Do Antiparasitic Medicines Used in Aquaculture Pose a Risk to the Norwegian Aquatic Environment?

Aquaculture production is an important industry in many countries and there has been a growth in the use of medicines to ensure the health and cost effectiveness of the industry. This study focused on the inputs of sea lice medication to the marine environment. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, emamecti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2014-07, Vol.48 (14), p.7774-7780
Hauptverfasser: Langford, Katherine H, Øxnevad, Sigurd, Schøyen, Merete, Thomas, Kevin V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7780
container_issue 14
container_start_page 7774
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 48
creator Langford, Katherine H
Øxnevad, Sigurd
Schøyen, Merete
Thomas, Kevin V
description Aquaculture production is an important industry in many countries and there has been a growth in the use of medicines to ensure the health and cost effectiveness of the industry. This study focused on the inputs of sea lice medication to the marine environment. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, emamectin benzoate, cypermethrin, and deltamethrin were measured in water, sediment, and biota samples in the vicinity of five aquaculture locations along the Norwegian coast. Deltamethrin and cypermethrin were not detected above the limits of detection in any samples. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, and emamectin benzoate were detected, and the data was compared the UK Environmental Quality Standards. The concentrations of emamectin benzoate detected in sediments exceed the environmental quality standard (EQS) on 5 occasions in this study. The EQS for teflubenzuron in sediment was exceeded in 67% of the samples and exceeded for diflubenzuron in 40% of the water samples collected. A crude assessment of the concentrations detected in the shrimp collected from one location and the levels at which chronic effects are seen in shrimp would suggest that there is a potential risk to shrimp. It would also be reasonable to extrapolate this to any species that undergoes moulting during its life cycle.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/es5005329
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560129203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1560129203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-ea1bef1da5052e302634f19e9c024c17b16571f06b0b703e72dadb4c7a41b6bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UtrFEEQB_BGDGaNHvwC0iCCHkar-jGPU1hiXhAfiAFvY3dPjXac7d50z0T89s6yayJ68VSXH_-q4s_YE4RXCAJfU9YAWormHlugFlDoWuN9tgBAWTSy_LzPHuZ8BQBCQv2A7QvVzL4WC_blTeTLMPq1SSb70Tv-ljrvfKDMLzN13Ae-vJ6Mm4ZxSsQ_xEzc8I8-f-dj5OM34u9i-kFfvdnCTcRxuPEphhWF8fAR2-vNkOnxbh6wy5PjT0dnxcX70_Oj5UVhFJRjQQYt9dgZDVqQBFFK1WNDjQOhHFYWS11hD6UFW4GkSnSms8pVRqEtrZUH7MU2d53i9UR5bFc-OxoGEyhOuUVdAopGgPwPqrQSqkac6bO_6FWcUpgf2ahK1xVUelYvt8qlmHOivl0nvzLpZ4vQbhpqbxua7dNd4mRX1N3K35XM4PkOmOzM0CcTnM93ri4bFKK-c8blP676Z-EvIHqh6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1547587075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Antiparasitic Medicines Used in Aquaculture Pose a Risk to the Norwegian Aquatic Environment?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Langford, Katherine H ; Øxnevad, Sigurd ; Schøyen, Merete ; Thomas, Kevin V</creator><creatorcontrib>Langford, Katherine H ; Øxnevad, Sigurd ; Schøyen, Merete ; Thomas, Kevin V</creatorcontrib><description>Aquaculture production is an important industry in many countries and there has been a growth in the use of medicines to ensure the health and cost effectiveness of the industry. This study focused on the inputs of sea lice medication to the marine environment. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, emamectin benzoate, cypermethrin, and deltamethrin were measured in water, sediment, and biota samples in the vicinity of five aquaculture locations along the Norwegian coast. Deltamethrin and cypermethrin were not detected above the limits of detection in any samples. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, and emamectin benzoate were detected, and the data was compared the UK Environmental Quality Standards. The concentrations of emamectin benzoate detected in sediments exceed the environmental quality standard (EQS) on 5 occasions in this study. The EQS for teflubenzuron in sediment was exceeded in 67% of the samples and exceeded for diflubenzuron in 40% of the water samples collected. A crude assessment of the concentrations detected in the shrimp collected from one location and the levels at which chronic effects are seen in shrimp would suggest that there is a potential risk to shrimp. It would also be reasonable to extrapolate this to any species that undergoes moulting during its life cycle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es5005329</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24905382</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Animal aquaculture ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Antiparasitic agents ; Antiparasitic Agents - adverse effects ; Antiparasitic Agents - analysis ; Aquaculture ; Aquatic Organisms - drug effects ; Aquatic Organisms - metabolism ; Benzamides - analysis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biota ; Crustacea - drug effects ; Decapoda ; Diflubenzuron - analysis ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental quality ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Ivermectin - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Ivermectin - analysis ; Life cycles ; Marine ; Medical sciences ; Nitriles - analysis ; Norway ; Penaeidae ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pisciculture ; Pyrethrins - analysis ; Reference Standards ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Sediments ; Shellfish ; Vertebrate aquaculture ; Water - chemistry ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - adverse effects ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Supply</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2014-07, Vol.48 (14), p.7774-7780</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Jul 15, 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-ea1bef1da5052e302634f19e9c024c17b16571f06b0b703e72dadb4c7a41b6bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-ea1bef1da5052e302634f19e9c024c17b16571f06b0b703e72dadb4c7a41b6bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es5005329$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es5005329$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2763,27075,27923,27924,56737,56787</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28691228$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24905382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langford, Katherine H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Øxnevad, Sigurd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schøyen, Merete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Kevin V</creatorcontrib><title>Do Antiparasitic Medicines Used in Aquaculture Pose a Risk to the Norwegian Aquatic Environment?</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Aquaculture production is an important industry in many countries and there has been a growth in the use of medicines to ensure the health and cost effectiveness of the industry. This study focused on the inputs of sea lice medication to the marine environment. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, emamectin benzoate, cypermethrin, and deltamethrin were measured in water, sediment, and biota samples in the vicinity of five aquaculture locations along the Norwegian coast. Deltamethrin and cypermethrin were not detected above the limits of detection in any samples. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, and emamectin benzoate were detected, and the data was compared the UK Environmental Quality Standards. The concentrations of emamectin benzoate detected in sediments exceed the environmental quality standard (EQS) on 5 occasions in this study. The EQS for teflubenzuron in sediment was exceeded in 67% of the samples and exceeded for diflubenzuron in 40% of the water samples collected. A crude assessment of the concentrations detected in the shrimp collected from one location and the levels at which chronic effects are seen in shrimp would suggest that there is a potential risk to shrimp. It would also be reasonable to extrapolate this to any species that undergoes moulting during its life cycle.</description><subject>Animal aquaculture</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Antiparasitic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antiparasitic Agents - analysis</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Aquatic Organisms - drug effects</subject><subject>Aquatic Organisms - metabolism</subject><subject>Benzamides - analysis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Crustacea - drug effects</subject><subject>Decapoda</subject><subject>Diflubenzuron - analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Ivermectin - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Ivermectin - analysis</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nitriles - analysis</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>Penaeidae</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pisciculture</subject><subject>Pyrethrins - analysis</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Shellfish</subject><subject>Vertebrate aquaculture</subject><subject>Water - chemistry</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0UtrFEEQB_BGDGaNHvwC0iCCHkar-jGPU1hiXhAfiAFvY3dPjXac7d50z0T89s6yayJ68VSXH_-q4s_YE4RXCAJfU9YAWormHlugFlDoWuN9tgBAWTSy_LzPHuZ8BQBCQv2A7QvVzL4WC_blTeTLMPq1SSb70Tv-ljrvfKDMLzN13Ae-vJ6Mm4ZxSsQ_xEzc8I8-f-dj5OM34u9i-kFfvdnCTcRxuPEphhWF8fAR2-vNkOnxbh6wy5PjT0dnxcX70_Oj5UVhFJRjQQYt9dgZDVqQBFFK1WNDjQOhHFYWS11hD6UFW4GkSnSms8pVRqEtrZUH7MU2d53i9UR5bFc-OxoGEyhOuUVdAopGgPwPqrQSqkac6bO_6FWcUpgf2ahK1xVUelYvt8qlmHOivl0nvzLpZ4vQbhpqbxua7dNd4mRX1N3K35XM4PkOmOzM0CcTnM93ri4bFKK-c8blP676Z-EvIHqh6g</recordid><startdate>20140715</startdate><enddate>20140715</enddate><creator>Langford, Katherine H</creator><creator>Øxnevad, Sigurd</creator><creator>Schøyen, Merete</creator><creator>Thomas, Kevin V</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140715</creationdate><title>Do Antiparasitic Medicines Used in Aquaculture Pose a Risk to the Norwegian Aquatic Environment?</title><author>Langford, Katherine H ; Øxnevad, Sigurd ; Schøyen, Merete ; Thomas, Kevin V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-ea1bef1da5052e302634f19e9c024c17b16571f06b0b703e72dadb4c7a41b6bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal aquaculture</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Antiparasitic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antiparasitic Agents - analysis</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Aquatic Organisms - drug effects</topic><topic>Aquatic Organisms - metabolism</topic><topic>Benzamides - analysis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Crustacea - drug effects</topic><topic>Decapoda</topic><topic>Diflubenzuron - analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Ivermectin - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Ivermectin - analysis</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nitriles - analysis</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>Penaeidae</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pisciculture</topic><topic>Pyrethrins - analysis</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Shellfish</topic><topic>Vertebrate aquaculture</topic><topic>Water - chemistry</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langford, Katherine H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Øxnevad, Sigurd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schøyen, Merete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Kevin V</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langford, Katherine H</au><au>Øxnevad, Sigurd</au><au>Schøyen, Merete</au><au>Thomas, Kevin V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Antiparasitic Medicines Used in Aquaculture Pose a Risk to the Norwegian Aquatic Environment?</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2014-07-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>7774</spage><epage>7780</epage><pages>7774-7780</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Aquaculture production is an important industry in many countries and there has been a growth in the use of medicines to ensure the health and cost effectiveness of the industry. This study focused on the inputs of sea lice medication to the marine environment. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, emamectin benzoate, cypermethrin, and deltamethrin were measured in water, sediment, and biota samples in the vicinity of five aquaculture locations along the Norwegian coast. Deltamethrin and cypermethrin were not detected above the limits of detection in any samples. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, and emamectin benzoate were detected, and the data was compared the UK Environmental Quality Standards. The concentrations of emamectin benzoate detected in sediments exceed the environmental quality standard (EQS) on 5 occasions in this study. The EQS for teflubenzuron in sediment was exceeded in 67% of the samples and exceeded for diflubenzuron in 40% of the water samples collected. A crude assessment of the concentrations detected in the shrimp collected from one location and the levels at which chronic effects are seen in shrimp would suggest that there is a potential risk to shrimp. It would also be reasonable to extrapolate this to any species that undergoes moulting during its life cycle.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>24905382</pmid><doi>10.1021/es5005329</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2014-07, Vol.48 (14), p.7774-7780
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560129203
source MEDLINE; ACS Publications
subjects Animal aquaculture
Animal productions
Animals
Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents
Antiparasitic agents
Antiparasitic Agents - adverse effects
Antiparasitic Agents - analysis
Aquaculture
Aquatic Organisms - drug effects
Aquatic Organisms - metabolism
Benzamides - analysis
Biological and medical sciences
Biota
Crustacea - drug effects
Decapoda
Diflubenzuron - analysis
Environmental Monitoring
Environmental quality
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Ivermectin - analogs & derivatives
Ivermectin - analysis
Life cycles
Marine
Medical sciences
Nitriles - analysis
Norway
Penaeidae
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Pisciculture
Pyrethrins - analysis
Reference Standards
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Sediments
Shellfish
Vertebrate aquaculture
Water - chemistry
Water Pollutants, Chemical - adverse effects
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
Water Supply
title Do Antiparasitic Medicines Used in Aquaculture Pose a Risk to the Norwegian Aquatic Environment?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T08%3A30%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Antiparasitic%20Medicines%20Used%20in%20Aquaculture%20Pose%20a%20Risk%20to%20the%20Norwegian%20Aquatic%20Environment?&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Langford,%20Katherine%20H&rft.date=2014-07-15&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=7774&rft.epage=7780&rft.pages=7774-7780&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es5005329&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1560129203%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1547587075&rft_id=info:pmid/24905382&rfr_iscdi=true