Hydraulic and thermal effects of in-stream structure-induced hyporheic exchange across a range of hydraulic conductivities

In‐stream structure‐induced hyporheic exchange and associated thermal dynamics affect stream ecosystems. Their importance is controlled by spatial variability of sediment hydraulic conductivity (K). We calibrated a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of surface and groundwater hydraulics near a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 2014-06, Vol.50 (6), p.4643-4661
Hauptverfasser: Menichino, Garrett T., Hester, Erich T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4661
container_issue 6
container_start_page 4643
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 50
creator Menichino, Garrett T.
Hester, Erich T.
description In‐stream structure‐induced hyporheic exchange and associated thermal dynamics affect stream ecosystems. Their importance is controlled by spatial variability of sediment hydraulic conductivity (K). We calibrated a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of surface and groundwater hydraulics near a channel‐spanning weir (represents log dams, boulder weirs) to field data and varied K from 10−7 to 10−2 m/s (silt to gravel). Surface water stopped cresting the weir for K > 10−3 m/s. Non‐Darcy hyporheic flow was also prevalent for K > 10−3 m/s, and velocity errors using non‐CFD models ranged up to 32.2%. We also modeled weir‐induced heat transport during summer. As K increased from 10−7 to 10−3 m/s, weir‐induced hyporheic heat advection steadily increased. Cooling and buffering along hyporheic flow paths decreased with increasing K, particularly above K = 10−5 and 10−4 m/s, respectively. Vertical heat conduction between surface water and groundwater near the weir decreased with increasing K, particularly for K > 10−5 m/s. Conduction between hyporheic flow paths and adjacent groundwater helped cool hyporheic flow. Downstream surface water cooling by hyporheic advection increased steadily with K as increases in hyporheic flow overwhelmed decreases in cooling along hyporheic flow paths. Yet such effects were small (0.016°C) even at K = 10−3 m/s. The largest thermal effect of weir‐induced exchange was therefore spatial expansion of subsurface diel variability (particularly for K > 10−5 m/s) which affects benthic habitat and chemical reactions. The specific values of K where such trend shifts occur is likely variable among streams based on flow conditions, but we expect the presence of such trend shifts to be widespread. Key Points Hyporheic exchange is strongly controlled by hydraulic conductivity (K) Weir‐induced hyporheic water and heat exchange vary most at high K Largest thermal effect of exchange is increased subsurface heterogeneity
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2013WR014758
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560129670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3545708921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4015-8f1b5bf73c286d485096cca021c6d9c6c5a61fc0e10f4f6b5dd909c61555f8553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EEkvhxgew1AsH0o7jf8kRbaGtVAHdgvZoeZ1x45JNtnbSdvn09XZRhThwGs3o99680RDynsERAyiPS2B8uQAmtKxekBmrhSh0rflLMgMQvGC81q_Jm5RuIENS6Rn5fbZtop264KjtGzq2GNe2o-g9ujHRwdPQF2mMaNc0l8mNU8Qi9M3ksKHtdjPEFrMYH1xr-2uk1sUhJWppfGqzQfu8wQ073RjuwhgwvSWvvO0SvvtTD8jPL59_zM-Ki2-n5_NPF4UVwGRRebaSK6-5KyvViEpCrZyzUDKnmtopJ61i3gEy8MKrlWyaGvKcSSl9JSU_IB_2vps43E6YRrMOyWHX2R6HKRkmFbCyVhoyevgPejNMsc_pDFOihGwsWKY-7qmnUyN6s4lhbePWMDC7R5i_H5FxvsfvQ4fb_7JmuZgv8hqxS13sVSGN-PCssvGXUZpraZZfT83VyWVVfz8pzYI_AsexmlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1642090941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydraulic and thermal effects of in-stream structure-induced hyporheic exchange across a range of hydraulic conductivities</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Menichino, Garrett T. ; Hester, Erich T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Menichino, Garrett T. ; Hester, Erich T.</creatorcontrib><description>In‐stream structure‐induced hyporheic exchange and associated thermal dynamics affect stream ecosystems. Their importance is controlled by spatial variability of sediment hydraulic conductivity (K). We calibrated a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of surface and groundwater hydraulics near a channel‐spanning weir (represents log dams, boulder weirs) to field data and varied K from 10−7 to 10−2 m/s (silt to gravel). Surface water stopped cresting the weir for K &gt; 10−3 m/s. Non‐Darcy hyporheic flow was also prevalent for K &gt; 10−3 m/s, and velocity errors using non‐CFD models ranged up to 32.2%. We also modeled weir‐induced heat transport during summer. As K increased from 10−7 to 10−3 m/s, weir‐induced hyporheic heat advection steadily increased. Cooling and buffering along hyporheic flow paths decreased with increasing K, particularly above K = 10−5 and 10−4 m/s, respectively. Vertical heat conduction between surface water and groundwater near the weir decreased with increasing K, particularly for K &gt; 10−5 m/s. Conduction between hyporheic flow paths and adjacent groundwater helped cool hyporheic flow. Downstream surface water cooling by hyporheic advection increased steadily with K as increases in hyporheic flow overwhelmed decreases in cooling along hyporheic flow paths. Yet such effects were small (0.016°C) even at K = 10−3 m/s. The largest thermal effect of weir‐induced exchange was therefore spatial expansion of subsurface diel variability (particularly for K &gt; 10−5 m/s) which affects benthic habitat and chemical reactions. The specific values of K where such trend shifts occur is likely variable among streams based on flow conditions, but we expect the presence of such trend shifts to be widespread. Key Points Hyporheic exchange is strongly controlled by hydraulic conductivity (K) Weir‐induced hyporheic water and heat exchange vary most at high K Largest thermal effect of exchange is increased subsurface heterogeneity</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2013WR014758</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Advection ; Chemical reactions ; computational fluid dynamics ; Cooling ; Fluid dynamics ; Gravel ; Groundwater ; heat flux ; Heat transport ; Hydraulics ; Hydrodynamics ; non-Darcy ; permeability ; Streams ; Surface water ; Surface-groundwater relations ; Weirs</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2014-06, Vol.50 (6), p.4643-4661</ispartof><rights>2014. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4015-8f1b5bf73c286d485096cca021c6d9c6c5a61fc0e10f4f6b5dd909c61555f8553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4015-8f1b5bf73c286d485096cca021c6d9c6c5a61fc0e10f4f6b5dd909c61555f8553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2013WR014758$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2013WR014758$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,11513,27923,27924,45573,45574,46467,46891</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Menichino, Garrett T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hester, Erich T.</creatorcontrib><title>Hydraulic and thermal effects of in-stream structure-induced hyporheic exchange across a range of hydraulic conductivities</title><title>Water resources research</title><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><description>In‐stream structure‐induced hyporheic exchange and associated thermal dynamics affect stream ecosystems. Their importance is controlled by spatial variability of sediment hydraulic conductivity (K). We calibrated a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of surface and groundwater hydraulics near a channel‐spanning weir (represents log dams, boulder weirs) to field data and varied K from 10−7 to 10−2 m/s (silt to gravel). Surface water stopped cresting the weir for K &gt; 10−3 m/s. Non‐Darcy hyporheic flow was also prevalent for K &gt; 10−3 m/s, and velocity errors using non‐CFD models ranged up to 32.2%. We also modeled weir‐induced heat transport during summer. As K increased from 10−7 to 10−3 m/s, weir‐induced hyporheic heat advection steadily increased. Cooling and buffering along hyporheic flow paths decreased with increasing K, particularly above K = 10−5 and 10−4 m/s, respectively. Vertical heat conduction between surface water and groundwater near the weir decreased with increasing K, particularly for K &gt; 10−5 m/s. Conduction between hyporheic flow paths and adjacent groundwater helped cool hyporheic flow. Downstream surface water cooling by hyporheic advection increased steadily with K as increases in hyporheic flow overwhelmed decreases in cooling along hyporheic flow paths. Yet such effects were small (0.016°C) even at K = 10−3 m/s. The largest thermal effect of weir‐induced exchange was therefore spatial expansion of subsurface diel variability (particularly for K &gt; 10−5 m/s) which affects benthic habitat and chemical reactions. The specific values of K where such trend shifts occur is likely variable among streams based on flow conditions, but we expect the presence of such trend shifts to be widespread. Key Points Hyporheic exchange is strongly controlled by hydraulic conductivity (K) Weir‐induced hyporheic water and heat exchange vary most at high K Largest thermal effect of exchange is increased subsurface heterogeneity</description><subject>Advection</subject><subject>Chemical reactions</subject><subject>computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Gravel</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>heat flux</subject><subject>Heat transport</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>non-Darcy</subject><subject>permeability</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Surface-groundwater relations</subject><subject>Weirs</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EEkvhxgew1AsH0o7jf8kRbaGtVAHdgvZoeZ1x45JNtnbSdvn09XZRhThwGs3o99680RDynsERAyiPS2B8uQAmtKxekBmrhSh0rflLMgMQvGC81q_Jm5RuIENS6Rn5fbZtop264KjtGzq2GNe2o-g9ujHRwdPQF2mMaNc0l8mNU8Qi9M3ksKHtdjPEFrMYH1xr-2uk1sUhJWppfGqzQfu8wQ073RjuwhgwvSWvvO0SvvtTD8jPL59_zM-Ki2-n5_NPF4UVwGRRebaSK6-5KyvViEpCrZyzUDKnmtopJ61i3gEy8MKrlWyaGvKcSSl9JSU_IB_2vps43E6YRrMOyWHX2R6HKRkmFbCyVhoyevgPejNMsc_pDFOihGwsWKY-7qmnUyN6s4lhbePWMDC7R5i_H5FxvsfvQ4fb_7JmuZgv8hqxS13sVSGN-PCssvGXUZpraZZfT83VyWVVfz8pzYI_AsexmlA</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Menichino, Garrett T.</creator><creator>Hester, Erich T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>Hydraulic and thermal effects of in-stream structure-induced hyporheic exchange across a range of hydraulic conductivities</title><author>Menichino, Garrett T. ; Hester, Erich T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4015-8f1b5bf73c286d485096cca021c6d9c6c5a61fc0e10f4f6b5dd909c61555f8553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Advection</topic><topic>Chemical reactions</topic><topic>computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Gravel</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>heat flux</topic><topic>Heat transport</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>non-Darcy</topic><topic>permeability</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Surface-groundwater relations</topic><topic>Weirs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Menichino, Garrett T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hester, Erich T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Menichino, Garrett T.</au><au>Hester, Erich T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydraulic and thermal effects of in-stream structure-induced hyporheic exchange across a range of hydraulic conductivities</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>4643</spage><epage>4661</epage><pages>4643-4661</pages><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>In‐stream structure‐induced hyporheic exchange and associated thermal dynamics affect stream ecosystems. Their importance is controlled by spatial variability of sediment hydraulic conductivity (K). We calibrated a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of surface and groundwater hydraulics near a channel‐spanning weir (represents log dams, boulder weirs) to field data and varied K from 10−7 to 10−2 m/s (silt to gravel). Surface water stopped cresting the weir for K &gt; 10−3 m/s. Non‐Darcy hyporheic flow was also prevalent for K &gt; 10−3 m/s, and velocity errors using non‐CFD models ranged up to 32.2%. We also modeled weir‐induced heat transport during summer. As K increased from 10−7 to 10−3 m/s, weir‐induced hyporheic heat advection steadily increased. Cooling and buffering along hyporheic flow paths decreased with increasing K, particularly above K = 10−5 and 10−4 m/s, respectively. Vertical heat conduction between surface water and groundwater near the weir decreased with increasing K, particularly for K &gt; 10−5 m/s. Conduction between hyporheic flow paths and adjacent groundwater helped cool hyporheic flow. Downstream surface water cooling by hyporheic advection increased steadily with K as increases in hyporheic flow overwhelmed decreases in cooling along hyporheic flow paths. Yet such effects were small (0.016°C) even at K = 10−3 m/s. The largest thermal effect of weir‐induced exchange was therefore spatial expansion of subsurface diel variability (particularly for K &gt; 10−5 m/s) which affects benthic habitat and chemical reactions. The specific values of K where such trend shifts occur is likely variable among streams based on flow conditions, but we expect the presence of such trend shifts to be widespread. Key Points Hyporheic exchange is strongly controlled by hydraulic conductivity (K) Weir‐induced hyporheic water and heat exchange vary most at high K Largest thermal effect of exchange is increased subsurface heterogeneity</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2013WR014758</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 2014-06, Vol.50 (6), p.4643-4661
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560129670
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Advection
Chemical reactions
computational fluid dynamics
Cooling
Fluid dynamics
Gravel
Groundwater
heat flux
Heat transport
Hydraulics
Hydrodynamics
non-Darcy
permeability
Streams
Surface water
Surface-groundwater relations
Weirs
title Hydraulic and thermal effects of in-stream structure-induced hyporheic exchange across a range of hydraulic conductivities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T13%3A07%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydraulic%20and%20thermal%20effects%20of%20in-stream%20structure-induced%20hyporheic%20exchange%20across%20a%20range%20of%20hydraulic%20conductivities&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Menichino,%20Garrett%20T.&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=4643&rft.epage=4661&rft.pages=4643-4661&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2013WR014758&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3545708921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1642090941&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true