Improved artery-vein separation with acceleration-dependent preparation for non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography
Purpose To compare the use of acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent flow‐preparation for non–contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE‐MRA), investigating both image quality and the ability to discriminate between arteries and veins. We develop an acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Magnetic resonance in medicine 2014-09, Vol.72 (3), p.699-706 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 706 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 699 |
container_title | Magnetic resonance in medicine |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Priest, Andrew Nicholas Taviani, Valentina Graves, Martin John Lomas, David John |
description | Purpose
To compare the use of acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent flow‐preparation for non–contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE‐MRA), investigating both image quality and the ability to discriminate between arteries and veins. We develop an acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA method known as acceleration dependent vascular anatomy for non–contrast‐enhanced MRA (ADVANCE‐MRA).
Methods
Acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent images were acquired using a constant and pulsatile flow‐phantom and from the lower legs of six healthy volunteers and one patient with peripheral vascular disease. The volunteer images were assessed both by quantitative signal measurements and qualitative scoring by a radiologist.
Results
In the phantom, acceleration‐dependent preparation depicted pulsatile but not constant flow, while velocity‐dependent preparation depicted both. In the volunteers and the patient, the velocity‐dependent preparation was unable to separate the arterial and venous signals completely, with some overlap of arterial and venous signals for all acquired flow sensitizations whereas the acceleration‐dependent preparation gave complete artery–vein separation over a wide range of flow sensitizations. Acceleration‐dependent preparation received the best overall qualitative scores for arterial image quality and venous contamination.
Conclusion
Acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA improves arterial image quality and reduces venous contamination, compared with velocity‐dependent NCE‐MRA, and warrants further investigation in patients. Magn Reson Med 72:699–706, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mrm.24981 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560117671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1560117671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5991-71f48f26c41b79a960eab6552eb437758a3f02dca836d4b6670d839afe9b62b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoMo9lpd-AdkwI0u0uY7k6UWrYW2QmlxGTIzZ-5NvZNMk7mtd-dPN-20FQShq8DJcx54z4vQW0r2KCFsf0jDHhOmps_QgkrGMJNGPEcLogXBnBqxg17lfEkIMUaLl2iHCcpVTdkC_T4axhSvoatcmiBt8TX4UGUYXXKTj6G68dOqcm0La5gnuIMRQgdhqsb0l-tjqkL5bWOYkssThrByoS3iwS0DTL6tEuQYbmeVC0sfl8mNq-1r9KJ36wxv7t9ddPH1y_nBN3z8_fDo4NMxbqUxFGvai7pnqhW00cYZRcA1SkoGjeBay9rxnrCudTVXnWiU0qSruXE9mEaxhvNd9GH2lrhXG8iTHXwuqdYuQNxkS6UilGql6RNQyTWRpjYFff8Pehk3KZQgdxTVWgtVqI8z1aaYc4LejskPLm0tJfa2QVsatHcNFvbdvXHTDNA9kg-VFWB_Bm78Grb_N9mTs5MHJZ43fJ7g1-OGSz-t0lxL--P00JZbyjPzubY1_wMC3LXv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1553177746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improved artery-vein separation with acceleration-dependent preparation for non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Priest, Andrew Nicholas ; Taviani, Valentina ; Graves, Martin John ; Lomas, David John</creator><creatorcontrib>Priest, Andrew Nicholas ; Taviani, Valentina ; Graves, Martin John ; Lomas, David John</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To compare the use of acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent flow‐preparation for non–contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE‐MRA), investigating both image quality and the ability to discriminate between arteries and veins. We develop an acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA method known as acceleration dependent vascular anatomy for non–contrast‐enhanced MRA (ADVANCE‐MRA).
Methods
Acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent images were acquired using a constant and pulsatile flow‐phantom and from the lower legs of six healthy volunteers and one patient with peripheral vascular disease. The volunteer images were assessed both by quantitative signal measurements and qualitative scoring by a radiologist.
Results
In the phantom, acceleration‐dependent preparation depicted pulsatile but not constant flow, while velocity‐dependent preparation depicted both. In the volunteers and the patient, the velocity‐dependent preparation was unable to separate the arterial and venous signals completely, with some overlap of arterial and venous signals for all acquired flow sensitizations whereas the acceleration‐dependent preparation gave complete artery–vein separation over a wide range of flow sensitizations. Acceleration‐dependent preparation received the best overall qualitative scores for arterial image quality and venous contamination.
Conclusion
Acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA improves arterial image quality and reduces venous contamination, compared with velocity‐dependent NCE‐MRA, and warrants further investigation in patients. Magn Reson Med 72:699–706, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24981</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24136812</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MRMEEN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; Angiography, Digital Subtraction ; Blood Flow Velocity - physiology ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods ; MRA ; non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography ; Peripheral Vascular Diseases - physiopathology ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Pulsatile Flow - physiology ; velocity</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2014-09, Vol.72 (3), p.699-706</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5991-71f48f26c41b79a960eab6552eb437758a3f02dca836d4b6670d839afe9b62b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5991-71f48f26c41b79a960eab6552eb437758a3f02dca836d4b6670d839afe9b62b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmrm.24981$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmrm.24981$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24136812$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Priest, Andrew Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taviani, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, Martin John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomas, David John</creatorcontrib><title>Improved artery-vein separation with acceleration-dependent preparation for non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><description>Purpose
To compare the use of acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent flow‐preparation for non–contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE‐MRA), investigating both image quality and the ability to discriminate between arteries and veins. We develop an acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA method known as acceleration dependent vascular anatomy for non–contrast‐enhanced MRA (ADVANCE‐MRA).
Methods
Acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent images were acquired using a constant and pulsatile flow‐phantom and from the lower legs of six healthy volunteers and one patient with peripheral vascular disease. The volunteer images were assessed both by quantitative signal measurements and qualitative scoring by a radiologist.
Results
In the phantom, acceleration‐dependent preparation depicted pulsatile but not constant flow, while velocity‐dependent preparation depicted both. In the volunteers and the patient, the velocity‐dependent preparation was unable to separate the arterial and venous signals completely, with some overlap of arterial and venous signals for all acquired flow sensitizations whereas the acceleration‐dependent preparation gave complete artery–vein separation over a wide range of flow sensitizations. Acceleration‐dependent preparation received the best overall qualitative scores for arterial image quality and venous contamination.
Conclusion
Acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA improves arterial image quality and reduces venous contamination, compared with velocity‐dependent NCE‐MRA, and warrants further investigation in patients. Magn Reson Med 72:699–706, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>Angiography, Digital Subtraction</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods</subject><subject>MRA</subject><subject>non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography</subject><subject>Peripheral Vascular Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Pulsatile Flow - physiology</subject><subject>velocity</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoMo9lpd-AdkwI0u0uY7k6UWrYW2QmlxGTIzZ-5NvZNMk7mtd-dPN-20FQShq8DJcx54z4vQW0r2KCFsf0jDHhOmps_QgkrGMJNGPEcLogXBnBqxg17lfEkIMUaLl2iHCcpVTdkC_T4axhSvoatcmiBt8TX4UGUYXXKTj6G68dOqcm0La5gnuIMRQgdhqsb0l-tjqkL5bWOYkssThrByoS3iwS0DTL6tEuQYbmeVC0sfl8mNq-1r9KJ36wxv7t9ddPH1y_nBN3z8_fDo4NMxbqUxFGvai7pnqhW00cYZRcA1SkoGjeBay9rxnrCudTVXnWiU0qSruXE9mEaxhvNd9GH2lrhXG8iTHXwuqdYuQNxkS6UilGql6RNQyTWRpjYFff8Pehk3KZQgdxTVWgtVqI8z1aaYc4LejskPLm0tJfa2QVsatHcNFvbdvXHTDNA9kg-VFWB_Bm78Grb_N9mTs5MHJZ43fJ7g1-OGSz-t0lxL--P00JZbyjPzubY1_wMC3LXv</recordid><startdate>201409</startdate><enddate>201409</enddate><creator>Priest, Andrew Nicholas</creator><creator>Taviani, Valentina</creator><creator>Graves, Martin John</creator><creator>Lomas, David John</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201409</creationdate><title>Improved artery-vein separation with acceleration-dependent preparation for non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography</title><author>Priest, Andrew Nicholas ; Taviani, Valentina ; Graves, Martin John ; Lomas, David John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5991-71f48f26c41b79a960eab6552eb437758a3f02dca836d4b6670d839afe9b62b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>Angiography, Digital Subtraction</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods</topic><topic>MRA</topic><topic>non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography</topic><topic>Peripheral Vascular Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Pulsatile Flow - physiology</topic><topic>velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Priest, Andrew Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taviani, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, Martin John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomas, David John</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Priest, Andrew Nicholas</au><au>Taviani, Valentina</au><au>Graves, Martin John</au><au>Lomas, David John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improved artery-vein separation with acceleration-dependent preparation for non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><date>2014-09</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>699</spage><epage>706</epage><pages>699-706</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><coden>MRMEEN</coden><abstract>Purpose
To compare the use of acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent flow‐preparation for non–contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE‐MRA), investigating both image quality and the ability to discriminate between arteries and veins. We develop an acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA method known as acceleration dependent vascular anatomy for non–contrast‐enhanced MRA (ADVANCE‐MRA).
Methods
Acceleration‐dependent and velocity‐dependent images were acquired using a constant and pulsatile flow‐phantom and from the lower legs of six healthy volunteers and one patient with peripheral vascular disease. The volunteer images were assessed both by quantitative signal measurements and qualitative scoring by a radiologist.
Results
In the phantom, acceleration‐dependent preparation depicted pulsatile but not constant flow, while velocity‐dependent preparation depicted both. In the volunteers and the patient, the velocity‐dependent preparation was unable to separate the arterial and venous signals completely, with some overlap of arterial and venous signals for all acquired flow sensitizations whereas the acceleration‐dependent preparation gave complete artery–vein separation over a wide range of flow sensitizations. Acceleration‐dependent preparation received the best overall qualitative scores for arterial image quality and venous contamination.
Conclusion
Acceleration‐dependent NCE‐MRA improves arterial image quality and reduces venous contamination, compared with velocity‐dependent NCE‐MRA, and warrants further investigation in patients. Magn Reson Med 72:699–706, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24136812</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.24981</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0740-3194 |
ispartof | Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2014-09, Vol.72 (3), p.699-706 |
issn | 0740-3194 1522-2594 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560117671 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Wiley Free Content |
subjects | Acceleration Angiography, Digital Subtraction Blood Flow Velocity - physiology Humans Image Enhancement - methods Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods MRA non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography Peripheral Vascular Diseases - physiopathology Phantoms, Imaging Pulsatile Flow - physiology velocity |
title | Improved artery-vein separation with acceleration-dependent preparation for non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A12%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improved%20artery-vein%20separation%20with%20acceleration-dependent%20preparation%20for%20non-contrast-enhanced%20magnetic%20resonance%20angiography&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Priest,%20Andrew%20Nicholas&rft.date=2014-09&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=699&rft.epage=706&rft.pages=699-706&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft.coden=MRMEEN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.24981&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1560117671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1553177746&rft_id=info:pmid/24136812&rfr_iscdi=true |