The long-wavelength admittance and effective elastic thickness of the Canadian Shield

The strength of the cratonic lithosphere has been controversial. On the one hand, many estimates of effective elastic thickness (Te) greatly exceed the crustal thickness, but on the other the great majority of cratonic earthquakes occur in the upper crust. This implies that the seismogenic thickness...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2014-06, Vol.119 (6), p.5187-5214
Hauptverfasser: Kirby, J. F., Swain, C. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5214
container_issue 6
container_start_page 5187
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth
container_volume 119
creator Kirby, J. F.
Swain, C. J.
description The strength of the cratonic lithosphere has been controversial. On the one hand, many estimates of effective elastic thickness (Te) greatly exceed the crustal thickness, but on the other the great majority of cratonic earthquakes occur in the upper crust. This implies that the seismogenic thickness of cratons is much smaller than Te, whereas in the ocean basins they are approximately the same, leading to suspicions about the large Te estimates. One region where such estimates have been questioned is the Canadian Shield, where glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) and mantle convection are thought to contribute to the long‐wavelength undulations of the topography and gravity. To date these have not been included in models used to estimate Te from topography and gravity which conventionally are based only on loading and flexure. Here we devise a theoretical expression for the free‐air (gravity/topography) admittance that includes the effects of GIA and convection as well as flexure and use it to estimate Te over the Canadian Shield. We use wavelet transforms for estimating the observed admittances, after showing that multitaper estimates, which have hitherto been popular for Te studies, have poor resolution at the long wavelengths where GIA and convection predominate, compared to wavelets. Our results suggest that Te over most of the shield exceeds 80 km, with a higher‐Te core near the southwest shore of Hudson Bay. This means that the lack of mantle earthquakes in this craton is simply due to its high strength compared to the applied stresses. Key Points Wavelet transform can separate convective and flexural signals in the admittance Elastic thickness of Canadian Shield exceeds 80 km
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2013JB010578
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1559703132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3547752861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4675-6a10eea673503b65329330e07e356cc7e5664bced76b542c3571e0fbc654bc6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1PAjEQhhujiQS5-QOaePHgarvdtuxRUFEkahSit6Z0Z6W4dHG7gPx7azDEeKDJpDOT553MB0LHlJxTQuKLmFDW7xBKuGzvoUZMRRqljIv9rU_ZIWp5PyXhtUOKJg00Gk4AF6V7j1Z6CQW493qCdTazda2dAaxdhiHPwdR2CRgK7WtrcD2x5sOB97jMQwC4q53OrHb4ZWKhyI7QQa4LD63fv4lGN9fD7m00eOzddS8HkU6E5JHQlABoIRknbCw4i1PGCBAJoW9jJHAhkrGBTIoxT2LDuKRA8rERPKRFzprodFN3XpWfC_C1mllvoCi0g3LhFeU8lSQMHgf05B86LReVC90pmlIm25yK9k5KJLEQjAVrorMNZarS-wpyNa_sTFdrRYn6OYb6e4yAsw2-sgWsd7Kq33vucCIJD6poo7K-hq-tSlcfKixMcvX60FNXT_TtoZPcK8a-AYNelw0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1642663366</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The long-wavelength admittance and effective elastic thickness of the Canadian Shield</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Kirby, J. F. ; Swain, C. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirby, J. F. ; Swain, C. J.</creatorcontrib><description>The strength of the cratonic lithosphere has been controversial. On the one hand, many estimates of effective elastic thickness (Te) greatly exceed the crustal thickness, but on the other the great majority of cratonic earthquakes occur in the upper crust. This implies that the seismogenic thickness of cratons is much smaller than Te, whereas in the ocean basins they are approximately the same, leading to suspicions about the large Te estimates. One region where such estimates have been questioned is the Canadian Shield, where glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) and mantle convection are thought to contribute to the long‐wavelength undulations of the topography and gravity. To date these have not been included in models used to estimate Te from topography and gravity which conventionally are based only on loading and flexure. Here we devise a theoretical expression for the free‐air (gravity/topography) admittance that includes the effects of GIA and convection as well as flexure and use it to estimate Te over the Canadian Shield. We use wavelet transforms for estimating the observed admittances, after showing that multitaper estimates, which have hitherto been popular for Te studies, have poor resolution at the long wavelengths where GIA and convection predominate, compared to wavelets. Our results suggest that Te over most of the shield exceeds 80 km, with a higher‐Te core near the southwest shore of Hudson Bay. This means that the lack of mantle earthquakes in this craton is simply due to its high strength compared to the applied stresses. Key Points Wavelet transform can separate convective and flexural signals in the admittance Elastic thickness of Canadian Shield exceeds 80 km</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2013JB010578</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Admittance ; Banks (topography) ; Basins ; Canadian Shield ; Convection ; Cratons ; Crustal thickness ; Earthquakes ; elastic thickness ; Electrical impedance ; Estimates ; Flexing ; Geophysics ; glacial isostatic adjustment ; Gravitation ; Gravity ; High strength ; Lithosphere ; Mantle convection ; multitaper method ; Ocean basins ; Seismic activity ; Seismic phenomena ; Slope ; Strength ; Topography ; Topography (geology) ; Wavelength ; Wavelengths ; wavelet transform ; Wavelet transforms</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2014-06, Vol.119 (6), p.5187-5214</ispartof><rights>2014. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4675-6a10eea673503b65329330e07e356cc7e5664bced76b542c3571e0fbc654bc6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4675-6a10eea673503b65329330e07e356cc7e5664bced76b542c3571e0fbc654bc6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2013JB010578$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2013JB010578$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirby, J. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swain, C. J.</creatorcontrib><title>The long-wavelength admittance and effective elastic thickness of the Canadian Shield</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</addtitle><description>The strength of the cratonic lithosphere has been controversial. On the one hand, many estimates of effective elastic thickness (Te) greatly exceed the crustal thickness, but on the other the great majority of cratonic earthquakes occur in the upper crust. This implies that the seismogenic thickness of cratons is much smaller than Te, whereas in the ocean basins they are approximately the same, leading to suspicions about the large Te estimates. One region where such estimates have been questioned is the Canadian Shield, where glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) and mantle convection are thought to contribute to the long‐wavelength undulations of the topography and gravity. To date these have not been included in models used to estimate Te from topography and gravity which conventionally are based only on loading and flexure. Here we devise a theoretical expression for the free‐air (gravity/topography) admittance that includes the effects of GIA and convection as well as flexure and use it to estimate Te over the Canadian Shield. We use wavelet transforms for estimating the observed admittances, after showing that multitaper estimates, which have hitherto been popular for Te studies, have poor resolution at the long wavelengths where GIA and convection predominate, compared to wavelets. Our results suggest that Te over most of the shield exceeds 80 km, with a higher‐Te core near the southwest shore of Hudson Bay. This means that the lack of mantle earthquakes in this craton is simply due to its high strength compared to the applied stresses. Key Points Wavelet transform can separate convective and flexural signals in the admittance Elastic thickness of Canadian Shield exceeds 80 km</description><subject>Admittance</subject><subject>Banks (topography)</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Canadian Shield</subject><subject>Convection</subject><subject>Cratons</subject><subject>Crustal thickness</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>elastic thickness</subject><subject>Electrical impedance</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Flexing</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>glacial isostatic adjustment</subject><subject>Gravitation</subject><subject>Gravity</subject><subject>High strength</subject><subject>Lithosphere</subject><subject>Mantle convection</subject><subject>multitaper method</subject><subject>Ocean basins</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic phenomena</subject><subject>Slope</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Topography (geology)</subject><subject>Wavelength</subject><subject>Wavelengths</subject><subject>wavelet transform</subject><subject>Wavelet transforms</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1PAjEQhhujiQS5-QOaePHgarvdtuxRUFEkahSit6Z0Z6W4dHG7gPx7azDEeKDJpDOT553MB0LHlJxTQuKLmFDW7xBKuGzvoUZMRRqljIv9rU_ZIWp5PyXhtUOKJg00Gk4AF6V7j1Z6CQW493qCdTazda2dAaxdhiHPwdR2CRgK7WtrcD2x5sOB97jMQwC4q53OrHb4ZWKhyI7QQa4LD63fv4lGN9fD7m00eOzddS8HkU6E5JHQlABoIRknbCw4i1PGCBAJoW9jJHAhkrGBTIoxT2LDuKRA8rERPKRFzprodFN3XpWfC_C1mllvoCi0g3LhFeU8lSQMHgf05B86LReVC90pmlIm25yK9k5KJLEQjAVrorMNZarS-wpyNa_sTFdrRYn6OYb6e4yAsw2-sgWsd7Kq33vucCIJD6poo7K-hq-tSlcfKixMcvX60FNXT_TtoZPcK8a-AYNelw0</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Kirby, J. F.</creator><creator>Swain, C. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>The long-wavelength admittance and effective elastic thickness of the Canadian Shield</title><author>Kirby, J. F. ; Swain, C. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4675-6a10eea673503b65329330e07e356cc7e5664bced76b542c3571e0fbc654bc6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Admittance</topic><topic>Banks (topography)</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Canadian Shield</topic><topic>Convection</topic><topic>Cratons</topic><topic>Crustal thickness</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>elastic thickness</topic><topic>Electrical impedance</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Flexing</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>glacial isostatic adjustment</topic><topic>Gravitation</topic><topic>Gravity</topic><topic>High strength</topic><topic>Lithosphere</topic><topic>Mantle convection</topic><topic>multitaper method</topic><topic>Ocean basins</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic phenomena</topic><topic>Slope</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Topography (geology)</topic><topic>Wavelength</topic><topic>Wavelengths</topic><topic>wavelet transform</topic><topic>Wavelet transforms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirby, J. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swain, C. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirby, J. F.</au><au>Swain, C. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The long-wavelength admittance and effective elastic thickness of the Canadian Shield</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</addtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>5187</spage><epage>5214</epage><pages>5187-5214</pages><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>The strength of the cratonic lithosphere has been controversial. On the one hand, many estimates of effective elastic thickness (Te) greatly exceed the crustal thickness, but on the other the great majority of cratonic earthquakes occur in the upper crust. This implies that the seismogenic thickness of cratons is much smaller than Te, whereas in the ocean basins they are approximately the same, leading to suspicions about the large Te estimates. One region where such estimates have been questioned is the Canadian Shield, where glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) and mantle convection are thought to contribute to the long‐wavelength undulations of the topography and gravity. To date these have not been included in models used to estimate Te from topography and gravity which conventionally are based only on loading and flexure. Here we devise a theoretical expression for the free‐air (gravity/topography) admittance that includes the effects of GIA and convection as well as flexure and use it to estimate Te over the Canadian Shield. We use wavelet transforms for estimating the observed admittances, after showing that multitaper estimates, which have hitherto been popular for Te studies, have poor resolution at the long wavelengths where GIA and convection predominate, compared to wavelets. Our results suggest that Te over most of the shield exceeds 80 km, with a higher‐Te core near the southwest shore of Hudson Bay. This means that the lack of mantle earthquakes in this craton is simply due to its high strength compared to the applied stresses. Key Points Wavelet transform can separate convective and flexural signals in the admittance Elastic thickness of Canadian Shield exceeds 80 km</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2013JB010578</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9313
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2014-06, Vol.119 (6), p.5187-5214
issn 2169-9313
2169-9356
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1559703132
source Wiley Journals; Wiley Free Content
subjects Admittance
Banks (topography)
Basins
Canadian Shield
Convection
Cratons
Crustal thickness
Earthquakes
elastic thickness
Electrical impedance
Estimates
Flexing
Geophysics
glacial isostatic adjustment
Gravitation
Gravity
High strength
Lithosphere
Mantle convection
multitaper method
Ocean basins
Seismic activity
Seismic phenomena
Slope
Strength
Topography
Topography (geology)
Wavelength
Wavelengths
wavelet transform
Wavelet transforms
title The long-wavelength admittance and effective elastic thickness of the Canadian Shield
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A38%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20long-wavelength%20admittance%20and%20effective%20elastic%20thickness%20of%20the%20Canadian%20Shield&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Kirby,%20J.%20F.&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=5187&rft.epage=5214&rft.pages=5187-5214&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2013JB010578&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3547752861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1642663366&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true