From intersectionality to interference: Feminist onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation

This article reviews the debate on ‘intersectionality’ as the dominant approach in gender studies, with an emphasis on the politics of representation. The debate on intersectionality officially began in the late 1980s, though the approach can be traced back to the institutionalization of women'...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Women's studies international forum 2013-11, Vol.41, p.171-178
Hauptverfasser: Geerts, Evelien, van der Tuin, Iris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 178
container_issue
container_start_page 171
container_title Women's studies international forum
container_volume 41
creator Geerts, Evelien
van der Tuin, Iris
description This article reviews the debate on ‘intersectionality’ as the dominant approach in gender studies, with an emphasis on the politics of representation. The debate on intersectionality officially began in the late 1980s, though the approach can be traced back to the institutionalization of women's studies in the 1970s and the feminist movement of the 1960s. Black and lesbian feminists have long advocated hyphenated identities to be the backbone of feminist thought. But in recent years, intersectionality has sustained criticism from numerous angles within gender studies, ranging from feminist philosophy to applied political research. This article will use the theorization of ‘interference’ as a searchlight to produce an overview of this interdisciplinary debate, culminating in our affirmative answer to the question: should we move from intersectionality to interference? Our answer is based on onto-epistemological reflections, i.e., reflections in which being and knowing are always already entangled.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1559007446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277539513001349</els_id><sourcerecordid>1559007446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-7bb1fef0b084000a7a65ef114d8db25b5caa8f7b7f7493746cb38aff13a7669b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS1UJKaFP8AqUjdskl7Hr6TqpqoYilSJDUjsLMdzDR4lcWp7ivrvcQgrFqir48d3rq1zCHlPoaFA5dWx-ZW8a1qgrAHVFHlFdrRTfd1y9v2M7KBVqhasF2_IeUpHAJDQdjuS9jFMlZ8zxoQ2-zCb0efnKoft0GHE2eJ1tcfJzz7lKsw51LiUJU5hDD-8NWMV0Y2bPRWgyj-xWkIZ5G3Zu3K9REw4Z7Mib8lrZ8aE7_7qBfm2__j17r5--PLp893tQ225orlWw0AdOhig4-W_Rhkp0FHKD91haMUgrDGdU4NyivdMcWkH1hnnKDNKyn5gF-TDNneJ4fGEKevJJ4vjaGYMp6SpED2A4ly-EOWMiRegIHkrBIOCXv6DHsMploQLxSX0qhd_3m43ysaQUklSL9FPJj5rCnptVx_12q5e29WgdJFiutlMWAJ88hh1sn5t6uBjKUIfgv-f_Tdk4q_t</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1460979546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From intersectionality to interference: Feminist onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Geerts, Evelien ; van der Tuin, Iris</creator><creatorcontrib>Geerts, Evelien ; van der Tuin, Iris</creatorcontrib><description>This article reviews the debate on ‘intersectionality’ as the dominant approach in gender studies, with an emphasis on the politics of representation. The debate on intersectionality officially began in the late 1980s, though the approach can be traced back to the institutionalization of women's studies in the 1970s and the feminist movement of the 1960s. Black and lesbian feminists have long advocated hyphenated identities to be the backbone of feminist thought. But in recent years, intersectionality has sustained criticism from numerous angles within gender studies, ranging from feminist philosophy to applied political research. This article will use the theorization of ‘interference’ as a searchlight to produce an overview of this interdisciplinary debate, culminating in our affirmative answer to the question: should we move from intersectionality to interference? Our answer is based on onto-epistemological reflections, i.e., reflections in which being and knowing are always already entangled.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-5395</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-243X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.013</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WSINDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Criticism ; Epistemology ; Females ; Feminism ; Gender ; Gender Studies ; Identity ; Institutionalization ; Interdisciplinary research ; Lesbianism ; Philosophy ; Political representation ; Political science ; Politics ; Representation ; Women</subject><ispartof>Women's studies international forum, 2013-11, Vol.41, p.171-178</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Nov/Dec 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-7bb1fef0b084000a7a65ef114d8db25b5caa8f7b7f7493746cb38aff13a7669b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-7bb1fef0b084000a7a65ef114d8db25b5caa8f7b7f7493746cb38aff13a7669b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,33774,33775,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geerts, Evelien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Tuin, Iris</creatorcontrib><title>From intersectionality to interference: Feminist onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation</title><title>Women's studies international forum</title><description>This article reviews the debate on ‘intersectionality’ as the dominant approach in gender studies, with an emphasis on the politics of representation. The debate on intersectionality officially began in the late 1980s, though the approach can be traced back to the institutionalization of women's studies in the 1970s and the feminist movement of the 1960s. Black and lesbian feminists have long advocated hyphenated identities to be the backbone of feminist thought. But in recent years, intersectionality has sustained criticism from numerous angles within gender studies, ranging from feminist philosophy to applied political research. This article will use the theorization of ‘interference’ as a searchlight to produce an overview of this interdisciplinary debate, culminating in our affirmative answer to the question: should we move from intersectionality to interference? Our answer is based on onto-epistemological reflections, i.e., reflections in which being and knowing are always already entangled.</description><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender Studies</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary research</subject><subject>Lesbianism</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Political representation</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Representation</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0277-5395</issn><issn>1879-243X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS1UJKaFP8AqUjdskl7Hr6TqpqoYilSJDUjsLMdzDR4lcWp7ivrvcQgrFqir48d3rq1zCHlPoaFA5dWx-ZW8a1qgrAHVFHlFdrRTfd1y9v2M7KBVqhasF2_IeUpHAJDQdjuS9jFMlZ8zxoQ2-zCb0efnKoft0GHE2eJ1tcfJzz7lKsw51LiUJU5hDD-8NWMV0Y2bPRWgyj-xWkIZ5G3Zu3K9REw4Z7Mib8lrZ8aE7_7qBfm2__j17r5--PLp893tQ225orlWw0AdOhig4-W_Rhkp0FHKD91haMUgrDGdU4NyivdMcWkH1hnnKDNKyn5gF-TDNneJ4fGEKevJJ4vjaGYMp6SpED2A4ly-EOWMiRegIHkrBIOCXv6DHsMploQLxSX0qhd_3m43ysaQUklSL9FPJj5rCnptVx_12q5e29WgdJFiutlMWAJ88hh1sn5t6uBjKUIfgv-f_Tdk4q_t</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Geerts, Evelien</creator><creator>van der Tuin, Iris</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>From intersectionality to interference: Feminist onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation</title><author>Geerts, Evelien ; van der Tuin, Iris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-7bb1fef0b084000a7a65ef114d8db25b5caa8f7b7f7493746cb38aff13a7669b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender Studies</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary research</topic><topic>Lesbianism</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Political representation</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Representation</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geerts, Evelien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Tuin, Iris</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Women's studies international forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geerts, Evelien</au><au>van der Tuin, Iris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From intersectionality to interference: Feminist onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation</atitle><jtitle>Women's studies international forum</jtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>41</volume><spage>171</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>171-178</pages><issn>0277-5395</issn><eissn>1879-243X</eissn><coden>WSINDA</coden><abstract>This article reviews the debate on ‘intersectionality’ as the dominant approach in gender studies, with an emphasis on the politics of representation. The debate on intersectionality officially began in the late 1980s, though the approach can be traced back to the institutionalization of women's studies in the 1970s and the feminist movement of the 1960s. Black and lesbian feminists have long advocated hyphenated identities to be the backbone of feminist thought. But in recent years, intersectionality has sustained criticism from numerous angles within gender studies, ranging from feminist philosophy to applied political research. This article will use the theorization of ‘interference’ as a searchlight to produce an overview of this interdisciplinary debate, culminating in our affirmative answer to the question: should we move from intersectionality to interference? Our answer is based on onto-epistemological reflections, i.e., reflections in which being and knowing are always already entangled.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.013</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-5395
ispartof Women's studies international forum, 2013-11, Vol.41, p.171-178
issn 0277-5395
1879-243X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1559007446
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Criticism
Epistemology
Females
Feminism
Gender
Gender Studies
Identity
Institutionalization
Interdisciplinary research
Lesbianism
Philosophy
Political representation
Political science
Politics
Representation
Women
title From intersectionality to interference: Feminist onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A27%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20intersectionality%20to%20interference:%20Feminist%20onto-epistemological%20reflections%20on%20the%20politics%20of%20representation&rft.jtitle=Women's%20studies%20international%20forum&rft.au=Geerts,%20Evelien&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=41&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=171-178&rft.issn=0277-5395&rft.eissn=1879-243X&rft.coden=WSINDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1559007446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1460979546&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0277539513001349&rfr_iscdi=true