Spin-orbit interaction in a two-dimensional electron gas: A SU(2) formulation
Spin‐orbit interaction is usefully classified as extrinsic or intrinsic, depending on its origin: the potential due to random impurities (extrinsic), or the crystalline potential associated with the band or device structure (intrinsic). In this paper we will show how, by using a SU(2) formulation, t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annalen der Physik 2012-04, Vol.524 (3-4), p.np-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Spin‐orbit interaction is usefully classified as extrinsic or intrinsic, depending on its origin: the potential due to random impurities (extrinsic), or the crystalline potential associated with the band or device structure (intrinsic). In this paper we will show how, by using a SU(2) formulation, the two sources may be described in an elegant and unified way. As a result we obtain a simple description of the interplay of the two types of spin‐orbit interaction, and a physically transparent explanation of the vanishing of the d.c. spin Hall conductivity in a Rashba two‐dimensional electron gas when spin relaxation is neglected, as well as its reinstatement when spin relaxation is allowed. Furthermore, we obtain an explicit formula for the transverse spin polarization created by an electric current, which generalizes the standard formula obtained by Edelstein, and Aronov and Lyanda‐Geller by including extrinsic spin‐orbit interaction and spin relaxation.
Spin‐orbit interaction is usefully classified as extrinsic or intrinsic, depending on its origin: the potential due to random impurities (extrinsic), or the crystalline potential associated with the band or device structure (intrinsic). In this paper it is shown how, by using a SU(2) formulation, the two sources may be described in an elegant and unified way. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-3804 1521-3889 |
DOI: | 10.1002/andp.201100253 |