Biodegradation of Polymethylmethacrylate Bone Cement May Not Be a Serious Issue in Total Hip Arthroplasty—Retrieval Study for Knoop Hardness and Young’s Modulus

Introduction: To investigate a long-term in vivo deterioration of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement over time, we evaluated retrieved PMMA cement in terms of chemical elements presenting in the cement using energy dispersive analysis of X-rays; Knoop hardness; and the Young's modulus us...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Open journal of orthopedics 2013-09, Vol.3 (6), p.269-277
Hauptverfasser: Maruyama, Masaaki, Capello, William N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 277
container_issue 6
container_start_page 269
container_title Open journal of orthopedics
container_volume 3
creator Maruyama, Masaaki
Capello, William N.
description Introduction: To investigate a long-term in vivo deterioration of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement over time, we evaluated retrieved PMMA cement in terms of chemical elements presenting in the cement using energy dispersive analysis of X-rays; Knoop hardness; and the Young's modulus using scanning acoustic microscopy. Materials and Methods: For mechanical evaluation, we could neglect the influences of entrapped air bubbles or blood by the use of small specimens. The study was based on thirteen cement samples (six used in the acetabulum and seven in the femur) derived from eight patients (age at revision surgery: mean 72.5, range 68 to 79). All of these samples were Simplex-P super([symbolomitted])cement. They were functioning well at least ten years after the previous surgery. Duration until revision surgery was ranged 12 to 25 years (average, 17.4 years). The reason for revision was aseptic mechanical loosening. Twenty samples of Simplex-P super(reg; ) cement were served by manually mixing as a control. Results: The average of the hardness of the cement was 17.0 plus or minus 1.2 (range, 13.4-20.6). In the control, the hardness was 17.8 plus or minus 1.5 (range, 14.0-24.6). There was no significant difference between these values. The mean of Young's modulus of the cement was 5.61 plus or minus 0.19 GPa (range, 5.09-6.10). In the control, the modulus was 6.04 plus or minus 0.13 GPa (range, 5.68-6.45). Although the modulus was significantly less than that of the control, there was only 7% decrease in average between twelve and twenty-five years in vivo. Conclusions: Our results suggest that long-term implantation and functional loading in vivo may not be the limiting factor in the mechanical integrity of the bone cement.
doi_str_mv 10.4236/ojo.2013.36050
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560114569</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1560114569</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1120-2161bd7dd24b7a0f2ade322327a14938cd5d404c9e52ab5e32644cae2fba6cc23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kT9vE0EQxU8IJKKQlnpKGpv9d2u7jC3AEfmDSCioTuPdueSi9c6xuxfpunwIGno-WT4JZ4KYYuZJ72mkp19VvZVibpS27_me50pIPddW1OJFdaSkNTMtpH35X4vl6-ok53sxTW3VUoqj6ve6Y0-3CT2WjiNwC184jHsqd2M4bHRpDFgI1hwJNrSnWOACR7jkAmsChGtKHQ8ZznIeCLoIN1wwwLbr4TSVu8R9wFzGp8efX6mkjh4m87oMfoSWE3yOzD1sMflIOQNGD995iLdPj78yXLAfwpDfVK9aDJlO_t3j6tvHDzeb7ez86tPZ5vR85qRUYjbVlDu_8F6Z3QJFq9CTVkqrBUqz0kvna2-EcSuqFe7qybPGOCTV7tA6p_Rx9e75b5_4x0C5NPsuOwoBI00NG1lbIaWp7WqKzp-jLnHOidqmT90e09hI0RyINBOR5kCk-UtE_wHvU4OG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1560114569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biodegradation of Polymethylmethacrylate Bone Cement May Not Be a Serious Issue in Total Hip Arthroplasty—Retrieval Study for Knoop Hardness and Young’s Modulus</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Maruyama, Masaaki ; Capello, William N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, Masaaki ; Capello, William N.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: To investigate a long-term in vivo deterioration of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement over time, we evaluated retrieved PMMA cement in terms of chemical elements presenting in the cement using energy dispersive analysis of X-rays; Knoop hardness; and the Young's modulus using scanning acoustic microscopy. Materials and Methods: For mechanical evaluation, we could neglect the influences of entrapped air bubbles or blood by the use of small specimens. The study was based on thirteen cement samples (six used in the acetabulum and seven in the femur) derived from eight patients (age at revision surgery: mean 72.5, range 68 to 79). All of these samples were Simplex-P super([symbolomitted])cement. They were functioning well at least ten years after the previous surgery. Duration until revision surgery was ranged 12 to 25 years (average, 17.4 years). The reason for revision was aseptic mechanical loosening. Twenty samples of Simplex-P super(reg; ) cement were served by manually mixing as a control. Results: The average of the hardness of the cement was 17.0 plus or minus 1.2 (range, 13.4-20.6). In the control, the hardness was 17.8 plus or minus 1.5 (range, 14.0-24.6). There was no significant difference between these values. The mean of Young's modulus of the cement was 5.61 plus or minus 0.19 GPa (range, 5.09-6.10). In the control, the modulus was 6.04 plus or minus 0.13 GPa (range, 5.68-6.45). Although the modulus was significantly less than that of the control, there was only 7% decrease in average between twelve and twenty-five years in vivo. Conclusions: Our results suggest that long-term implantation and functional loading in vivo may not be the limiting factor in the mechanical integrity of the bone cement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2164-3008</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-3016</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4236/ojo.2013.36050</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Open journal of orthopedics, 2013-09, Vol.3 (6), p.269-277</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1120-2161bd7dd24b7a0f2ade322327a14938cd5d404c9e52ab5e32644cae2fba6cc23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27906,27907</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, Masaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capello, William N.</creatorcontrib><title>Biodegradation of Polymethylmethacrylate Bone Cement May Not Be a Serious Issue in Total Hip Arthroplasty—Retrieval Study for Knoop Hardness and Young’s Modulus</title><title>Open journal of orthopedics</title><description>Introduction: To investigate a long-term in vivo deterioration of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement over time, we evaluated retrieved PMMA cement in terms of chemical elements presenting in the cement using energy dispersive analysis of X-rays; Knoop hardness; and the Young's modulus using scanning acoustic microscopy. Materials and Methods: For mechanical evaluation, we could neglect the influences of entrapped air bubbles or blood by the use of small specimens. The study was based on thirteen cement samples (six used in the acetabulum and seven in the femur) derived from eight patients (age at revision surgery: mean 72.5, range 68 to 79). All of these samples were Simplex-P super([symbolomitted])cement. They were functioning well at least ten years after the previous surgery. Duration until revision surgery was ranged 12 to 25 years (average, 17.4 years). The reason for revision was aseptic mechanical loosening. Twenty samples of Simplex-P super(reg; ) cement were served by manually mixing as a control. Results: The average of the hardness of the cement was 17.0 plus or minus 1.2 (range, 13.4-20.6). In the control, the hardness was 17.8 plus or minus 1.5 (range, 14.0-24.6). There was no significant difference between these values. The mean of Young's modulus of the cement was 5.61 plus or minus 0.19 GPa (range, 5.09-6.10). In the control, the modulus was 6.04 plus or minus 0.13 GPa (range, 5.68-6.45). Although the modulus was significantly less than that of the control, there was only 7% decrease in average between twelve and twenty-five years in vivo. Conclusions: Our results suggest that long-term implantation and functional loading in vivo may not be the limiting factor in the mechanical integrity of the bone cement.</description><issn>2164-3008</issn><issn>2164-3016</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kT9vE0EQxU8IJKKQlnpKGpv9d2u7jC3AEfmDSCioTuPdueSi9c6xuxfpunwIGno-WT4JZ4KYYuZJ72mkp19VvZVibpS27_me50pIPddW1OJFdaSkNTMtpH35X4vl6-ok53sxTW3VUoqj6ve6Y0-3CT2WjiNwC184jHsqd2M4bHRpDFgI1hwJNrSnWOACR7jkAmsChGtKHQ8ZznIeCLoIN1wwwLbr4TSVu8R9wFzGp8efX6mkjh4m87oMfoSWE3yOzD1sMflIOQNGD995iLdPj78yXLAfwpDfVK9aDJlO_t3j6tvHDzeb7ez86tPZ5vR85qRUYjbVlDu_8F6Z3QJFq9CTVkqrBUqz0kvna2-EcSuqFe7qybPGOCTV7tA6p_Rx9e75b5_4x0C5NPsuOwoBI00NG1lbIaWp7WqKzp-jLnHOidqmT90e09hI0RyINBOR5kCk-UtE_wHvU4OG</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Maruyama, Masaaki</creator><creator>Capello, William N.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Biodegradation of Polymethylmethacrylate Bone Cement May Not Be a Serious Issue in Total Hip Arthroplasty—Retrieval Study for Knoop Hardness and Young’s Modulus</title><author>Maruyama, Masaaki ; Capello, William N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1120-2161bd7dd24b7a0f2ade322327a14938cd5d404c9e52ab5e32644cae2fba6cc23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, Masaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capello, William N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Open journal of orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maruyama, Masaaki</au><au>Capello, William N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biodegradation of Polymethylmethacrylate Bone Cement May Not Be a Serious Issue in Total Hip Arthroplasty—Retrieval Study for Knoop Hardness and Young’s Modulus</atitle><jtitle>Open journal of orthopedics</jtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>269-277</pages><issn>2164-3008</issn><eissn>2164-3016</eissn><abstract>Introduction: To investigate a long-term in vivo deterioration of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement over time, we evaluated retrieved PMMA cement in terms of chemical elements presenting in the cement using energy dispersive analysis of X-rays; Knoop hardness; and the Young's modulus using scanning acoustic microscopy. Materials and Methods: For mechanical evaluation, we could neglect the influences of entrapped air bubbles or blood by the use of small specimens. The study was based on thirteen cement samples (six used in the acetabulum and seven in the femur) derived from eight patients (age at revision surgery: mean 72.5, range 68 to 79). All of these samples were Simplex-P super([symbolomitted])cement. They were functioning well at least ten years after the previous surgery. Duration until revision surgery was ranged 12 to 25 years (average, 17.4 years). The reason for revision was aseptic mechanical loosening. Twenty samples of Simplex-P super(reg; ) cement were served by manually mixing as a control. Results: The average of the hardness of the cement was 17.0 plus or minus 1.2 (range, 13.4-20.6). In the control, the hardness was 17.8 plus or minus 1.5 (range, 14.0-24.6). There was no significant difference between these values. The mean of Young's modulus of the cement was 5.61 plus or minus 0.19 GPa (range, 5.09-6.10). In the control, the modulus was 6.04 plus or minus 0.13 GPa (range, 5.68-6.45). Although the modulus was significantly less than that of the control, there was only 7% decrease in average between twelve and twenty-five years in vivo. Conclusions: Our results suggest that long-term implantation and functional loading in vivo may not be the limiting factor in the mechanical integrity of the bone cement.</abstract><doi>10.4236/ojo.2013.36050</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2164-3008
ispartof Open journal of orthopedics, 2013-09, Vol.3 (6), p.269-277
issn 2164-3008
2164-3016
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560114569
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Biodegradation of Polymethylmethacrylate Bone Cement May Not Be a Serious Issue in Total Hip Arthroplasty—Retrieval Study for Knoop Hardness and Young’s Modulus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A53%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biodegradation%20of%20Polymethylmethacrylate%20Bone%20Cement%20May%20Not%20Be%20a%20Serious%20Issue%20in%20Total%20Hip%20Arthroplasty%E2%80%94Retrieval%20Study%20for%20Knoop%20Hardness%20and%20Young%E2%80%99s%20Modulus&rft.jtitle=Open%20journal%20of%20orthopedics&rft.au=Maruyama,%20Masaaki&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=269-277&rft.issn=2164-3008&rft.eissn=2164-3016&rft_id=info:doi/10.4236/ojo.2013.36050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1560114569%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1560114569&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true