From intersectionality to interference: Feminist onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation
This article reviews the debate on ‘intersectionality’ as the dominant approach in gender studies, with an emphasis on the politics of representation. The debate on intersectionality officially began in the late 1980s, though the approach can be traced back to the institutionalization of women'...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Women's studies international forum 2013-11, Vol.41, p.171-178 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 178 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 171 |
container_title | Women's studies international forum |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Geerts, Evelien van der Tuin, Iris |
description | This article reviews the debate on ‘intersectionality’ as the dominant approach in gender studies, with an emphasis on the politics of representation. The debate on intersectionality officially began in the late 1980s, though the approach can be traced back to the institutionalization of women's studies in the 1970s and the feminist movement of the 1960s. Black and lesbian feminists have long advocated hyphenated identities to be the backbone of feminist thought. But in recent years, intersectionality has sustained criticism from numerous angles within gender studies, ranging from feminist philosophy to applied political research. This article will use the theorization of ‘interference’ as a searchlight to produce an overview of this interdisciplinary debate, culminating in our affirmative answer to the question: should we move from intersectionality to interference? Our answer is based on onto-epistemological reflections, i.e., reflections in which being and knowing are always already entangled. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1559007446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277539513001349</els_id><sourcerecordid>1559007446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-7bb1fef0b084000a7a65ef114d8db25b5caa8f7b7f7493746cb38aff13a7669b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS1UJKaFP8AqUjdskl7Hr6TqpqoYilSJDUjsLMdzDR4lcWp7ivrvcQgrFqir48d3rq1zCHlPoaFA5dWx-ZW8a1qgrAHVFHlFdrRTfd1y9v2M7KBVqhasF2_IeUpHAJDQdjuS9jFMlZ8zxoQ2-zCb0efnKoft0GHE2eJ1tcfJzz7lKsw51LiUJU5hDD-8NWMV0Y2bPRWgyj-xWkIZ5G3Zu3K9REw4Z7Mib8lrZ8aE7_7qBfm2__j17r5--PLp893tQ225orlWw0AdOhig4-W_Rhkp0FHKD91haMUgrDGdU4NyivdMcWkH1hnnKDNKyn5gF-TDNneJ4fGEKevJJ4vjaGYMp6SpED2A4ly-EOWMiRegIHkrBIOCXv6DHsMploQLxSX0qhd_3m43ysaQUklSL9FPJj5rCnptVx_12q5e29WgdJFiutlMWAJ88hh1sn5t6uBjKUIfgv-f_Tdk4q_t</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1460979546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From intersectionality to interference: Feminist onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Geerts, Evelien ; van der Tuin, Iris</creator><creatorcontrib>Geerts, Evelien ; van der Tuin, Iris</creatorcontrib><description>This article reviews the debate on ‘intersectionality’ as the dominant approach in gender studies, with an emphasis on the politics of representation. The debate on intersectionality officially began in the late 1980s, though the approach can be traced back to the institutionalization of women's studies in the 1970s and the feminist movement of the 1960s. Black and lesbian feminists have long advocated hyphenated identities to be the backbone of feminist thought. But in recent years, intersectionality has sustained criticism from numerous angles within gender studies, ranging from feminist philosophy to applied political research. This article will use the theorization of ‘interference’ as a searchlight to produce an overview of this interdisciplinary debate, culminating in our affirmative answer to the question: should we move from intersectionality to interference? Our answer is based on onto-epistemological reflections, i.e., reflections in which being and knowing are always already entangled.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-5395</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-243X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.013</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WSINDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Criticism ; Epistemology ; Females ; Feminism ; Gender ; Gender Studies ; Identity ; Institutionalization ; Interdisciplinary research ; Lesbianism ; Philosophy ; Political representation ; Political science ; Politics ; Representation ; Women</subject><ispartof>Women's studies international forum, 2013-11, Vol.41, p.171-178</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Nov/Dec 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-7bb1fef0b084000a7a65ef114d8db25b5caa8f7b7f7493746cb38aff13a7669b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-7bb1fef0b084000a7a65ef114d8db25b5caa8f7b7f7493746cb38aff13a7669b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,33774,33775,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geerts, Evelien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Tuin, Iris</creatorcontrib><title>From intersectionality to interference: Feminist onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation</title><title>Women's studies international forum</title><description>This article reviews the debate on ‘intersectionality’ as the dominant approach in gender studies, with an emphasis on the politics of representation. The debate on intersectionality officially began in the late 1980s, though the approach can be traced back to the institutionalization of women's studies in the 1970s and the feminist movement of the 1960s. Black and lesbian feminists have long advocated hyphenated identities to be the backbone of feminist thought. But in recent years, intersectionality has sustained criticism from numerous angles within gender studies, ranging from feminist philosophy to applied political research. This article will use the theorization of ‘interference’ as a searchlight to produce an overview of this interdisciplinary debate, culminating in our affirmative answer to the question: should we move from intersectionality to interference? Our answer is based on onto-epistemological reflections, i.e., reflections in which being and knowing are always already entangled.</description><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender Studies</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary research</subject><subject>Lesbianism</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Political representation</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Representation</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0277-5395</issn><issn>1879-243X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS1UJKaFP8AqUjdskl7Hr6TqpqoYilSJDUjsLMdzDR4lcWp7ivrvcQgrFqir48d3rq1zCHlPoaFA5dWx-ZW8a1qgrAHVFHlFdrRTfd1y9v2M7KBVqhasF2_IeUpHAJDQdjuS9jFMlZ8zxoQ2-zCb0efnKoft0GHE2eJ1tcfJzz7lKsw51LiUJU5hDD-8NWMV0Y2bPRWgyj-xWkIZ5G3Zu3K9REw4Z7Mib8lrZ8aE7_7qBfm2__j17r5--PLp893tQ225orlWw0AdOhig4-W_Rhkp0FHKD91haMUgrDGdU4NyivdMcWkH1hnnKDNKyn5gF-TDNneJ4fGEKevJJ4vjaGYMp6SpED2A4ly-EOWMiRegIHkrBIOCXv6DHsMploQLxSX0qhd_3m43ysaQUklSL9FPJj5rCnptVx_12q5e29WgdJFiutlMWAJ88hh1sn5t6uBjKUIfgv-f_Tdk4q_t</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Geerts, Evelien</creator><creator>van der Tuin, Iris</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>From intersectionality to interference: Feminist onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation</title><author>Geerts, Evelien ; van der Tuin, Iris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-7bb1fef0b084000a7a65ef114d8db25b5caa8f7b7f7493746cb38aff13a7669b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender Studies</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary research</topic><topic>Lesbianism</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Political representation</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Representation</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geerts, Evelien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Tuin, Iris</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Women's studies international forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geerts, Evelien</au><au>van der Tuin, Iris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From intersectionality to interference: Feminist onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation</atitle><jtitle>Women's studies international forum</jtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>41</volume><spage>171</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>171-178</pages><issn>0277-5395</issn><eissn>1879-243X</eissn><coden>WSINDA</coden><abstract>This article reviews the debate on ‘intersectionality’ as the dominant approach in gender studies, with an emphasis on the politics of representation. The debate on intersectionality officially began in the late 1980s, though the approach can be traced back to the institutionalization of women's studies in the 1970s and the feminist movement of the 1960s. Black and lesbian feminists have long advocated hyphenated identities to be the backbone of feminist thought. But in recent years, intersectionality has sustained criticism from numerous angles within gender studies, ranging from feminist philosophy to applied political research. This article will use the theorization of ‘interference’ as a searchlight to produce an overview of this interdisciplinary debate, culminating in our affirmative answer to the question: should we move from intersectionality to interference? Our answer is based on onto-epistemological reflections, i.e., reflections in which being and knowing are always already entangled.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.013</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-5395 |
ispartof | Women's studies international forum, 2013-11, Vol.41, p.171-178 |
issn | 0277-5395 1879-243X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1559007446 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Criticism Epistemology Females Feminism Gender Gender Studies Identity Institutionalization Interdisciplinary research Lesbianism Philosophy Political representation Political science Politics Representation Women |
title | From intersectionality to interference: Feminist onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A27%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20intersectionality%20to%20interference:%20Feminist%20onto-epistemological%20reflections%20on%20the%20politics%20of%20representation&rft.jtitle=Women's%20studies%20international%20forum&rft.au=Geerts,%20Evelien&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=41&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=171-178&rft.issn=0277-5395&rft.eissn=1879-243X&rft.coden=WSINDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1559007446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1460979546&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0277539513001349&rfr_iscdi=true |