Interimager Variability in ADC Measurement of the Human Brain

Purpose: Routine clinical practice involves the application of diverse scanning parameters that can affect apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. We evaluated interimager variability in ADC values with respect to their potential effect in clinical applications.Methods: In 7 healthy volunteers,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences 2014/06/01, Vol.13(2), pp.81-87
Hauptverfasser: TSUJITA, Naoko, KAI, Naoki, FUJITA, Yujiro, HIAI, Yasuhiro, HIRAI, Toshinori, KITAJIMA, Mika, YAMASHITA, Yasuyuki, MURAKAMI, Ryuji
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 87
container_issue 2
container_start_page 81
container_title Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
container_volume 13
creator TSUJITA, Naoko
KAI, Naoki
FUJITA, Yujiro
HIAI, Yasuhiro
HIRAI, Toshinori
KITAJIMA, Mika
YAMASHITA, Yasuyuki
MURAKAMI, Ryuji
description Purpose: Routine clinical practice involves the application of diverse scanning parameters that can affect apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. We evaluated interimager variability in ADC values with respect to their potential effect in clinical applications.Methods: In 7 healthy volunteers, we obtained diffusion-weighted (DW) images using routine clinical parameters and 1.5- (n = 9) and 3-tesla (n = 3) magnetic resonance (MR) imagers from 5 different vendors, performing 84 MR imaging studies. To evaluate the differences in ADC values among the imagers, vendors, and magnetic field strengths, we measured the mean pixel values of the frontal white matter and thalamus (gray matter) in both cerebral hemispheres of the 7 volunteers and used repeated-measures analysis of variance for multiple comparisons.Results: The laterality of ADC values in the bilateral structures ranged from one to 3% for the 12 imagers. Although the relative difference in ADC values of white matter was 7% for scanners yielding the highest and lowest mean ADC values (P < 0.01), it was within 2 to 4% for instruments from the same vendors. For gray matter, the interimager difference was 4 to 12%, even among the same vendors (P < 0.05). Among the 3T imagers, the difference for white and gray matter was approximately 3%.Conclusions: There were significant interimager differences in ADC values, especially with respect to gray matter. Taking into consideration the existing laterality, however, the differences among our 3T imagers may be acceptable despite the use of diverse scanning parameters. In routine clinical practice, the existing variability must be considered imager by imager.
doi_str_mv 10.2463/mrms.2012-0098
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560102590</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1539708617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c648t-a728dfa16843bebc8692995bd6bc87304b087053219f1828730eed9f74449e233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkTtPwzAUhS0EoqWwMqJILCwpftWPgaG0QCsVsQCr5aQ3NFUexU6G_nsc-hiYWHyvfD8fXZ-D0DXBQ8oFuy9d6YcUExpjrNUJ6hOlcEwpFqehZ1zGjCjaQxferzFmKozPUY9yKbRgtI8e5lUDLi_tF7jo07rcJnmRN9sor6LxdBK9gvWtgxKqJqqzqFlBNGtLW0WPzubVJTrLbOHhal8H6OP56X0yixdvL_PJeBGngqsmtpKqZWaJUJwlkKRKaKr1KFmK0EuGeYKVxCNGic7Ctt0VwFJnknOugTI2QHc73Y2rv1vwjSlzn0JR2Arq1hsyEphgOtL4HyjTEitBZEBv_6DrunVV-EigOCNcylAGaLijUld77yAzm84vtzUEmy4D02VgugxMl0F4cLOXbZMSlkf8YHoApjtg7Zvg-xGwrsnTAnZ6hBn6exx0j-N0ZZ2Biv0AnNSXHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1543147754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interimager Variability in ADC Measurement of the Human Brain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>J-STAGE (Japan Science &amp; Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>TSUJITA, Naoko ; KAI, Naoki ; FUJITA, Yujiro ; HIAI, Yasuhiro ; HIRAI, Toshinori ; KITAJIMA, Mika ; YAMASHITA, Yasuyuki ; MURAKAMI, Ryuji</creator><creatorcontrib>TSUJITA, Naoko ; KAI, Naoki ; FUJITA, Yujiro ; HIAI, Yasuhiro ; HIRAI, Toshinori ; KITAJIMA, Mika ; YAMASHITA, Yasuyuki ; MURAKAMI, Ryuji</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Routine clinical practice involves the application of diverse scanning parameters that can affect apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. We evaluated interimager variability in ADC values with respect to their potential effect in clinical applications.Methods: In 7 healthy volunteers, we obtained diffusion-weighted (DW) images using routine clinical parameters and 1.5- (n = 9) and 3-tesla (n = 3) magnetic resonance (MR) imagers from 5 different vendors, performing 84 MR imaging studies. To evaluate the differences in ADC values among the imagers, vendors, and magnetic field strengths, we measured the mean pixel values of the frontal white matter and thalamus (gray matter) in both cerebral hemispheres of the 7 volunteers and used repeated-measures analysis of variance for multiple comparisons.Results: The laterality of ADC values in the bilateral structures ranged from one to 3% for the 12 imagers. Although the relative difference in ADC values of white matter was 7% for scanners yielding the highest and lowest mean ADC values (P &lt; 0.01), it was within 2 to 4% for instruments from the same vendors. For gray matter, the interimager difference was 4 to 12%, even among the same vendors (P &lt; 0.05). Among the 3T imagers, the difference for white and gray matter was approximately 3%.Conclusions: There were significant interimager differences in ADC values, especially with respect to gray matter. Taking into consideration the existing laterality, however, the differences among our 3T imagers may be acceptable despite the use of diverse scanning parameters. In routine clinical practice, the existing variability must be considered imager by imager.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1347-3182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1880-2206</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2463/mrms.2012-0098</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24769632</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</publisher><subject>Adult ; apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ; Brain Mapping - methods ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging ; Female ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; interimager variability ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation</subject><ispartof>Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences, 2014/06/01, Vol.13(2), pp.81-87</ispartof><rights>2014 by Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency 2014</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c648t-a728dfa16843bebc8692995bd6bc87304b087053219f1828730eed9f74449e233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c648t-a728dfa16843bebc8692995bd6bc87304b087053219f1828730eed9f74449e233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1877,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24769632$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>TSUJITA, Naoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAI, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUJITA, Yujiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIAI, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIRAI, Toshinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KITAJIMA, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAMASHITA, Yasuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURAKAMI, Ryuji</creatorcontrib><title>Interimager Variability in ADC Measurement of the Human Brain</title><title>Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences</title><addtitle>MRMS</addtitle><description>Purpose: Routine clinical practice involves the application of diverse scanning parameters that can affect apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. We evaluated interimager variability in ADC values with respect to their potential effect in clinical applications.Methods: In 7 healthy volunteers, we obtained diffusion-weighted (DW) images using routine clinical parameters and 1.5- (n = 9) and 3-tesla (n = 3) magnetic resonance (MR) imagers from 5 different vendors, performing 84 MR imaging studies. To evaluate the differences in ADC values among the imagers, vendors, and magnetic field strengths, we measured the mean pixel values of the frontal white matter and thalamus (gray matter) in both cerebral hemispheres of the 7 volunteers and used repeated-measures analysis of variance for multiple comparisons.Results: The laterality of ADC values in the bilateral structures ranged from one to 3% for the 12 imagers. Although the relative difference in ADC values of white matter was 7% for scanners yielding the highest and lowest mean ADC values (P &lt; 0.01), it was within 2 to 4% for instruments from the same vendors. For gray matter, the interimager difference was 4 to 12%, even among the same vendors (P &lt; 0.05). Among the 3T imagers, the difference for white and gray matter was approximately 3%.Conclusions: There were significant interimager differences in ADC values, especially with respect to gray matter. Taking into consideration the existing laterality, however, the differences among our 3T imagers may be acceptable despite the use of diverse scanning parameters. In routine clinical practice, the existing variability must be considered imager by imager.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>interimager variability</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><issn>1347-3182</issn><issn>1880-2206</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkTtPwzAUhS0EoqWwMqJILCwpftWPgaG0QCsVsQCr5aQ3NFUexU6G_nsc-hiYWHyvfD8fXZ-D0DXBQ8oFuy9d6YcUExpjrNUJ6hOlcEwpFqehZ1zGjCjaQxferzFmKozPUY9yKbRgtI8e5lUDLi_tF7jo07rcJnmRN9sor6LxdBK9gvWtgxKqJqqzqFlBNGtLW0WPzubVJTrLbOHhal8H6OP56X0yixdvL_PJeBGngqsmtpKqZWaJUJwlkKRKaKr1KFmK0EuGeYKVxCNGic7Ctt0VwFJnknOugTI2QHc73Y2rv1vwjSlzn0JR2Arq1hsyEphgOtL4HyjTEitBZEBv_6DrunVV-EigOCNcylAGaLijUld77yAzm84vtzUEmy4D02VgugxMl0F4cLOXbZMSlkf8YHoApjtg7Zvg-xGwrsnTAnZ6hBn6exx0j-N0ZZ2Biv0AnNSXHw</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>TSUJITA, Naoko</creator><creator>KAI, Naoki</creator><creator>FUJITA, Yujiro</creator><creator>HIAI, Yasuhiro</creator><creator>HIRAI, Toshinori</creator><creator>KITAJIMA, Mika</creator><creator>YAMASHITA, Yasuyuki</creator><creator>MURAKAMI, Ryuji</creator><general>Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</general><general>Japan Science and Technology Agency</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Interimager Variability in ADC Measurement of the Human Brain</title><author>TSUJITA, Naoko ; KAI, Naoki ; FUJITA, Yujiro ; HIAI, Yasuhiro ; HIRAI, Toshinori ; KITAJIMA, Mika ; YAMASHITA, Yasuyuki ; MURAKAMI, Ryuji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c648t-a728dfa16843bebc8692995bd6bc87304b087053219f1828730eed9f74449e233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>interimager variability</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>TSUJITA, Naoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAI, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUJITA, Yujiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIAI, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIRAI, Toshinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KITAJIMA, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAMASHITA, Yasuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURAKAMI, Ryuji</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>TSUJITA, Naoko</au><au>KAI, Naoki</au><au>FUJITA, Yujiro</au><au>HIAI, Yasuhiro</au><au>HIRAI, Toshinori</au><au>KITAJIMA, Mika</au><au>YAMASHITA, Yasuyuki</au><au>MURAKAMI, Ryuji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interimager Variability in ADC Measurement of the Human Brain</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences</jtitle><addtitle>MRMS</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>81-87</pages><issn>1347-3182</issn><eissn>1880-2206</eissn><abstract>Purpose: Routine clinical practice involves the application of diverse scanning parameters that can affect apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. We evaluated interimager variability in ADC values with respect to their potential effect in clinical applications.Methods: In 7 healthy volunteers, we obtained diffusion-weighted (DW) images using routine clinical parameters and 1.5- (n = 9) and 3-tesla (n = 3) magnetic resonance (MR) imagers from 5 different vendors, performing 84 MR imaging studies. To evaluate the differences in ADC values among the imagers, vendors, and magnetic field strengths, we measured the mean pixel values of the frontal white matter and thalamus (gray matter) in both cerebral hemispheres of the 7 volunteers and used repeated-measures analysis of variance for multiple comparisons.Results: The laterality of ADC values in the bilateral structures ranged from one to 3% for the 12 imagers. Although the relative difference in ADC values of white matter was 7% for scanners yielding the highest and lowest mean ADC values (P &lt; 0.01), it was within 2 to 4% for instruments from the same vendors. For gray matter, the interimager difference was 4 to 12%, even among the same vendors (P &lt; 0.05). Among the 3T imagers, the difference for white and gray matter was approximately 3%.Conclusions: There were significant interimager differences in ADC values, especially with respect to gray matter. Taking into consideration the existing laterality, however, the differences among our 3T imagers may be acceptable despite the use of diverse scanning parameters. In routine clinical practice, the existing variability must be considered imager by imager.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</pub><pmid>24769632</pmid><doi>10.2463/mrms.2012-0098</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1347-3182
ispartof Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences, 2014/06/01, Vol.13(2), pp.81-87
issn 1347-3182
1880-2206
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1560102590
source MEDLINE; J-STAGE (Japan Science & Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)
Brain Mapping - methods
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging
Female
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
interimager variability
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
title Interimager Variability in ADC Measurement of the Human Brain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A43%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interimager%20Variability%20in%20ADC%20Measurement%20of%20the%20Human%20Brain&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20Resonance%20in%20Medical%20Sciences&rft.au=TSUJITA,%20Naoko&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=81-87&rft.issn=1347-3182&rft.eissn=1880-2206&rft_id=info:doi/10.2463/mrms.2012-0098&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1539708617%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1543147754&rft_id=info:pmid/24769632&rfr_iscdi=true