A good time to leave?: the sunk time effect in pigeons

•Like humans, pigeons do not know when is a good time to leave – they commit the sunk time effect.•Pigeons persist in responding during a long time interval, which ends with no reward, instead of making an escape response which might return them to a short interval ending in reward.•Whether they esc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioural processes 2014-06, Vol.105, p.1-5
Hauptverfasser: Magalhães, Paula, White, K. Geoffrey
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Behavioural processes
container_volume 105
creator Magalhães, Paula
White, K. Geoffrey
description •Like humans, pigeons do not know when is a good time to leave – they commit the sunk time effect.•Pigeons persist in responding during a long time interval, which ends with no reward, instead of making an escape response which might return them to a short interval ending in reward.•Whether they escape depends on their discrimination of the ratio of short to long intervals. Persistence in a losing course of action due to prior investments of time, known as the sunk time effect, has seldom been studied in nonhuman animals. On every trial in the present study, pigeons were required to choose between two response keys. Responses on one key produced food after a short fixed interval (FI) of time on some trials, or on other trials, no food (Extinction) after a longer time. FI and Extinction trials were not differently signaled, were equiprobable, and alternated randomly. Responses on a second Escape key allowed the pigeon to terminate the current trial and start a new one. The optimal behavior was for pigeons to peck the escape key once the duration equivalent to the short FI had elapsed without reward. Durations of the short FI and the longer Extinction schedules were varied over conditions. In some conditions, the pigeons suboptimally responded through the Extinction interval, thus committing the sunk time effect. The absolute duration of the short FI had no effect on the choice between persisting and escaping. Instead, the ratio of FI and Extinction durations determined the likelihood of persistence during extinction
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560108111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376635714000461</els_id><sourcerecordid>1560108111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-cac04f6e63528f65bd6377cab989994e6725167e2fa556377b4db22946c7c9783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctOwzAQRS0EouXxBwhlg8QmwXb8CgtQVfGSKrGBteU4k-KSJiVOKvH3uE2BHWLlxZyZuXOM0BnBCcFEXC2SHFZtYxOKCUswTTDBe2hMlKSxSrHaR2OcShGLlMsROvJ-gTEmCotDNKKMC54pOkZiEs2bpog6t4Soa6IKzBpur6PuDSLf1-9DAcoSbBe5Olq5OTS1P0EHpak8nO7eY_R6f_cyfYxnzw9P08kstozyLrbGYlYKCBmoKgXPC5FKaU2eqSzLGAhJORESaGk435RyVuSUZkxYaTOp0mN0OcwNl3704Du9dN5CVZkamt5rwkU4WxFC_oFSKmQmt1PZgNq28b6FUq9atzTtpyZYb-TqhR7k6o1cjakOW0Lb-W5Dny-h-Gn6thmAix1gvDVV2ZraOv_LKRY-Zhv1ZuAgqFs7aLW3DmoLhWuDZ1007u8kXxWmlg4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1522679778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A good time to leave?: the sunk time effect in pigeons</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Magalhães, Paula ; White, K. Geoffrey</creator><creatorcontrib>Magalhães, Paula ; White, K. Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><description>•Like humans, pigeons do not know when is a good time to leave – they commit the sunk time effect.•Pigeons persist in responding during a long time interval, which ends with no reward, instead of making an escape response which might return them to a short interval ending in reward.•Whether they escape depends on their discrimination of the ratio of short to long intervals. Persistence in a losing course of action due to prior investments of time, known as the sunk time effect, has seldom been studied in nonhuman animals. On every trial in the present study, pigeons were required to choose between two response keys. Responses on one key produced food after a short fixed interval (FI) of time on some trials, or on other trials, no food (Extinction) after a longer time. FI and Extinction trials were not differently signaled, were equiprobable, and alternated randomly. Responses on a second Escape key allowed the pigeon to terminate the current trial and start a new one. The optimal behavior was for pigeons to peck the escape key once the duration equivalent to the short FI had elapsed without reward. Durations of the short FI and the longer Extinction schedules were varied over conditions. In some conditions, the pigeons suboptimally responded through the Extinction interval, thus committing the sunk time effect. The absolute duration of the short FI had no effect on the choice between persisting and escaping. Instead, the ratio of FI and Extinction durations determined the likelihood of persistence during extinction</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-6357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24565982</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BPRODA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal ethology ; Animals ; Aves ; Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Choice ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Columbidae ; Extinction ; Extinction, Psychological - physiology ; Fixed interval ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Reinforcement Schedule ; Reward ; Sunk cost ; Sunk time ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>Behavioural processes, 2014-06, Vol.105, p.1-5</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-cac04f6e63528f65bd6377cab989994e6725167e2fa556377b4db22946c7c9783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-cac04f6e63528f65bd6377cab989994e6725167e2fa556377b4db22946c7c9783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28483011$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24565982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Magalhães, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, K. Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><title>A good time to leave?: the sunk time effect in pigeons</title><title>Behavioural processes</title><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><description>•Like humans, pigeons do not know when is a good time to leave – they commit the sunk time effect.•Pigeons persist in responding during a long time interval, which ends with no reward, instead of making an escape response which might return them to a short interval ending in reward.•Whether they escape depends on their discrimination of the ratio of short to long intervals. Persistence in a losing course of action due to prior investments of time, known as the sunk time effect, has seldom been studied in nonhuman animals. On every trial in the present study, pigeons were required to choose between two response keys. Responses on one key produced food after a short fixed interval (FI) of time on some trials, or on other trials, no food (Extinction) after a longer time. FI and Extinction trials were not differently signaled, were equiprobable, and alternated randomly. Responses on a second Escape key allowed the pigeon to terminate the current trial and start a new one. The optimal behavior was for pigeons to peck the escape key once the duration equivalent to the short FI had elapsed without reward. Durations of the short FI and the longer Extinction schedules were varied over conditions. In some conditions, the pigeons suboptimally responded through the Extinction interval, thus committing the sunk time effect. The absolute duration of the short FI had no effect on the choice between persisting and escaping. Instead, the ratio of FI and Extinction durations determined the likelihood of persistence during extinction</description><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Choice</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Columbidae</subject><subject>Extinction</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological - physiology</subject><subject>Fixed interval</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Reinforcement Schedule</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Sunk cost</subject><subject>Sunk time</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>0376-6357</issn><issn>1872-8308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctOwzAQRS0EouXxBwhlg8QmwXb8CgtQVfGSKrGBteU4k-KSJiVOKvH3uE2BHWLlxZyZuXOM0BnBCcFEXC2SHFZtYxOKCUswTTDBe2hMlKSxSrHaR2OcShGLlMsROvJ-gTEmCotDNKKMC54pOkZiEs2bpog6t4Soa6IKzBpur6PuDSLf1-9DAcoSbBe5Olq5OTS1P0EHpak8nO7eY_R6f_cyfYxnzw9P08kstozyLrbGYlYKCBmoKgXPC5FKaU2eqSzLGAhJORESaGk435RyVuSUZkxYaTOp0mN0OcwNl3704Du9dN5CVZkamt5rwkU4WxFC_oFSKmQmt1PZgNq28b6FUq9atzTtpyZYb-TqhR7k6o1cjakOW0Lb-W5Dny-h-Gn6thmAix1gvDVV2ZraOv_LKRY-Zhv1ZuAgqFs7aLW3DmoLhWuDZ1007u8kXxWmlg4</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Magalhães, Paula</creator><creator>White, K. Geoffrey</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>A good time to leave?: the sunk time effect in pigeons</title><author>Magalhães, Paula ; White, K. Geoffrey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-cac04f6e63528f65bd6377cab989994e6725167e2fa556377b4db22946c7c9783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Choice</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Columbidae</topic><topic>Extinction</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological - physiology</topic><topic>Fixed interval</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Reinforcement Schedule</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Sunk cost</topic><topic>Sunk time</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Magalhães, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, K. Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Magalhães, Paula</au><au>White, K. Geoffrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A good time to leave?: the sunk time effect in pigeons</atitle><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>105</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>5</epage><pages>1-5</pages><issn>0376-6357</issn><eissn>1872-8308</eissn><coden>BPRODA</coden><abstract>•Like humans, pigeons do not know when is a good time to leave – they commit the sunk time effect.•Pigeons persist in responding during a long time interval, which ends with no reward, instead of making an escape response which might return them to a short interval ending in reward.•Whether they escape depends on their discrimination of the ratio of short to long intervals. Persistence in a losing course of action due to prior investments of time, known as the sunk time effect, has seldom been studied in nonhuman animals. On every trial in the present study, pigeons were required to choose between two response keys. Responses on one key produced food after a short fixed interval (FI) of time on some trials, or on other trials, no food (Extinction) after a longer time. FI and Extinction trials were not differently signaled, were equiprobable, and alternated randomly. Responses on a second Escape key allowed the pigeon to terminate the current trial and start a new one. The optimal behavior was for pigeons to peck the escape key once the duration equivalent to the short FI had elapsed without reward. Durations of the short FI and the longer Extinction schedules were varied over conditions. In some conditions, the pigeons suboptimally responded through the Extinction interval, thus committing the sunk time effect. The absolute duration of the short FI had no effect on the choice between persisting and escaping. Instead, the ratio of FI and Extinction durations determined the likelihood of persistence during extinction</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24565982</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.010</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0376-6357
ispartof Behavioural processes, 2014-06, Vol.105, p.1-5
issn 0376-6357
1872-8308
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560108111
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animal ethology
Animals
Aves
Behavior, Animal - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Choice
Choice Behavior - physiology
Columbidae
Extinction
Extinction, Psychological - physiology
Fixed interval
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Reinforcement Schedule
Reward
Sunk cost
Sunk time
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
title A good time to leave?: the sunk time effect in pigeons
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A13%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20good%20time%20to%20leave?:%20the%20sunk%20time%20effect%20in%20pigeons&rft.jtitle=Behavioural%20processes&rft.au=Magalh%C3%A3es,%20Paula&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=105&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=5&rft.pages=1-5&rft.issn=0376-6357&rft.eissn=1872-8308&rft.coden=BPRODA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1560108111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1522679778&rft_id=info:pmid/24565982&rft_els_id=S0376635714000461&rfr_iscdi=true