Do Antiparasitic Medicines Used in Aquaculture Pose a Risk to the Norwegian Aquatic Environment?
Aquaculture production is an important industry in many countries and there has been a growth in the use of medicines to ensure the health and cost effectiveness of the industry. This study focused on the inputs of sea lice medication to the marine environment. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, emamecti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science & technology 2014-07, Vol.48 (14), p.7774-7780 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7780 |
---|---|
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 7774 |
container_title | Environmental science & technology |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Langford, Katherine H Øxnevad, Sigurd Schøyen, Merete Thomas, Kevin V |
description | Aquaculture production is an important industry in many countries and there has been a growth in the use of medicines to ensure the health and cost effectiveness of the industry. This study focused on the inputs of sea lice medication to the marine environment. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, emamectin benzoate, cypermethrin, and deltamethrin were measured in water, sediment, and biota samples in the vicinity of five aquaculture locations along the Norwegian coast. Deltamethrin and cypermethrin were not detected above the limits of detection in any samples. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, and emamectin benzoate were detected, and the data was compared the UK Environmental Quality Standards. The concentrations of emamectin benzoate detected in sediments exceed the environmental quality standard (EQS) on 5 occasions in this study. The EQS for teflubenzuron in sediment was exceeded in 67% of the samples and exceeded for diflubenzuron in 40% of the water samples collected. A crude assessment of the concentrations detected in the shrimp collected from one location and the levels at which chronic effects are seen in shrimp would suggest that there is a potential risk to shrimp. It would also be reasonable to extrapolate this to any species that undergoes moulting during its life cycle. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/es5005329 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560129203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1560129203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-ea1bef1da5052e302634f19e9c024c17b16571f06b0b703e72dadb4c7a41b6bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UtrFEEQB_BGDGaNHvwC0iCCHkar-jGPU1hiXhAfiAFvY3dPjXac7d50z0T89s6yayJ68VSXH_-q4s_YE4RXCAJfU9YAWormHlugFlDoWuN9tgBAWTSy_LzPHuZ8BQBCQv2A7QvVzL4WC_blTeTLMPq1SSb70Tv-ljrvfKDMLzN13Ae-vJ6Mm4ZxSsQ_xEzc8I8-f-dj5OM34u9i-kFfvdnCTcRxuPEphhWF8fAR2-vNkOnxbh6wy5PjT0dnxcX70_Oj5UVhFJRjQQYt9dgZDVqQBFFK1WNDjQOhHFYWS11hD6UFW4GkSnSms8pVRqEtrZUH7MU2d53i9UR5bFc-OxoGEyhOuUVdAopGgPwPqrQSqkac6bO_6FWcUpgf2ahK1xVUelYvt8qlmHOivl0nvzLpZ4vQbhpqbxua7dNd4mRX1N3K35XM4PkOmOzM0CcTnM93ri4bFKK-c8blP676Z-EvIHqh6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1547587075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Antiparasitic Medicines Used in Aquaculture Pose a Risk to the Norwegian Aquatic Environment?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Langford, Katherine H ; Øxnevad, Sigurd ; Schøyen, Merete ; Thomas, Kevin V</creator><creatorcontrib>Langford, Katherine H ; Øxnevad, Sigurd ; Schøyen, Merete ; Thomas, Kevin V</creatorcontrib><description>Aquaculture production is an important industry in many countries and there has been a growth in the use of medicines to ensure the health and cost effectiveness of the industry. This study focused on the inputs of sea lice medication to the marine environment. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, emamectin benzoate, cypermethrin, and deltamethrin were measured in water, sediment, and biota samples in the vicinity of five aquaculture locations along the Norwegian coast. Deltamethrin and cypermethrin were not detected above the limits of detection in any samples. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, and emamectin benzoate were detected, and the data was compared the UK Environmental Quality Standards. The concentrations of emamectin benzoate detected in sediments exceed the environmental quality standard (EQS) on 5 occasions in this study. The EQS for teflubenzuron in sediment was exceeded in 67% of the samples and exceeded for diflubenzuron in 40% of the water samples collected. A crude assessment of the concentrations detected in the shrimp collected from one location and the levels at which chronic effects are seen in shrimp would suggest that there is a potential risk to shrimp. It would also be reasonable to extrapolate this to any species that undergoes moulting during its life cycle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es5005329</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24905382</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Animal aquaculture ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Antiparasitic agents ; Antiparasitic Agents - adverse effects ; Antiparasitic Agents - analysis ; Aquaculture ; Aquatic Organisms - drug effects ; Aquatic Organisms - metabolism ; Benzamides - analysis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biota ; Crustacea - drug effects ; Decapoda ; Diflubenzuron - analysis ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental quality ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Ivermectin - analogs & derivatives ; Ivermectin - analysis ; Life cycles ; Marine ; Medical sciences ; Nitriles - analysis ; Norway ; Penaeidae ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pisciculture ; Pyrethrins - analysis ; Reference Standards ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Sediments ; Shellfish ; Vertebrate aquaculture ; Water - chemistry ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - adverse effects ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Supply</subject><ispartof>Environmental science & technology, 2014-07, Vol.48 (14), p.7774-7780</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Jul 15, 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-ea1bef1da5052e302634f19e9c024c17b16571f06b0b703e72dadb4c7a41b6bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-ea1bef1da5052e302634f19e9c024c17b16571f06b0b703e72dadb4c7a41b6bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es5005329$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es5005329$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2763,27075,27923,27924,56737,56787</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28691228$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24905382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langford, Katherine H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Øxnevad, Sigurd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schøyen, Merete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Kevin V</creatorcontrib><title>Do Antiparasitic Medicines Used in Aquaculture Pose a Risk to the Norwegian Aquatic Environment?</title><title>Environmental science & technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Aquaculture production is an important industry in many countries and there has been a growth in the use of medicines to ensure the health and cost effectiveness of the industry. This study focused on the inputs of sea lice medication to the marine environment. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, emamectin benzoate, cypermethrin, and deltamethrin were measured in water, sediment, and biota samples in the vicinity of five aquaculture locations along the Norwegian coast. Deltamethrin and cypermethrin were not detected above the limits of detection in any samples. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, and emamectin benzoate were detected, and the data was compared the UK Environmental Quality Standards. The concentrations of emamectin benzoate detected in sediments exceed the environmental quality standard (EQS) on 5 occasions in this study. The EQS for teflubenzuron in sediment was exceeded in 67% of the samples and exceeded for diflubenzuron in 40% of the water samples collected. A crude assessment of the concentrations detected in the shrimp collected from one location and the levels at which chronic effects are seen in shrimp would suggest that there is a potential risk to shrimp. It would also be reasonable to extrapolate this to any species that undergoes moulting during its life cycle.</description><subject>Animal aquaculture</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Antiparasitic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antiparasitic Agents - analysis</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Aquatic Organisms - drug effects</subject><subject>Aquatic Organisms - metabolism</subject><subject>Benzamides - analysis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Crustacea - drug effects</subject><subject>Decapoda</subject><subject>Diflubenzuron - analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Ivermectin - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Ivermectin - analysis</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nitriles - analysis</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>Penaeidae</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pisciculture</subject><subject>Pyrethrins - analysis</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Shellfish</subject><subject>Vertebrate aquaculture</subject><subject>Water - chemistry</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0UtrFEEQB_BGDGaNHvwC0iCCHkar-jGPU1hiXhAfiAFvY3dPjXac7d50z0T89s6yayJ68VSXH_-q4s_YE4RXCAJfU9YAWormHlugFlDoWuN9tgBAWTSy_LzPHuZ8BQBCQv2A7QvVzL4WC_blTeTLMPq1SSb70Tv-ljrvfKDMLzN13Ae-vJ6Mm4ZxSsQ_xEzc8I8-f-dj5OM34u9i-kFfvdnCTcRxuPEphhWF8fAR2-vNkOnxbh6wy5PjT0dnxcX70_Oj5UVhFJRjQQYt9dgZDVqQBFFK1WNDjQOhHFYWS11hD6UFW4GkSnSms8pVRqEtrZUH7MU2d53i9UR5bFc-OxoGEyhOuUVdAopGgPwPqrQSqkac6bO_6FWcUpgf2ahK1xVUelYvt8qlmHOivl0nvzLpZ4vQbhpqbxua7dNd4mRX1N3K35XM4PkOmOzM0CcTnM93ri4bFKK-c8blP676Z-EvIHqh6g</recordid><startdate>20140715</startdate><enddate>20140715</enddate><creator>Langford, Katherine H</creator><creator>Øxnevad, Sigurd</creator><creator>Schøyen, Merete</creator><creator>Thomas, Kevin V</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140715</creationdate><title>Do Antiparasitic Medicines Used in Aquaculture Pose a Risk to the Norwegian Aquatic Environment?</title><author>Langford, Katherine H ; Øxnevad, Sigurd ; Schøyen, Merete ; Thomas, Kevin V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a406t-ea1bef1da5052e302634f19e9c024c17b16571f06b0b703e72dadb4c7a41b6bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal aquaculture</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Antiparasitic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antiparasitic Agents - analysis</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Aquatic Organisms - drug effects</topic><topic>Aquatic Organisms - metabolism</topic><topic>Benzamides - analysis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Crustacea - drug effects</topic><topic>Decapoda</topic><topic>Diflubenzuron - analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Ivermectin - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Ivermectin - analysis</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nitriles - analysis</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>Penaeidae</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pisciculture</topic><topic>Pyrethrins - analysis</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Shellfish</topic><topic>Vertebrate aquaculture</topic><topic>Water - chemistry</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langford, Katherine H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Øxnevad, Sigurd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schøyen, Merete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Kevin V</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langford, Katherine H</au><au>Øxnevad, Sigurd</au><au>Schøyen, Merete</au><au>Thomas, Kevin V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Antiparasitic Medicines Used in Aquaculture Pose a Risk to the Norwegian Aquatic Environment?</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2014-07-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>7774</spage><epage>7780</epage><pages>7774-7780</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Aquaculture production is an important industry in many countries and there has been a growth in the use of medicines to ensure the health and cost effectiveness of the industry. This study focused on the inputs of sea lice medication to the marine environment. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, emamectin benzoate, cypermethrin, and deltamethrin were measured in water, sediment, and biota samples in the vicinity of five aquaculture locations along the Norwegian coast. Deltamethrin and cypermethrin were not detected above the limits of detection in any samples. Diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron, and emamectin benzoate were detected, and the data was compared the UK Environmental Quality Standards. The concentrations of emamectin benzoate detected in sediments exceed the environmental quality standard (EQS) on 5 occasions in this study. The EQS for teflubenzuron in sediment was exceeded in 67% of the samples and exceeded for diflubenzuron in 40% of the water samples collected. A crude assessment of the concentrations detected in the shrimp collected from one location and the levels at which chronic effects are seen in shrimp would suggest that there is a potential risk to shrimp. It would also be reasonable to extrapolate this to any species that undergoes moulting during its life cycle.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>24905382</pmid><doi>10.1021/es5005329</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-936X |
ispartof | Environmental science & technology, 2014-07, Vol.48 (14), p.7774-7780 |
issn | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560129203 |
source | MEDLINE; ACS Publications |
subjects | Animal aquaculture Animal productions Animals Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents Antiparasitic agents Antiparasitic Agents - adverse effects Antiparasitic Agents - analysis Aquaculture Aquatic Organisms - drug effects Aquatic Organisms - metabolism Benzamides - analysis Biological and medical sciences Biota Crustacea - drug effects Decapoda Diflubenzuron - analysis Environmental Monitoring Environmental quality Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Ivermectin - analogs & derivatives Ivermectin - analysis Life cycles Marine Medical sciences Nitriles - analysis Norway Penaeidae Pharmacology. Drug treatments Pisciculture Pyrethrins - analysis Reference Standards Risk Assessment Risk Factors Sediments Shellfish Vertebrate aquaculture Water - chemistry Water Pollutants, Chemical - adverse effects Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water Supply |
title | Do Antiparasitic Medicines Used in Aquaculture Pose a Risk to the Norwegian Aquatic Environment? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T08%3A30%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Antiparasitic%20Medicines%20Used%20in%20Aquaculture%20Pose%20a%20Risk%20to%20the%20Norwegian%20Aquatic%20Environment?&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Langford,%20Katherine%20H&rft.date=2014-07-15&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=7774&rft.epage=7780&rft.pages=7774-7780&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es5005329&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1560129203%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1547587075&rft_id=info:pmid/24905382&rfr_iscdi=true |