissue%20sarcoma&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=O'Donnell,%20Patrick%20W.&rft.date=2014-09-15&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=2866&rft.epage=2875&rft.pages=2866-2875&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.28793&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1561032592%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1561032592&rft_id=info:pmid/24894656&rfr_iscdi=true