Perception and automatic detection of wind-induced microphone noise
Wind can induce noise on microphones, causing problems for users of hearing aids and for those making recordings outdoors. Perceptual tests in the laboratory and via the Internet were carried out to understand what features of wind noise are important to the perceived audio quality of speech recordi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2014-09, Vol.136 (3), p.1176-1186 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1186 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1176 |
container_title | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America |
container_volume | 136 |
creator | Jackson, Iain R Kendrick, Paul Cox, Trevor J Fazenda, Bruno M Li, Francis F |
description | Wind can induce noise on microphones, causing problems for users of hearing aids and for those making recordings outdoors. Perceptual tests in the laboratory and via the Internet were carried out to understand what features of wind noise are important to the perceived audio quality of speech recordings. The average A-weighted sound pressure level of the wind noise was found to dominate the perceived degradation of quality, while gustiness was mostly unimportant. Large degradations in quality were observed when the signal to noise ratio was lower than about 15 dB. A model to allow an estimation of wind noise level was developed using an ensemble of decision trees. The model was designed to work with a single microphone in the presence of a variety of foreground sounds. The model outputted four classes of wind noise: none, low, medium, and high. Wind free examples were accurately identified in 79% of cases. For the three classes with noise present, on average 93% of samples were correctly assigned. A second ensemble of decision trees was used to estimate the signal to noise ratio and thereby infer the perceived degradation caused by wind noise. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1121/1.4892772 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560583316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1560583316</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e4c9a0896a6a554cd6ec33e09bd94a6b71636c4559e62c34b1ea4b7a500dcbaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68A9Ij3romslXm6Ms6wcs6EHPIU2mGNk2tWkR_71dd_UwDDM8vMw8hFwCXQIwuIWlKDUrCnZE5iAZzUvJxDGZU0ohF1qpGTlL6WMaZcn1KZkxCZpyzeZk9YK9w24Isc1s6zM7DrGxQ3CZxwHd7z7W2VdofT7V6NBnTXB97N5ji1kbQ8JzclLbbcKLQ1-Qt_v16-ox3zw_PK3uNrnjCoYchdOWllpZZaUUzit0nCPVldfCqqoAxZUTUmpUzHFRAVpRFVZS6l1la74g1_vcro-fI6bBNCE53G5ti3FMBqTaPcinnAW52aPTpSn1WJuuD43tvw1Qs3NmwBycTezVIXasGvT_5J8k_gOF1WY7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1560583316</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perception and automatic detection of wind-induced microphone noise</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Jackson, Iain R ; Kendrick, Paul ; Cox, Trevor J ; Fazenda, Bruno M ; Li, Francis F</creator><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Iain R ; Kendrick, Paul ; Cox, Trevor J ; Fazenda, Bruno M ; Li, Francis F</creatorcontrib><description>Wind can induce noise on microphones, causing problems for users of hearing aids and for those making recordings outdoors. Perceptual tests in the laboratory and via the Internet were carried out to understand what features of wind noise are important to the perceived audio quality of speech recordings. The average A-weighted sound pressure level of the wind noise was found to dominate the perceived degradation of quality, while gustiness was mostly unimportant. Large degradations in quality were observed when the signal to noise ratio was lower than about 15 dB. A model to allow an estimation of wind noise level was developed using an ensemble of decision trees. The model was designed to work with a single microphone in the presence of a variety of foreground sounds. The model outputted four classes of wind noise: none, low, medium, and high. Wind free examples were accurately identified in 79% of cases. For the three classes with noise present, on average 93% of samples were correctly assigned. A second ensemble of decision trees was used to estimate the signal to noise ratio and thereby infer the perceived degradation caused by wind noise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.4892772</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25190392</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Acoustics - instrumentation ; Adult ; Algorithms ; Audiometry, Speech ; Automation ; Decision Trees ; Humans ; Models, Theoretical ; Motion ; Noise ; Perceptual Masking ; Pressure ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Signal-To-Noise Ratio ; Speech Perception ; Time Factors ; Transducers, Pressure ; Wind ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014-09, Vol.136 (3), p.1176-1186</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e4c9a0896a6a554cd6ec33e09bd94a6b71636c4559e62c34b1ea4b7a500dcbaf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e4c9a0896a6a554cd6ec33e09bd94a6b71636c4559e62c34b1ea4b7a500dcbaf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25190392$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Iain R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendrick, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Trevor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazenda, Bruno M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Francis F</creatorcontrib><title>Perception and automatic detection of wind-induced microphone noise</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>Wind can induce noise on microphones, causing problems for users of hearing aids and for those making recordings outdoors. Perceptual tests in the laboratory and via the Internet were carried out to understand what features of wind noise are important to the perceived audio quality of speech recordings. The average A-weighted sound pressure level of the wind noise was found to dominate the perceived degradation of quality, while gustiness was mostly unimportant. Large degradations in quality were observed when the signal to noise ratio was lower than about 15 dB. A model to allow an estimation of wind noise level was developed using an ensemble of decision trees. The model was designed to work with a single microphone in the presence of a variety of foreground sounds. The model outputted four classes of wind noise: none, low, medium, and high. Wind free examples were accurately identified in 79% of cases. For the three classes with noise present, on average 93% of samples were correctly assigned. A second ensemble of decision trees was used to estimate the signal to noise ratio and thereby infer the perceived degradation caused by wind noise.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Acoustics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Audiometry, Speech</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Decision Trees</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Transducers, Pressure</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68A9Ij3romslXm6Ms6wcs6EHPIU2mGNk2tWkR_71dd_UwDDM8vMw8hFwCXQIwuIWlKDUrCnZE5iAZzUvJxDGZU0ohF1qpGTlL6WMaZcn1KZkxCZpyzeZk9YK9w24Isc1s6zM7DrGxQ3CZxwHd7z7W2VdofT7V6NBnTXB97N5ji1kbQ8JzclLbbcKLQ1-Qt_v16-ox3zw_PK3uNrnjCoYchdOWllpZZaUUzit0nCPVldfCqqoAxZUTUmpUzHFRAVpRFVZS6l1la74g1_vcro-fI6bBNCE53G5ti3FMBqTaPcinnAW52aPTpSn1WJuuD43tvw1Qs3NmwBycTezVIXasGvT_5J8k_gOF1WY7</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Jackson, Iain R</creator><creator>Kendrick, Paul</creator><creator>Cox, Trevor J</creator><creator>Fazenda, Bruno M</creator><creator>Li, Francis F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Perception and automatic detection of wind-induced microphone noise</title><author>Jackson, Iain R ; Kendrick, Paul ; Cox, Trevor J ; Fazenda, Bruno M ; Li, Francis F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-e4c9a0896a6a554cd6ec33e09bd94a6b71636c4559e62c34b1ea4b7a500dcbaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Acoustics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Audiometry, Speech</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Decision Trees</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Transducers, Pressure</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Iain R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendrick, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Trevor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazenda, Bruno M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Francis F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jackson, Iain R</au><au>Kendrick, Paul</au><au>Cox, Trevor J</au><au>Fazenda, Bruno M</au><au>Li, Francis F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perception and automatic detection of wind-induced microphone noise</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1176</spage><epage>1186</epage><pages>1176-1186</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>Wind can induce noise on microphones, causing problems for users of hearing aids and for those making recordings outdoors. Perceptual tests in the laboratory and via the Internet were carried out to understand what features of wind noise are important to the perceived audio quality of speech recordings. The average A-weighted sound pressure level of the wind noise was found to dominate the perceived degradation of quality, while gustiness was mostly unimportant. Large degradations in quality were observed when the signal to noise ratio was lower than about 15 dB. A model to allow an estimation of wind noise level was developed using an ensemble of decision trees. The model was designed to work with a single microphone in the presence of a variety of foreground sounds. The model outputted four classes of wind noise: none, low, medium, and high. Wind free examples were accurately identified in 79% of cases. For the three classes with noise present, on average 93% of samples were correctly assigned. A second ensemble of decision trees was used to estimate the signal to noise ratio and thereby infer the perceived degradation caused by wind noise.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>25190392</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.4892772</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-4966 |
ispartof | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014-09, Vol.136 (3), p.1176-1186 |
issn | 0001-4966 1520-8524 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560583316 |
source | MEDLINE; AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Acoustics - instrumentation Adult Algorithms Audiometry, Speech Automation Decision Trees Humans Models, Theoretical Motion Noise Perceptual Masking Pressure Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted Signal-To-Noise Ratio Speech Perception Time Factors Transducers, Pressure Wind Young Adult |
title | Perception and automatic detection of wind-induced microphone noise |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T11%3A14%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perception%20and%20automatic%20detection%20of%20wind-induced%20microphone%20noise&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Jackson,%20Iain%20R&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1176&rft.epage=1186&rft.pages=1176-1186&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.4892772&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1560583316%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1560583316&rft_id=info:pmid/25190392&rfr_iscdi=true |