Hydraulic and thermal effects of in-stream structure-induced hyporheic exchange across a range of hydraulic conductivities
In‐stream structure‐induced hyporheic exchange and associated thermal dynamics affect stream ecosystems. Their importance is controlled by spatial variability of sediment hydraulic conductivity (K). We calibrated a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of surface and groundwater hydraulics near a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water resources research 2014-06, Vol.50 (6), p.4643-4661 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4661 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 4643 |
container_title | Water resources research |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Menichino, Garrett T. Hester, Erich T. |
description | In‐stream structure‐induced hyporheic exchange and associated thermal dynamics affect stream ecosystems. Their importance is controlled by spatial variability of sediment hydraulic conductivity (K). We calibrated a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of surface and groundwater hydraulics near a channel‐spanning weir (represents log dams, boulder weirs) to field data and varied K from 10−7 to 10−2 m/s (silt to gravel). Surface water stopped cresting the weir for K > 10−3 m/s. Non‐Darcy hyporheic flow was also prevalent for K > 10−3 m/s, and velocity errors using non‐CFD models ranged up to 32.2%. We also modeled weir‐induced heat transport during summer. As K increased from 10−7 to 10−3 m/s, weir‐induced hyporheic heat advection steadily increased. Cooling and buffering along hyporheic flow paths decreased with increasing K, particularly above K = 10−5 and 10−4 m/s, respectively. Vertical heat conduction between surface water and groundwater near the weir decreased with increasing K, particularly for K > 10−5 m/s. Conduction between hyporheic flow paths and adjacent groundwater helped cool hyporheic flow. Downstream surface water cooling by hyporheic advection increased steadily with K as increases in hyporheic flow overwhelmed decreases in cooling along hyporheic flow paths. Yet such effects were small (0.016°C) even at K = 10−3 m/s. The largest thermal effect of weir‐induced exchange was therefore spatial expansion of subsurface diel variability (particularly for K > 10−5 m/s) which affects benthic habitat and chemical reactions. The specific values of K where such trend shifts occur is likely variable among streams based on flow conditions, but we expect the presence of such trend shifts to be widespread.
Key Points
Hyporheic exchange is strongly controlled by hydraulic conductivity (K)
Weir‐induced hyporheic water and heat exchange vary most at high K
Largest thermal effect of exchange is increased subsurface heterogeneity |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2013WR014758 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560129670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3545708921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4015-8f1b5bf73c286d485096cca021c6d9c6c5a61fc0e10f4f6b5dd909c61555f8553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EEkvhxgew1AsH0o7jf8kRbaGtVAHdgvZoeZ1x45JNtnbSdvn09XZRhThwGs3o99680RDynsERAyiPS2B8uQAmtKxekBmrhSh0rflLMgMQvGC81q_Jm5RuIENS6Rn5fbZtop264KjtGzq2GNe2o-g9ujHRwdPQF2mMaNc0l8mNU8Qi9M3ksKHtdjPEFrMYH1xr-2uk1sUhJWppfGqzQfu8wQ073RjuwhgwvSWvvO0SvvtTD8jPL59_zM-Ki2-n5_NPF4UVwGRRebaSK6-5KyvViEpCrZyzUDKnmtopJ61i3gEy8MKrlWyaGvKcSSl9JSU_IB_2vps43E6YRrMOyWHX2R6HKRkmFbCyVhoyevgPejNMsc_pDFOihGwsWKY-7qmnUyN6s4lhbePWMDC7R5i_H5FxvsfvQ4fb_7JmuZgv8hqxS13sVSGN-PCssvGXUZpraZZfT83VyWVVfz8pzYI_AsexmlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1642090941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydraulic and thermal effects of in-stream structure-induced hyporheic exchange across a range of hydraulic conductivities</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Menichino, Garrett T. ; Hester, Erich T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Menichino, Garrett T. ; Hester, Erich T.</creatorcontrib><description>In‐stream structure‐induced hyporheic exchange and associated thermal dynamics affect stream ecosystems. Their importance is controlled by spatial variability of sediment hydraulic conductivity (K). We calibrated a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of surface and groundwater hydraulics near a channel‐spanning weir (represents log dams, boulder weirs) to field data and varied K from 10−7 to 10−2 m/s (silt to gravel). Surface water stopped cresting the weir for K > 10−3 m/s. Non‐Darcy hyporheic flow was also prevalent for K > 10−3 m/s, and velocity errors using non‐CFD models ranged up to 32.2%. We also modeled weir‐induced heat transport during summer. As K increased from 10−7 to 10−3 m/s, weir‐induced hyporheic heat advection steadily increased. Cooling and buffering along hyporheic flow paths decreased with increasing K, particularly above K = 10−5 and 10−4 m/s, respectively. Vertical heat conduction between surface water and groundwater near the weir decreased with increasing K, particularly for K > 10−5 m/s. Conduction between hyporheic flow paths and adjacent groundwater helped cool hyporheic flow. Downstream surface water cooling by hyporheic advection increased steadily with K as increases in hyporheic flow overwhelmed decreases in cooling along hyporheic flow paths. Yet such effects were small (0.016°C) even at K = 10−3 m/s. The largest thermal effect of weir‐induced exchange was therefore spatial expansion of subsurface diel variability (particularly for K > 10−5 m/s) which affects benthic habitat and chemical reactions. The specific values of K where such trend shifts occur is likely variable among streams based on flow conditions, but we expect the presence of such trend shifts to be widespread.
Key Points
Hyporheic exchange is strongly controlled by hydraulic conductivity (K)
Weir‐induced hyporheic water and heat exchange vary most at high K
Largest thermal effect of exchange is increased subsurface heterogeneity</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2013WR014758</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Advection ; Chemical reactions ; computational fluid dynamics ; Cooling ; Fluid dynamics ; Gravel ; Groundwater ; heat flux ; Heat transport ; Hydraulics ; Hydrodynamics ; non-Darcy ; permeability ; Streams ; Surface water ; Surface-groundwater relations ; Weirs</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2014-06, Vol.50 (6), p.4643-4661</ispartof><rights>2014. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4015-8f1b5bf73c286d485096cca021c6d9c6c5a61fc0e10f4f6b5dd909c61555f8553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4015-8f1b5bf73c286d485096cca021c6d9c6c5a61fc0e10f4f6b5dd909c61555f8553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2013WR014758$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2013WR014758$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,11513,27923,27924,45573,45574,46467,46891</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Menichino, Garrett T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hester, Erich T.</creatorcontrib><title>Hydraulic and thermal effects of in-stream structure-induced hyporheic exchange across a range of hydraulic conductivities</title><title>Water resources research</title><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><description>In‐stream structure‐induced hyporheic exchange and associated thermal dynamics affect stream ecosystems. Their importance is controlled by spatial variability of sediment hydraulic conductivity (K). We calibrated a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of surface and groundwater hydraulics near a channel‐spanning weir (represents log dams, boulder weirs) to field data and varied K from 10−7 to 10−2 m/s (silt to gravel). Surface water stopped cresting the weir for K > 10−3 m/s. Non‐Darcy hyporheic flow was also prevalent for K > 10−3 m/s, and velocity errors using non‐CFD models ranged up to 32.2%. We also modeled weir‐induced heat transport during summer. As K increased from 10−7 to 10−3 m/s, weir‐induced hyporheic heat advection steadily increased. Cooling and buffering along hyporheic flow paths decreased with increasing K, particularly above K = 10−5 and 10−4 m/s, respectively. Vertical heat conduction between surface water and groundwater near the weir decreased with increasing K, particularly for K > 10−5 m/s. Conduction between hyporheic flow paths and adjacent groundwater helped cool hyporheic flow. Downstream surface water cooling by hyporheic advection increased steadily with K as increases in hyporheic flow overwhelmed decreases in cooling along hyporheic flow paths. Yet such effects were small (0.016°C) even at K = 10−3 m/s. The largest thermal effect of weir‐induced exchange was therefore spatial expansion of subsurface diel variability (particularly for K > 10−5 m/s) which affects benthic habitat and chemical reactions. The specific values of K where such trend shifts occur is likely variable among streams based on flow conditions, but we expect the presence of such trend shifts to be widespread.
Key Points
Hyporheic exchange is strongly controlled by hydraulic conductivity (K)
Weir‐induced hyporheic water and heat exchange vary most at high K
Largest thermal effect of exchange is increased subsurface heterogeneity</description><subject>Advection</subject><subject>Chemical reactions</subject><subject>computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Gravel</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>heat flux</subject><subject>Heat transport</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>non-Darcy</subject><subject>permeability</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Surface-groundwater relations</subject><subject>Weirs</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EEkvhxgew1AsH0o7jf8kRbaGtVAHdgvZoeZ1x45JNtnbSdvn09XZRhThwGs3o99680RDynsERAyiPS2B8uQAmtKxekBmrhSh0rflLMgMQvGC81q_Jm5RuIENS6Rn5fbZtop264KjtGzq2GNe2o-g9ujHRwdPQF2mMaNc0l8mNU8Qi9M3ksKHtdjPEFrMYH1xr-2uk1sUhJWppfGqzQfu8wQ073RjuwhgwvSWvvO0SvvtTD8jPL59_zM-Ki2-n5_NPF4UVwGRRebaSK6-5KyvViEpCrZyzUDKnmtopJ61i3gEy8MKrlWyaGvKcSSl9JSU_IB_2vps43E6YRrMOyWHX2R6HKRkmFbCyVhoyevgPejNMsc_pDFOihGwsWKY-7qmnUyN6s4lhbePWMDC7R5i_H5FxvsfvQ4fb_7JmuZgv8hqxS13sVSGN-PCssvGXUZpraZZfT83VyWVVfz8pzYI_AsexmlA</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Menichino, Garrett T.</creator><creator>Hester, Erich T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>Hydraulic and thermal effects of in-stream structure-induced hyporheic exchange across a range of hydraulic conductivities</title><author>Menichino, Garrett T. ; Hester, Erich T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4015-8f1b5bf73c286d485096cca021c6d9c6c5a61fc0e10f4f6b5dd909c61555f8553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Advection</topic><topic>Chemical reactions</topic><topic>computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Gravel</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>heat flux</topic><topic>Heat transport</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>non-Darcy</topic><topic>permeability</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Surface-groundwater relations</topic><topic>Weirs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Menichino, Garrett T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hester, Erich T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Menichino, Garrett T.</au><au>Hester, Erich T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydraulic and thermal effects of in-stream structure-induced hyporheic exchange across a range of hydraulic conductivities</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>4643</spage><epage>4661</epage><pages>4643-4661</pages><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>In‐stream structure‐induced hyporheic exchange and associated thermal dynamics affect stream ecosystems. Their importance is controlled by spatial variability of sediment hydraulic conductivity (K). We calibrated a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of surface and groundwater hydraulics near a channel‐spanning weir (represents log dams, boulder weirs) to field data and varied K from 10−7 to 10−2 m/s (silt to gravel). Surface water stopped cresting the weir for K > 10−3 m/s. Non‐Darcy hyporheic flow was also prevalent for K > 10−3 m/s, and velocity errors using non‐CFD models ranged up to 32.2%. We also modeled weir‐induced heat transport during summer. As K increased from 10−7 to 10−3 m/s, weir‐induced hyporheic heat advection steadily increased. Cooling and buffering along hyporheic flow paths decreased with increasing K, particularly above K = 10−5 and 10−4 m/s, respectively. Vertical heat conduction between surface water and groundwater near the weir decreased with increasing K, particularly for K > 10−5 m/s. Conduction between hyporheic flow paths and adjacent groundwater helped cool hyporheic flow. Downstream surface water cooling by hyporheic advection increased steadily with K as increases in hyporheic flow overwhelmed decreases in cooling along hyporheic flow paths. Yet such effects were small (0.016°C) even at K = 10−3 m/s. The largest thermal effect of weir‐induced exchange was therefore spatial expansion of subsurface diel variability (particularly for K > 10−5 m/s) which affects benthic habitat and chemical reactions. The specific values of K where such trend shifts occur is likely variable among streams based on flow conditions, but we expect the presence of such trend shifts to be widespread.
Key Points
Hyporheic exchange is strongly controlled by hydraulic conductivity (K)
Weir‐induced hyporheic water and heat exchange vary most at high K
Largest thermal effect of exchange is increased subsurface heterogeneity</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2013WR014758</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1397 |
ispartof | Water resources research, 2014-06, Vol.50 (6), p.4643-4661 |
issn | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560129670 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Advection Chemical reactions computational fluid dynamics Cooling Fluid dynamics Gravel Groundwater heat flux Heat transport Hydraulics Hydrodynamics non-Darcy permeability Streams Surface water Surface-groundwater relations Weirs |
title | Hydraulic and thermal effects of in-stream structure-induced hyporheic exchange across a range of hydraulic conductivities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T13%3A07%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydraulic%20and%20thermal%20effects%20of%20in-stream%20structure-induced%20hyporheic%20exchange%20across%20a%20range%20of%20hydraulic%20conductivities&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Menichino,%20Garrett%20T.&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=4643&rft.epage=4661&rft.pages=4643-4661&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2013WR014758&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3545708921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1642090941&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |