Efficacy of chemical repellents against Otobius megnini (Acari: Argasidae) and three species of ixodid ticks
Otobius megnini (Dugès), often referred to as the ear tick or spinose ear tick, is a one-host tick native to the southwestern United States and Mexico. Infestations of this species can cause severe irritation and may affect breeding behavior in the host. Although chemical repellents are commonly use...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental & applied acarology 2014-09, Vol.64 (1), p.99-107 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 107 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 99 |
container_title | Experimental & applied acarology |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Niebuhr, Chris N. Mays, Sarah E. Breeden, Jeff B. Lambert, Barry D. Kattes, David H. |
description | Otobius megnini
(Dugès), often referred to as the ear tick or spinose ear tick, is a one-host tick native to the southwestern United States and Mexico. Infestations of this species can cause severe irritation and may affect breeding behavior in the host. Although chemical repellents are commonly used as an alternative approach to conventional arthropod vector control, information on repellency against
O. megnini
is lacking. This study compared repellency of ammonia, BioUD
®
, 98.25 % DEET, garlic pepper tea, permanone, and pyrethrin with piperonyl butoxide, against larvae stages of
O. megnini
,
Amblyomma americanum
(L.),
Dermacentor variabilis
(Say), and
Rhipicephalus sanguineus
(Latreille). To test for repellency, tick movement was recorded at 30 s intervals for five min after introduction to a partially treated piece of filter paper. Results showed larvae of
O. megnini
exhibited less aversion to the chemicals tested when compared to the other tick species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10493-014-9799-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560106717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3389475431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-9b932133e0be250a402fbd094bff69b51eb475d30f3500c7b8c3960e2a57fb03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9PHCEUx0nTpm61f0AvDUkv9jD1wQzM4m1jbDUx8eKdAPNYsfNj5c0k-t-XzdrGmPREHnze5wFfxr4I-CEA2jMS0Ji6AtFUpjWm0u_YSqhWlgrke7YCodfVWmh5xD4RPQCAAq0-siPZaGWUMCvWX8aYggvPfIo83ONQip5n3GHf4zgTd1uXRpr57Tz5tBAfcDumMfHTTXA5nfNN3jpKncPv3I0dn-8zIqcdhoS0d6anqUtlP4XfdMI-RNcTfn5Zj9ndz8u7i6vq5vbX9cXmpgpNq-bKeFNLUdcIHqUC14CMvgPT-Bi18UqgL1xXQ6wVQGj9OtRGA0qn2uihPmanB-0uT48L0myHRKE8yI04LWSF0iBAt6It6Lc36MO05LFcrlBFrkHJplDiQIU8EWWMdpfT4PKzFWD3SdhDErYkYfdJWF16vr6YFz9g96_j79cXQB4AKkfjFvOr0f-1_gFGtJLW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1550060524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of chemical repellents against Otobius megnini (Acari: Argasidae) and three species of ixodid ticks</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Niebuhr, Chris N. ; Mays, Sarah E. ; Breeden, Jeff B. ; Lambert, Barry D. ; Kattes, David H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Niebuhr, Chris N. ; Mays, Sarah E. ; Breeden, Jeff B. ; Lambert, Barry D. ; Kattes, David H.</creatorcontrib><description>Otobius megnini
(Dugès), often referred to as the ear tick or spinose ear tick, is a one-host tick native to the southwestern United States and Mexico. Infestations of this species can cause severe irritation and may affect breeding behavior in the host. Although chemical repellents are commonly used as an alternative approach to conventional arthropod vector control, information on repellency against
O. megnini
is lacking. This study compared repellency of ammonia, BioUD
®
, 98.25 % DEET, garlic pepper tea, permanone, and pyrethrin with piperonyl butoxide, against larvae stages of
O. megnini
,
Amblyomma americanum
(L.),
Dermacentor variabilis
(Say), and
Rhipicephalus sanguineus
(Latreille). To test for repellency, tick movement was recorded at 30 s intervals for five min after introduction to a partially treated piece of filter paper. Results showed larvae of
O. megnini
exhibited less aversion to the chemicals tested when compared to the other tick species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9702</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10493-014-9799-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24659519</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EAACEM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Acari ; Allium sativum ; Amblyomma americanum ; Animal Ecology ; Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Animals ; Argasidae ; Arthropoda ; Behavior, Animal - drug effects ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; DEET ; Dermacentor variabilis ; Entomology ; Insect Repellents ; Ixodidae ; Ketones ; Larva ; Larvae ; Life Sciences ; Pyrethrins ; Repellents ; Rhipicephalus sanguineus</subject><ispartof>Experimental & applied acarology, 2014-09, Vol.64 (1), p.99-107</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-9b932133e0be250a402fbd094bff69b51eb475d30f3500c7b8c3960e2a57fb03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-9b932133e0be250a402fbd094bff69b51eb475d30f3500c7b8c3960e2a57fb03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10493-014-9799-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10493-014-9799-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24659519$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niebuhr, Chris N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mays, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breeden, Jeff B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Barry D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kattes, David H.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of chemical repellents against Otobius megnini (Acari: Argasidae) and three species of ixodid ticks</title><title>Experimental & applied acarology</title><addtitle>Exp Appl Acarol</addtitle><addtitle>Exp Appl Acarol</addtitle><description>Otobius megnini
(Dugès), often referred to as the ear tick or spinose ear tick, is a one-host tick native to the southwestern United States and Mexico. Infestations of this species can cause severe irritation and may affect breeding behavior in the host. Although chemical repellents are commonly used as an alternative approach to conventional arthropod vector control, information on repellency against
O. megnini
is lacking. This study compared repellency of ammonia, BioUD
®
, 98.25 % DEET, garlic pepper tea, permanone, and pyrethrin with piperonyl butoxide, against larvae stages of
O. megnini
,
Amblyomma americanum
(L.),
Dermacentor variabilis
(Say), and
Rhipicephalus sanguineus
(Latreille). To test for repellency, tick movement was recorded at 30 s intervals for five min after introduction to a partially treated piece of filter paper. Results showed larvae of
O. megnini
exhibited less aversion to the chemicals tested when compared to the other tick species.</description><subject>Acari</subject><subject>Allium sativum</subject><subject>Amblyomma americanum</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Argasidae</subject><subject>Arthropoda</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - drug effects</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>DEET</subject><subject>Dermacentor variabilis</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Insect Repellents</subject><subject>Ixodidae</subject><subject>Ketones</subject><subject>Larva</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Pyrethrins</subject><subject>Repellents</subject><subject>Rhipicephalus sanguineus</subject><issn>0168-8162</issn><issn>1572-9702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9PHCEUx0nTpm61f0AvDUkv9jD1wQzM4m1jbDUx8eKdAPNYsfNj5c0k-t-XzdrGmPREHnze5wFfxr4I-CEA2jMS0Ji6AtFUpjWm0u_YSqhWlgrke7YCodfVWmh5xD4RPQCAAq0-siPZaGWUMCvWX8aYggvPfIo83ONQip5n3GHf4zgTd1uXRpr57Tz5tBAfcDumMfHTTXA5nfNN3jpKncPv3I0dn-8zIqcdhoS0d6anqUtlP4XfdMI-RNcTfn5Zj9ndz8u7i6vq5vbX9cXmpgpNq-bKeFNLUdcIHqUC14CMvgPT-Bi18UqgL1xXQ6wVQGj9OtRGA0qn2uihPmanB-0uT48L0myHRKE8yI04LWSF0iBAt6It6Lc36MO05LFcrlBFrkHJplDiQIU8EWWMdpfT4PKzFWD3SdhDErYkYfdJWF16vr6YFz9g96_j79cXQB4AKkfjFvOr0f-1_gFGtJLW</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Niebuhr, Chris N.</creator><creator>Mays, Sarah E.</creator><creator>Breeden, Jeff B.</creator><creator>Lambert, Barry D.</creator><creator>Kattes, David H.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Efficacy of chemical repellents against Otobius megnini (Acari: Argasidae) and three species of ixodid ticks</title><author>Niebuhr, Chris N. ; Mays, Sarah E. ; Breeden, Jeff B. ; Lambert, Barry D. ; Kattes, David H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-9b932133e0be250a402fbd094bff69b51eb475d30f3500c7b8c3960e2a57fb03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acari</topic><topic>Allium sativum</topic><topic>Amblyomma americanum</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Argasidae</topic><topic>Arthropoda</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - drug effects</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>DEET</topic><topic>Dermacentor variabilis</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Insect Repellents</topic><topic>Ixodidae</topic><topic>Ketones</topic><topic>Larva</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Pyrethrins</topic><topic>Repellents</topic><topic>Rhipicephalus sanguineus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niebuhr, Chris N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mays, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breeden, Jeff B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Barry D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kattes, David H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Experimental & applied acarology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niebuhr, Chris N.</au><au>Mays, Sarah E.</au><au>Breeden, Jeff B.</au><au>Lambert, Barry D.</au><au>Kattes, David H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of chemical repellents against Otobius megnini (Acari: Argasidae) and three species of ixodid ticks</atitle><jtitle>Experimental & applied acarology</jtitle><stitle>Exp Appl Acarol</stitle><addtitle>Exp Appl Acarol</addtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>99-107</pages><issn>0168-8162</issn><eissn>1572-9702</eissn><coden>EAACEM</coden><abstract>Otobius megnini
(Dugès), often referred to as the ear tick or spinose ear tick, is a one-host tick native to the southwestern United States and Mexico. Infestations of this species can cause severe irritation and may affect breeding behavior in the host. Although chemical repellents are commonly used as an alternative approach to conventional arthropod vector control, information on repellency against
O. megnini
is lacking. This study compared repellency of ammonia, BioUD
®
, 98.25 % DEET, garlic pepper tea, permanone, and pyrethrin with piperonyl butoxide, against larvae stages of
O. megnini
,
Amblyomma americanum
(L.),
Dermacentor variabilis
(Say), and
Rhipicephalus sanguineus
(Latreille). To test for repellency, tick movement was recorded at 30 s intervals for five min after introduction to a partially treated piece of filter paper. Results showed larvae of
O. megnini
exhibited less aversion to the chemicals tested when compared to the other tick species.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>24659519</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10493-014-9799-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-8162 |
ispartof | Experimental & applied acarology, 2014-09, Vol.64 (1), p.99-107 |
issn | 0168-8162 1572-9702 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560106717 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Acari Allium sativum Amblyomma americanum Animal Ecology Animal Genetics and Genomics Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography Animals Argasidae Arthropoda Behavior, Animal - drug effects Biomedical and Life Sciences DEET Dermacentor variabilis Entomology Insect Repellents Ixodidae Ketones Larva Larvae Life Sciences Pyrethrins Repellents Rhipicephalus sanguineus |
title | Efficacy of chemical repellents against Otobius megnini (Acari: Argasidae) and three species of ixodid ticks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T00%3A11%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20chemical%20repellents%20against%20Otobius%20megnini%20(Acari:%20Argasidae)%20and%20three%20species%20of%20ixodid%20ticks&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20&%20applied%20acarology&rft.au=Niebuhr,%20Chris%20N.&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=99-107&rft.issn=0168-8162&rft.eissn=1572-9702&rft.coden=EAACEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10493-014-9799-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3389475431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1550060524&rft_id=info:pmid/24659519&rfr_iscdi=true |