Meiotic versus mitotic recombination: Two different routes for double-strand break repair
Studies in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have validated the major features of the double‐strand break repair (DSBR) model as an accurate representation of the pathway through which meiotic crossovers (COs) are produced. This success has led to this model being invoked to explain double‐strand b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BioEssays 2010-12, Vol.32 (12), p.1058-1066 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1066 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1058 |
container_title | BioEssays |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Andersen, Sabrina L. Sekelsky, Jeff |
description | Studies in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have validated the major features of the double‐strand break repair (DSBR) model as an accurate representation of the pathway through which meiotic crossovers (COs) are produced. This success has led to this model being invoked to explain double‐strand break (DSB) repair in other contexts. However, most non‐crossover (NCO) recombinants generated during S. cerevisiae meiosis do not arise via a DSBR pathway. Furthermore, it is becoming increasingly clear that DSBR is a minor pathway for recombinational repair of DSBs that occur in mitotically‐proliferating cells and that the synthesis‐dependent strand annealing (SDSA) model appears to describe mitotic DSB repair more accurately. Fundamental dissimilarities between meiotic and mitotic recombination are not unexpected, since meiotic recombination serves a very different purpose (accurate chromosome segregation, which requires COs) than mitotic recombination (repair of DNA damage, which typically generates NCOs). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/bies.201000087 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560124165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3375725851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3007-3365e046b092e273d147a9b2a0375d3265db71af2acaa539c9a1d154e7c768b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwMkdiYUnxR2w3bFCVtlIBISIqJstJLpJLGhc7ofS_x6WoA9Pdk37v9O4hdEnwgGBMb3IDfkBx2DEeyiPUI5ySmAzl8Bj1MBU8TmkiT9GZ98uApIImPfT-CMa2poi-wPnORyvT_koHhV3lptGtsc1tlG1sVJqqAgdNGznbteCjyrqotF1eQ-xbp5syyh3oj-Bda-PO0Umlaw8Xf7OPsodxNprG8-fJbHQ3jwuGsYwZExxwInKcUqCSlSSROs2pxkzykoXYZS6JrqgutOYsLVJNSsITkIUUw5z10fX-7NrZzw58q1bGF1DXugHbeUW4wIQmRPCAXv1Dl7ZzTQgXqIQLmXLOApXuqY2pYavWzqy02yqC1a5ltWtZHVpW97Px60EFb7z3Gt_C98Gr3YcSMvyjFk8TRRd8xKcvmXpjP8Rmgh0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545679553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meiotic versus mitotic recombination: Two different routes for double-strand break repair</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Andersen, Sabrina L. ; Sekelsky, Jeff</creator><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Sabrina L. ; Sekelsky, Jeff</creatorcontrib><description>Studies in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have validated the major features of the double‐strand break repair (DSBR) model as an accurate representation of the pathway through which meiotic crossovers (COs) are produced. This success has led to this model being invoked to explain double‐strand break (DSB) repair in other contexts. However, most non‐crossover (NCO) recombinants generated during S. cerevisiae meiosis do not arise via a DSBR pathway. Furthermore, it is becoming increasingly clear that DSBR is a minor pathway for recombinational repair of DSBs that occur in mitotically‐proliferating cells and that the synthesis‐dependent strand annealing (SDSA) model appears to describe mitotic DSB repair more accurately. Fundamental dissimilarities between meiotic and mitotic recombination are not unexpected, since meiotic recombination serves a very different purpose (accurate chromosome segregation, which requires COs) than mitotic recombination (repair of DNA damage, which typically generates NCOs).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-9247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-1878</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bies.201000087</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOEEJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag</publisher><subject>DNA repair ; double-strand break repair ; Genetic recombination ; meiotic recombination ; mitotic recombination ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae ; Yeast</subject><ispartof>BioEssays, 2010-12, Vol.32 (12), p.1058-1066</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 WILEY Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3007-3365e046b092e273d147a9b2a0375d3265db71af2acaa539c9a1d154e7c768b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbies.201000087$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbies.201000087$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Sabrina L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekelsky, Jeff</creatorcontrib><title>Meiotic versus mitotic recombination: Two different routes for double-strand break repair</title><title>BioEssays</title><addtitle>Bioessays</addtitle><description>Studies in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have validated the major features of the double‐strand break repair (DSBR) model as an accurate representation of the pathway through which meiotic crossovers (COs) are produced. This success has led to this model being invoked to explain double‐strand break (DSB) repair in other contexts. However, most non‐crossover (NCO) recombinants generated during S. cerevisiae meiosis do not arise via a DSBR pathway. Furthermore, it is becoming increasingly clear that DSBR is a minor pathway for recombinational repair of DSBs that occur in mitotically‐proliferating cells and that the synthesis‐dependent strand annealing (SDSA) model appears to describe mitotic DSB repair more accurately. Fundamental dissimilarities between meiotic and mitotic recombination are not unexpected, since meiotic recombination serves a very different purpose (accurate chromosome segregation, which requires COs) than mitotic recombination (repair of DNA damage, which typically generates NCOs).</description><subject>DNA repair</subject><subject>double-strand break repair</subject><subject>Genetic recombination</subject><subject>meiotic recombination</subject><subject>mitotic recombination</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><issn>0265-9247</issn><issn>1521-1878</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwMkdiYUnxR2w3bFCVtlIBISIqJstJLpJLGhc7ofS_x6WoA9Pdk37v9O4hdEnwgGBMb3IDfkBx2DEeyiPUI5ySmAzl8Bj1MBU8TmkiT9GZ98uApIImPfT-CMa2poi-wPnORyvT_koHhV3lptGtsc1tlG1sVJqqAgdNGznbteCjyrqotF1eQ-xbp5syyh3oj-Bda-PO0Umlaw8Xf7OPsodxNprG8-fJbHQ3jwuGsYwZExxwInKcUqCSlSSROs2pxkzykoXYZS6JrqgutOYsLVJNSsITkIUUw5z10fX-7NrZzw58q1bGF1DXugHbeUW4wIQmRPCAXv1Dl7ZzTQgXqIQLmXLOApXuqY2pYavWzqy02yqC1a5ltWtZHVpW97Px60EFb7z3Gt_C98Gr3YcSMvyjFk8TRRd8xKcvmXpjP8Rmgh0</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Andersen, Sabrina L.</creator><creator>Sekelsky, Jeff</creator><general>WILEY-VCH Verlag</general><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>Meiotic versus mitotic recombination: Two different routes for double-strand break repair</title><author>Andersen, Sabrina L. ; Sekelsky, Jeff</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3007-3365e046b092e273d147a9b2a0375d3265db71af2acaa539c9a1d154e7c768b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>DNA repair</topic><topic>double-strand break repair</topic><topic>Genetic recombination</topic><topic>meiotic recombination</topic><topic>mitotic recombination</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Sabrina L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekelsky, Jeff</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>BioEssays</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andersen, Sabrina L.</au><au>Sekelsky, Jeff</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meiotic versus mitotic recombination: Two different routes for double-strand break repair</atitle><jtitle>BioEssays</jtitle><addtitle>Bioessays</addtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1058</spage><epage>1066</epage><pages>1058-1066</pages><issn>0265-9247</issn><eissn>1521-1878</eissn><coden>BIOEEJ</coden><abstract>Studies in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have validated the major features of the double‐strand break repair (DSBR) model as an accurate representation of the pathway through which meiotic crossovers (COs) are produced. This success has led to this model being invoked to explain double‐strand break (DSB) repair in other contexts. However, most non‐crossover (NCO) recombinants generated during S. cerevisiae meiosis do not arise via a DSBR pathway. Furthermore, it is becoming increasingly clear that DSBR is a minor pathway for recombinational repair of DSBs that occur in mitotically‐proliferating cells and that the synthesis‐dependent strand annealing (SDSA) model appears to describe mitotic DSB repair more accurately. Fundamental dissimilarities between meiotic and mitotic recombination are not unexpected, since meiotic recombination serves a very different purpose (accurate chromosome segregation, which requires COs) than mitotic recombination (repair of DNA damage, which typically generates NCOs).</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY-VCH Verlag</pub><doi>10.1002/bies.201000087</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0265-9247 |
ispartof | BioEssays, 2010-12, Vol.32 (12), p.1058-1066 |
issn | 0265-9247 1521-1878 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560124165 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | DNA repair double-strand break repair Genetic recombination meiotic recombination mitotic recombination Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast |
title | Meiotic versus mitotic recombination: Two different routes for double-strand break repair |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A22%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meiotic%20versus%20mitotic%20recombination:%20Two%20different%20routes%20for%20double-strand%20break%20repair&rft.jtitle=BioEssays&rft.au=Andersen,%20Sabrina%20L.&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1058&rft.epage=1066&rft.pages=1058-1066&rft.issn=0265-9247&rft.eissn=1521-1878&rft.coden=BIOEEJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bies.201000087&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E3375725851%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545679553&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |