Improved artery-vein separation with acceleration-dependent preparation for non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography

Purpose To compare the use of acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent flow‐preparation for non–contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE‐MRA), investigating both image quality and the ability to discriminate between arteries and veins. We develop an acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2014-09, Vol.72 (3), p.699-706
Hauptverfasser: Priest, Andrew Nicholas, Taviani, Valentina, Graves, Martin John, Lomas, David John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 706
container_issue 3
container_start_page 699
container_title Magnetic resonance in medicine
container_volume 72
creator Priest, Andrew Nicholas
Taviani, Valentina
Graves, Martin John
Lomas, David John
description Purpose To compare the use of acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent flow‐preparation for non–contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE‐MRA), investigating both image quality and the ability to discriminate between arteries and veins. We develop an acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA method known as acceleration dependent vascular anatomy for non–contrast‐enhanced MRA (ADVANCE‐MRA). Methods Acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent images were acquired using a constant and pulsatile flow‐phantom and from the lower legs of six healthy volunteers and one patient with peripheral vascular disease. The volunteer images were assessed both by quantitative signal measurements and qualitative scoring by a radiologist. Results In the phantom, acceleration‐dependent preparation depicted pulsatile but not constant flow, while velocity‐dependent preparation depicted both. In the volunteers and the patient, the velocity‐dependent preparation was unable to separate the arterial and venous signals completely, with some overlap of arterial and venous signals for all acquired flow sensitizations whereas the acceleration‐dependent preparation gave complete artery–vein separation over a wide range of flow sensitizations. Acceleration‐dependent preparation received the best overall qualitative scores for arterial image quality and venous contamination. Conclusion Acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA improves arterial image quality and reduces venous contamination, compared with velocity‐dependent NCE‐MRA, and warrants further investigation in patients. Magn Reson Med 72:699–706, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mrm.24981
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560117671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1560117671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5991-71f48f26c41b79a960eab6552eb437758a3f02dca836d4b6670d839afe9b62b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoMo9lpd-AdkwI0u0uY7k6UWrYW2QmlxGTIzZ-5NvZNMk7mtd-dPN-20FQShq8DJcx54z4vQW0r2KCFsf0jDHhOmps_QgkrGMJNGPEcLogXBnBqxg17lfEkIMUaLl2iHCcpVTdkC_T4axhSvoatcmiBt8TX4UGUYXXKTj6G68dOqcm0La5gnuIMRQgdhqsb0l-tjqkL5bWOYkssThrByoS3iwS0DTL6tEuQYbmeVC0sfl8mNq-1r9KJ36wxv7t9ddPH1y_nBN3z8_fDo4NMxbqUxFGvai7pnqhW00cYZRcA1SkoGjeBay9rxnrCudTVXnWiU0qSruXE9mEaxhvNd9GH2lrhXG8iTHXwuqdYuQNxkS6UilGql6RNQyTWRpjYFff8Pehk3KZQgdxTVWgtVqI8z1aaYc4LejskPLm0tJfa2QVsatHcNFvbdvXHTDNA9kg-VFWB_Bm78Grb_N9mTs5MHJZ43fJ7g1-OGSz-t0lxL--P00JZbyjPzubY1_wMC3LXv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1553177746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improved artery-vein separation with acceleration-dependent preparation for non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Priest, Andrew Nicholas ; Taviani, Valentina ; Graves, Martin John ; Lomas, David John</creator><creatorcontrib>Priest, Andrew Nicholas ; Taviani, Valentina ; Graves, Martin John ; Lomas, David John</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To compare the use of acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent flow‐preparation for non–contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE‐MRA), investigating both image quality and the ability to discriminate between arteries and veins. We develop an acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA method known as acceleration dependent vascular anatomy for non–contrast‐enhanced MRA (ADVANCE‐MRA). Methods Acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent images were acquired using a constant and pulsatile flow‐phantom and from the lower legs of six healthy volunteers and one patient with peripheral vascular disease. The volunteer images were assessed both by quantitative signal measurements and qualitative scoring by a radiologist. Results In the phantom, acceleration‐dependent preparation depicted pulsatile but not constant flow, while velocity‐dependent preparation depicted both. In the volunteers and the patient, the velocity‐dependent preparation was unable to separate the arterial and venous signals completely, with some overlap of arterial and venous signals for all acquired flow sensitizations whereas the acceleration‐dependent preparation gave complete artery–vein separation over a wide range of flow sensitizations. Acceleration‐dependent preparation received the best overall qualitative scores for arterial image quality and venous contamination. Conclusion Acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA improves arterial image quality and reduces venous contamination, compared with velocity‐dependent NCE‐MRA, and warrants further investigation in patients. Magn Reson Med 72:699–706, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24981</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24136812</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MRMEEN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; Angiography, Digital Subtraction ; Blood Flow Velocity - physiology ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods ; MRA ; non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography ; Peripheral Vascular Diseases - physiopathology ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Pulsatile Flow - physiology ; velocity</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2014-09, Vol.72 (3), p.699-706</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5991-71f48f26c41b79a960eab6552eb437758a3f02dca836d4b6670d839afe9b62b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5991-71f48f26c41b79a960eab6552eb437758a3f02dca836d4b6670d839afe9b62b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmrm.24981$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmrm.24981$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24136812$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Priest, Andrew Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taviani, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, Martin John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomas, David John</creatorcontrib><title>Improved artery-vein separation with acceleration-dependent preparation for non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><description>Purpose To compare the use of acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent flow‐preparation for non–contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE‐MRA), investigating both image quality and the ability to discriminate between arteries and veins. We develop an acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA method known as acceleration dependent vascular anatomy for non–contrast‐enhanced MRA (ADVANCE‐MRA). Methods Acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent images were acquired using a constant and pulsatile flow‐phantom and from the lower legs of six healthy volunteers and one patient with peripheral vascular disease. The volunteer images were assessed both by quantitative signal measurements and qualitative scoring by a radiologist. Results In the phantom, acceleration‐dependent preparation depicted pulsatile but not constant flow, while velocity‐dependent preparation depicted both. In the volunteers and the patient, the velocity‐dependent preparation was unable to separate the arterial and venous signals completely, with some overlap of arterial and venous signals for all acquired flow sensitizations whereas the acceleration‐dependent preparation gave complete artery–vein separation over a wide range of flow sensitizations. Acceleration‐dependent preparation received the best overall qualitative scores for arterial image quality and venous contamination. Conclusion Acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA improves arterial image quality and reduces venous contamination, compared with velocity‐dependent NCE‐MRA, and warrants further investigation in patients. Magn Reson Med 72:699–706, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>Angiography, Digital Subtraction</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods</subject><subject>MRA</subject><subject>non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography</subject><subject>Peripheral Vascular Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Pulsatile Flow - physiology</subject><subject>velocity</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoMo9lpd-AdkwI0u0uY7k6UWrYW2QmlxGTIzZ-5NvZNMk7mtd-dPN-20FQShq8DJcx54z4vQW0r2KCFsf0jDHhOmps_QgkrGMJNGPEcLogXBnBqxg17lfEkIMUaLl2iHCcpVTdkC_T4axhSvoatcmiBt8TX4UGUYXXKTj6G68dOqcm0La5gnuIMRQgdhqsb0l-tjqkL5bWOYkssThrByoS3iwS0DTL6tEuQYbmeVC0sfl8mNq-1r9KJ36wxv7t9ddPH1y_nBN3z8_fDo4NMxbqUxFGvai7pnqhW00cYZRcA1SkoGjeBay9rxnrCudTVXnWiU0qSruXE9mEaxhvNd9GH2lrhXG8iTHXwuqdYuQNxkS6UilGql6RNQyTWRpjYFff8Pehk3KZQgdxTVWgtVqI8z1aaYc4LejskPLm0tJfa2QVsatHcNFvbdvXHTDNA9kg-VFWB_Bm78Grb_N9mTs5MHJZ43fJ7g1-OGSz-t0lxL--P00JZbyjPzubY1_wMC3LXv</recordid><startdate>201409</startdate><enddate>201409</enddate><creator>Priest, Andrew Nicholas</creator><creator>Taviani, Valentina</creator><creator>Graves, Martin John</creator><creator>Lomas, David John</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201409</creationdate><title>Improved artery-vein separation with acceleration-dependent preparation for non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography</title><author>Priest, Andrew Nicholas ; Taviani, Valentina ; Graves, Martin John ; Lomas, David John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5991-71f48f26c41b79a960eab6552eb437758a3f02dca836d4b6670d839afe9b62b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>Angiography, Digital Subtraction</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods</topic><topic>MRA</topic><topic>non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography</topic><topic>Peripheral Vascular Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Pulsatile Flow - physiology</topic><topic>velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Priest, Andrew Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taviani, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, Martin John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomas, David John</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Priest, Andrew Nicholas</au><au>Taviani, Valentina</au><au>Graves, Martin John</au><au>Lomas, David John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improved artery-vein separation with acceleration-dependent preparation for non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><date>2014-09</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>699</spage><epage>706</epage><pages>699-706</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><coden>MRMEEN</coden><abstract>Purpose To compare the use of acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent flow‐preparation for non–contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE‐MRA), investigating both image quality and the ability to discriminate between arteries and veins. We develop an acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA method known as acceleration dependent vascular anatomy for non–contrast‐enhanced MRA (ADVANCE‐MRA). Methods Acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent images were acquired using a constant and pulsatile flow‐phantom and from the lower legs of six healthy volunteers and one patient with peripheral vascular disease. The volunteer images were assessed both by quantitative signal measurements and qualitative scoring by a radiologist. Results In the phantom, acceleration‐dependent preparation depicted pulsatile but not constant flow, while velocity‐dependent preparation depicted both. In the volunteers and the patient, the velocity‐dependent preparation was unable to separate the arterial and venous signals completely, with some overlap of arterial and venous signals for all acquired flow sensitizations whereas the acceleration‐dependent preparation gave complete artery–vein separation over a wide range of flow sensitizations. Acceleration‐dependent preparation received the best overall qualitative scores for arterial image quality and venous contamination. Conclusion Acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA improves arterial image quality and reduces venous contamination, compared with velocity‐dependent NCE‐MRA, and warrants further investigation in patients. Magn Reson Med 72:699–706, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24136812</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.24981</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0740-3194
ispartof Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2014-09, Vol.72 (3), p.699-706
issn 0740-3194
1522-2594
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560117671
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Wiley Free Content
subjects Acceleration
Angiography, Digital Subtraction
Blood Flow Velocity - physiology
Humans
Image Enhancement - methods
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods
MRA
non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography
Peripheral Vascular Diseases - physiopathology
Phantoms, Imaging
Pulsatile Flow - physiology
velocity
title Improved artery-vein separation with acceleration-dependent preparation for non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A12%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improved%20artery-vein%20separation%20with%20acceleration-dependent%20preparation%20for%20non-contrast-enhanced%20magnetic%20resonance%20angiography&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Priest,%20Andrew%20Nicholas&rft.date=2014-09&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=699&rft.epage=706&rft.pages=699-706&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft.coden=MRMEEN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.24981&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1560117671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1553177746&rft_id=info:pmid/24136812&rfr_iscdi=true