Perception and automatic detection of wind-induced microphone noise

Wind can induce noise on microphones, causing problems for users of hearing aids and for those making recordings outdoors. Perceptual tests in the laboratory and via the Internet were carried out to understand what features of wind noise are important to the perceived audio quality of speech recordi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2014-09, Vol.136 (3), p.1176-1186
Hauptverfasser: Jackson, Iain R, Kendrick, Paul, Cox, Trevor J, Fazenda, Bruno M, Li, Francis F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1186
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1176
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 136
creator Jackson, Iain R
Kendrick, Paul
Cox, Trevor J
Fazenda, Bruno M
Li, Francis F
description Wind can induce noise on microphones, causing problems for users of hearing aids and for those making recordings outdoors. Perceptual tests in the laboratory and via the Internet were carried out to understand what features of wind noise are important to the perceived audio quality of speech recordings. The average A-weighted sound pressure level of the wind noise was found to dominate the perceived degradation of quality, while gustiness was mostly unimportant. Large degradations in quality were observed when the signal to noise ratio was lower than about 15 dB. A model to allow an estimation of wind noise level was developed using an ensemble of decision trees. The model was designed to work with a single microphone in the presence of a variety of foreground sounds. The model outputted four classes of wind noise: none, low, medium, and high. Wind free examples were accurately identified in 79% of cases. For the three classes with noise present, on average 93% of samples were correctly assigned. A second ensemble of decision trees was used to estimate the signal to noise ratio and thereby infer the perceived degradation caused by wind noise.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.4892772
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560583316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1560583316</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e4c9a0896a6a554cd6ec33e09bd94a6b71636c4559e62c34b1ea4b7a500dcbaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68A9Ij3romslXm6Ms6wcs6EHPIU2mGNk2tWkR_71dd_UwDDM8vMw8hFwCXQIwuIWlKDUrCnZE5iAZzUvJxDGZU0ohF1qpGTlL6WMaZcn1KZkxCZpyzeZk9YK9w24Isc1s6zM7DrGxQ3CZxwHd7z7W2VdofT7V6NBnTXB97N5ji1kbQ8JzclLbbcKLQ1-Qt_v16-ox3zw_PK3uNrnjCoYchdOWllpZZaUUzit0nCPVldfCqqoAxZUTUmpUzHFRAVpRFVZS6l1la74g1_vcro-fI6bBNCE53G5ti3FMBqTaPcinnAW52aPTpSn1WJuuD43tvw1Qs3NmwBycTezVIXasGvT_5J8k_gOF1WY7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1560583316</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perception and automatic detection of wind-induced microphone noise</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Jackson, Iain R ; Kendrick, Paul ; Cox, Trevor J ; Fazenda, Bruno M ; Li, Francis F</creator><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Iain R ; Kendrick, Paul ; Cox, Trevor J ; Fazenda, Bruno M ; Li, Francis F</creatorcontrib><description>Wind can induce noise on microphones, causing problems for users of hearing aids and for those making recordings outdoors. Perceptual tests in the laboratory and via the Internet were carried out to understand what features of wind noise are important to the perceived audio quality of speech recordings. The average A-weighted sound pressure level of the wind noise was found to dominate the perceived degradation of quality, while gustiness was mostly unimportant. Large degradations in quality were observed when the signal to noise ratio was lower than about 15 dB. A model to allow an estimation of wind noise level was developed using an ensemble of decision trees. The model was designed to work with a single microphone in the presence of a variety of foreground sounds. The model outputted four classes of wind noise: none, low, medium, and high. Wind free examples were accurately identified in 79% of cases. For the three classes with noise present, on average 93% of samples were correctly assigned. A second ensemble of decision trees was used to estimate the signal to noise ratio and thereby infer the perceived degradation caused by wind noise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.4892772</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25190392</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Acoustics - instrumentation ; Adult ; Algorithms ; Audiometry, Speech ; Automation ; Decision Trees ; Humans ; Models, Theoretical ; Motion ; Noise ; Perceptual Masking ; Pressure ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Signal-To-Noise Ratio ; Speech Perception ; Time Factors ; Transducers, Pressure ; Wind ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014-09, Vol.136 (3), p.1176-1186</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e4c9a0896a6a554cd6ec33e09bd94a6b71636c4559e62c34b1ea4b7a500dcbaf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e4c9a0896a6a554cd6ec33e09bd94a6b71636c4559e62c34b1ea4b7a500dcbaf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25190392$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Iain R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendrick, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Trevor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazenda, Bruno M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Francis F</creatorcontrib><title>Perception and automatic detection of wind-induced microphone noise</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>Wind can induce noise on microphones, causing problems for users of hearing aids and for those making recordings outdoors. Perceptual tests in the laboratory and via the Internet were carried out to understand what features of wind noise are important to the perceived audio quality of speech recordings. The average A-weighted sound pressure level of the wind noise was found to dominate the perceived degradation of quality, while gustiness was mostly unimportant. Large degradations in quality were observed when the signal to noise ratio was lower than about 15 dB. A model to allow an estimation of wind noise level was developed using an ensemble of decision trees. The model was designed to work with a single microphone in the presence of a variety of foreground sounds. The model outputted four classes of wind noise: none, low, medium, and high. Wind free examples were accurately identified in 79% of cases. For the three classes with noise present, on average 93% of samples were correctly assigned. A second ensemble of decision trees was used to estimate the signal to noise ratio and thereby infer the perceived degradation caused by wind noise.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Acoustics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Audiometry, Speech</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Decision Trees</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Transducers, Pressure</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68A9Ij3romslXm6Ms6wcs6EHPIU2mGNk2tWkR_71dd_UwDDM8vMw8hFwCXQIwuIWlKDUrCnZE5iAZzUvJxDGZU0ohF1qpGTlL6WMaZcn1KZkxCZpyzeZk9YK9w24Isc1s6zM7DrGxQ3CZxwHd7z7W2VdofT7V6NBnTXB97N5ji1kbQ8JzclLbbcKLQ1-Qt_v16-ox3zw_PK3uNrnjCoYchdOWllpZZaUUzit0nCPVldfCqqoAxZUTUmpUzHFRAVpRFVZS6l1la74g1_vcro-fI6bBNCE53G5ti3FMBqTaPcinnAW52aPTpSn1WJuuD43tvw1Qs3NmwBycTezVIXasGvT_5J8k_gOF1WY7</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Jackson, Iain R</creator><creator>Kendrick, Paul</creator><creator>Cox, Trevor J</creator><creator>Fazenda, Bruno M</creator><creator>Li, Francis F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Perception and automatic detection of wind-induced microphone noise</title><author>Jackson, Iain R ; Kendrick, Paul ; Cox, Trevor J ; Fazenda, Bruno M ; Li, Francis F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e4c9a0896a6a554cd6ec33e09bd94a6b71636c4559e62c34b1ea4b7a500dcbaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Acoustics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Audiometry, Speech</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Decision Trees</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Transducers, Pressure</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Iain R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendrick, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Trevor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazenda, Bruno M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Francis F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jackson, Iain R</au><au>Kendrick, Paul</au><au>Cox, Trevor J</au><au>Fazenda, Bruno M</au><au>Li, Francis F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perception and automatic detection of wind-induced microphone noise</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1176</spage><epage>1186</epage><pages>1176-1186</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>Wind can induce noise on microphones, causing problems for users of hearing aids and for those making recordings outdoors. Perceptual tests in the laboratory and via the Internet were carried out to understand what features of wind noise are important to the perceived audio quality of speech recordings. The average A-weighted sound pressure level of the wind noise was found to dominate the perceived degradation of quality, while gustiness was mostly unimportant. Large degradations in quality were observed when the signal to noise ratio was lower than about 15 dB. A model to allow an estimation of wind noise level was developed using an ensemble of decision trees. The model was designed to work with a single microphone in the presence of a variety of foreground sounds. The model outputted four classes of wind noise: none, low, medium, and high. Wind free examples were accurately identified in 79% of cases. For the three classes with noise present, on average 93% of samples were correctly assigned. A second ensemble of decision trees was used to estimate the signal to noise ratio and thereby infer the perceived degradation caused by wind noise.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>25190392</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.4892772</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014-09, Vol.136 (3), p.1176-1186
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560583316
source MEDLINE; AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America
subjects Acoustic Stimulation
Acoustics - instrumentation
Adult
Algorithms
Audiometry, Speech
Automation
Decision Trees
Humans
Models, Theoretical
Motion
Noise
Perceptual Masking
Pressure
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Speech Perception
Time Factors
Transducers, Pressure
Wind
Young Adult
title Perception and automatic detection of wind-induced microphone noise
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T11%3A14%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perception%20and%20automatic%20detection%20of%20wind-induced%20microphone%20noise&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Jackson,%20Iain%20R&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1176&rft.epage=1186&rft.pages=1176-1186&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.4892772&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1560583316%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1560583316&rft_id=info:pmid/25190392&rfr_iscdi=true